Dan and James chat about a recent twitter discussion on open science funding and the benefits of Editors sharing their opinions online. James also shares three project proposals that he thinks deserves funding, which Dan ranks.
- The Twitter thread from Tage Rai on conflicts of interest in funding on science
- The Raytheon Amphitheater at Northeastern University
- How Nature Human Behavior evaluates your mansucripts, from episode 105.
- Good and bad experiences with Frontiers journals
- A contract for getting paid for reviews
- Get access to our Patreon newsletter
- The peer-review process at eLife
- James' three grant proposal ideas
- The taxi story [Story in Norwegian but Google translate does a good enough job]
- The eyetracker that's 100x cheaper than commercial eyetrackers
- Ads in R package load up messages
- Chat about this episode on the Git Gud Science Discord server
- [Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
- [James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
- [Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
- [Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
- $1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, September 21) "116: In my opinion", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WT46Z