{"version":"https://jsonfeed.org/version/1","title":"Everything Hertz","home_page_url":"https://everythinghertz.com","feed_url":"https://everythinghertz.com/json","description":"Methodology, scientific life, and bad language. Co-hosted by Dr. Dan Quintana (University of Oslo) and Dr. James Heathers (Cipher Skin)","_fireside":{"subtitle":"Methodology, scientific life, and bad language. ","pubdate":"2024-12-03T11:45:00.000+01:00","explicit":true,"copyright":"2025 by Dan Quintana \u0026 James Heathers","owner":"Dan Quintana","image":"https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/f/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/cover.jpg?v=2"},"items":[{"id":"c0e1aecc-ab55-4e0d-a17e-2c3d0a21502c","title":"187: What started the replication crisis era?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/187","content_text":"We chat about the events that started the replication crisis in psychology and Dorothy Bishop's recent resignation from the Royal Society\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe resignation blogpost from Dorothy Bishop\nThe bluesky post from Sarah Weiten that asked the question, \"If you had to cite an event that opened the \"replication crisis\" era, what would you point to?\"\nThe \"Year of Horrors\" paper from Eric-Jan Wagenmakers\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on Bluesky\n\n\nDan on Bluesky \nJames on Bluesky\nEverything Hertz on Bluesky \n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D. S., \u0026amp; Heathers, J. (2024, Dec 3). 187: What started the replication crisis era?, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/EC7QH","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat about the events that started the replication crisis in psychology and Dorothy Bishop\u0026#39;s recent resignation from the Royal Society\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"http://deevybee.blogspot.com/2024/11/why-i-have-resigned-from-royal-society.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eresignation blogpost\u003c/a\u003e from Dorothy Bishop\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://bsky.app/profile/sarahwieten.bsky.social/post/3lbtsqc6jcs2z\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ebluesky post\u003c/a\u003e from Sarah Weiten that asked the question, \u0026quot;If you had to cite an event that opened the \u0026quot;replication crisis\u0026quot; era, what would you point to?\u0026quot;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.ejwagenmakers.com/2012/Wagenmakers2012Horrors.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e\u0026quot;Year of Horrors\u0026quot; paper\u003c/a\u003e from Eric-Jan Wagenmakers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on Bluesky\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://bsky.app/profile/dsquintana.bsky.social\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on Bluesky\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://bsky.app/profile/jamesheathers.bsky.social\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on Bluesky\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://bsky.app/profile/hertzpodcast.bsky.social\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Bluesky\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D. S., \u0026amp; Heathers, J. (2024, Dec 3). 187: What started the replication crisis era?, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/EC7QH\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat about the events that started the replication crisis in psychology and Dorothy Bishop's recent resignation from the Royal Society","date_published":"2024-12-03T11:45:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/c0e1aecc-ab55-4e0d-a17e-2c3d0a21502c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":52938709,"duration_in_seconds":3308}]},{"id":"74dca206-c4a6-4e4d-8ac5-6603d1a2734f","title":"186: Evaluating journal quality","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/186","content_text":"In this episode we chat about a Nordic approach for evaluating the journal quality and how we should be teaching undergraduates to evaluate journal and article quality\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe Norwegian journal register\nThe Finnish journal register\nEpisode 22, where we played \"Pokemon or Cholesterol medication?\"\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D. S., \u0026amp; Heathers, J. (2024, Nov 13). 186: Evaluating journal quality, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KB37U","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode we chat about a Nordic approach for evaluating the journal quality and how we should be teaching undergraduates to evaluate journal and article quality\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Norwegian \u003ca href=\"https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/en/informasjonsartikler/about-the-norwegian-register\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ejournal register\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Finnish \u003ca href=\"https://julkaisufoorumi.fi/en/publication-forum\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ejournal register\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/22\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEpisode 22\u003c/a\u003e, where we played \u0026quot;Pokemon or Cholesterol medication?\u0026quot;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D. S., \u0026amp; Heathers, J. (2024, Nov 13). 186: Evaluating journal quality, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KB37U\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KB37U\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"In this episode we chat about a Nordic approach for evaluating the journal quality and how we should be teaching undergraduates to evaluate journal and article quality","date_published":"2024-11-13T19:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/74dca206-c4a6-4e4d-8ac5-6603d1a2734f.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":31092715,"duration_in_seconds":2591}]},{"id":"ddb1f15e-3360-4442-bcf3-80709666592f","title":"185: The Retraction","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/185","content_text":"We discuss the recent retraction of a paper that reported the effects of rigour-enhancing practices on replicability. We also cover James' new estimate that 1 out of 7 scientific papers are fake.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe story about data integrity concerns in 130 women’s health papers \nJames' new preprint with the estimate that 1 out of 7 scientific papers are fake\nThe retracted paper in Nature Human Behavior by Protzko and coworkers\nThe Matters Arising article from Bak-Coleman and Devezer, who initially raised concerns about the paper from Protzko and coworkers.\nThe Everything Hertz merch store \nThe paper about puns/jokes in paper titles\nThe \"Everything Hertz\" paper from James\nDan's only paper with a pun in the title\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D. S., \u0026amp; Heathers, J. (2024, Oct 4). 185: The Retraction, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/528SF","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe discuss the recent retraction of a paper that reported the effects of rigour-enhancing practices on replicability. We also cover James\u0026#39; new estimate that 1 out of 7 scientific papers are fake.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-02907-3\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003estory\u003c/a\u003e about data integrity concerns in 130 women’s health papers \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/23zcr\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003enew preprint\u003c/a\u003e with the estimate that 1 out of 7 scientific papers are fake\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01749-9\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eretracted paper in \u003cem\u003eNature Human Behavior\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/a\u003e by Protzko and coworkers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://rdcu.be/dVXN8\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eMatters Arising article\u003c/a\u003e from Bak-Coleman and Devezer, who initially raised concerns about the paper from Protzko and coworkers.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Everything Hertz \u003ca href=\"https://everything-hertz-podcast.creator-spring.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003emerch store\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0165551507086261\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e about puns/jokes in paper titles\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2014.00177/full\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e\u0026quot;Everything Hertz\u0026quot; paper\u003c/a\u003e from James\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://www.biologicalpsychiatryjournal.com/article/S0006-3223(15)00528-4/abstract\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eonly paper\u003c/a\u003e with a pun in the title\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D. S., \u0026amp; Heathers, J. (2024, Oct 4). 185: The Retraction, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/528SF\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/528SF\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We discuss the recent retraction of a paper that reported the effects of rigour-enhancing practices on replicability. We also cover James' new estimate that 1 out of 7 scientific papers are fake","date_published":"2024-10-04T07:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/ddb1f15e-3360-4442-bcf3-80709666592f.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49448855,"duration_in_seconds":4120}]},{"id":"52abf447-73bd-45db-bc69-b00c5f726d03","title":"184: A race to the bottom","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/184","content_text":"Open access articles have democratized the availability of scientific research, but are author-paid publication fees undermining the quality of science? \n\nThe preprint by Morgan and Smaldino - https://osf.io/preprints/osf/3ez9v\nPaul Smaldino's text book - Modeling social behavior\n\nMain edisode takeaways (AI-assisted summary)\n\n\nThere is a wide variability in the quality of papers published in gold open access journals and a wide variate of open access journals, some of which prioritise quality research\nDiamond open access and green open access are alternative models to consider.\nThe publishing industry needs more transparency and mandatory reporting of data. The pressure to publish more can lead to a crowding out problem and a focus on quantity over quality.\nDetermining the quality of journals and papers is challenging, and there are varying levels of quality within different tiers of journals.\nFraudulent publishing practices, such as paper mills and fake papers, can be facilitated by the market for publishing.\nThe Publons service (R.I.P) and similar platforms can improve the transparency of peer review and provide a record of reviewers' contributions.\nSociety journals may offer a better publishing model as they have a reputation to maintain and are less likely to prioritize quantity over quality.\n\n\nOther links\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D. S., \u0026amp; Heathers, J. (2024, Sept 5). 184: A race to the bottom, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3MUJV","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eOpen access articles have democratized the availability of scientific research, but are author-paid publication fees undermining the quality of science? \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe preprint by Morgan and Smaldino - \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/preprints/osf/3ez9v\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/preprints/osf/3ez9v\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nPaul Smaldino\u0026#39;s text book - \u003ca href=\"https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691224145/modeling-social-behavior\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eModeling social behavior\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMain edisode takeaways (AI-assisted summary)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThere is a wide variability in the quality of papers published in gold open access journals and a wide variate of open access journals, some of which prioritise quality research\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDiamond open access and green open access are alternative models to consider.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe publishing industry needs more transparency and mandatory reporting of data. The pressure to publish more can lead to a crowding out problem and a focus on quantity over quality.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDetermining the quality of journals and papers is challenging, and there are varying levels of quality within different tiers of journals.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFraudulent publishing practices, such as paper mills and fake papers, can be facilitated by the market for publishing.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Publons service (R.I.P) and similar platforms can improve the transparency of peer review and provide a record of reviewers\u0026#39; contributions.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSociety journals may offer a better publishing model as they have a reputation to maintain and are less likely to prioritize quantity over quality.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D. S., \u0026amp; Heathers, J. (2024, Sept 5). 184: A race to the bottom, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3MUJV\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3MUJV\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Open access articles have democratized the availability of scientific research, but are author-paid publication fees undermining the quality of science? ","date_published":"2024-09-05T19:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/52abf447-73bd-45db-bc69-b00c5f726d03.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":34765949,"duration_in_seconds":2897}]},{"id":"806742dc-2ca8-4df3-9e73-a2208614ca10","title":"183: Too beautiful to be true","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/183","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a paper describing a journal editor's efforts to receive data from authors who submitted papers with results that seemed a little too beautiful to be true\n\nMain edisode takeaways (AI generated summary)\n\n\nThis editorial on the reproducibility crisis emphasizes the importance of providing raw data in scientific publications and highlights the need for transparency and accountability in the research process\nThe lack of oversight and the discrepancy between the amount of data required for scientific statements and what is often provided in academic publishing is a cause for concern.\nEnsuring the integrity of scientific research requires the active involvement of editors, reviewers, and researchers in promoting transparency and upholding ethical standards. The scientific publishing process lacks oversight and accountability, leading to potential issues with the accuracy and trustworthiness of published papers.\nJournals should prioritize maintaining high standards and ensuring that papers are thoroughly reviewed and validated before publication.\nChanging behaviors within the scientific community, such as pledging to publish in open access journals, can promote positive change and improve research integrity.\nThere is a need for active maintenance and improvement of the systems and parameters of scientific research to prevent potential negative consequences.\n\n\nLinks for papers we mentioned\n\n\nThe Molecular Brain editorial by Miyakawa: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-020-0552-2\nThe STALT preprint: https://osf.io/6hste\n\n\nOther links\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D. S., \u0026amp; Heathers, J. (2024, Aug 3). 183: Too beautiful to be true Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JF5MS","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss a paper describing a journal editor\u0026#39;s efforts to receive data from authors who submitted papers with results that seemed a little too beautiful to be true\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMain edisode takeaways (AI generated summary)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThis editorial on the reproducibility crisis emphasizes the importance of providing raw data in scientific publications and highlights the need for transparency and accountability in the research process\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe lack of oversight and the discrepancy between the amount of data required for scientific statements and what is often provided in academic publishing is a cause for concern.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEnsuring the integrity of scientific research requires the active involvement of editors, reviewers, and researchers in promoting transparency and upholding ethical standards. The scientific publishing process lacks oversight and accountability, leading to potential issues with the accuracy and trustworthiness of published papers.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJournals should prioritize maintaining high standards and ensuring that papers are thoroughly reviewed and validated before publication.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChanging behaviors within the scientific community, such as pledging to publish in open access journals, can promote positive change and improve research integrity.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThere is a need for active maintenance and improvement of the systems and parameters of scientific research to prevent potential negative consequences.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks for papers we mentioned\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003cem\u003eMolecular Brain\u003c/em\u003e editorial by Miyakawa: \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-020-0552-2\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-020-0552-2\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe STALT preprint: \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/6hste\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/6hste\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D. S., \u0026amp; Heathers, J. (2024, Aug 3). 183: Too beautiful to be true Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JF5MS\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JF5MS\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss a paper describing a journal editor's efforts to receive data from authors who submitted papers with results that seemed a little too beautiful to be true","date_published":"2024-08-03T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/806742dc-2ca8-4df3-9e73-a2208614ca10.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":43288449,"duration_in_seconds":2705}]},{"id":"bfc27816-6f79-4c76-ab94-13bd8c18b509","title":"182: What practices should the behavioural sciences borrow (and ignore) from other research fields?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/182","content_text":"Dan and James answer a listener question on what practices should the behavioural sciences borrow (and ignore) from other research fields.\n\nHere are the main takeaways:\n\n\nKeeping laboratory records and using electronic lab management software is beneficial practices biology that would benefit the behavioral sciences\nThe rate of pre-registration of meta-analysis in psychology is low, unlike other fields, which have a higher pre-registration rate. Here is the preprint on pre-registration of psychology meta-analyses that was mentioned: https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/627a4\nCase studies (somewhat common in medicine) can provide valuable insights, especially when there is aggressive sampling and oversampling of single points\nDouble-blinded should not be adopted. as these can be challenging to implement effectively and may not always work as intended\nPhilosophers often (but not always) have a clear writing style and structure their arguments well, which can be enjoyable to read and should be more widely adopted\nThe publishing industry needs more innovation, particularly in the areas of peer review and editorial processes\n\n\nOther links\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D. S., \u0026amp; Heathers, J. (2024, July 2). 182: What practices should the behavioural sciences borrow (and ignore) from other research fields? Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XN8DT","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James answer a listener question on what practices should the behavioural sciences borrow (and ignore) from other research fields.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere are the main takeaways:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKeeping laboratory records and using electronic lab management software is beneficial practices biology that would benefit the behavioral sciences\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe rate of pre-registration of meta-analysis in psychology is low, unlike other fields, which have a higher pre-registration rate. Here is the preprint on pre-registration of psychology meta-analyses that was mentioned: \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/627a4\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/627a4\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCase studies (somewhat common in medicine) can provide valuable insights, especially when there is aggressive sampling and oversampling of single points\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDouble-blinded should not be adopted. as these can be challenging to implement effectively and may not always work as intended\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePhilosophers often (but not always) have a clear writing style and structure their arguments well, which can be enjoyable to read and should be more widely adopted\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe publishing industry needs more innovation, particularly in the areas of peer review and editorial processes\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D. S., \u0026amp; Heathers, J. (2024, July 2). 182: What practices should the behavioural sciences borrow (and ignore) from other research fields? Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XN8DT\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XN8DT\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James answer a listener question on what practices should the behavioural sciences borrow (and ignore) from other research fields","date_published":"2024-07-02T19:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/bfc27816-6f79-4c76-ab94-13bd8c18b509.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49119816,"duration_in_seconds":3069}]},{"id":"2a84c764-bedf-4354-a6d7-99f88472cfb9","title":"181: Down the rabbit hole","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/181","content_text":"We discuss how following citation chains in psychology can often lead to unexpected places, and how this can contribute to unreplicable findings. We also discuss why team science has taken longer to catch on in psychology compared to other research fields.\n\n\nHere is the preprint that we mentioned authored by Andrew Gelman and Nick Brown  - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/ekmdf\nOur episode with Nick Brown - https://everythinghertz.com/44\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, June 3) \"181: Down the rabbit hole\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/C7F9N","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe discuss how following citation chains in psychology can often lead to unexpected places, and how this can contribute to unreplicable findings. We also discuss why team science has taken longer to catch on in psychology compared to other research fields.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHere is the preprint that we mentioned authored by Andrew Gelman and Nick Brown  - \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/ekmdf\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/ekmdf\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur episode with Nick Brown - \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/44\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://everythinghertz.com/44\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, June 3) \u0026quot;181: Down the rabbit hole\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/C7F9N\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We discuss how following citation chains in psychology can often lead to unexpected places, and how this can contribute to unreplicable findings. We also discuss why team science has taken longer to catch on in psychology compared to other research fields.","date_published":"2024-06-03T13:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2a84c764-bedf-4354-a6d7-99f88472cfb9.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":41129272,"duration_in_seconds":2570}]},{"id":"8491786a-86eb-4c56-bfc5-997cec4df130","title":"180: Consortium peer reviews","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/180","content_text":"Dan and James discuss why innovation in scientific publishing is so hard, an emerging consortium peer review model, and a recent replication of the 'refilling soup bowl' study.\n\nOther things they cover and links:\n\n\nWhich studies should we spend time replicating?\nThe business models of for-profit scientific publishers \nHow many tacos can you buy with the money it costs to publish open access in Nature?\nThe original soup bowl study: https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2005.12\nThe replication study: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001503\nThe Peer Community In initiative: https://peercommunityin.org/\nStuart Buck's newsletter: https://goodscience.substack.com\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, May 2) \"180: Consortium peer reviews\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/24FMP","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss why innovation in scientific publishing is so hard, an emerging consortium peer review model, and a recent replication of the \u0026#39;refilling soup bowl\u0026#39; study.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOther things they cover and links:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhich studies should we spend time replicating?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe business models of for-profit scientific publishers \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow many tacos can you buy with the money it costs to publish open access in Nature?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe original soup bowl study: \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2005.12\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2005.12\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe replication study: \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001503\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001503\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Peer Community In initiative: \u003ca href=\"https://peercommunityin.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://peercommunityin.org/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStuart Buck\u0026#39;s newsletter: \u003ca href=\"https://goodscience.substack.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://goodscience.substack.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, May 2) \u0026quot;180: Consortium peer reviews\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/24FMP\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss why innovation in scientific publishing is so hard, an emerging consortium peer review model, and a recent replication of the 'refilling soup bowl' study.","date_published":"2024-05-02T10:15:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/8491786a-86eb-4c56-bfc5-997cec4df130.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48231652,"duration_in_seconds":3014}]},{"id":"02087976-ed03-4cd1-b847-b56c54abf0d2","title":"179: Discovery vs. maintenance ","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/179","content_text":"Dan and James discuss how scientific research often neglects the importance of maintenance and long-term access for scientific tools and resources.\n\nOther things they cover:\n\n\nShould there be an annual limit on publications (even if this were somehow possible)?\nThe downsides of PhD by publication\nThe Gates Foundation's new Open Access policy\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, April 3) \"179: Discovery vs. maintenance\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KS8PV","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss how scientific research often neglects the importance of maintenance and long-term access for scientific tools and resources.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOther things they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould there be an annual limit on publications (even if this were somehow possible)?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe downsides of PhD by publication\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Gates Foundation\u0026#39;s new Open Access policy\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, April 3) \u0026quot;179: Discovery vs. maintenance\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KS8PV\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss how scientific research often neglects the importance of maintenance and long-term access for scientific tools and resources","date_published":"2024-04-03T06:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/02087976-ed03-4cd1-b847-b56c54abf0d2.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":46696070,"duration_in_seconds":2918}]},{"id":"12ce8dbf-be90-4fef-adad-3f8c67db0126","title":"178: Alerting researchers about retractions","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/178","content_text":"Dan and James discuss the Retractobot service, which emails authors about papers they've cited that have been retracted. What should authors do if they discover a paper they've cited has been retracted after they published their paper?\n\nOther things they chat about\n\n\nA listener question about including examiner's comments in thesis\nThe different types of retractions and thier impact\nWhy aren't versioning systems more common in scientific publishing?\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, February 29) \"178: Alerting researchers about retractions\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/T8HRD","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss the Retractobot service, which emails authors about papers they\u0026#39;ve cited that have been retracted. What should authors do if they discover a paper they\u0026#39;ve cited has been retracted after they published their paper?\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOther things they chat about\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA listener question about including examiner\u0026#39;s comments in thesis\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe different types of retractions and thier impact\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy aren\u0026#39;t versioning systems more common in scientific publishing?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, February 29) \u0026quot;178: Alerting researchers about retractions\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/T8HRD\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss the Retractobot service, which emails authors about papers they've cited that have been retracted. What should authors do if they discover a paper they've cited has been retracted after they published their paper?","date_published":"2024-02-29T21:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/12ce8dbf-be90-4fef-adad-3f8c67db0126.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":47760612,"duration_in_seconds":2985}]},{"id":"29ad5802-d32d-4d00-8675-2c443397e8e7","title":"177: Plagiarism ","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/177","content_text":"We discuss two recent plagiarism cases, one you've probably heard about and another that you probably haven't heard about if you're outside Norway. We also chat about the parallels between plagiarism and sports doping—would people reconsider academic dishonesty if they were reminded that future technology may catch them out?\n\nHere are some of the takeaways from the episode (generated with the help of AI):\n\n\nPlagiarism cases can range from minor academic practice issues to more serious instances of copying verbatim\nThe detection and punishment of plagiarism can vary depending on the context, such as academic journals or internal university issues.\nThe mindset and motivations behind plagiarism can differ between athletes and students, with athletes often driven by intense competition.\nLong-term detectability and the potential consequences of cheating are factors that may discourage individuals from engaging in plagiarism.\nAddressing plagiarism requires a balance between identifying genuine cases and avoiding ideological biases. \n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, January 31) \"177: Plagiarism\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4M3F2","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe discuss two recent plagiarism cases, one you\u0026#39;ve probably heard about and another that you probably haven\u0026#39;t heard about if you\u0026#39;re outside Norway. We also chat about the parallels between plagiarism and sports doping—would people reconsider academic dishonesty if they were reminded that future technology may catch them out?\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere are some of the takeaways from the episode (generated with the help of AI):\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePlagiarism cases can range from minor academic practice issues to more serious instances of copying verbatim\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe detection and punishment of plagiarism can vary depending on the context, such as academic journals or internal university issues.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe mindset and motivations behind plagiarism can differ between athletes and students, with athletes often driven by intense competition.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLong-term detectability and the potential consequences of cheating are factors that may discourage individuals from engaging in plagiarism.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAddressing plagiarism requires a balance between identifying genuine cases and avoiding ideological biases. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, January 31) \u0026quot;177: Plagiarism\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4M3F2\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We discuss two recent plagiarism cases, one you've probably heard about and another that you probably haven't heard about if you're outside Norway. We also chat about the parallels between plagiarism and sports doping—would people reconsider academic dishonesty if they were reminded that future technology may catch them out?","date_published":"2024-01-31T20:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/29ad5802-d32d-4d00-8675-2c443397e8e7.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":41155603,"duration_in_seconds":2572}]},{"id":"2edf1492-7433-471a-82c8-8091505c580d","title":"176: Tracking academic workloads","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/176","content_text":"We chat about a paper on the invisible workload of open science and why academics are so bad at tracking their workloads.\n\nThis episode was originally recorded in May 2023 in a hotel room just before our live recording of Episode 169, which is why we refer to the paper as a 'new' paper near the start of the episode.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper on the invisible workload of open research\nOur live and in-person episode with Sandra Matz on using big data to understand behavior\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, December 29) \"176: Tracking academic workloads\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U84JC","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat about a paper on the invisible workload of open science and why academics are so bad at tracking their workloads.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThis episode was originally recorded in May 2023 in a hotel room just before our live recording of Episode 169, which is why we refer to the paper as a \u0026#39;new\u0026#39; paper near the start of the episode.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://journal.trialanderror.org/pub/the-invisible-workload/release/1\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e on the invisible workload of open research\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/169\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003elive and in-person episode\u003c/a\u003e with Sandra Matz on using big data to understand behavior\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, December 29) \u0026quot;176: Tracking academic workloads\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U84JC\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat about a paper on the invisible workload of open science and why academics are so bad at tracking their workloads","date_published":"2023-12-29T20:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2edf1492-7433-471a-82c8-8091505c580d.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":34763336,"duration_in_seconds":2172}]},{"id":"f2c6507b-4408-4415-95bf-f7db65f773b6","title":"175: Defending against the scientific dark arts","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/175","content_text":"We chat about a recent blogpost from Dorothy Bishop, in which she proposes a Master course that will provide training in fraud detection—what should such a course specifically teach and where would these people work to apply their training? We also discuss whether open science is a cult that has trouble seeing outward.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe blog post on the Master in dark arts defence from Dorothy Bishop\nThe blog post on whether open science is a cult from Andrew Gelman\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, December 7) \"175: Defending against the scientific dark arts\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/K2J7N","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat about a recent blogpost from Dorothy Bishop, in which she proposes a Master course that will provide training in fraud detection—what should such a course specifically teach and where would these people work to apply their training? We also discuss whether open science is a cult that has trouble seeing outward.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://deevybee.blogspot.com/2023/11/defence-against-dark-arts-proposal-for.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eblog post\u003c/a\u003e on the Master in dark arts defence from Dorothy Bishop\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2023/11/29/why-i-continue-to-support-the-science-reform-movement-despite-its-flaws/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eblog post\u003c/a\u003e on whether open science is a cult from Andrew Gelman\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, December 7) \u0026quot;175: Defending against the scientific dark arts\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/K2J7N\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat about a recent blogpost from Dorothy Bishop, in which she proposes a Master course that will provide training in fraud detection—what should such a course specifically teach and where would these people work to apply their training? We also discuss whether open science is a cult that has trouble seeing outward.","date_published":"2023-12-07T14:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/f2c6507b-4408-4415-95bf-f7db65f773b6.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":36647496,"duration_in_seconds":2290}]},{"id":"f8afc507-6b31-4fb3-8574-3a1d2e756c47","title":"174: Smug missionaries with test tubes","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/174","content_text":"James proposes proposes a new type of consortium paper that could provide collaborative opportunities for researchers from countries that are underrepresented in published research papers. We also talk about computational reproducibility and paper publication bonuses.  \n\nLinks\nThe paper from Steve Lindsay on computational reproducbility: A Plea to Psychology Professional Societies that Publish Journals: Assess Computational Reproducibility\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, October 31) \"174: Smug missionaries with test tubes\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FBHRZ","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eJames proposes proposes a new type of consortium paper that could provide collaborative opportunities for researchers from countries that are underrepresented in published research papers. We also talk about computational reproducibility and paper publication bonuses.  \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThe paper from Steve Lindsay on computational reproducbility: \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2023.4020\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eA Plea to Psychology Professional Societies that Publish Journals: Assess Computational Reproducibility\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, October 31) \u0026quot;174: Smug missionaries with test tubes\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FBHRZ\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"James proposes a new type of consortium paper that could provide collaborative opportunities for researchers from countries that are underrepresented in published research papers ","date_published":"2023-11-01T21:15:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/f8afc507-6b31-4fb3-8574-3a1d2e756c47.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":51225076,"duration_in_seconds":3201}]},{"id":"bbfc3ecf-6c6e-465c-b72c-cb82921900d4","title":"173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/173","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper that investigated how science journalists evaluate psychology papers. To answer this question, the researchers presented science journalists with fictitious psychology studies and manipulated sample size, sample representativeness, p-values, and institutional prestige\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper on how science journalists evaluate psychology papers\nThe preprint paper on small samples\nLaboratory Life by Bruno Latour\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, September 30) \"173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/SG4BM","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss a recent paper that investigated how science journalists evaluate psychology papers. To answer this question, the researchers presented science journalists with fictitious psychology studies and manipulated sample size, sample representativeness, p-values, and institutional prestige\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231183912\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eThe paper\u003c/a\u003e on how science journalists evaluate psychology papers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.09.19.558509v1\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epreprint paper\u003c/a\u003e on small samples\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691028323/laboratory-life\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLaboratory Life\u003c/a\u003e by Bruno Latour\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, September 30) \u0026quot;173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/SG4BM\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper that investigated how science journalists evaluate psychology papers. To answer this question, the researchers presented science journalists with fictitious psychology studies and manipulated sample size, sample representativeness, p-values, and institutional prestige","date_published":"2023-10-01T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/bbfc3ecf-6c6e-465c-b72c-cb82921900d4.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":33713422,"duration_in_seconds":2107}]},{"id":"d92a8a7f-a9f2-4ac9-bce9-9c96f7e5c108","title":"172: In defence of the discussion section","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/172","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a recent proposal to do away with discussion sections and suggest other stuff they'd like to get rid of from academic publishing.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper on the proposed elimiation of the discussion section\nThe paper on machine readable hypothesis tests\nOur episodes with Daniel Lakens\nOur episode with Lisa DeBruine\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, August 31) \"172: In defence of the discussion section\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/N3SFT","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss a recent proposal to do away with discussion sections and suggest other stuff they\u0026#39;d like to get rid of from academic publishing.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04267-3\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e on the proposed elimiation of the discussion section\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920970949\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e on machine readable hypothesis tests\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/guests/daniel-lakens\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eepisodes\u003c/a\u003e with Daniel Lakens\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/78\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eepisode\u003c/a\u003e with Lisa DeBruine\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, August 31) \u0026quot;172: In defence of the discussion section\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/N3SFT\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss a recent proposal to do away with discussion sections and suggest other stuff they'd like to get rid of from academic publishing","date_published":"2023-08-31T21:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/d92a8a7f-a9f2-4ac9-bce9-9c96f7e5c108.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":34185298,"duration_in_seconds":2136}]},{"id":"c31876c8-f38d-487e-98b5-3b789b09e4b1","title":"171: The easiest person to fool is yourself (with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/171","content_text":"We chat with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris about the science of cons and how we can we can avoid being taken in. We also cover the fate of the gorilla suit from the 'invisible gorilla' study, why scientists are especially prone to being fooled, plus more!\n\nBuy Daniel and Christopher's new book, Nobody's fool, from your favourite bookseller here.\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, July 20) \"171: The easiest person to fool is yourself (with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/F8SMRSpecial Guests: Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris about the science of cons and how we can we can avoid being taken in. We also cover the fate of the gorilla suit from the \u0026#39;invisible gorilla\u0026#39; study, why scientists are especially prone to being fooled, plus more!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eBuy Daniel and Christopher\u0026#39;s new book, Nobody\u0026#39;s fool, from your favourite bookseller \u003ca href=\"https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/daniel-simons/nobodys-fool/9781541602236/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, July 20) \u0026quot;171: The easiest person to fool is yourself (with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/F8SMR\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guests: Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris about the science of cons and how we can we can avoid being taken in. We also cover the fate of the gorilla suit from the 'invisible gorilla' study, why scientists are especially prone to being fooled, plus more!","date_published":"2023-07-20T19:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/c31876c8-f38d-487e-98b5-3b789b09e4b1.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":53480384,"duration_in_seconds":3342}]},{"id":"f712ba6d-2570-4079-a61b-9c3566606a5f","title":"170: Holy sheet","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/170","content_text":"We discuss evidence of data tampering in a series of experiments investigating dishonesty revealed via excel spreadsheet metadata and how traditional peer review is not suited for the detection of data tampering.\n\nLinks\n\n\nData colada post 1\nThe conceptual replication attempt in Guatemalan taxpayers \nThe paper on using caution when applying behavioural science to policy \nData colada post 2\nThe carthorse child\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, June 23) \"170: Holy Sheet\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DW2C7","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe discuss evidence of data tampering in a series of experiments investigating dishonesty revealed via excel spreadsheet metadata and how traditional peer review is not suited for the detection of data tampering.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eData colada \u003ca href=\"https://datacolada.org/109\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epost 1\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/7/2/28\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003econceptual replication attempt\u003c/a\u003e in Guatemalan taxpayers \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://rdcu.be/dfdS8\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e on using caution when applying behavioural science to policy \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eData colada \u003ca href=\"https://datacolada.org/110\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epost 2\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://hackernoon.com/introducing-sprite-and-the-case-of-the-carthorse-child-58683c2bfeb#.o9um9unoj\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ecarthorse child\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, June 23) \u0026quot;170: Holy Sheet\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DW2C7\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We discuss evidence of data tampering in a series of experiments investigating dishonesty revealed via excel spreadsheet metadata and how traditional peer review is not suited for the detection of data tampering.","date_published":"2023-06-23T15:45:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/f712ba6d-2570-4079-a61b-9c3566606a5f.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48519626,"duration_in_seconds":3032}]},{"id":"b3dc2531-fb57-4d41-b063-23c1f5a09a14","title":"169: Using big data to understand behavior (Live episode with Sandra Matz)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/169","content_text":"In our first ever live and in-person episode, we chat with Sandra Matz about the opportunities and challenges for using big data to understand human behavior\n\nLinks\n\n\nEverybody lies book, by Seth Stephens-Davidowitz\nA paper on \"Born open\" data \n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, May 31) \"169: Using big data to understand behavior (Live episode with Sandra Matz)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JDXHFSpecial Guest: Sandra Matz.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn our first ever live and in-person episode, we chat with Sandra Matz about the opportunities and challenges for using big data to understand human behavior\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverybody lies \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Everybody-Lies-Internet-About-Really/dp/0062390856\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ebook\u003c/a\u003e, by Seth Stephens-Davidowitz\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA \u003ca href=\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-015-0630-z\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e on \u0026quot;Born open\u0026quot; data \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, May 31) \u0026quot;169: Using big data to understand behavior (Live episode with Sandra Matz)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JDXHF\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Sandra Matz.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"In our first ever live and in-person episode, we chat with Sandra Matz about the opportunities and challenges for using big data to understand human behavior","date_published":"2023-05-31T10:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b3dc2531-fb57-4d41-b063-23c1f5a09a14.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":41988178,"duration_in_seconds":2624}]},{"id":"5ae3b881-edc8-47ac-91f7-e368f1f45c54","title":"168: Meta-meta-science","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/168","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a new paper that reviews potential issues in metascience practices. They also talk about their upcoming live show in May in Frankfurt.\n\nLinks\n\n\nOur upcoming show on May 8th, which will be a part of the at the 4th symposium on big data and research syntheses in psychology symposium to be held in Frankfurt, Germany\nThe paper we discuss from Mark Rubin \nPeder Isager and team's paper on what to replicate \n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, April 26) \"168: Meta-meta-science\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/CSJ3X","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss a new paper that reviews potential issues in metascience practices. They also talk about their upcoming live show in May in Frankfurt.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur upcoming show on May 8th, which will be a part of the at the \u003ca href=\"https://conference-service.com/ressyn-bigdata-2023/xpage.html?xpage=243\u0026lang=en\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e4th symposium on big data and research syntheses in psychology symposium\u003c/a\u003e to be held in Frankfurt, Germany\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://journal.trialanderror.org/pub/questionable-metascience-practices/release/3\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e we discuss from Mark Rubin \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeder Isager and team\u0026#39;s paper on \u003ca href=\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34928679/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewhat to replicate\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, April 26) \u0026quot;168: Meta-meta-science\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/CSJ3X\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss a new paper that reviews potential issues in metascience practices. They also talk about their upcoming live show in May in Frankfurt.","date_published":"2023-04-27T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5ae3b881-edc8-47ac-91f7-e368f1f45c54.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":46505481,"duration_in_seconds":2906}]},{"id":"50984b49-057c-4cdd-8855-01ce6eac0e84","title":"167: Diluted effect sizes","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/167","content_text":"Dan and James chat about a new study that uses homeopathy studies to evaluate bias in biomedical research, a new-ish type of authorship fraud, and the potential for Chat GPT peer-review.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe Chat GPT paper library tweet\nThe Homeopathy paper\nThe David Grimes paper\nBritish dental journal paper on fraud\nThe AHealthcareZ YouTube channel\nThe FittDesign Studio YouTube channel\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, March 16) \"167: Diluted effect sizes\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/H847F","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James chat about a new study that uses homeopathy studies to evaluate bias in biomedical research, a new-ish type of authorship fraud, and the potential for Chat GPT peer-review.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Chat GPT paper library \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/michelnivard/status/1625786225725526016?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etweet\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Homeopathy \u003ca href=\"https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(23)00010-0/fulltext\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe David Grimes \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7166.2012.01162.x\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBritish dental journal paper on \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-023-5514-5\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003efraud\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe AHealthcareZ YouTube \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/@ahealthcarez\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003echannel\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe FittDesign Studio YouTube \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/@fittdesign.studio\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003echannel\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, March 16) \u0026quot;167: Diluted effect sizes\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/H847F\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James chat about a new study that uses homeopathy studies to evaluate bias in biomedical research, a new-ish type of authorship fraud, and the potential for Chat GPT peer-review.","date_published":"2023-03-16T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/50984b49-057c-4cdd-8855-01ce6eac0e84.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":41917543,"duration_in_seconds":2619}]},{"id":"29fc59bf-4429-4191-949b-9140c488bc12","title":"166: Is science becoming less disruptive over time?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/166","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper that claims that science is becoming less disruptive over time and the suggested causes for this decline.\n\nLinks\n\n\nOur prior episode, which discussed PhD defences\nThe paper on disruption in science\nThe news piece on the paper\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, January 25) \"166: Is science becoming less disruptive over time?\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/X6YS5","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss a recent paper that claims that science is becoming less disruptive over time and the suggested causes for this decline.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/165\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eprior episode\u003c/a\u003e, which discussed PhD defences\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05543-x\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e on disruption in science\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-04577-5\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003enews piece\u003c/a\u003e on the paper\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, January 25) \u0026quot;166: Is science becoming less disruptive over time?\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/X6YS5\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper that claims that science is becoming less disruptive over time and the suggested causes for this decline.","date_published":"2023-01-25T09:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/29fc59bf-4429-4191-949b-9140c488bc12.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":50125843,"duration_in_seconds":3132}]},{"id":"7e6f6829-88bd-41a4-8b1e-e9e4666a9f4e","title":"165: Self-promotion","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/165","content_text":"Dan and James chat about self-promotion in academia, how they both wish they had doctoral defences (these aren't a thing in Australia), and replacing error bars with the letter \"t\".\n\nLinks and stuff\n\n\nThe now retracted paper with the error bars as \"t\"s \nA direct link to the figure \nThe blog post on self-promotion, titled \"The End of Decency: When Self-Promotion Goes Too Far\" https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2022/12/09/why-too-much-public-self-promotion-academics-damaging-opinion\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, December 30) \"165: Self-promotion\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U2N9Q","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James chat about self-promotion in academia, how they both wish they had doctoral defences (these aren\u0026#39;t a thing in Australia), and replacing error bars with the letter \u0026quot;t\u0026quot;.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks and stuff\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe now \u003ca href=\"https://www.hindawi.com/journals/amse/2022/3802603/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eretracted paper\u003c/a\u003e with the error bars as \u0026quot;t\u0026quot;s \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA \u003ca href=\"https://www.hindawi.com/journals/amse/2022/3802603/fig9/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003edirect link\u003c/a\u003e to the figure \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe blog post on self-promotion, titled \u0026quot;The End of Decency: When Self-Promotion Goes Too Far\u0026quot; \u003ca href=\"https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2022/12/09/why-too-much-public-self-promotion-academics-damaging-opinion\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2022/12/09/why-too-much-public-self-promotion-academics-damaging-opinion\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, December 30) \u0026quot;165: Self-promotion\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U2N9Q\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James chat about self-promotion in academia, how they both wish they had doctoral defences (these aren't a thing in Australia), and replacing error bars with the letter \"t\".","date_published":"2022-12-30T09:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/7e6f6829-88bd-41a4-8b1e-e9e4666a9f4e.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":39662820,"duration_in_seconds":2478}]},{"id":"e1ff9e27-137b-4b6b-870f-e7ec4da558d2","title":"164: The great migration","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/164","content_text":"James and Dan discuss the recent migration of scientists from Twitter to Mastodon and the pros and cons of sharing the prior submission history of manuscripts \n\n\nThe Mastodon thread discussion the submission history policy in American Chemical Society Journals\nThe \"Weekend at Bernies\" film \nOur new Mastodon account: @hertzpodcast@mas.to\nJames' leaf blower man haiku \n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, November 28) \"164: The great migration\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/ZBJQS","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eJames and Dan discuss the recent migration of scientists from Twitter to Mastodon and the pros and cons of sharing the prior submission history of manuscripts \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://mas.to/@SteinbockGroup/109385540133459884\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eMastodon thread\u003c/a\u003e discussion the submission history policy in American Chemical Society Journals\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u0026quot;Weekend at Bernies\u0026quot; \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weekend_at_Bernie%27s\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003efilm\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur new Mastodon account: \u003ca href=\"https://mas.to/@hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e@hertzpodcast@mas.to\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; leaf blower man \u003ca href=\"https://techhub.social/@jamesheathers/109394055056309720\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehaiku\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, November 28) \u0026quot;164: The great migration\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/ZBJQS\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"James and Dan discuss the recent migration of scientists from Twitter to Mastodon and the pros and cons of sharing the prior submission history of manuscripts ","date_published":"2022-11-28T09:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/e1ff9e27-137b-4b6b-870f-e7ec4da558d2.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":47040051,"duration_in_seconds":2940}]},{"id":"a41f46dd-ea93-4b25-b773-25e57883f789","title":"163: eLife's new peer review model","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/163","content_text":"Dan and James discuss eLife's new peer review model, in which they no longer make accept/reject decisions at the end of the peer-review process. Instead, papers invited for peer review will receive an assessment from eLife and the peer reviews will be shared on eLife's website. It's up to author if they would like revise their manuscript or publish their paper as the version of record. \n\n\neLife's announment \nA editorial from Michael Eisen and team\nEpisode 122: Reoptimizing scientific publishing for the internet age (with Michael Eisen)\nEpisode 123: Authenticated anonymity (with Michael Eisen) \nA paper describing p-rep \n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, November 7) \"163: eLife's new peer review model\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/XYBU5","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss eLife\u0026#39;s new peer review model, in which they no longer make accept/reject decisions at the end of the peer-review process. Instead, papers invited for peer review will receive an assessment from eLife and the peer reviews will be shared on eLife\u0026#39;s website. It\u0026#39;s up to author if they would like revise their manuscript or publish their paper as the version of record. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eeLife\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://elifesciences.org/inside-elife/54d63486/elife-s-new-model-changing-the-way-you-share-your-research\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eannounment\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA \u003ca href=\"https://elifesciences.org/articles/83889\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eeditorial\u003c/a\u003e from Michael Eisen and team\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/122\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEpisode 122\u003c/a\u003e: Reoptimizing scientific publishing for the internet age (with Michael Eisen)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/123\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEpisode 123\u003c/a\u003e: Authenticated anonymity (with Michael Eisen) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA \u003ca href=\"http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/2009/IversonEtAl2009Agony.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e describing p-rep \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, November 7) \u0026quot;163: eLife\u0026#39;s new peer review model\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/XYBU5\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss eLife's new peer review model, in which they no longer make accept/reject decisions at the end of the peer-review process. Instead, papers invited for peer review will receive an assessment from eLife and the peer reviews will be shared on eLife's website. It's up to author if they would like revise their manuscript or publish their paper as the version of record. ","date_published":"2022-11-07T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/a41f46dd-ea93-4b25-b773-25e57883f789.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":52544991,"duration_in_seconds":3284}]},{"id":"ef14f3df-11a0-41ea-99c7-6941d2451411","title":"162: Status bias in peer review","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/162","content_text":"We chat about a recent preprint describing an experiment on the role of author status in peer-review, dodgy conference proceedings journals, and authorships for sale.\n\nLinks\n\n\nJames' blogpost on conference proceedings journals\nThe preprint/working paper on status bias \n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, October 17) \"162: Status bias in peer review\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 110.17605/OSF.IO/WX2A7","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat about a recent preprint describing an experiment on the role of author status in peer-review, dodgy conference proceedings journals, and authorships for sale.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; \u003ca href=\"https://jamesheathers.medium.com/publication-laundering-95c4888afd21\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eblogpost\u003c/a\u003e on conference proceedings journals\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4190976\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epreprint/working paper\u003c/a\u003e on status bias \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, October 17) \u0026quot;162: Status bias in peer review\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 110.17605/OSF.IO/WX2A7\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat about a recent preprint describing an experiment on the role of author status in peer-review, dodgy conference proceedings journals, and authorships for sale ","date_published":"2022-10-17T09:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/ef14f3df-11a0-41ea-99c7-6941d2451411.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48693079,"duration_in_seconds":3043}]},{"id":"2e3bbe4f-dc59-4f4b-b658-11415af92fa0","title":"161: The memo (with Brian Nosek)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/161","content_text":"Dan and James are joined by Brian Nosek (Co-founder and Executive Director of the Center for Open Science) to discuss the recent White House Office of Science Technology \u0026amp; Policy memo ensuring free, immediate, and equitable access to federally funded research. They also cover the implications of this memo for scientific publishing, as well as the mechanics of culture change in science.\n\n\nOpen Science Framework hits half a million users\nThe White house memo\nBrian on Twitter\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, August 31) \"161: The memo (with Brian Nosek)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/A7D86Special Guest: Brian Nosek.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James are joined by Brian Nosek (Co-founder and Executive Director of the Center for Open Science) to discuss the recent White House Office of Science Technology \u0026amp; Policy memo ensuring free, immediate, and equitable access to federally funded research. They also cover the implications of this memo for scientific publishing, as well as the mechanics of culture change in science.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOpen Science Framework hits \u003ca href=\"https://www.cos.io/blog/celebrating-a-global-open-science-community\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehalf a million users\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe White house \u003ca href=\"https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/08-2022-OSTP-Public-Access-Memo.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ememo\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBrian on \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/BrianNosek\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eTwitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, August 31) \u0026quot;161: The memo (with Brian Nosek)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/A7D86\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Brian Nosek.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James are joined by Brian Nosek (Co-founder and Executive Director of the Center for Open Science) to discuss the recent White House Office of Science Technology \u0026 Policy memo ensuring free, immediate, and equitable access to federally funded research. They also cover the implications of this memo for scientific publishing, as well as the mechanics of culture change in science.","date_published":"2022-09-12T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2e3bbe4f-dc59-4f4b-b658-11415af92fa0.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":46054085,"duration_in_seconds":2878}]},{"id":"bf23b318-e59d-4cef-9621-7f90c80723a3","title":"160: Whistleblowing","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/160","content_text":"Dan and James share ten rules for whistleblowing academic misconduct. \n\n\nThe Safe Faculty Project website\nSLAPP statues https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_public_participation\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, August 31) \"160: Whistleblowing\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/NFUJQ","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James share ten rules for whistleblowing academic misconduct. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.safefacultyproject.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSafe Faculty Project\u003c/a\u003e website\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSLAPP statues \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_public_participation\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_public_participation\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, August 31) \u0026quot;160: Whistleblowing\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/NFUJQ\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James share ten rules for whistleblowing academic misconduct. ","date_published":"2022-08-31T14:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/bf23b318-e59d-4cef-9621-7f90c80723a3.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48645432,"duration_in_seconds":3040}]},{"id":"1720dda1-c492-4584-84ae-11ca81e65e19","title":"159: Peer review isn't working (with Saloni Dattani)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/159","content_text":"Dan and James are joined by Saloni Dattani for a chat about the history of peer review, a reimagination of what peer review could look like, what happens when you actually pay peer reviewers,  peer reviewer specialisation,  post publication peer review, annual paper limits for authors, automation in peer review, and Big Cheese.\n\nLinks\n\n\nWorks in Progress magazine\nOne of the many news stories about the Jarsberg cheese study\nThe actual study\nSaloni's peer review piece\nThe F1000 format\nOur episode with Elisabeth Bik\nPCI registered reports\nSaloni on Twitter\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, August 15) \"159: Peer review isn't working (with Saloni Dattani)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/PZS97Special Guest: Saloni Dattani.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James are joined by Saloni Dattani for a chat about the history of peer review, a reimagination of what peer review could look like, what happens when you actually pay peer reviewers,  peer reviewer specialisation,  post publication peer review, annual paper limits for authors, automation in peer review, and Big Cheese.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWorks in Progress \u003ca href=\"https://www.worksinprogress.co/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003emagazine\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOne of the many \u003ca href=\"https://www.euronews.com/next/2022/08/04/this-cheese-could-be-the-latest-superfood-with-unique-properties-to-improve-bone-health\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003enews stories\u003c/a\u003e about the Jarsberg cheese study\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://nutrition.bmj.com/content/early/2022/06/29/bmjnph-2022-000424\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eactual study\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSaloni\u0026#39;s peer review \u003ca href=\"https://www.worksinprogress.co/issue/real-peer-review/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epiece\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://f1000research.com/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eF1000 format\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/74\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eepisode\u003c/a\u003e with Elisabeth Bik\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://rr.peercommunityin.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ePCI registered reports\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSaloni \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/salonium\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eon Twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, August 15) \u0026quot;159: Peer review isn\u0026#39;t working (with Saloni Dattani)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/PZS97\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Saloni Dattani.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James are joined by Saloni Dattani for a chat about the history of peer review, a reimagination of what peer review could look like, what happens when you actually pay peer reviewers,  peer reviewer specialisation,  post publication peer review, annual paper limits for authors, automation in peer review, and Big Cheese.","date_published":"2022-08-15T10:15:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/1720dda1-c492-4584-84ae-11ca81e65e19.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49525236,"duration_in_seconds":3095}]},{"id":"574197fb-e771-49df-aa90-14a6dae545a9","title":"158: Word limits","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/158","content_text":"By popular demand, Dan and James chat about journal word and page limits.They also the debate around a recent meta-analysis on nudge interventions.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe PNAS nudge meta-analysis\nThe response letter \nThe paper on adjectives and adverbs in life sciences\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, August 1) \"158: Word limits\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3DY9J","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eBy popular demand, Dan and James chat about journal word and page limits.They also the debate around a recent meta-analysis on nudge interventions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe PNAS nudge \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2107346118\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003emeta-analysis\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe response \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200300119\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eletter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-022-04453-z\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e on adjectives and adverbs in life sciences\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, August 1) \u0026quot;158: Word limits\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3DY9J\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"By popular demand, Dan and James chat about journal word and page limits. They also the debate around a recent meta-analysis on nudge interventions","date_published":"2022-08-01T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/574197fb-e771-49df-aa90-14a6dae545a9.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":43390013,"duration_in_seconds":2711}]},{"id":"f9031ba8-ad42-4d53-ba8c-79486c1e1af8","title":"157: Limitations","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/157","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a new preprint that examined the types of limitations authors discuss in their published articles and whether these limitation types has changed over the past decade, especially in light of methodological reform efforts. \n\nLinks\n\n\nThe Genetic Lottery by Kathryn Paige Harden\nThe limitations preprint by Beth Clarke and collegues \nSimine Vazire’s episode (also known as the one where Dan's wife starts going into labor)\nThe heartbeat paper from Galvez-Pol and collegues\nRand Wilcox and robust statistical methods\nThe tweet thread explainer from Beth Clarke\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, July 11) \"157: Limitations\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/APCU3","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss a new preprint that examined the types of limitations authors discuss in their published articles and whether these limitation types has changed over the past decade, especially in light of methodological reform efforts. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691190808/the-genetic-lottery\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eThe Genetic Lottery \u003c/a\u003eby Kathryn Paige Harden\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://psyarxiv.com/n4eq7/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003elimitations preprint\u003c/a\u003e by Beth Clarke and collegues \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSimine Vazire’s \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/58\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eepisode\u003c/a\u003e (also known as the one where Dan\u0026#39;s wife starts going into labor)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945222000685\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eheartbeat paper\u003c/a\u003e from Galvez-Pol and collegues\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRand Wilcox and \u003ca href=\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-019-01246-w#article-info\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003erobust statistical methods\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/bethclarke_/status/1544646323684917248\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etweet thread explainer\u003c/a\u003e from Beth Clarke\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, July 11) \u0026quot;157: Limitations\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/APCU3\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss a new preprint that examined the types of limitations authors discuss in their published articles and whether these limitation types has changed over the past decade, especially in light of methodological reform efforts. ","date_published":"2022-07-11T19:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/f9031ba8-ad42-4d53-ba8c-79486c1e1af8.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":44909713,"duration_in_seconds":2806}]},{"id":"73e8bcd3-fc78-4ed3-9f96-a32733dbc0f9","title":"156: Looking for seeders","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/156","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper that concluded (again) that most researchers aren't compliant with their published data sharing statement and whether torrents (remember them?) are a viable alternative for sharing large datasets.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe data request paper\nThe paper Dan and James co-authored led by Julian Koenig\nOur episode with Henry Drysdale\nOur episode with Chris Chambers\nThe meta-psychology journal\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n​\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n​\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, June 21) \"156: Looking for seeders\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4Q6JY","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss a recent paper that concluded (again) that most researchers aren\u0026#39;t compliant with their published data sharing statement and whether torrents (remember them?) are a viable alternative for sharing large datasets.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe data request \u003ca href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S089543562200141X\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/psyp.13688\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e Dan and James co-authored led by Julian Koenig\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/79\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eepisode\u003c/a\u003e with Henry Drysdale\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/56\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eepisode\u003c/a\u003e with Chris Chambers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe meta-psychology journal\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\n​\n\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\n​\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, June 21) \u0026quot;156: Looking for seeders\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4Q6JY\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper that concluded (again) that most researchers aren't compliant with their published data sharing statement and whether torrents (remember them?) are a viable alternative for sharing large datasets.","date_published":"2022-06-21T23:30:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/73e8bcd3-fc78-4ed3-9f96-a32733dbc0f9.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48922957,"duration_in_seconds":3057}]},{"id":"ba64c9cd-82bf-43ef-9a99-dcebba437e5e","title":"155: Don't you know who I am?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/155","content_text":"We chat about appeals to authority when responding to scientific critique, university ranking systems, Goodhart’s law (and its origin), and private institutional review boards.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe history of Goodhart's law \nThe original psychadelics paper in Nature Medicine\nThe critique\nThe response to the critique\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation \n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, May 30) \"155: Don't you know who I am?\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VXBKS","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat about appeals to authority when responding to scientific critique, university ranking systems, Goodhart’s law (and its origin), and private institutional review boards.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehistory\u003c/a\u003e of Goodhart\u0026#39;s law \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://rdcu.be/cOraY\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eoriginal\u003c/a\u003e psychadelics paper in \u003cem\u003eNature Medicine\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://psyarxiv.com/a25wb/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ecritique\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://psyarxiv.com/pdbf5/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eresponse\u003c/a\u003e to the critique\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, May 30) \u0026quot;155: Don\u0026#39;t you know who I am?\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VXBKS\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat about appeals to authority when responding to scientific critique, university ranking systems, Goodhart’s law (and its origin), and private institutional review boards.","date_published":"2022-05-30T09:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/ba64c9cd-82bf-43ef-9a99-dcebba437e5e.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":44482141,"duration_in_seconds":2780}]},{"id":"aca5af64-9a88-429f-adfd-e89332af9034","title":"154: When the evidence is constructed around the narrative","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/154","content_text":"We chat about the Theranos story and the parallels with academic research, as well as Twitter's new owner and whether academics will actually leave the platform\n\nLinks\n\n\nMastodon (the band) \nElon Musk’s Onion article\nThe Dropout podcast\nThe Juicero \nBad Blood: The Final Chapter podcast by John Carreyrou \n \"Macho Man\" Randy Savage \n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, May 9) \"154: When the evidence is constructed around the narrative\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/45Z2J","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat about the Theranos story and the parallels with academic research, as well as Twitter\u0026#39;s new owner and whether academics will \u003cem\u003eactually\u003c/em\u003e leave the platform\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastodon_(band)\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eMastodon\u003c/a\u003e (the band) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eElon Musk’s \u003ca href=\"https://www.theonion.com/please-like-me-1848674003\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eOnion article\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Dropout \u003ca href=\"https://abcaudio.com/podcasts/the-dropout/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juicero\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJuicero\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/bad-blood-the-final-chapter/id1575738174\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eBad Blood: The Final Chapter\u003c/a\u003e podcast by John Carreyrou \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e \u0026quot;Macho Man\u0026quot; \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randy_Savage\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eRandy Savage\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, May 9) \u0026quot;154: When the evidence is constructed around the narrative\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/45Z2J\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat about the Theranos story and the parallels with academic research, as well as Twitter's new owner and whether academics will *actually* leave the platform","date_published":"2022-05-09T09:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/aca5af64-9a88-429f-adfd-e89332af9034.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49191705,"duration_in_seconds":3074}]},{"id":"2f69f8a7-38db-42d8-879f-c6ae61c61ef6","title":"153: Shame shame shame","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/153","content_text":"We discuss a journal's new \"wall of shame\" page, which details unethical behaviours in an effort to discourage future misconduct. We also cover scientific ideas that won't die (but one idea that HAS died), and ECNP's \"negative data\" prize\n\nThe audio quality of this recording isn't up to our usual standards as we were both travelling and without our normal recording gear. We'll be back with our normal gear next episode!\n\nLinks\n\n\nJames’ letter to the editor/obituary on sympathovagal balance\nThe Mirror neuron book that Dan mentioned \nThe Wall of Shame page\nAn archive of the Wall of Shame page if it gets taken down\nA story from 2014 on Paul Brooks and his Science Fraud website \nAnother story on Paul Brooks from Retraction Watch\nNews story: Missing Australian 'fraudster' could have cut off her own FOOT to trick police into thinking she is dead, cops say after body part is found\nBest Negative Data Prize\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, April 18) \"153: Shame shame shame\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/YZ8VG","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe discuss a journal\u0026#39;s new \u0026quot;wall of shame\u0026quot; page, which details unethical behaviours in an effort to discourage future misconduct. We also cover scientific ideas that won\u0026#39;t die (but one idea that HAS died), and ECNP\u0026#39;s \u0026quot;negative data\u0026quot; prize\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe audio quality of this recording isn\u0026#39;t up to our usual standards as we were \u003cem\u003eboth\u003c/em\u003e travelling and without our normal recording gear. We\u0026#39;ll be back with our normal gear next episode!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames’ \u003ca href=\"https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1113/expphysiol.2011.063867\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eletter to the editor/obituary\u003c/a\u003e on sympathovagal balance\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Mirror neuron \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Myth-Mirror-Neurons-Neuroscience-Communication/dp/0393089614\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ebook\u003c/a\u003e that Dan mentioned \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.cureus.com/wall_of_shame\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eWall of Shame\u003c/a\u003e page\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAn \u003ca href=\"https://web.archive.org/web/20220412151018/https://www.cureus.com/wall_of_shame\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003earchive\u003c/a\u003e of the Wall of Shame page if it gets taken down\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA \u003ca href=\"https://www.science.org/content/article/paul-brookes-surviving-outed-whistleblower\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003estory\u003c/a\u003e from 2014 on Paul Brooks and his Science Fraud website \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://retractionwatch.com/2014/03/11/so-what-happened-after-paul-brookes-was-forced-to-shut-down-science-fraud-org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eAnother story\u003c/a\u003e on Paul Brooks from Retraction Watch\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNews story: Missing Australian \u0026#39;fraudster\u0026#39; could have \u003ca href=\"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9338203/Missing-Australian-fraudster-cut-FOOT.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ecut off her own FOOT\u003c/a\u003e to trick police into thinking she is dead, cops say after body part is found\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBest Negative Data \u003ca href=\"https://www.ecnp.eu/research-innovation/awards/best-negative-data-prize\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ePrize\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, April 18) \u0026quot;153: Shame shame shame\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/YZ8VG\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We discuss a journal's new \"wall of shame\" page, which details unethical behaviours in an effort to discourage future misconduct. We also cover scientific ideas that won't die (but one idea that HAS died), and ECNP's \"negative data\" prize","date_published":"2022-04-18T09:45:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2f69f8a7-38db-42d8-879f-c6ae61c61ef6.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":45435088,"duration_in_seconds":2839}]},{"id":"75cab818-c0ee-458e-8602-a3abfa4011a5","title":"152: Sorry Not Sorry","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/152","content_text":"James and Dan chat about apologies vs. non-apologies, how to decide when to call it quits on a paper, and governments vetoing research proposals recommended by their own funding agencies\n\nLinks for stuff we mention\n\n\nThe tweet from Chris Jackson that started it all\nChris Jackson's Hertz episode on the cumulative advantage of academic capital \nThe Science Diagrams that Look Like Shitposts twitter account\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, April 4) \"152: Sorry Not Sorry\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WBVXZ","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eJames and Dan chat about apologies vs. non-apologies, how to decide when to call it quits on a paper, and governments vetoing research proposals recommended by their own funding agencies\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks for stuff we mention\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/seis_matters/status/1504456677176840195?s=20\u0026t=26p1PhsNiUOaCVyAToadpg\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etweet\u003c/a\u003e from Chris Jackson that started it all\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChris Jackson\u0026#39;s Hertz episode on \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/111\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ethe cumulative advantage of academic capital \u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Science Diagrams that Look Like Shitposts \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/scienceshitpost\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etwitter account\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, April 4) \u0026quot;152: Sorry Not Sorry\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WBVXZ\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"James and Dan chat about apologies vs. non-apologies, how to decide when to call it quits on a paper, and governments vetoing research proposals recommended by their own funding agencies\r\n","date_published":"2022-04-04T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/75cab818-c0ee-458e-8602-a3abfa4011a5.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":53547675,"duration_in_seconds":3346}]},{"id":"ef8dcf79-7caf-47d0-aed4-63c04cdfc9be","title":"151: The dirty dozen","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/151","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a new preprint that details twelve p-hacking strategies and simulates their impact on false-positive rates. They also discuss the Great Resignation in academia and the academic job market.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe twitter discussion on Associate editor pay kicked off by Eiko Fried\nThe p-hacking paper from Angelika Stefan and Felix Schönbrodt\nThe sample size preprint from Daniel Lakens\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, March 21) \"151: The dirty dozen\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KNM59","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss a new preprint that details twelve p-hacking strategies and simulates their impact on false-positive rates. They also discuss the Great Resignation in academia and the academic job market.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/EikoFried/status/1504374568357617666?s=20\u0026t=u5-8GBwxmEyxOUGbHjt9cw\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etwitter discussion\u003c/a\u003e on Associate editor pay kicked off by Eiko Fried\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://psyarxiv.com/xy2dk/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ep-hacking paper\u003c/a\u003e from Angelika Stefan and Felix Schönbrodt\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://psyarxiv.com/9d3yf/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003esample size preprint\u003c/a\u003e from Daniel Lakens\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, March 21) \u0026quot;151: The dirty dozen\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KNM59\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss a new preprint that details twelve p-hacking strategies and simulates their impact on false-positive rates. They also discuss the Great Resignation in academia and the academic job market.","date_published":"2022-03-21T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/ef8dcf79-7caf-47d0-aed4-63c04cdfc9be.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":38305877,"duration_in_seconds":2393}]},{"id":"02ca7cba-d7e8-49c9-9cf6-44c1ae5af19c","title":"150: Why can't you do nothing?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/150","content_text":"We discuss the latest paper to seriously use the Kardashian index, which is the discrepancy between a scientist's publication record and social media following, and a listener question on whether original authors should get the last word when a comment on an article is submitted \n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper on citation impact and social media visibility of Great Barrington and John Snow signatories for COVID-19 strategy\nThe Rapid Responses comments on the paper\nThe peer review reports for the paper\nSend us an audio question!\nAbout PubPeer\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, February 28) \"150: Why can't you do nothing?\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7RPA4","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe discuss the latest paper to seriously use the Kardashian index, which is the discrepancy between a scientist\u0026#39;s publication record and social media following, and a listener question on whether original authors should get the last word when a comment on an article is submitted \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/2/e052891\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eThe paper\u003c/a\u003e on citation impact and social media visibility of Great Barrington and John Snow signatories for COVID-19 strategy\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/2/e052891.responses\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eRapid Responses\u003c/a\u003e comments on the paper\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/suppl/2022/02/15/bmjopen-2021-052891.DC1/bmjopen-2021-052891.RH.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epeer review reports\u003c/a\u003e for the paper\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSend us an \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/audio-question\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eaudio question\u003c/a\u003e!\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://pubpeer.com/static/about\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eAbout\u003c/a\u003e PubPeer\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, February 28) \u0026quot;150: Why can\u0026#39;t you do nothing?\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7RPA4\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We discuss the latest paper to seriously use the Kardashian index, which is the discrepancy between a scientist's publication record and social media following and a listener question on whether original authors should get the last word when a comment on an article is submitted ","date_published":"2022-02-28T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/02ca7cba-d7e8-49c9-9cf6-44c1ae5af19c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":50448508,"duration_in_seconds":3153}]},{"id":"2b4bffca-1c25-4d19-be81-e2679100e40c","title":"149: Medical misinformation (with Rohin Francis)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/149","content_text":"Dan and James chat with cardiologist Rohin Francis about medical misinformation and how he uses YouTube for science communication via his 'Medlife Crisis' channel.\n\nLinks to stuff that was mentioned:\n\n\nRohin's YouTube channel\nRohin on Twitter\nCan you be so fit that you die video?\nWhy does getting in the water want to make you pee video\nWhat is the stupidest nerve in the body video\nCan you legally buy a human skeleton video\nThe Tibbies YouTube channel\nUp and atom YouTube Channel\nBelinda Carr YouTube Channel\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, February 14) \"149: Medical misinformation (with Rohin Francis)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7RCMNSpecial Guest: Rohin Francis.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James chat with cardiologist Rohin Francis about medical misinformation and how he uses YouTube for science communication via his \u0026#39;Medlife Crisis\u0026#39; channel.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks to stuff that was mentioned:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRohin\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgRBRE1DUP2w7HTH9j_L4OQ\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eYouTube channel\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRohin \u003ca href=\"https://mobile.twitter.com/medcrisis\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eon Twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCan you be so fit that you die \u003ca href=\"https://youtu.be/hT8GZlBBv5k\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003evideo\u003c/a\u003e?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy does getting in the water want to make you pee \u003ca href=\"https://youtu.be/A-1hPjGvf3U\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003evideo\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat is the stupidest nerve in the body \u003ca href=\"https://youtu.be/wzIXF6zy7hg\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003evideo\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCan you legally buy a human skeleton \u003ca href=\"https://youtu.be/QcudPWsyxzk\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003evideo\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Tibbies \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC52kszkc08-acFOuogFl5jw\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eYouTube channel\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUp and atom \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/c/UpandAtom\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eYouTube Channel\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBelinda Carr \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/c/BelindaCarr\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eYouTube Channel\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, February 14) \u0026quot;149: Medical misinformation (with Rohin Francis)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7RCMN\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Rohin Francis.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James chat with cardiologist Rohin Francis about medical misinformation and how he uses YouTube for science communication","date_published":"2022-02-14T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2b4bffca-1c25-4d19-be81-e2679100e40c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":54531133,"duration_in_seconds":3408}]},{"id":"582c81b5-400c-4cfd-bbe5-b7a5c5eabbd2","title":"148: Academic reference letters","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/148","content_text":"Dan and James chat about why academic reference letters are terrible, a recent position statement on preprints, and whether the \"great resignation\" is also happening in academia.\n\nLinks to stuff that was mentioned:\n\n\nThe tweet from Dr. Eliza Bliss-Moreau on acedemic reference letter\nThe tweet from Gilad Feldman about the 100 references he's submitted in 2020 alone\nThe AMWA-EMWA-ISMPP joint position statement paper on medical publications, preprints, and peer review,\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, January 31) \"148: Academic reference letters\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VZ67","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James chat about why academic reference letters are terrible, a recent position statement on preprints, and whether the \u0026quot;great resignation\u0026quot; is also happening in academia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks to stuff that was mentioned:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/eblissmoreau/status/1481784305911169027?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etweet\u003c/a\u003e from Dr. Eliza Bliss-Moreau on acedemic reference letter\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/giladfeldman/status/1483973974032007169?s=20\u0026t=xVaPpN8q1v_bHNTvn-xrdQ\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etweet\u003c/a\u003e from Gilad Feldman about the 100 references he\u0026#39;s submitted in 2020 alone\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe AMWA-EMWA-ISMPP \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2021.1900365\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ejoint position statement paper\u003c/a\u003e on medical publications, preprints, and peer review,\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, January 31) \u0026quot;148: Academic reference letters\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VZ67\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James chat about why academic reference letters are terrible, a recent position statement on preprints, and whether the \"great resignation\" is also happening in academia.","date_published":"2022-01-31T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/582c81b5-400c-4cfd-bbe5-b7a5c5eabbd2.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49714990,"duration_in_seconds":3107}]},{"id":"5cfa7684-8137-4281-b777-3e539299ce6a","title":"147: The $7000 golden ticket","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/147","content_text":"We discuss the $7000 'accelerated publication' option for some Taylor \u0026amp; Francis journals that promises 3-5 week publication and a novel type of research fellowship.\n\n\nDetails for the accelerated publication\nThe New Science 2022 Summer Fellowship\n\n\nWe have new merch! Use the discount code 'METAL' to get 20% off (valid until January 31st, 2022).\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, January 17) \"147: The $7000 golden ticket\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VNPBJ","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe discuss the $7000 \u0026#39;accelerated publication\u0026#39; option for some Taylor \u0026amp; Francis journals that promises 3-5 week publication and a novel type of research fellowship.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://taylorandfrancis.com/partnership/commercial/accelerated-publication/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDetails\u003c/a\u003e for the accelerated publication\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe New Science 2022 \u003ca href=\"https://newscience.org/summer-fellowship/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSummer Fellowship\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eWe have \u003ca href=\"https://everything-hertz-podcast.creator-spring.com/listing/metal-7594\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003enew merch\u003c/a\u003e! Use the discount code \u0026#39;METAL\u0026#39; to get 20% off (valid until January 31st, 2022).\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, January 17) \u0026quot;147: The $7000 golden ticket\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VNPBJ\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We discuss the $7000 'accelerated publication' option for some Taylor \u0026 Francis journals that promises 3-5 week publication, and a novel type of research fellowship from New Science","date_published":"2022-01-17T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5cfa7684-8137-4281-b777-3e539299ce6a.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":52285857,"duration_in_seconds":3267}]},{"id":"edb3486b-2a2f-4638-81fb-e099c89368d6","title":"146: Skills pay bills","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/146","content_text":"We answer a series of questions from a listener on whether to start a PhD, what to ask potential supervisors, the financial perils of being a PhD student, the future of higher education, the importance of skills, what keeps us going, and more.\n\nHere are the specific questions that we answered in this episode (the background to these questions is shared in the episode):\n\n\n Would you have any advice on how I can even decide whether to commence a PhD? \n Are there any questions in particular that you think are important to ask prospective supervisors?\n How do people make PhDs work financially? You are supposed to treat the degree like a regular 40 hour/ week job (and students commonly fail to do so). However, what full-time job pays ~$540 per week and expects this?! You are not supposed to work \u0026gt; 8 hours/ week outside of this?! I thought I could at least work 2-3 full days a week if I needed to.\n Why do people generally leave academia, or not continue, after their PhD, despite obvious potential?\n In what form do you think universities will be around in 5 and 10 years?\n Are one-year progress reports from the PhD committee enough to stay on track?\n What utility do PhDs hold inside and outside of academia? Apparently, skills matter more than a topic, and you have a better chance of getting a postdoc etc... if you have worked on a hot topic with a well-known supervisor.\n How can one start the PhD prepared enough to finish it on time and earlier?\n I am wondering what keeps academics going. I may be jaded, but lab environments don’t seem collaborative, and academics seem to be ruled by the admin people and hedge fund managers (or whoever). They also seem to make their money off students (i.e., the customer). I see a reverence for science and people trying to game the system, but not people wanting to seek truth in science. I now wonder how much of academia is motivated by pride, comfort, and not knowing what else to do. In my mind (and I am exaggerating a little), the PhD journey is coming to resemble an abusive relationship between the student and the uni, facilitated by the supervisor who hopefully gets something out of it. I assume it only gets worse from here.\nI have been told that the PhD is the only program that offers solid research training and the ability to do your original research (something an industry job does not offer). Even if I accept those premises, I now wonder what it is all for.\nWhere do you both see yourselves in 5 and 10 years?\nWhat keeps you both going?\n\n\n\nWe have new merch! Use the discount code 'METAL' to get 20% off (valid until January 31st, 2022).\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, December 27) \"146: Skills pay bills\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/PUW6N","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe answer a series of questions from a listener on whether to start a PhD, what to ask potential supervisors, the financial perils of being a PhD student, the future of higher education, the importance of skills, what keeps us going, and more.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere are the specific questions that we answered in this episode (the background to these questions is shared in the episode):\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Would you have any advice on how I can even decide whether to commence a PhD? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Are there any questions in particular that you think are important to ask prospective supervisors?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e How do people make PhDs work financially? You are supposed to treat the degree like a regular 40 hour/ week job (and students commonly fail to do so). However, what full-time job pays ~$540 per week and expects this?! You are not supposed to work \u0026gt; 8 hours/ week outside of this?! I thought I could at least work 2-3 full days a week if I needed to.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Why do people generally leave academia, or not continue, after their PhD, despite obvious potential?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e In what form do you think universities will be around in 5 and 10 years?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Are one-year progress reports from the PhD committee enough to stay on track?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e What utility do PhDs hold inside and outside of academia? Apparently, skills matter more than a topic, and you have a better chance of getting a postdoc etc... if you have worked on a hot topic with a well-known supervisor.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e How can one start the PhD prepared enough to finish it on time and earlier?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e I am wondering what keeps academics going. I may be jaded, but lab environments don’t seem collaborative, and academics seem to be ruled by the admin people and hedge fund managers (or whoever). They also seem to make their money off students (i.e., the customer). I see a reverence for science and people trying to game the system, but not people wanting to seek truth in science. I now wonder how much of academia is motivated by pride, comfort, and not knowing what else to do. In my mind (and I am exaggerating a little), the PhD journey is coming to resemble an abusive relationship between the student and the uni, facilitated by the supervisor who hopefully gets something out of it. I assume it only gets worse from here.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eI have been told that the PhD is the only program that offers solid research training and the ability to do your original research (something an industry job does not offer). Even if I accept those premises, I now wonder what it is all for.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhere do you both see yourselves in 5 and 10 years?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat keeps you both going?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe have \u003ca href=\"https://everything-hertz-podcast.creator-spring.com/listing/metal-7594\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003enew merch\u003c/a\u003e! Use the discount code \u0026#39;METAL\u0026#39; to get 20% off (valid until January 31st, 2022).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, December 27) \u0026quot;146: Skills pay bills\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/PUW6N\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We answer a series of questions from a listener on whether to start a PhD, what to ask potential supervisors, the financial perils of being a PhD student, the future of higher education, the importance of skills, what keeps us going, and more","date_published":"2021-12-27T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/edb3486b-2a2f-4638-81fb-e099c89368d6.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":66953298,"duration_in_seconds":4184}]},{"id":"41dc8d16-3fb3-41a0-abc2-603b9a81d919","title":"145: Our boat is sinking slightly slower","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/145","content_text":"We discuss the results from the cancer biology reproducibility project, the inevitable comparisons with reproducibility in psychology, and authorship expectations for posting public datasets. \n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology \nThe paper on the impact of alphabetical order on career outcomes in economics (whose authorship order are determinedby alphabetical order\n That human sports science paper that inlcluded a cranionotomy\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, December 13) \"145: Our boat is sinking slightly slower\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/634QJ","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe discuss the results from the cancer biology reproducibility project, the inevitable comparisons with reproducibility in psychology, and authorship expectations for posting public datasets. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://elifesciences.org/articles/71601\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://academic.oup.com/ej/article-abstract/131/635/1250/5824166\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e on the impact of alphabetical order on career outcomes in economics (whose authorship order are determinedby alphabetical order\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e That human sports science \u003ca href=\"https://pubpeer.com/publications/28EA24F1ABCFF6CD121B167A9A68BB\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e that inlcluded a cranionotomy\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, December 13) \u0026quot;145: Our boat is sinking slightly slower\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/634QJ\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We discuss the results from the cancer biology reproducibility project, the inevitable comparisons with reproducibility in psychology, and authorship expectations for posting open datasets. ","date_published":"2021-12-13T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/41dc8d16-3fb3-41a0-abc2-603b9a81d919.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":46157321,"duration_in_seconds":2884}]},{"id":"6bea82bc-27b6-464f-b8f3-3c65bf36dba5","title":"144: The role of luck in academia","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/144","content_text":"If your child asked you whether they should pursue a career in academia, what would you say? We discuss this question plus three more quick-fire topics: the death of expertise, memorable presentations, and including internships in more graduate programs \n\nLinks\n\n\nGet a 30% discount on a Scite subscription for a year, just use the coupon code EVERYTHINGHERTZ via this link\nThe “Remind me of this later” twitter bot\nThe Chase, Chance, and Creativity book\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, November 15) \"144: The role of luck in academia\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BKAH6Sponsored By:Scite: Everything Hertz listeners can get 30% off for a year of access to scite, just use the promo code EVERYTHINGHERTZ at checkout Promo Code: EVERYTHINGHERTZ","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIf your child asked you whether they should pursue a career in academia, what would you say? We discuss this question plus three more quick-fire topics: the death of expertise, memorable presentations, and including internships in more graduate programs \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGet a 30% discount on a Scite subscription for a year, just use the coupon code EVERYTHINGHERTZ via \u003ca href=\"https://scite.ai/?via=everythinghertz\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ethis link\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe “Remind me of this later” \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/remindme_ofthis\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etwitter bot\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Chase, Chance, and Creativity \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Chase-Chance-Creativity-Lucky-Novelty/dp/0262511355\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, November 15) \u0026quot;144: The role of luck in academia\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BKAH6\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://scite.ai/?via=everythinghertz\"\u003eScite\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://scite.ai/?via=everythinghertz\"\u003eEverything Hertz listeners can get 30% off for a year of access to scite, just use the promo code EVERYTHINGHERTZ at checkout\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: EVERYTHINGHERTZ\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"If your child asked you whether they should pursue a career in academia, what would you say? We discuss this question along three more quick-fire topics: the death of expertise, memorable presentations, and the lack of internship options in most graduate programs ","date_published":"2021-11-15T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/6bea82bc-27b6-464f-b8f3-3c65bf36dba5.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":51798516,"duration_in_seconds":3237}]},{"id":"d22cf38a-dc65-4f4f-9d1c-31a6548c7b37","title":"143: A little less conversation, a little more action","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/143","content_text":"Dan and James discuss the differences between 'talk' and 'action' in scientific reform and why reforms are taking such a long time to be realised. They also chat about whether messy (but correct) code is worse than no code at all, and revisit the grad student who never said \"no\".\n\nOther links\n\n\nGet a 30% discount on a Scite subscription for a year, just use the coupon code EVERYTHINGHERTZ via this link\nJames' blog post on why he loves preprints\nThe grad student who never said \"no\" (archived) blog post\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, November 1) \"143: A little less conversation, a little more action\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/X75SZSponsored By:Scite: Everything Hertz listeners can get 30% off for a year of access to scite, just use the promo code EVERYTHINGHERTZ at checkout Promo Code: EVERYTHINGHERTZ","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss the differences between \u0026#39;talk\u0026#39; and \u0026#39;action\u0026#39; in scientific reform and why reforms are taking such a long time to be realised. They also chat about whether messy (but correct) code is worse than no code at all, and revisit the grad student \u003ca href=\"https://web.archive.org/web/20170312041524/http:/www.brianwansink.com/phd-advice/the-grad-student-who-never-said-no\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewho never said \u0026quot;no\u0026quot;\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGet a 30% discount on a Scite subscription for a year, just use the coupon code EVERYTHINGHERTZ via \u003ca href=\"https://scite.ai/?via=everythinghertz\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ethis link\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; blog post on \u003ca href=\"https://jamesheathers.medium.com/why-i-love-pre-prints-9d727eeb22b8\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewhy he loves preprints\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe grad student who never said \u0026quot;no\u0026quot; \u003ca href=\"https://web.archive.org/web/20170312041524/http:/www.brianwansink.com/phd-advice/the-grad-student-who-never-said-no\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e(archived) blog post\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, November 1) \u0026quot;143: A little less conversation, a little more action\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/X75SZ\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://scite.ai/?via=everythinghertz\"\u003eScite\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://scite.ai/?via=everythinghertz\"\u003eEverything Hertz listeners can get 30% off for a year of access to scite, just use the promo code EVERYTHINGHERTZ at checkout\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: EVERYTHINGHERTZ\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss the differences between 'talk' and 'action' in scientific reform and why reforms are taking such a long time to be realised. They also chat about whether messy (but correct) code is worse than no code at all, and revisit the grad student who never said \"no\".","date_published":"2021-11-01T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/d22cf38a-dc65-4f4f-9d1c-31a6548c7b37.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":52361089,"duration_in_seconds":3272}]},{"id":"e65654c5-763d-4041-a46b-3474ac0f8946","title":"142: Red flags in academia [Live episode]","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/142","content_text":"In this live episode, Dan and James discuss red flags in academia, in terms of research fields, papers, and individuals. Thanks to everyone that participated in this live event!\n\nLinks to stuff that was mentioned\n\n\nGet a 30% discount on a Scite subscription for a year, just use the coupon code EVERYTHINGHERTZ via this link\nThe p-hacker app\nBurro racing on Wikipedia\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, October 18) \"142: Red flags in academia [Live episode]\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3YB47Sponsored By:Scite: Everything Hertz listeners can get 30% off for a year of access to scite, just use the promo code EVERYTHINGHERTZ at checkout Promo Code: EVERYTHINGHERTZ","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this live episode, Dan and James discuss red flags in academia, in terms of research fields, papers, and individuals. Thanks to everyone that participated in this live event!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks to stuff that was mentioned\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGet a 30% discount on a Scite subscription for a year, just use the coupon code EVERYTHINGHERTZ via \u003ca href=\"https://scite.ai/?via=everythinghertz\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ethis link\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe p-hacker \u003ca href=\"https://shinyapps.org/apps/p-hacker/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eapp\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBurro racing on \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pack_burro_racing\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eWikipedia\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, October 18) \u0026quot;142: Red flags in academia [Live episode]\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3YB47\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://scite.ai/?via=everythinghertz\"\u003eScite\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://scite.ai/?via=everythinghertz\"\u003eEverything Hertz listeners can get 30% off for a year of access to scite, just use the promo code EVERYTHINGHERTZ at checkout\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: EVERYTHINGHERTZ\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"In this live episode, Dan and James discuss red flags in academia, in terms of research fields, papers, and individuals. ","date_published":"2021-10-18T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/e65654c5-763d-4041-a46b-3474ac0f8946.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":54922761,"duration_in_seconds":3432}]},{"id":"fdc5283c-63ce-4839-84b4-a8a975d4fa99","title":"141: Why we should diversify study samples (with Sakshi Ghai)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/141","content_text":"We chat with Sakshi Ghai (University of Cambridge) about why we should diversify sample diversity and retire the Western, educated, rich, industrialized and democratic (WEIRD) dichotomy in the behavioral sciences \n\nLinks to stuff we discuss:\n\n\nSakshi's piece in Nature Human Behavior \nMany Labs 2 paper \nThe ‘helicopter' research piece\nJoseph Heinrich’s recent book, The WEIRDest People in the World\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nMusic credits\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, September 20) \"141: Why we should diversify study samples (with Sakshi Ghai)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/J9E6WSpecial Guest: Sakshi Ghai.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat with Sakshi Ghai (University of Cambridge) about why we should diversify sample diversity and retire the Western, educated, rich, industrialized and democratic (WEIRD) dichotomy in the behavioral sciences \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks to stuff we discuss:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSakshi\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://rdcu.be/cyKEQ\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epiece\u003c/a\u003e in \u003cem\u003eNature Human Behavior\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMany Labs 2 \u003ca href=\"https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2515245918810225\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe ‘helicopter\u0026#39; research \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01795-1\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epiece\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJoseph Heinrich’s recent book, \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/WEIRDest-People-World-Psychologically-Particularly-ebook/dp/B07RZFCPMD\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eThe WEIRDest People in the World\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMusic credits\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nOur outro music is by \u003ca href=\"https://freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLee Rosevere\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, September 20) \u0026quot;141: Why we should diversify study samples (with Sakshi Ghai)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/J9E6W\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Sakshi Ghai.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat with Sakshi Ghai (University of Cambridge) about why we should diversify sample diversity and retire the Western, educated, rich, industrialized and democratic (WEIRD) dichotomy in the behavioral sciences ","date_published":"2021-10-04T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/fdc5283c-63ce-4839-84b4-a8a975d4fa99.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":54875114,"duration_in_seconds":3429}]},{"id":"b818709b-8b91-4602-94e6-167fd62434c3","title":"140: You can’t buy cat biscuits with ‘thank you’ emails","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/140","content_text":"James proposes that peer review reports should be published as their own citable objects, provided that the manuscript author thinks that the peer review report is of sufficient quality and the peer reviewers agree\n\nOther links and things we discuss\n\n\nAn update on James’ start up job\nThe American service industry \nDan’s first outing since the pandemic started\nThe villlage of Hell, in Norway\nThe villiage of Fucking (now changed to Fugging) in Austria \nThe Hertz long term archive on Open Science Framework\nWe’re up for doing a syllabus episodes that you can assign to your classes\nDan’s recent piece in Nature Human Behavior on replication projects for undergraduate research theses\nWhat about a replication study as part of a PhD thesis?\nThe trope of, “future replications are needed’\nCollaborative Replications and Education Project (CREP)\nDaniel Lakens mentioning that his paper might be the most cited Frontiers article ever\nHow thorough should peer review be?\nJames' new articles isn't online yet, but he will pin it to his Twitter profile as soon as it is\nThe Julian Koenig-led paper James mentioned (that Dan and James are co-authors on)\nThe Psychophysiology liviing meta-analysis article\n\n\nOther links\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nMusic credits\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere\n\nEpisode citation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, September 20) \"140: You can’t buy cat biscuits with ‘thank you’ emails\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BW65N","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eJames proposes that peer review reports should be published as their own citable objects, provided that the manuscript author thinks that the peer review report is of sufficient quality and the peer reviewers agree\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links and things we discuss\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAn update on James’ start up job\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe American service industry \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan’s first outing since the pandemic started\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe villlage of \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hell,_Norway\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eHell\u003c/a\u003e, in Norway\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe villiage of \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugging,_Upper_Austria\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eFucking\u003c/a\u003e (now changed to Fugging) in Austria \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Hertz \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/zj7y3/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003elong term archive\u003c/a\u003e on Open Science Framework\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe’re up for doing a syllabus episodes that you can assign to your classes\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan’s \u003ca href=\"https://rdcu.be/cx3H0\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003erecent piece\u003c/a\u003e in Nature Human Behavior on replication projects for undergraduate research theses\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat about a replication study as part of a PhD thesis?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe trope of, “future replications are needed’\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCollaborative Replications and Education Project (\u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/wfc6u/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eCREP\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDaniel Lakens \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/lakens/status/1435696324708642816?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ementioning\u003c/a\u003e that his paper might be the most cited Frontiers article ever\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow thorough should peer review be?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; new articles isn\u0026#39;t online yet, but he will pin it to his Twitter profile as soon as it is\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe J\u003ca href=\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/psyp.13688\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eulian Koenig-led paper\u003c/a\u003e James mentioned (that Dan and James are co-authors on)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Psychophysiology\u003ca href=\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/psyp.13933\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e liviing meta-analysis\u003c/a\u003e article\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMusic credits\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nOur outro music is by \u003ca href=\"https://freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLee Rosevere\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, September 20) \u0026quot;140: You can’t buy cat biscuits with ‘thank you’ emails\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BW65N\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"James proposes that peer review reports should be published as their own citable objects, provided that the manuscript author thinks that the peer review report is of sufficient quality and the peer reviewers agree","date_published":"2021-09-20T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b818709b-8b91-4602-94e6-167fd62434c3.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":58933915,"duration_in_seconds":3683}]},{"id":"ee1fbae1-840b-471b-a265-db2d73a0fda9","title":"139: Open science from a funder's perspective (with Ashley Farley)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/139","content_text":"We chat with Ashley Farley about her background as an academic librarian, the underrecognised importance of copyright in academic publishing, and her work as a Program Officer at the Gates Foundation\n\n\nAn academic librarian’s perpsective on the importance of open reseasch\nThe  importance of copyright in research and what it means signing over your copyright\nThe PDF crisis! \nWhat does a program officer at a grant funding organsiation do?\nWhy should funding organisations care about open science?\nWhy open access is more than just about acacemic papers, but extends to posters and presentations\nWhy can't academics collectively decide to push back against the big publishers?\nThe difference between private funders vs. goverment funding agencies\n\n\nOther links\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nMusic credits\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, September 6) \"139: Open science from a funder's perspective (with Ashley Farley)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FQXSZSpecial Guest: Ashley Farley.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat with Ashley Farley about her background as an academic librarian, the underrecognised importance of copyright in academic publishing, and her work as a Program Officer at the Gates Foundation\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAn academic librarian’s perpsective on the importance of open reseasch\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe  importance of copyright in research and what it means signing over your copyright\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe PDF crisis! \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat does a program officer at a grant funding organsiation do?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy should funding organisations care about open science?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy open access is more than just about acacemic papers, but extends to posters and presentations\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy can\u0026#39;t academics collectively decide to push back against the big publishers?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe difference between private funders vs. goverment funding agencies\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMusic credits\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nOur outro music is by \u003ca href=\"https://freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLee Rosevere\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, September 6) \u0026quot;139: Open science from a funder\u0026#39;s perspective (with Ashley Farley)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FQXSZ\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Ashley Farley.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat with Ashley Farley about her background as an academic librarian, the underrecognised importance of copyright in academic publishing, and her work as a Program Officer at the Gates Foundation","date_published":"2021-09-06T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/ee1fbae1-840b-471b-a265-db2d73a0fda9.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":54181301,"duration_in_seconds":3386}]},{"id":"09d86ffd-4240-46c9-8238-39cbd4eeba32","title":"138: Preprints in the time of coronavirus (with Michele Avissar-Whiting)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/138","content_text":"We chat with Michele Avissar-Whiting about her role as the Editor-in-chief of the Research Square preprint platform and how she weighs up the benefits and costs of potentially problematic preprints during a pandemic.\n\nNotes, links, and stuff we cover:\n\n\nThe Journal Ghoul reference in the intro\nMichele’s role as a the editor for a preprint server\nHow Research Square works\nWeighing up the urgency of preprints vs. potential danger\nThe preprint-to- hype pipeline\nThe Scholarly Kitchen piece on knowledge democratization\nBadges for preprints\nThe recent withdrawal of a preprint\n\n\nOther links\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nMusic credits\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, August 16) \"138: Preprints in the time of coronavirus (with Michele Avissar-Whiting)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/AU8PWSpecial Guest: Michele Avissar-Whiting.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat with Michele Avissar-Whiting about her role as the Editor-in-chief of the Research Square preprint platform and how she weighs up the benefits and costs of potentially problematic preprints during a pandemic.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eNotes, links, and stuff we cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/jamesheathers/status/1425421173366693891?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJournal Ghoul\u003c/a\u003e reference in the intro\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMichele’s role as a the editor for a preprint server\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow \u003ca href=\"https://researchsquare.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eResearch Square\u003c/a\u003e works\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWeighing up the urgency of preprints vs. potential danger\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe preprint-to- hype pipeline\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Scholarly Kitchen \u003ca href=\"https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2021/02/24/open-access-conspiracy-theories-and-the-democratization-of-knowledge/?utm_source=feedburner\u0026utm_medium=email\u0026utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ScholarlyKitchen+%28The+Scholarly+Kitchen%29\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epiece\u003c/a\u003e on knowledge democratization\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBadges for preprints\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe recent withdrawal of a preprint\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMusic credits\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nOur outro music is by \u003ca href=\"https://freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLee Rosevere\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, August 16) \u0026quot;138: Preprints in the time of coronavirus (with Michele Avissar-Whiting)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/AU8PW\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Michele Avissar-Whiting.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat with Michele Avissar-Whiting about her role as the Editor-in-chief of the Research Square preprint platform and how she weighs up the benefits and costs of potentially problematic preprints during a pandemic","date_published":"2021-08-16T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/09d86ffd-4240-46c9-8238-39cbd4eeba32.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":64205217,"duration_in_seconds":4012}]},{"id":"c15bafbd-130e-43ed-a854-394385d221b5","title":"137: Ten rules for improving academic work-life balance","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/137","content_text":"Dan and James share their thoughts on a recent paper that proposes ten rules for improving academic work-life balance for early career researchers and the figure from this paper that became a meme.\n\nHere are the rules:\n\n\nLong hours do not equal productive hours\nExamine your options for flexible work practices\nSet boundaries to establish your workplace and time\nCommit to strategies that increase your efficiency and productivity\nHave a long-term strategy to help with prioritization, and review it regularly\nMake your health a priority\nRegularly interact with family and friends\nMake time for volunteer work or similar commitments that are important and meaningful to you\nSeek out or help create peer and institutional support systems\nOpen a dialogue about the importance of work–life balance and advocate for systemic change\n\n\nDan mentioned an app he sometimes uses to track his time, called Timery.\n\nOther links\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nMusic credits\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, August 2) \"137: Ten rules for improving academic work-life balance\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7F3KN","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James share their thoughts on a \u003ca href=\"https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009124\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003erecent paper\u003c/a\u003e that proposes ten rules for improving academic work-life balance for early career researchers and the figure from this paper that became a meme.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere are the rules:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLong hours do not equal productive hours\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExamine your options for flexible work practices\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSet boundaries to establish your workplace and time\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCommit to strategies that increase your efficiency and productivity\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHave a long-term strategy to help with prioritization, and review it regularly\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMake your health a priority\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRegularly interact with family and friends\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMake time for volunteer work or similar commitments that are important and meaningful to you\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSeek out or help create peer and institutional support systems\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOpen a dialogue about the importance of work–life balance and advocate for systemic change\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDan mentioned an app he sometimes uses to track his time, called \u003ca href=\"https://timeryapp.com/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eTimery\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMusic credits\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nOur outro music is by \u003ca href=\"https://freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLee Rosevere\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, August 2) \u0026quot;137: Ten rules for improving academic work-life balance\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7F3KN\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James share their thoughts on a recent paper that proposes ten rules for improving academic work-life balance for early career researchers and the figure from this paper that became a meme.","date_published":"2021-08-02T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/c15bafbd-130e-43ed-a854-394385d221b5.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":51221314,"duration_in_seconds":3201}]},{"id":"0f414481-fc19-4bfa-b45b-b7c4b84b6ce6","title":"136: Who peer-reviews the peer-reviewed journals?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/136","content_text":"We discuss Journal Reviewer (journalreviewer.org), which is a website that provides a forum for researchers to share and rate their experiences with journal's peer review processes. We also cover how some journals negotiate the way in which their impact factors are calculated. \n\nLinks\n\n\nThe reference to James' mention of Dick Whittington\nJames’ RIOT science talk \nNichola's Raihani's tweet\nhttps://journalreviewer.org/\nThe South Park Yelp episode\n\n\nOther links\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nMusic credits\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere\n\nEpisode citation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, July 19) \"136: Who peer-reviews the peer-reviewed journals?\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/5SH2Z","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe discuss Journal Reviewer (journalreviewer.org), which is a website that provides a forum for researchers to share and rate their experiences with journal\u0026#39;s peer review processes. We also cover how some journals negotiate the way in which their impact factors are calculated. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Whittington\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ereference\u003c/a\u003e to James\u0026#39; mention of Dick Whittington\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames’ RIOT science \u003ca href=\"https://youtu.be/t733sc9xhtw\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etalk\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNichola\u0026#39;s Raihani\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/nicholaraihani/status/1415308025179656194?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etweet\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://journalreviewer.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://journalreviewer.org/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe South Park \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You%27re_Not_Yelping\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eYelp episode\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMusic credits\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nOur outro music is by \u003ca href=\"https://freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLee Rosevere\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, July 19) \u0026quot;136: Who peer-reviews the peer-reviewed journals?\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/5SH2Z\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We discuss Journal Reviewer (journalreviewer.org), which is a website that provides a forum for researchers to share and rate their experiences with journal's peer review processes. We also cover how some journals negotiate the way in which their impact factors are calculated ","date_published":"2021-07-19T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/0f414481-fc19-4bfa-b45b-b7c4b84b6ce6.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48479084,"duration_in_seconds":3029}]},{"id":"627c4d07-f502-4689-a5fe-c4e6f9184a4b","title":"135: A loss of confidence","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/135","content_text":"Dan Quintana and James Heathers chat about well-known psychology studies that we've now lost confidence in due to replication failures and the role of auxiliary assumptions in hypothesis-driven research. \n\nOther links\n\n\nThe reversals in psychology website \nAnne Scheel and team's paper on whether you’re ready to test hypotheses \nHomer Simpson burning bridges meme \nThe paper that suggests replications will make psychology too boring and nobody will want to study it\nDaniel Lakens’ blog post on the hungry judges study \n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nMusic credits\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, July 5) \"135: A loss of confidence\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/GHKRCSponsored By:Paperpile: Paperpile is the reference manager you’ll actually want to use. Paperpile works seamlessly with Google Docs and Word for inserting citations and generating references lists. Paperpile’s iOS and Android apps also make it easy to add and read papers on the go. Everything Hertz listeners get 20% off a Paperpile subscription with the coupon code \"hertz\" (valid until January 1st, 2022).\r\n Promo Code: hertz","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan Quintana and James Heathers chat about well-known psychology studies that we\u0026#39;ve now lost confidence in due to replication failures and the role of auxiliary assumptions in hypothesis-driven research. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe reversals in psychology \u003ca href=\"https://www.gleech.org/psych\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewebsite\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnne Scheel and team\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1745691620966795\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e on whether you’re ready to test hypotheses \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHomer Simpson burning bridges \u003ca href=\"https://youtu.be/PnnXc3T_pK8\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ememe\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.003\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e that suggests replications will make psychology too boring and nobody will want to study it\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDaniel Lakens’ \u003ca href=\"http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2017/07/impossibly-hungry-judges.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eblog post\u003c/a\u003e on the hungry judges study \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMusic credits\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nOur outro music is by \u003ca href=\"https://freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLee Rosevere\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, July 5) \u0026quot;135: A loss of confidence\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/GHKRC\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://paperpile.com/\"\u003ePaperpile\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://paperpile.com/\"\u003ePaperpile is the reference manager you’ll actually want to use. Paperpile works seamlessly with Google Docs and Word for inserting citations and generating references lists. Paperpile’s iOS and Android apps also make it easy to add and read papers on the go. Everything Hertz listeners get 20% off a Paperpile subscription with the coupon code \u0026quot;hertz\u0026quot; (valid until January 1st, 2022).\r\n\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: hertz\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"Dan Quintana and James Heathers chat about well-known psychology studies that we've now lost confidence in due to replication failures and the role of auxiliary assumptions in hypothesis-driven research. ","date_published":"2021-07-05T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/627c4d07-f502-4689-a5fe-c4e6f9184a4b.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48859427,"duration_in_seconds":3053}]},{"id":"a2351cfa-1e19-4ff7-b37b-b9c1b4ddc97c","title":"134: Paywalled questionnaires","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/134","content_text":"We discuss a recent retraction triggered by the authors not paying a copyright fee to use a questionnaire (that also happened to be critical of the original questionnaire). \n\nLinks for stuff that we mention:\n\n\nThe paper that was retracted for not getting the correct licence for a questionnaire \nThe retraction notice for this paper \nThe Spectrum piece that discusses this story\nWhy most online recipes begin with some ridiculous story\nLibkey, which provides one-click access to papers via your institutional library subscription\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nMusic credits\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, June 21) \"134: Paywalled questionnaires\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/76KTYSponsored By:Paperpile: Paperpile is the reference manager you’ll actually want to use. Paperpile works seamlessly with Google Docs and Word for inserting citations and generating references lists. Paperpile’s iOS and Android apps also make it easy to add and read papers on the go. Everything Hertz listeners get 20% off a Paperpile subscription with the coupon code \"hertz\" (valid until January 1st, 2022).\r\n Promo Code: hertz","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe discuss a recent retraction triggered by the authors not paying a copyright fee to use a questionnaire (that also happened to be critical of the original questionnaire). \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLinks for stuff that we mention:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://molecularautism.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13229-021-00427-9\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e that was retracted for not getting the correct licence for a questionnaire \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://molecularautism.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13229-021-00446-6\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eretraction notice\u003c/a\u003e for this paper \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.spectrumnews.org/news/copyright-claim-prompts-retraction-of-study-on-alexithymia-in-autism/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSpectrum piece\u003c/a\u003e that discusses this story\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy most online recipes begin with \u003ca href=\"https://copyrightalliance.org/are-recipes-cookbooks-protected-by-copyright/#:%7E:text=Recipes%20can%20be%20protected%20under,anecdotes%20alongside%20a%20recipe\u0026#x27;s%20ingredients\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003esome ridiculous story\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://libkey.io/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLibkey\u003c/a\u003e, which provides one-click access to papers via your institutional library subscription\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMusic credits\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nOur outro music is by \u003ca href=\"https://freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLee Rosevere\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, June 21) \u0026quot;134: Paywalled questionnaires\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/76KTY\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://paperpile.com/\"\u003ePaperpile\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://paperpile.com/\"\u003ePaperpile is the reference manager you’ll actually want to use. Paperpile works seamlessly with Google Docs and Word for inserting citations and generating references lists. Paperpile’s iOS and Android apps also make it easy to add and read papers on the go. Everything Hertz listeners get 20% off a Paperpile subscription with the coupon code \u0026quot;hertz\u0026quot; (valid until January 1st, 2022).\r\n\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: hertz\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"We discuss a recent retraction triggered by the authors not paying a copyright fee to use a questionnaire (that also happened to be critical of the original questionnaire). ","date_published":"2021-06-21T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/a2351cfa-1e19-4ff7-b37b-b9c1b4ddc97c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":54399894,"duration_in_seconds":3399}]},{"id":"6d71527f-5b0c-4858-b0ce-5629883dc337","title":"133: Manuscript submission fees","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/133","content_text":"Some journals use nominal manuscript submission fees to discourage frivolous submissions. However, it has been suggested that increasing submission fees could reduce article processing charges. Dan and James discuss this proposal, along with the recently released code of conduct for scientific integrity from the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. \n\n\nJames’ Atlantic piece\nSubmission fees for mansucripts\nThe scholarly kitchen blog post\nWe have a new partner: Paperpile!\nOur PeerJ episode with Jason Hoyt \nThe code of conduct for scientific integrity from the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences \n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nMusic credits\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere\n\nEpisode citation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, June 7) \"133: Manuscript submission fees\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/5MAQNSponsored By:Paperpile: Paperpile is the reference manager you’ll actually want to use. Paperpile works seamlessly with Google Docs and Word for inserting citations and generating references lists. Paperpile’s iOS and Android apps also make it easy to add and read papers on the go. Everything Hertz listeners get 20% off a Paperpile subscription with the coupon code \"hertz\" (valid until January 1st, 2022).\r\n Promo Code: hertz","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eSome journals use nominal manuscript submission fees to discourage frivolous submissions. However, it has been suggested that increasing submission fees could reduce article processing charges. Dan and James discuss this proposal, along with the recently released code of conduct for scientific integrity from the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames’ \u003ca href=\"https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2021/06/microchipped-vaccines-15-minute-investigation/619081/?utm_source=twitter\u0026utm_medium=social\u0026utm_term=2021-06-03T12%3A00%3A56\u0026utm_content=edit-promo\u0026utm_campaign=the-atlantic\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eAtlantic piece\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSubmission fees for mansucripts\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe scholarly kitchen \u003ca href=\"https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/09/20/plan-t-scrap-apcs-and-fund-open-access-with-submission-fees/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eblog post\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe have a new partner: \u003ca href=\"http://paperpile.com/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ePaperpile!\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/48\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ePeerJ episode\u003c/a\u003e with Jason Hoyt \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://zenodo.org/record/4707560#.YLzReTaA4-Q\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ecode of conduct\u003c/a\u003e for scientific integrity from the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverything Hertz on social media\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMusic credits\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nOur outro music is by \u003ca href=\"https://freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLee Rosevere\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, June 7) \u0026quot;133: Manuscript submission fees\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/5MAQN\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://paperpile.com/\"\u003ePaperpile\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://paperpile.com/\"\u003ePaperpile is the reference manager you’ll actually want to use. Paperpile works seamlessly with Google Docs and Word for inserting citations and generating references lists. Paperpile’s iOS and Android apps also make it easy to add and read papers on the go. Everything Hertz listeners get 20% off a Paperpile subscription with the coupon code \u0026quot;hertz\u0026quot; (valid until January 1st, 2022).\r\n\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: hertz\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"Some journals use nominal manuscript submission fees to discourage frivolous submissions. However, it has been suggested that increasing submission fees could reduce article processing charges. Dan and James discuss this proposal, along with the recently released code of conduct for scientific integrity from the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. \r\n","date_published":"2021-06-07T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/6d71527f-5b0c-4858-b0ce-5629883dc337.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":47182575,"duration_in_seconds":2948}]},{"id":"881459f9-5807-43d4-9ccd-543f86fa9940","title":"132: Post-pandemic academia","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/132","content_text":"Dan and James discuss how academia should operate in a post-pandemic world. What pandemic practices should we keep and what should we abandon? \n\nLinks and details:\n\n\nQuiz: Norwegian metal band or Norwegian town?\nThings are slowly getting back to normal in some (but not alI) countries. So what academic practices and routines should we keep from the pandemic and what should we kiss goodbye?\nWould it be possible to be physically located at your local university but to be employed/educated at another university? \nVideo abstracts are now an option is some journals, here's an example\nPresentations might be more convenient online, but it's hard to replicate a good poster session\nWhat is the actual point of academic conferences?\nThe neuromatch academy https://academy.neuromatch.io/\nThe neuromatch academy paper in Trends in Cognitive Sciences \n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, May 17) \"132: Post-pandemic academia\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FAU7Z","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss how academia should operate in a post-pandemic world. What pandemic practices should we keep and what should we abandon? \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks and details:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eQuiz: Norwegian metal band or Norwegian town?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThings are slowly getting back to normal in some (but not alI) countries. So what academic practices and routines should we keep from the pandemic and what should we kiss goodbye?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWould it be possible to be physically located at your local university but to be employed/educated at another university? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVideo abstracts are now an option is some journals, here\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpcu.13015\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ean example\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePresentations might be more convenient online, but it\u0026#39;s hard to replicate a good poster session\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat is the actual point of academic conferences?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe neuromatch academy \u003ca href=\"https://academy.neuromatch.io/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://academy.neuromatch.io/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe neuromatch academy \u003ca href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661321000954?dgcid=author\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e in Trends in Cognitive Sciences \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, May 17) \u0026quot;132: Post-pandemic academia\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FAU7Z\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss how academia should operate in a post-pandemic world. What pandemic practices should we keep and what should we abandon? ","date_published":"2021-05-17T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/881459f9-5807-43d4-9ccd-543f86fa9940.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48712306,"duration_in_seconds":3044}]},{"id":"7bc5024b-98b6-45e1-8c31-6fc483991690","title":"131: Long live the overhead projector!","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/131","content_text":"Dan and James answer listener audio questions on indirect costs for research grants, the mind/body problem, and why many academics aren't trained to teach. They also profess their love for the overhead projector\n\nSome more details:\n\n\nShould we require universities to justify overhead costs, like heating and electricity?\nOverheads can inflate the costs of grants, some grants provide an additional percentage for overheads but others don’t allow this, which can eat into grants\nGet to know the people in your local grant office!\nIndirect costs at MIT \nA primer on indirect costs and why they are important to MIT\nDoes it matter that we address the mind body problem in psychology? \nOn the teaching of the history and philosophy of science (or lack thereof) in psychology courses\nWhy aren’t academics better equipped to teach? \nThe 3Blue1Brown YouTube channel \n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, May 3) \"131: Long live the overhead projector!\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8TFKC","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James answer listener audio questions on indirect costs for research grants, the mind/body problem, and why many academics aren\u0026#39;t trained to teach. They also profess their love for the overhead projector\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome more details:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould we require universities to justify overhead costs, like heating and electricity?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOverheads can inflate the costs of grants, some grants provide an additional percentage for overheads but others don’t allow this, which can eat into grants\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGet to know the people in your local grant office!\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIndirect costs \u003ca href=\"https://ras.mit.edu/facilities-and-administrative-fa-rates\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eat MIT\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA \u003ca href=\"https://web.mit.edu/fnl/volume/295/zuber.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eprimer\u003c/a\u003e on indirect costs and why they are important to MIT\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDoes it matter that we address the mind body problem in psychology? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOn the teaching of the history and philosophy of science (or lack thereof) in psychology courses\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy aren’t academics better equipped to teach? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe 3Blue1Brown YouTube \u003ca href=\"http://www.3blue1brown.com/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003echannel\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, May 3) \u0026quot;131: Long live the overhead projector!\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8TFKC\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James answer listener audio questions on indirect costs for research grants, the mind/body problem, and why many academics aren't trained to teach. They also profess their love for the overhead projector\r\n","date_published":"2021-05-03T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/7bc5024b-98b6-45e1-8c31-6fc483991690.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":60682657,"duration_in_seconds":3792}]},{"id":"5651405c-e19a-4e26-94cc-ba7b662979f8","title":"130: Normalizing retractions (with Dorothy Bishop)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/130","content_text":"Dan and James chat with Dorothy Bishop (University of Oxford) about the importance of normalizing the retraction of scientific papers, publication ethics, and whether paper mills (companies that make fake papers at scale) are an issue in the psychological sciences\n\nHere are some links and stuff we covered:\n\n\nDorothy's thoughts on how the adoption of open science practices has been progressing since we last had her on the show in June 2018\nThe European Research Council's new open access journal, which is free to publish in if you're ERC funded\nDan's proposal of something similar in a 2019 The Chronicle piece (free to read with email signup) \nDorothy's recent blogpost on publication ethics\nThe Society for Microbiology piece behind the blogpost\nOur episode with Elisabeth Bik\nImage manipulation in scientific papers\nWhy don't publishers have agreements with authors that if they discover something dodgy in papers the author can't sue them?\nRetraction notices don't easily discriminate between fraud and mistakes, and this is one reason why that authors are so reluctant to have their work retracted\nJames' fictional paper mill story (based on real fraud), that he wrote with Otto Kalliokoski\nAre paper mills a problem in psychology?\nDorothy's Oxford photo challenge\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, April 19) \"130: Normalizing retractions (with Dorothy Bishop)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HRXU2Special Guest: Dorothy Bishop.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James chat with Dorothy Bishop (University of Oxford) about the importance of normalizing the retraction of scientific papers, publication ethics, and whether paper mills (companies that make fake papers at scale) are an issue in the psychological sciences\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere are some links and stuff we covered:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDorothy\u0026#39;s thoughts on how the adoption of open science practices has been progressing since we last had her on the show in June 2018\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe European Research Council\u0026#39;s new open access journal, which is free to publish in if you\u0026#39;re ERC funded\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan\u0026#39;s proposal of something similar in a 2019 \u003ca href=\"https://www.chronicle.com/article/how-to-bring-prestige-to-open-access-and-make-science-more-reliable\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eThe Chronicle piece\u003c/a\u003e (free to read with email signup) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDorothy\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"http://deevybee.blogspot.com/2021/03/time-for-publishers-to-consider-rights.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003erecent blogpost\u003c/a\u003e on publication ethics\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Society for Microbiology \u003ca href=\"https://asm.org/Articles/2021/March/Publication-Ethics-Barriers-in-Resolving-Figure-C\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epiece\u003c/a\u003e behind the blogpost\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/74\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eepisode\u003c/a\u003e with Elisabeth Bik\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eImage manipulation in scientific papers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy don\u0026#39;t publishers have agreements with authors that if they discover something dodgy in papers the author can\u0026#39;t sue them?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRetraction notices don\u0026#39;t easily discriminate between fraud and mistakes, and this is one reason why that authors are so reluctant to have their work retracted\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; fictional \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/ds6hk/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper mill story\u003c/a\u003e (based on real fraud), that he wrote with Otto Kalliokoski\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAre paper mills a problem in psychology?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDorothy\u0026#39;s Oxford \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/hashtag/OxPhotoQuiz?src=hashtag_click\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ephoto challenge\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, April 19) \u0026quot;130: Normalizing retractions (with Dorothy Bishop)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HRXU2\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Dorothy Bishop.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James chat with Dorothy Bishop (University of Oxford) about the importance of normalizing the retraction of scientific papers, publication ethics, and whether paper mills (companies that make fake papers at scale) are an issue in the psychological sciences ","date_published":"2021-04-19T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5651405c-e19a-4e26-94cc-ba7b662979f8.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":43376013,"duration_in_seconds":3614}]},{"id":"1f4c2b61-a2cf-449a-bc13-c1db011dca9d","title":"129: Transparency audits ","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/129","content_text":"Dan and James discuss the recently proposed \"transparency audit\", why it received so much blowback, and the characteristics of successful reform schemes\n\nThe specifics...\n\n\nThe computational research integrity conference\nThe transparancy leaderboard proposed by Curate Science\nOur episode with Chris Jackson, that James mentioned\nWhat about a transparency leaderboard for instiutions?\nWhat are the characteristics of grassroots reform schemes that worked?\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, April 5) \"129: Transparency audits\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JRNP8","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss the recently proposed \u0026quot;transparency audit\u0026quot;, why it received so much blowback, and the characteristics of successful reform schemes\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe specifics...\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe computational research integrity \u003ca href=\"https://cri-conf.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003econference\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://etiennelebel.com/cs/t-leaderboard/t-leaderboard.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etransparancy leaderboard\u003c/a\u003e proposed by \u003ca href=\"https://curatescience.org/app/home\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eCurate Science\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur episode with \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/111\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eChris Jackson\u003c/a\u003e, that James mentioned\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat about a transparency leaderboard for instiutions?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat are the characteristics of grassroots reform schemes that worked?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, April 5) \u0026quot;129: Transparency audits\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JRNP8\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss the recently proposed \"transparency audit\", why it received so much blowback, and the characteristics of successful reform schemes","date_published":"2021-04-05T07:45:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/1f4c2b61-a2cf-449a-bc13-c1db011dca9d.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":40941609,"duration_in_seconds":3411}]},{"id":"c5ca06b0-1fee-4c56-8081-ee2fec2f980f","title":"128: How do you generate new research ideas?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/128","content_text":"Dan and James chat about how they come up with new ideas, why everyone seems to be trying to monetise their hobbies, and why it's so hard for most labs to have a singular focus of research.\n\nWe had some problems with James' mic so the quality of his audio wasn't up our usual standard. To make up for this we've added one of our older bonus episodes at the end of this conventional episode (this begins at 54:18). These bonus episodes are typically only made available for our Professor Fancypants Patreon patrons, but now you'll get to hear one!\n\nOther notes and links:\n\n\nThe half-serious \"Highlander\" bounty program from Noah Haber\nThe metapsy journal \nHow do we come up with new ideas?\nWhat James watches and listens to in his spare time\nThe urge to monetise your hobby\nThe \"Let's do nothing\" kids book\n\"How to Do Nothing\" by Jenny Odell\nRobert Provine's Laughter as a scientific problem: An adventure in sidewalk neuroscience\nThe value of including many experiments in a single paper\nIs there too much reform happening in psychology?\nClubhouse and the new twitter clone, 'Spaces' (still in beta)\nBonus episode 15: The true truth of pre-registration\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, March 15) \"128: How do you generate new research ideas?\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U79NW","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James chat about how they come up with new ideas, why everyone seems to be trying to monetise their hobbies, and why it\u0026#39;s so hard for most labs to have a singular focus of research.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eWe had some problems with James\u0026#39; mic so the quality of his audio wasn\u0026#39;t up our usual standard. To make up for this we\u0026#39;ve added one of our older bonus episodes at the end of this conventional episode (this begins at 54:18). These bonus episodes are typically only made available for our Professor Fancypants Patreon patrons, but now you\u0026#39;ll get to hear one!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOther notes and links:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe half-serious \u0026quot;Highlander\u0026quot; bounty program from \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/NoahHaber/status/1370045749287923715?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eNoah Haber\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe metapsy \u003ca href=\"https://open.lnu.se/index.php/metapsychology/about\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ejournal\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow do we come up with new ideas?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat James watches and listens to in his spare time\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe urge to monetise your hobby\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u0026quot;\u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Lets-Do-Nothing-Tony-Fucile/dp/0763652695\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLet\u0026#39;s do nothing\u003c/a\u003e\u0026quot; kids book\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026quot;\u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/How-Do-Nothing-Resisting-Attention/dp/1612197493\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eHow to Do Nothing\u003c/a\u003e\u0026quot; by Jenny Odell\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRobert Provine\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26131571/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLaughter as a scientific problem:\u003c/a\u003e An adventure in sidewalk neuroscience\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe value of including many experiments in a single paper\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIs there \u003cem\u003etoo\u003c/em\u003e much reform happening in psychology?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eClubhouse and the new twitter clone, \u0026#39;Spaces\u0026#39; (still in beta)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBonus episode 15: \u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/posts/34414977\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eThe true truth of pre-registration\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, March 15) \u0026quot;128: How do you generate new research ideas?\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U79NW\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James chat about how they come up with new ideas, why everyone seems to be trying to monetise their hobbies, and why it's so hard for most labs to have a singular focus of research.","date_published":"2021-03-15T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/c5ca06b0-1fee-4c56-8081-ee2fec2f980f.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":51454746,"duration_in_seconds":4287}]},{"id":"7e2e5c87-09b1-4b4b-9240-eeb821150a82","title":"127: Speak up or shut up?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/127","content_text":"We discuss when is the right time in your academic career to begin speaking up to critique your research field or whether the risk of retaliation means you should shut up and keep your head down. This was a recorded Clubhouse chat, which includes some audience interaction at the end.\n\nLinks and details:\n\n\nMoin Syed's blogpost, which was the inspiration for this topic\nThe 'proper' letter to the editor critique vs. a social media critique \nWhat about retaliation for speaking out?\nDifferences between industry and academia\nThank you to Yan, Louis, Evan for their contribitions to our chat!\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe discuss when is the right time in your academic career to begin speaking up to critique your research field or whether the risk of retaliation means you should shut up and keep your head down. This was a recorded Clubhouse chat, which includes some audience interaction at the end.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks and details:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMoin Syed\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"http://getsyeducated.blogspot.com/2021/02/the-time-for-criticism-is-now.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eblogpost\u003c/a\u003e, which was the inspiration for this topic\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u0026#39;proper\u0026#39; letter to the editor critique vs. a social media critique \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat about retaliation for speaking out?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDifferences between industry and academia\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThank you to Yan, Louis, Evan for their contribitions to our chat!\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We discuss when is the right time in your academic career to begin speaking up to critique your research field or whether the risk of retaliation means you should shut up and keep your head down","date_published":"2021-03-01T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/7e2e5c87-09b1-4b4b-9240-eeb821150a82.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":36863059,"duration_in_seconds":3071}]},{"id":"86121b0a-2f20-4722-872a-9c802aad8005","title":"126: The division of scientific labor (with Saloni Dattani) ","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/126","content_text":"We have a wide-ranging chat with Saloni Dattani (Kings College London and University of Hong Kong) about the benefits of dividing scientific labor, the magazine she co-founded (Works in Progress) that shares novel ideas and stories of progress, and fighting online misinformation \n\nHere are some links and other stuff we cover\n\n\nFollow Saloni on Twitter: https://twitter.com/salonium\nWhy Saloni started the Works in Progress magazine\n[Overleaf](overleaf.com), for writing papers in LaTeX \nHow science will benefit from the division of labour \nPublic writing vs. scientific writing\nWhy has behavioral science not been very useful in curbing the pandemic?\nA paper suggested a link between digit ratio (2D:4D) and sex differences in COVID fatalities, and another paper debunking this claim \nA paper suggesting baldness is a coronavirus risk factor, without controlling for age \nShould peer-review be abolished altogether? Paper link\nThe Japanese mathematician who solved an \"impossible\" conjecture and posted the papers on his website \nReforms are more likely by work by chipping away at smaller problems, rather trying to fix everyting \nGoogle dataset search https://datasetsearch.research.google.com/\nThe COVIDfaq.co website\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nBuy our Merch here: https://everything-hertz-podcast.creator-spring.com/\n\n\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, February 15) \"126: The division of scientific labor (with Saloni Dattani)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VJA4SSpecial Guest: Saloni Dattani.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe have a wide-ranging chat with Saloni Dattani (Kings College London and University of Hong Kong) about the benefits of dividing scientific labor, the magazine she co-founded (Works in Progress) that shares novel ideas and stories of progress, and fighting online misinformation \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere are some links and other stuff we cover\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFollow Saloni on Twitter: \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/salonium\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/salonium\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy Saloni started the \u003ca href=\"https://worksinprogress.co/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eWorks in Progress\u003c/a\u003e magazine\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Overleaf](overleaf.com), for writing papers in LaTeX \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow science will benefit from the division of labour \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePublic writing vs. scientific writing\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy has behavioral science not been very useful in curbing the pandemic?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378378220302929\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eA paper\u003c/a\u003e suggested a link between digit ratio (2D:4D) and sex differences in COVID fatalities, and \u003ca href=\"https://psyarxiv.com/ht74e/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eanother paper\u003c/a\u003e debunking this claim \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/factcheck-are-bald-men-at-greater-risk-of-severe-coronavirus-illness\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eA paper\u003c/a\u003e suggesting baldness is a coronavirus risk factor, without controlling for age \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould peer-review be abolished altogether? Paper \u003ca href=\"https://academic.oup.com/bjps/advance-article/doi/10.1093/bjps/axz029/5526887\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003elink\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/math-mystery-shinichi-mochizuki-and-the-impenetrable-proof/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJapanese mathematician\u003c/a\u003e who solved an \u0026quot;impossible\u0026quot; conjecture and posted the papers on his website \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eReforms are more likely by work by chipping away at smaller problems, rather trying to fix everyting \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGoogle dataset search \u003ca href=\"https://datasetsearch.research.google.com/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://datasetsearch.research.google.com/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe COVIDfaq.co website\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eBuy our Merch here: \u003ca href=\"https://everything-hertz-podcast.creator-spring.com/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://everything-hertz-podcast.creator-spring.com/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, February 15) \u0026quot;126: The division of scientific labor (with Saloni Dattani)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VJA4S\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Saloni Dattani.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We have a wide-ranging chat with Saloni Dattani (Kings College London and University of Hong Kong) about the benefits of dividing scientific labor, the magazine she co-founded (Works in Progress) that shares novel ideas and stories of progress, and fighting online misinformation ","date_published":"2021-02-15T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/86121b0a-2f20-4722-872a-9c802aad8005.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":37600966,"duration_in_seconds":3133}]},{"id":"200fb190-dd3b-4208-a8d8-aa46c7d591fe","title":"125: Upon reasonable request","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/125","content_text":"Dan has a blue-sky proposal to increase data sharing—that funders mandate scholars to store and analyse data on their servers for which the funder decides what constitutes a reasonable data request (among other benefits)\n\nOther stuff covered:\n\n\nWe return with part 2 of \"overrated/underrated/appropately rated\", in which James throws nouns  at Dan and he responds with whether these things are overrated, underrated, or appropately rated.\nJoe Hilgard's blog post\nDan' proposal that funders should require all funded researchers to store and perform their analysis on a central server, which would make it easier to share data, and then the funder could decide what \"upon reasonable request\" means, not the reseacher or the instution\nLong term vs. short term reform efforts\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, February 1) \"125: Upon reasonable request \", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HR5JA","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan has a blue-sky proposal to increase data sharing—that funders mandate scholars to store and analyse data on their servers for which the funder decides what constitutes a reasonable data request (among other benefits)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOther stuff covered:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe return with part 2 of \u0026quot;overrated/underrated/appropately rated\u0026quot;, in which James throws nouns  at Dan and he responds with whether these things are overrated, underrated, or appropately rated.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJoe Hilgard\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"http://crystalprisonzone.blogspot.com/2021/01/i-tried-to-report-scientific-misconduct.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eblog post\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan\u0026#39; proposal that funders should require all funded researchers to store and perform their analysis on a central server, which would make it easier to share data, and then the funder could decide what \u0026quot;upon reasonable request\u0026quot; means, not the reseacher or the instution\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLong term vs. short term reform efforts\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, February 1) \u0026quot;125: Upon reasonable request \u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HR5JA\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan has a blue-sky proposal to increase data sharing—that funders mandate scholars to store and analyse data on their servers for which the funder decides what constitutes a reasonable data request (among other benefits)","date_published":"2021-02-01T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/200fb190-dd3b-4208-a8d8-aa46c7d591fe.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":33824600,"duration_in_seconds":2818}]},{"id":"c3ed69f9-39d6-41c7-951e-6c243313c7c3","title":"124: From Ptolemy to Takeshi's Castle","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/124","content_text":"We discuss under which circumstances retracting decades-old articles is worth the time. We also chat about why LinkenIn is underrated (yes, really) and special journal issues are overrated.\n\nA more specific list of topics and links:\n\n\nWe play a game of \"overated/underated\", in which Dan has a list of stuff that he asks James whether these things are overrated or underated (or appropiated rated)\nWhy LinkedIn is underated\nGraphical abstracts are underrated\nOnline conferences are underrated\nAuthors should have the chance to wildly speculate (as long as it's marked as wild speculation)\nSourdough bread is so gorgeous that even hipsters can't ruin it\nSpecial journal themes are overrated\nShould we bother putting the energy into retracting old studies?\nThe retracted article that Eysenck co-authored, entitled “Coffee-Drinking and Personality as Factors in the Genesis of Cancer and Coronary Heart Disease”\nTHIS is Takeshi's Castle\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, January 18) \"124: From Ptolemy to Takeshi's Castle\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DG3PY","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe discuss under which circumstances retracting decades-old articles is worth the time. We also chat about why LinkenIn is underrated (yes, really) and special journal issues are overrated.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eA more specific list of topics and links:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe play a game of \u0026quot;overated/underated\u0026quot;, in which Dan has a list of stuff that he asks James whether these things are overrated or underated (or appropiated rated)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy LinkedIn is underated\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGraphical abstracts are underrated\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOnline conferences are underrated\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAuthors should have the chance to wildly speculate (as long as it\u0026#39;s marked as wild speculation)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSourdough bread is so gorgeous that even hipsters can\u0026#39;t ruin it\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpecial journal themes are overrated\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould we bother putting the energy into retracting old studies?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/512536\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eretracted article\u003c/a\u003e that Eysenck co-authored, entitled “Coffee-Drinking and Personality as Factors in the Genesis of Cancer and Coronary Heart Disease”\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://youtu.be/TNScPDSRCzI\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eTHIS\u003c/a\u003e is Takeshi\u0026#39;s Castle\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, January 18) \u0026quot;124: From Ptolemy to Takeshi\u0026#39;s Castle\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DG3PY\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We discuss under which circumstances retracting decades-old articles is worth the time. We also chat about why LinkenIn is underrated (yes, really) and special journal issues are overrated.","date_published":"2021-01-18T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/c3ed69f9-39d6-41c7-951e-6c243313c7c3.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":36924186,"duration_in_seconds":3077}]},{"id":"efe932b9-154a-4465-a3c9-1f55d26d4958","title":"123: Authenticated anonymity (with Michael Eisen)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/123","content_text":"Part two of our chat with Michael Eisen (eLife Editor-in-Cheif), in which we discuss the pros and cons of collaborative peer review, journal submission interfaces, Michael's take on James' proposal that peer reviewers should be paid $450 dollars, why negative comments on peer reviews need to be normalised, plus much more. \n\nSome more details:\n\n\nThe pros and cons of collaborative peer review (in which all peer reviewers discuss the paper after all individual peer reviews have been submitted \nHow technology can constrain journal operations\nThe strange engineered delay in paper reviews (I doesn't take 2-3 weeks to review a paper)\nMichael's proposal for a system in which people can nominate they have time in the near future to review a paper and then papers can be sent to them so they're rapidly reviewed\nJournal submission interfaces\nMichael's take on paying peer reviewers \nWho owns peer reviews?\nWould negative (anonomous or not) comments on an open peer review report penalise authors in the future?\nEvery paper gets negative peer-review comments, this doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad paper \nMichael proposes an explicit \"speculation\" section for papers, where authors get free reign to basically say whatever they want\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citationSpecial Guest:  Michael Eisen.Sponsored By:Scite: Scite is a new tool that helps researchers quickly see how a research paper has been cited and if it has been supported or disputed by subsequent research. Instead of just a list of titles, Scite shows you an excerpt of text from each citing article so you can easily see what each citing paper says.\r\n\r\nAs an Everything Hertz listener, you can get 30% off their premium package for 12 months, which gives you access to unlimited reports and reference checks. Use the coupon code \"HERTZ\" to claim this offer. This offer expires on Jan 1, 2021. Promo Code: HERTZ","content_html":"\u003cp\u003ePart two of our chat with Michael Eisen (eLife Editor-in-Cheif), in which we discuss the pros and cons of collaborative peer review, journal submission interfaces, Michael\u0026#39;s take on James\u0026#39; proposal that peer reviewers should be paid $450 dollars, why negative comments on peer reviews need to be normalised, plus much more. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome more details:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe pros and cons of collaborative peer review (in which all peer reviewers discuss the paper after all individual peer reviews have been submitted \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow technology can constrain journal operations\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe strange engineered delay in paper reviews (I doesn\u0026#39;t take 2-3 weeks to review a paper)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMichael\u0026#39;s proposal for a system in which people can nominate they have time in the near future to review a paper and then papers can be sent to them so they\u0026#39;re rapidly reviewed\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJournal submission interfaces\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMichael\u0026#39;s take on paying peer reviewers \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWho owns peer reviews?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWould negative (anonomous or not) comments on an open peer review report penalise authors in the future?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEvery paper gets negative peer-review comments, this doesn\u0026#39;t necessarily mean it\u0026#39;s a bad paper \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMichael proposes an explicit \u0026quot;speculation\u0026quot; section for papers, where authors get free reign to basically say whatever they want\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest:  Michael Eisen.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://scite.ai/\"\u003eScite\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://scite.ai/\"\u003eScite is a new tool that helps researchers quickly see how a research paper has been cited and if it has been supported or disputed by subsequent research. Instead of just a list of titles, Scite shows you an excerpt of text from each citing article so you can easily see what each citing paper says.\r\n\r\nAs an Everything Hertz listener, you can get 30% off their premium package for 12 months, which gives you access to unlimited reports and reference checks. Use the coupon code \u0026quot;HERTZ\u0026quot; to claim this offer. This offer expires on Jan 1, 2021.\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: HERTZ\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"Part two of our chat with Michael Eisen (eLife Editor-in-Cheif), in which we discuss the pros and cons of collaborative peer review, journal submission interfaces, Michael's take on James' proposal that peer reviewers should be paid $450 dollars, why negative comments on peer reviews need to be normalised, plus much more. ","date_published":"2021-01-04T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/efe932b9-154a-4465-a3c9-1f55d26d4958.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":38748891,"duration_in_seconds":3229}]},{"id":"a26b5e53-5e8c-4f94-826a-1dc75b35240b","title":"122: Reoptimizing scientific publishing for the internet age (with Michael Eisen) ","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/122","content_text":"The internet should have transformed science publishing, but it didn't. We chat with Michael Eisen (Editor-in-Chief of eLife) about reoptimizing scientific publishing and peer review for the internet age.\n\nHere what we cover and some links:\n\n\n How Michael co-founded PLOS\nThe book Dan mentioned on the history of the scientific journal \nWhy did eLife launch? What did it offer that other journals didn't?\nNature's recently proposed $11k article processing fee proposal\neLife's new \"author-driven publishing\" approach, in which all submitted papers have to be posted as preprints\nPart two of our conversation will be released on January 4, 2021\n\n\nOther links\n\n\nDan [on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\nJames [on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\nEverything Hertz [on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \nEverything Hertz [on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\nOur merch store, with mugs, shirts, hoodies + more\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\nOne dollar a month: a twenty percent discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- Five dollars a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, December 21) \"122: Reoptimizing scientific publishing for the internet age (with Michael Eisen)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/USYFCSpecial Guest:  Michael Eisen.Sponsored By:Scite: Scite is a new tool that helps researchers quickly see how a research paper has been cited and if it has been supported or disputed by subsequent research. Instead of just a list of titles, Scite shows you an excerpt of text from each citing article so you can easily see what each citing paper says.\r\n\r\nAs an Everything Hertz listener, you can get 30% off their premium package for 12 months, which gives you access to unlimited reports and reference checks. Use the coupon code \"HERTZ\" to claim this offer. This offer expires on Jan 1, 2021. Promo Code: HERTZ","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eThe internet should have transformed science publishing, but it didn\u0026#39;t. We chat with Michael Eisen (Editor-in-Chief of \u003ca href=\"https://elifesciences.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eeLife\u003c/a\u003e) about reoptimizing scientific publishing and peer review for the internet age.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere what we cover and some links:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e How Michael co-founded \u003ca href=\"https://plos.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ePLOS\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe book Dan mentioned on \u003ca href=\"https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo28179042.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ethe history of the scientific journal\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy did eLife launch? What did it offer that other journals didn\u0026#39;t?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNature\u0026#39;s recently proposed $11k article processing fee proposal\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eeLife\u0026#39;s new \u0026quot;\u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64910\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eauthor-driven publishing\u0026quot; approach\u003c/a\u003e, in which all submitted papers have to be posted as preprints\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePart two of our conversation will be released on January 4, 2021\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOther links\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan [on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames [on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverything Hertz [on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverything Hertz [on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur \u003ca href=\"https://everything-hertz-podcast.myteespring.co/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003emerch store\u003c/a\u003e, with mugs, shirts, hoodies + more\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOne dollar a month: a twenty percent discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- Five dollars a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, December 21) \u0026quot;122: Reoptimizing scientific publishing for the internet age (with Michael Eisen)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/USYFC\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest:  Michael Eisen.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://scite.ai/\"\u003eScite\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://scite.ai/\"\u003eScite is a new tool that helps researchers quickly see how a research paper has been cited and if it has been supported or disputed by subsequent research. Instead of just a list of titles, Scite shows you an excerpt of text from each citing article so you can easily see what each citing paper says.\r\n\r\nAs an Everything Hertz listener, you can get 30% off their premium package for 12 months, which gives you access to unlimited reports and reference checks. Use the coupon code \u0026quot;HERTZ\u0026quot; to claim this offer. This offer expires on Jan 1, 2021.\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: HERTZ\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"The internet should have transformed science publishing, but it didn't. We chat with Michael Eisen (Editor-in-Chief of eLife) about reoptimizing scientific publishing and peer review for the internet age","date_published":"2020-12-21T07:45:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/a26b5e53-5e8c-4f94-826a-1dc75b35240b.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":28849528,"duration_in_seconds":2404}]},{"id":"16bfab64-a21a-43e0-a336-22a48c8dead6","title":"121: Transparent peer review","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/121","content_text":"Dan and James discuss the pros and cons of transparent peer-review, in which peer review reports are published alongside manuscripts, as a keynote feature at the recent Munin Conference on scholarly publishing.\n\nHere's what they cover and some links:\n\n\nWatch the video of this episode on the Everything Hertz YouTube page\nWhat is transparent peer-review?\nThe permanancy of open peer review reports\nCLOCKSS provides a sustainable dark archive to ensure the long-term survival of Web-based scholarly content \nOpen peer reviews provide additional info for historians\nWhat changes when you know that your review is going to be public?\nA Motte-and-bailey castle\nAn update and summary of the 450 movement\nInvolving patients/user representatives in the peer review and disemination process\nThe GRIM test\nWhat about the publication of peer review reports for papers that are rejected?\nThe mega-analysis paper that Dan and James were co-authors on\nThank you to the organisers of the Munin conference for the invitation!\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\nOne dollar a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- Five dollars a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, December 7) \"121: Transparent peer review\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/S2948Sponsored By:Scite: Scite is a new tool that helps researchers quickly see how a research paper has been cited and if it has been supported or disputed by subsequent research. Instead of just a list of titles, Scite shows you an excerpt of text from each citing article so you can easily see what each citing paper says.\r\n\r\nAs an Everything Hertz listener, you can get 30% off their premium package for 12 months, which gives you access to unlimited reports and reference checks. Use the coupon code \"HERTZ\" to claim this offer. This offer expires on Jan 1, 2021. Promo Code: HERTZ","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss the pros and cons of transparent peer-review, in which peer review reports are published alongside manuscripts, as a keynote feature at the recent Munin Conference on scholarly publishing.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what they cover and some links:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWatch \u003ca href=\"https://youtu.be/1Xp3IXaq970\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ethe video of this episode\u003c/a\u003e on the Everything Hertz YouTube page\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat is transparent peer-review?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe permanancy of open peer review reports\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://clockss.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eCLOCKSS\u003c/a\u003e provides a sustainable dark archive to ensure the long-term survival of Web-based scholarly content \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOpen peer reviews provide additional info for historians\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat changes when you know that your review is going to be public?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_castle\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eMotte-and-bailey castle\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAn update and summary of \u003ca href=\"https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/the-450-movement-1f86132a29bd\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ethe 450 movement\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eInvolving patients/user representatives in the peer review and disemination process\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GRIM_test\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eGRIM test\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat about the publication of peer review reports for papers that are rejected?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/psyp.13688\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003emega-analysis paper\u003c/a\u003e that Dan and James were co-authors on\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThank you to the organisers of the Munin conference for the invitation!\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOne dollar a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- Five dollars a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, December 7) \u0026quot;121: Transparent peer review\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/S2948\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://scite.ai/\"\u003eScite\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://scite.ai/\"\u003eScite is a new tool that helps researchers quickly see how a research paper has been cited and if it has been supported or disputed by subsequent research. Instead of just a list of titles, Scite shows you an excerpt of text from each citing article so you can easily see what each citing paper says.\r\n\r\nAs an Everything Hertz listener, you can get 30% off their premium package for 12 months, which gives you access to unlimited reports and reference checks. Use the coupon code \u0026quot;HERTZ\u0026quot; to claim this offer. This offer expires on Jan 1, 2021.\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: HERTZ\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss the pros and cons of transparent peer-review, in which peer review reports are published alongside manuscripts, as a keynote feature at the recent Munin Conference on scholarly publishing.","date_published":"2020-12-07T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/16bfab64-a21a-43e0-a336-22a48c8dead6.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":41466357,"duration_in_seconds":3455}]},{"id":"050bbc47-e6a1-436f-8283-c7e836a008d5","title":"120: How false beliefs spread in science (with Cailin O'Connor)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/120","content_text":"Dan and James chat with Cailin O'Connor (University of California, Irvine) about the how false beliefs spread in science and remedies for this issue\n\nHere's what they cover:\n\n\nWhy should psychologist scientists learn about the philosophy of science?\nCailin's new preprint on error propogation that she co-authrored \nBoyd and Richerson's \"Culture and the Evolutionary Process\" book\nEpisode 91 with Kristin Sainani that discussed magnitude based inference\nChristie Aschwanden on Magnitude Based Inference\nThe Misinformation age, co-authored by Cailin\nCailin's paper on the retraction of scientific papers\nWith Scite, you can be alterted whether a given paper has been retracted\nWhere should you start if you're interested in the philosophy of science?\nScience as social knowledge, by Helen Longino\nCailin's on Twitter and you should also check out her website\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, November 16) \"120: How false beliefs spread in science (with Cailin O'Connor\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/6S8TBSpecial Guest: Cailin O'Connor.Sponsored By:Scite: Scite is a new tool that helps researchers quickly see how a research paper has been cited and if it has been supported or disputed by subsequent research. Instead of just a list of titles, Scite shows you an excerpt of text from each citing article so you can easily see what each citing paper says.\r\n\r\nAs an Everything Hertz listener, you can get 30% off their premium package for 12 months, which gives you access to unlimited reports and reference checks. Use the coupon code \"HERTZ\" to claim this offer. This offer expires on Jan 1, 2021. Promo Code: HERTZ","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James chat with Cailin O\u0026#39;Connor (University of California, Irvine) about the how false beliefs spread in science and remedies for this issue\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy should psychologist scientists learn about the philosophy of science?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCailin\u0026#39;s new preprint on error propogation that she co-authrored \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBoyd and Richerson\u0026#39;s \u0026quot;\u003ca href=\"https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo5970597.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eCulture and the Evolutionary Process\u0026quot; book\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/91\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEpisode 91 with Kristin Sainani\u003c/a\u003e that discussed magnitude based inference\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-shoddy-statistics-found-a-home-in-sports-research/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eChristie Aschwanden\u003c/a\u003e on Magnitude Based Inference\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300234015/misinformation-age\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eThe Misinformation age\u003c/a\u003e, co-authored by Cailin\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCailin\u0026#39;s paper on the \u003ca href=\"http://cailinoconnor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Retractions_in_Epistemic_Networks-2.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eretraction of scientific papers\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWith Scite, you can be alterted whether a given paper has been retracted\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhere should you start if you\u0026#39;re interested in the philosophy of science?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691020518/science-as-social-knowledge\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eScience as social knowledge\u003c/a\u003e, by Helen Longino\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCailin\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/cailinmeister\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eon Twitter\u003c/a\u003e and you should also check out \u003ca href=\"http://cailinoconnor.com/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eher website\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, November 16) \u0026quot;120: How false beliefs spread in science (with Cailin O\u0026#39;Connor\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/6S8TB\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Cailin O\u0026#39;Connor.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://scite.ai/\"\u003eScite\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://scite.ai/\"\u003eScite is a new tool that helps researchers quickly see how a research paper has been cited and if it has been supported or disputed by subsequent research. Instead of just a list of titles, Scite shows you an excerpt of text from each citing article so you can easily see what each citing paper says.\r\n\r\nAs an Everything Hertz listener, you can get 30% off their premium package for 12 months, which gives you access to unlimited reports and reference checks. Use the coupon code \u0026quot;HERTZ\u0026quot; to claim this offer. This offer expires on Jan 1, 2021.\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: HERTZ\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"Dan and James chat with Cailin O'Connor (University of California, Irvine) about the how false beliefs spread in science and remedies for this issue","date_published":"2020-11-16T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/050bbc47-e6a1-436f-8283-c7e836a008d5.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":34153116,"duration_in_seconds":2846}]},{"id":"b41c69ec-bd02-4ce9-a071-4d0edeb5c689","title":"119: Rules of thumb","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/119","content_text":"Dan and James discuss how rules of thumbs in science, such as those often applied to sample sizes and effect sizes, lead to mindless research evaluation.\n\nMore info and links:\n\n\nIs there any justifcation for holding back the public posting of data becuase you're not done with your analyses\nWe have a new episode partner, Scite!\nScite helps researchers quickly see how a research paper has been cited and if it has been supported or disputed by subsequent research\nGet a 30% discount on a 12-month Premium Scite subscription. Use the coupon code: HERTZ (offer expires January 1, 2021)\nLake Wobegon, were all the children are above average\nThe tweet from Marco Altini about his desk-rejected manuscript\nSample size rules-of-thumb\nEffect size rules-of-thumb\nDan's effect size distribution paper (Here's the preprint if you don't have access to the paywalled version)\nWe have a live episode scheduled for the 18 November (4pm CET) as part of the Munin Conference on Scholarly Publising \n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, November 2) \"119: Rules of thumb\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UMXR7Sponsored By:Scite: Scite is a new tool that helps researchers quickly see how a research paper has been cited and if it has been supported or disputed by subsequent research. Instead of just a list of titles, Scite shows you an excerpt of text from each citing article so you can easily see what each citing paper says.\r\n\r\nAs an Everything Hertz listener, you can get 30% off their premium package for 12 months, which gives you access to unlimited reports and reference checks. Use the coupon code \"HERTZ\" to claim this offer. This offer expires on Jan 1, 2021. Promo Code: HERTZ","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss how rules of thumbs in science, such as those often applied to sample sizes and effect sizes, lead to mindless research evaluation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMore info and links:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIs there any justifcation for holding back the public posting of data becuase you\u0026#39;re not done with your analyses\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe have a new episode partner, \u003ca href=\"https://scite.ai/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eScite\u003c/a\u003e!\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScite helps researchers quickly see how a research paper has been cited and if it has been supported or disputed by subsequent research\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGet a 30% discount on a 12-month Premium Scite subscription. Use the coupon code: HERTZ (offer expires January 1, 2021)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Wobegon\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLake Wobegon\u003c/a\u003e, were all the children are above average\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/altini_marco/status/1321432168216858625\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etweet from Marco Altini\u003c/a\u003e about his desk-rejected manuscript\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSample size rules-of-thumb\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEffect size rules-of-thumb\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27914167/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eeffect size distribution paper\u003c/a\u003e (Here\u0026#39;s the \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/5y55v/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epreprint\u003c/a\u003e if you don\u0026#39;t have access to the paywalled version)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe have a live episode scheduled for the 18 November (4pm CET) as part of the \u003ca href=\"https://site.uit.no/muninconf/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eMunin Conference on Scholarly Publising\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, November 2) \u0026quot;119: Rules of thumb\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UMXR7\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://scite.ai/\"\u003eScite\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://scite.ai/\"\u003eScite is a new tool that helps researchers quickly see how a research paper has been cited and if it has been supported or disputed by subsequent research. Instead of just a list of titles, Scite shows you an excerpt of text from each citing article so you can easily see what each citing paper says.\r\n\r\nAs an Everything Hertz listener, you can get 30% off their premium package for 12 months, which gives you access to unlimited reports and reference checks. Use the coupon code \u0026quot;HERTZ\u0026quot; to claim this offer. This offer expires on Jan 1, 2021.\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: HERTZ\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss how rules of thumbs in science, such as those often applied to sample sizes and effect sizes, lead to mindless research evaluation","date_published":"2020-11-02T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b41c69ec-bd02-4ce9-a071-4d0edeb5c689.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":40880796,"duration_in_seconds":3406}]},{"id":"cbcff247-7f77-4ab6-9cd1-25ee63572458","title":"118: Evidence-free gatekeeping","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/118","content_text":"Dan and James answer audio listener questions on the worst review comments they've received (and how the responded), their thoughts on the current state of preprints, and how institutional prestige influences researcher evaluations.\n\nOther points and links:\n\n\nSend in your audio question at our website\nListen to our episode with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti, on memes, TikTok, and science communication\nThe worst peer reviewers we have received\nHow do we respond to bad peer review comments\nThe Research Square preprint server\nThe current state of preprints\nThe 'readiness scale' paper at Nature Human Behavior\nHow the prestige of one's institition affects how they are assessed \nThe mathematician Grigori Perelman, who declined the Fields medal \nThe Laboratory Life book\nDouble-blinded peer-review\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, October 19) \"118: Evidence-free gatekeeping\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/RAVXK","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James answer audio listener questions on the worst review comments they\u0026#39;ve received (and how the responded), their thoughts on the current state of preprints, and how institutional prestige influences researcher evaluations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOther points and links:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSend in your audio question at \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/audio-question\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eour website\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eListen to our \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/107\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eepisode with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti\u003c/a\u003e, on memes, TikTok, and science communication\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe worst peer reviewers we have received\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow do we respond to bad peer review comments\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.researchsquare.com/publishers/in-review\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eResearch Square\u003c/a\u003e preprint server\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe current state of preprints\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://rdcu.be/b8G3m\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e\u0026#39;readiness scale\u0026#39; paper\u003c/a\u003e at Nature Human Behavior\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow the prestige of one\u0026#39;s institition affects how they are assessed \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe mathematician \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grigori_Perelman\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eGrigori Perelman\u003c/a\u003e, who declined the \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fields_Medal\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eFields medal\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Laboratory Life \u003ca href=\"https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691028323/laboratory-life\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDouble-blinded peer-review\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, October 19) \u0026quot;118: Evidence-free gatekeeping\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/RAVXK\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James answer audio listener questions on the worst review comments they've received (and how the responded), their thoughts on the current state of preprints, and how institutional prestige influences researcher evaluations.","date_published":"2020-10-19T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/cbcff247-7f77-4ab6-9cd1-25ee63572458.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":46475598,"duration_in_seconds":3872}]},{"id":"35c7fecb-e304-46f9-96ce-9336bea3af7c","title":"117: How we peer-review papers","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/117","content_text":"Dan and James choose a preprint and walk through how they would peer-review it. James also provides an update on his recent proposal that scientists should be paid for performing peer reviews for journals published by for-profit companies\n\nSpecific links and topics:\n\n\nAn update on the 450 movement, which proposes that scientists should be paid for performing peer reviews for journals published by for-profit companies\nYou should follow Overly Honest Editor on Twitter\nThe Volkswagen fellowships \nEmma Mills, from Lancaster University, asks us how we review papers\nWe review this paper: \"Direct perception of other people’s heart rate\"\nThe tweet from Maarten van Smeeden on data simulation\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, October 5) \"117: How we peer-review papers\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7JHFP","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James choose a preprint and walk through how they would peer-review it. James also provides an update on his recent proposal that scientists should be paid for performing peer reviews for journals published by for-profit companies\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSpecific links and topics:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAn update on the \u003ca href=\"https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/the-450-movement-1f86132a29bd\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e450 movement\u003c/a\u003e, which proposes that scientists should be paid for performing peer reviews for journals published by for-profit companies\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYou should follow \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/Edit0r_At_Large\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eOverly Honest Editor\u003c/a\u003e on Twitter\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.volkswagenstiftung.de/en/funding/our-funding-portfolio-at-a-glance/freigeist-fellowships\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eVolkswagen fellowships\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.research.lancs.ac.uk/portal/en/people/emma-mills(edc1db6a-ca34-4086-b16f-95dd24534887).html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eEmma Mills\u003c/a\u003e, from Lancaster University, asks us how we review papers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe review this paper: \u0026quot;\u003ca href=\"https://psyarxiv.com/7f9pq\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDirect perception of other people’s heart rate\u003c/a\u003e\u0026quot;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/MaartenvSmeden/status/1310210069779316737?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etweet from Maarten van Smeeden\u003c/a\u003e on data simulation\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, October 5) \u0026quot;117: How we peer-review papers\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7JHFP\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James choose a preprint and walk through how they would peer-review it. James also provides an update on his recent proposal that scientists should be paid for performing peer reviews for journals published by for-profit companies","date_published":"2020-10-05T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/35c7fecb-e304-46f9-96ce-9336bea3af7c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":46684055,"duration_in_seconds":3890}]},{"id":"4ca2ac44-6658-4549-8716-491e6f1dd193","title":"116: In my opinion","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/116","content_text":"Dan and James chat about a recent twitter discussion on open science funding and the benefits of Editors sharing their opinions online. James also shares three project proposals that he thinks deserves funding, which Dan ranks.\n\nOther stuff...\n\n\nThe Twitter thread from Tage Rai on conflicts of interest in funding on science \nThe Raytheon Amphitheater at Northeastern University\nHow Nature Human Behavior evaluates your mansucripts, from episode 105.\nGood and bad experiences with Frontiers journals\nA contract for getting paid for reviews\nGet access to our Patreon newsletter\nThe peer-review process at eLife\nJames' three grant proposal ideas\nThe taxi story [Story in Norwegian but Google translate does a good enough job]\nPsycoPy \nThe eyetracker that's 100x cheaper than commercial eyetrackers \nAds in R package load up messages\nChat about this episode on the Git Gud Science Discord server\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, September 21) \"116: In my opinion\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WT46Z","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James chat about a recent twitter discussion on open science funding and the benefits of Editors sharing their opinions online. James also shares three project proposals that he thinks deserves funding, which Dan ranks.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOther stuff...\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/tage_rai/status/1304985745157914624?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eTwitter thread\u003c/a\u003e from Tage Rai on conflicts of interest in funding on science \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"http://www.northeastern.edu/egan/raytheon.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eRaytheon Amphitheater\u003c/a\u003e at Northeastern University\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow \u003ca href=\"https://rdcu.be/b7otB\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eNature Human Behavior evaluates your mansucripts\u003c/a\u003e, from episode \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/105\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e105\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGood and bad experiences with Frontiers journals\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/5ey8g/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003econtract\u003c/a\u003e for getting paid for reviews\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGet access to our \u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ePatreon newsletter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://reviewer.elifesciences.org/reviewer-guide/review-process\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epeer-review process\u003c/a\u003e at eLife\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; three grant proposal ideas\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/i/21LV4B/topp-professor-tok-taxi-for-en-halv-mill-paa-det-offentliges-regning\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eThe taxi story\u003c/a\u003e [Story in Norwegian but Google translate does a good enough job]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.psychopy.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ePsycoPy\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe eyetracker that\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://rdcu.be/b7s0q\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e100x cheaper\u003c/a\u003e than commercial eyetrackers \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAds in R package load up messages\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChat about this episode on the \u003ca href=\"https://discord.gg/n7ty4EQ\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eGit Gud Science Discord server\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, September 21) \u0026quot;116: In my opinion\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WT46Z\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James chat about a recent twitter discussion on open science funding and the benefits of Editors sharing their opinions online. James also outlines three project proposals that he thinks deserves funding, which Dan ranks.","date_published":"2020-09-21T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/4ca2ac44-6658-4549-8716-491e6f1dd193.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":55611663,"duration_in_seconds":4634}]},{"id":"631eb613-033c-4596-acb1-727e32ce211d","title":"115: A modest proposal","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/115","content_text":"We discuss James' recent proposal that scientists should be paid for performing peer review for journals published by for-profit companies—$450, to be precise. Dan also puts forward three meta-science projects that he thinks are worth funding. \n\nMore details\n\n\nJames' tweet proposing peer review should be compensated \nSince recording this episode, James has set up the @450Movement twitter account\nAlso see James' blog post\nThe Collabra Psychology journal\nDid the folks that co-authored the \"redefine statistical sigificance\" paper actually go on to follow their own recommendations?\nWould high financial compensation of people on job search panels lead to better quality hires?\nA tool that would automatically scrape the email addresses the of authors of papers you cite would make life easier for asking for feedback and providing review recommendations.\nI'm curious as to whether people are reading the show notes. If you are reading this and want a Hertz mug, the first person to send @hertzpodcast a tweet saying they read the show notes will get a free mug\nKristoffer Magnusson's statstics art\nJoin the Git Gud Science Discord by following this link: https://discord.gg/s8MN3gA\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\n- Save 16% on either tier if you pay annually!\n\nEpisode citation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, September 7) \"115: A modest proposal\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4ZQ2E","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe discuss James\u0026#39; recent proposal that scientists should be paid for performing peer review for journals published by for-profit companies—$450, to be precise. Dan also puts forward three meta-science projects that he thinks are worth funding. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMore details\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/jamesheathers/status/1301533455520608256?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames\u0026#39; tweet\u003c/a\u003e proposing peer review should be compensated \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSince recording this episode, James has set up the \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/450movement\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e@450Movement twitter account\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlso see \u003ca href=\"https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/the-450-movement-1f86132a29bd\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJames\u0026#39; blog post\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.collabra.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eCollabra Psychology\u003c/a\u003e journal\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDid the folks that co-authored the \u0026quot;\u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0189-z\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eredefine statistical sigificance\u003c/a\u003e\u0026quot; paper actually go on to follow their own recommendations?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWould high financial compensation of people on job search panels lead to better quality hires?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA tool that would automatically scrape the email addresses the of authors of papers you cite would make life easier for asking for feedback and providing review recommendations.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eI\u0026#39;m curious as to whether people are reading the show notes. If you are reading this and want a Hertz mug, the first person to send \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e@hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e a tweet saying they read the show notes will get a free mug\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKristoffer Magnusson\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://rpsychologist.com/viz\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003estatstics art\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJoin the Git Gud Science Discord by following this link: \u003ca href=\"https://discord.gg/s8MN3gA\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://discord.gg/s8MN3gA\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- Save 16% on either tier if you pay annually!\u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, September 7) \u0026quot;115: A modest proposal\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4ZQ2E\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We discuss James' recent proposal that scientists should be paid for performing peer review for journals published by for-profit companies—$450, to be precise. Dan also puts forward three meta-science projects that he thinks are worth funding. ","date_published":"2020-09-07T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/631eb613-033c-4596-acb1-727e32ce211d.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":43276643,"duration_in_seconds":3606}]},{"id":"698e1774-9221-4f7a-80b8-54546b3ba1e4","title":"114: Diversity in science (with Jess Wade)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/114","content_text":"We chat with Jess Wade (Imperial College London) about diversity issues in science, including her work increasing the profile of underrepresented scientists on Wikipedia and on getting more young women into science.\n\nHere's what we cover:\n\n\nJess' Wikipedia page\nInferior, by Angela Saini\nWhat's involved when making a bio page?\nThe \"notability\" criteria for adding a scientist's bio on wikipedia\nListen to Wikipedia grow on Hatnote\nDon't write your own page, even under a psuedonym. \nWhat's the best way to get girls into science and engineering?\nThe lack of diversity in science award winners\nFollow Jess on Twitter!\nThe opportunuties provided by social media\nUsing social media to scope out new labs\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, August 16) \"114: Diversity in Science (with Jess Wade)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/A6VMU Special Guest: Jess Wade.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat with Jess Wade (Imperial College London) about diversity issues in science, including her work increasing the profile of underrepresented scientists on Wikipedia and on getting more young women into science.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what we cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJess\u0026#39; \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jess_Wade\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eWikipedia page\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/553867/inferior-by-angela-saini/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eInferior\u003c/a\u003e, by Angela Saini\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat\u0026#39;s involved when making a bio page?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u0026quot;notability\u0026quot; criteria for adding a scientist\u0026#39;s bio on wikipedia\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eListen to Wikipedia grow on \u003ca href=\"http://listen.hatnote.com/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eHatnote\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDon\u0026#39;t write your own page, even under a psuedonym. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat\u0026#39;s the best way to get girls into science and engineering?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe lack of diversity in science award winners\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFollow \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/jesswade\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJess on Twitter\u003c/a\u003e!\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe opportunuties provided by social media\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing social media to scope out new labs\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003e- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, August 16) \u0026quot;114: Diversity in Science (with Jess Wade)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/A6VMU \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Jess Wade.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat with Jess Wade (Imperial College London) about diversity issues in science, including her work increasing the profile of underrepresented scientists on Wikipedia and on getting more young women into science.","date_published":"2020-08-17T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/698e1774-9221-4f7a-80b8-54546b3ba1e4.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":38683062,"duration_in_seconds":3223}]},{"id":"32c58e2d-f02e-461d-8f37-68dd70acda22","title":"113: Citation needed","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/113","content_text":"Dan and James discuss whether scientists should spend more time creating and editing Wikipedia articles. They also chat about how they read scientific articles and the heuristics they use to help decide whether a paper's worth their time.\n\nHere are some more details and links:\n\n\nSend in your audio questions here\nHow does James read so much and what tips do Dan and James have for reading papers?\nThe Stork paper recommendation service\nHow James and Dan rapidly judge whether a paper is worth the time to read\nThe benefit of a memorable paper title\nPeer review forces you to read papers carefully\nJames screens a few papers for further reading on the spot based on their titles\nWhat is the role of Wikipedia in science communication and education?\nJess Wade's project advocating for better representation of female scientists on Wikipedia\nWikipedia articles vs. textbooks\nDo we even need textbooks in psychology?\nThe Biological Psychology wiki textbook is a ghost town \nUsing the R bookdown package for online books\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, August 3) \"113: Citation needed\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3D6YJ","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss whether scientists should spend more time creating and editing Wikipedia articles. They also chat about how they read scientific articles and the heuristics they use to help decide whether a paper\u0026#39;s worth their time.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere are some more details and links:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSend in your audio questions \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/audio-question\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow does James read so much and what tips do Dan and James have for reading papers?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.storkapp.me/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eStork\u003c/a\u003e paper recommendation service\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow James and Dan rapidly judge whether a paper is worth the time to read\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe benefit of a memorable paper title\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeer review forces you to read papers carefully\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames screens a few papers for further reading \u003cstrong\u003eon the spot\u003c/strong\u003e based on their titles\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat is the role of Wikipedia in science communication and education?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/jesswade\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJess Wade\u0026#39;s\u003c/a\u003e project advocating for better representation of female scientists on Wikipedia\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWikipedia articles vs. textbooks\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDo we even need textbooks in psychology?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Biological_Psychology\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eBiological Psychology wiki textbook\u003c/a\u003e is a ghost town \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing the \u003ca href=\"https://bookdown.org/home/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eR bookdown package\u003c/a\u003e for online books\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, August 3) \u0026quot;113: Citation needed\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3D6YJ\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss whether scientists should spend more time creating and editing Wikipedia articles. They also chat about how they read scientific articles and the heuristics they use to help decide whether a paper's worth their time","date_published":"2020-08-03T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/32c58e2d-f02e-461d-8f37-68dd70acda22.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":38299376,"duration_in_seconds":3191}]},{"id":"24408ba7-9862-413f-b2f9-e40c72e39fb6","title":"112: Leaving academia","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/112","content_text":"Dan and James chat about James' new industry job, why he quit academia, the biggest differences between academia and industry, and why it's crucial for early career researchers to have a plan B.\n\n\nJames new industry job\nJames' medium blog post \nHaving a plan B (and plan C) in academia\nUsing consulting a bridge to a full-time industry job\nHow to get an industry job\nThe role of grant success in academia\nMore research is now open access than not\nGet 20% off our merch by using the promo code \"AUGUST\"\nIt's now easier to not be employed in academia but still contribute to academia \nThe NBA bubble\nThe Oura ring\nDifferences in work/life balance between academia and industry\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nCite this episode\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, July 27) \"112: Leaving academia\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DAZ7S","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James chat about James\u0026#39; new industry job, why he quit academia, the biggest differences between academia and industry, and why it\u0026#39;s crucial for early career researchers to have a plan B.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames new industry job\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; \u003ca href=\"https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/i-quit-be062295f638\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003emedium blog post\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHaving a plan B (and plan C) in academia\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing consulting a bridge to a full-time industry job\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow to get an industry job\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe role of grant success in academia\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMore research is now open access than not\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGet 20% off \u003ca href=\"https://teespring.com/en-GB/stores/everything-hertz-podcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eour merch\u003c/a\u003e by using the promo code \u0026quot;AUGUST\u0026quot;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIt\u0026#39;s now easier to not be employed in academia but still \u003cem\u003econtribute\u003c/em\u003e to academia \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://slate.com/culture/2020/07/nba-bubble-coronavirus-orlando-life.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eNBA bubble\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://ouraring.com/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eOura ring\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDifferences in work/life balance between academia and industry\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCite this episode\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, July 27) \u0026quot;112: Leaving academia\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DAZ7S\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James chat about James' new industry job, why he quit academia, the biggest differences between academia and industry, and why it's crucial for early career researchers to have a plan B.","date_published":"2020-07-27T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/24408ba7-9862-413f-b2f9-e40c72e39fb6.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":36811964,"duration_in_seconds":3067}]},{"id":"9479927c-0334-49fb-9a34-d400235b5479","title":"111: The cumulative advantage of academic capital (with Chris Jackson)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/111","content_text":"We chat with Chris Jackson (Imperial College, London) about the \"Matthew Effect\" in academia, how we can improve work/balance, and whether we should stop citing shitty people.\n\nHere's more stuff we cover:\n\n\nChris climbed the world's most dangerous volcano for a BBC show\nChris' email signature \nHaving a code of conduct for your lab\nWork/life balance in academia\nAre things worse in academia compared to other desk jobs?\nHow Chris co-founded \"EarthArxiv\", a preprint server for the earth sciences\nThe point/counterpoint article format (here is an example)\nOpen science in the geosciences\nRequesting data from authors\nFollow Chris on Twitter\nIssues with bibliometrics\nShould we stop citing shitty people?\nThe long wait to get your work expenses reiumbursed \n\n\nOther links\n\n\nDan on twitter\nJames on [twitter]((https://twitter.com/jamesheathers)\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on [Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nCite this episode\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, July 6) \"111: The cumulative advantage of academic capital (with Chris Jackson)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KJ76GSpecial Guest: Chris Jackson.Sponsored By:Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz Promo Code: everythinghertz","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat with Chris Jackson (Imperial College, London) about the \u0026quot;Matthew Effect\u0026quot; in academia, how we can improve work/balance, and whether we should stop citing shitty people.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s more stuff we cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChris climbed the world\u0026#39;s most dangerous volcano for a \u003ca href=\"https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b09hlzbb\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eBBC show\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChris\u0026#39; email signature \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHaving a code of conduct for your lab\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWork/life balance in academia\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAre things worse in academia compared to other desk jobs?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow Chris co-founded \u0026quot;EarthArxiv\u0026quot;, a preprint server for the earth sciences\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe point/counterpoint article format (\u003ca href=\"https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/japplphysiol.00604.2017\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e is an example)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOpen science in the geosciences\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRequesting data from authors\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFollow Chris \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/seis_matters\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eon Twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIssues with bibliometrics\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould we stop citing shitty people?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe long wait to get your work expenses reiumbursed \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan on \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etwitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames on [twitter]((\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverything Hertz on \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etwitter\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverything Hertz on [Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCite this episode\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, July 6) \u0026quot;111: The cumulative advantage of academic capital (with Chris Jackson)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KJ76G\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Chris Jackson.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: everythinghertz\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"We chat with Chris Jackson (Imperial College, London) about the \"Matthew Effect\" in academia, how we can improve work/balance, and whether we should stop citing shitty people.","date_published":"2020-07-06T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/9479927c-0334-49fb-9a34-d400235b5479.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":43518955,"duration_in_seconds":3626}]},{"id":"2376639d-712c-4737-9cb5-2b3eb0756686","title":"110: Red flags for errors in papers","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/110","content_text":"We answer a listener question on identifying red flags for errors in papers. Is there a way to better equip peer-reviewers for spotting errors and suspicious data?\n\nMore details and links...\n\n\nWe answer an audio question from Kim Mitchell.\nSubmit your audio questions via our website\nNick Brown's blogpost on the video game \"study\"\nWe ran a live survey using Prolific! Go to prolific.com/everythinghertz to get $50 worth of credit for $1\nSpotting unlikely data in meta-analysis\nHow can make reviewers better at detecting errors in papers?\n Using a \"Red team\" to pull apart your papers\n What do lay people think really happens in peer review?\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nBuy our merch from our online store! We've got hats, mugs, hoodies, shirts + more \n\n\n\n\nCite this episode\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, June 15) \"110: Red flags for errors in papers\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VTYNGSponsored By:Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz Promo Code: everythinghertz","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe answer a listener question on identifying red flags for errors in papers. Is there a way to better equip peer-reviewers for spotting errors and suspicious data?\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMore details and links...\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe answer an audio question from \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/academicswrite\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eKim Mitchell\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSubmit your audio questions \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/audio-question\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003evia our website\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNick Brown\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"http://steamtraen.blogspot.com/2020/04/some-issues-in-recent-gaming-research.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eblogpost\u003c/a\u003e on the video game \u0026quot;study\u0026quot;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe ran a live survey using Prolific! Go to prolific.com/everythinghertz to get $50 worth of credit for $1\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpotting unlikely data in meta-analysis\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow can make reviewers better at detecting errors in papers?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Using a \u0026quot;\u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_team\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eRed team\u003c/a\u003e\u0026quot; to pull apart your papers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e What do lay people think \u003cem\u003ereally\u003c/em\u003e happens in peer review?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eBuy our merch from our \u003ca href=\"https://teespring.com/stores/everything-hertz-podcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eonline store\u003c/a\u003e! We\u0026#39;ve got hats, mugs, hoodies, shirts + more \u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cimg src=\"https://vangogh.teespring.com/v3/image/MMTLZXJvOr6yzbqO5k5mdkmfFhY/480/560.jpg\" alt=\"\"\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCite this episode\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, June 15) \u0026quot;110: Red flags for errors in papers\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VTYNG\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: everythinghertz\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"We answer a listener question on identifying red flags for errors in papers. Is there a way to better equip peer-reviewers for spotting errors and suspicious data?","date_published":"2020-06-15T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2376639d-712c-4737-9cb5-2b3eb0756686.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":33832124,"duration_in_seconds":2819}]},{"id":"238fe449-a33f-4a7d-91cb-5380466afef1","title":"109: Open scientific publishing [Live episode]","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/109","content_text":"Dan and James recorded a live episode on open publishing as part of the Open Publishing Fest. They also ran a survey (from start to finish) during the course of the episode on the public's perception of open scientific publishing and discuss the results.\n\nHere are more stuff they covered, plus links!\n\n\nThe Open Publishing Fest\nWe collected data LIVE thanks to Prolific! Go to prolific.co/everythinghertz to get $50 worth of credit for just $1\nHow to build a low cost book scanner\nA prepreprint repository for African researchers\nWhat is the role of \"niche\" preprint servers vs. general preprint servers?\nIs there a discoverability crisis?\nDetailed literature search is HARD\nThe Octopus publishing platform\nWe discuss the results of our real-time survey on the public's perception of open publishing\nSome university have set up a 'data office', to which data requests are sent to (instead of the author). Is this a good idea?\nAre people really doing that many coronavirus studies?\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\nWe have a Merch store too, where you can pick up some Hertz gear.\n\nCite this episode\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, June 1) \"109: Open scientific publishing [live episode]\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/AT2XHSponsored By:Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz Promo Code: everythinghertz","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James recorded a live episode on open publishing as part of the Open Publishing Fest. They also ran a survey (from start to finish) during the course of the episode on the public\u0026#39;s perception of open scientific publishing and discuss the results.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere are more stuff they covered, plus links!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://openpublishingfest.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eOpen Publishing Fest\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe collected data LIVE thanks to Prolific! Go to prolific.co/everythinghertz to get $50 worth of credit for just $1\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow to build a \u003ca href=\"https://goinggnu.wordpress.com/2020/04/20/making-of-kaniyam-scanbox-diy-scanner/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003elow cost book scanner\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA \u003ca href=\"https://info.africarxiv.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eprepreprint repository\u003c/a\u003e for African researchers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat is the role of \u0026quot;niche\u0026quot; preprint servers vs. general preprint servers?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIs there a discoverability crisis?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDetailed literature search is HARD\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://app.science-octopus.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eOctopus publishing platform\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe discuss the results of our real-time survey on the public\u0026#39;s perception of open publishing\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSome university have set up a \u0026#39;data office\u0026#39;, to which data requests are sent to (instead of the author). Is this a good idea?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAre people \u003cem\u003ereally\u003c/em\u003e doing that many coronavirus studies?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eWe have a \u003ca href=\"https://teespring.com/en-GB/stores/everything-hertz-podcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eMerch store too\u003c/a\u003e, where you can pick up some Hertz gear.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCite this episode\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, June 1) \u0026quot;109: Open scientific publishing [live episode]\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/AT2XH\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: everythinghertz\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"Dan and James recorded a live episode on open publishing as part of the Open Publishing Fest. They also ran a survey (from start to finish) during the course of the episode on the public's perception of open scientific publishing and discuss the results.","date_published":"2020-06-01T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/238fe449-a33f-4a7d-91cb-5380466afef1.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":37345489,"duration_in_seconds":3112}]},{"id":"c5afa726-4969-4201-b91f-ac53f00b603b","title":"108: Requiem for a Screen","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/108","content_text":"We discuss the recent claim that screen time is more harmful than heroin and whether psychological science is a crisis-ready discipline\n\nOther stuff we cover:\n\n\nDan's adjustment to a second kid\nThe \"Psychological science is not yet a crisis ready discipline\" preprint \nThe Twitter thread from Rickard Carlsson\nThere is a contimuum of evidence for psychological science's use in a crisis\nBelgian Officials: To Save Country's Potato Industry, Belgians Must Eat More Fries\nOur episode with Amy Orben\nScreen time has apparenty worse effects than heroin use on wellbeing\nAre we better off without press releases?\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\nEpisode citation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, May 18) \"108: Requiem for a screen\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BCKMSSponsored By:Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz Promo Code: everythinghertz","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe discuss the recent claim that screen time is more harmful than heroin and whether psychological science is a crisis-ready discipline\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOther stuff we cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan\u0026#39;s adjustment to a second kid\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u0026quot;\u003ca href=\"https://psyarxiv.com/whds4/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ePsychological science is not yet a crisis ready discipline\u003c/a\u003e\u0026quot; preprint \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/rickcarlsson/status/1260661034580242432?s=21\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eTwitter thread\u003c/a\u003e from Rickard Carlsson\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThere is a contimuum of evidence for psychological science\u0026#39;s use in a crisis\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBelgian Officials: To Save Country\u0026#39;s Potato Industry, \u003ca href=\"https://time.com/5829078/belgium-coronavirus-potatoes-frites/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eBelgians Must Eat More Fries\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur episode with Amy Orben\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScreen time has \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-0839-4?draft=collection\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eapparenty worse effects than heroin use on wellbeing\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAre we better off without press releases?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, May 18) \u0026quot;108: Requiem for a screen\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BCKMS\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: everythinghertz\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"We discuss the recent claim that screen time is more harmful than heroin and whether psychological science is a crisis-ready discipline","date_published":"2020-05-18T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/c5afa726-4969-4201-b91f-ac53f00b603b.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":34384457,"duration_in_seconds":2865}]},{"id":"6fff5962-f045-4770-b6b9-e3b6527e4967","title":"107: Memes, TikTok, and science communication (with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/107","content_text":"We chat with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti (Chapman University, USA) about the role of memes and emerging social media in communicating science and statistics.\n\nStuff we cover + links:\n\n\nWhy Chelsea uses memes and social media for science communication\nChelsea's use of TikTok \nChelsea's TikTok profile\nChelsea's Instagram profile\nHow much time should you spend on science communication vs. science research?\nWhat Twitch is and how this can be used by academics\nChelsea's Twitch profile\nDan's livestream of him writing a paper\nChelsea's profile on YouTube\nCustom Stats themed Quiplash Game Codes: (JNL-HWDN) (DJM-ZDES)\nIs Instagram worth it for Science communication?\nNeuralNetMemes: https://instagram.com/neuralnetmemes/?hl=en\nHave statistical software packages become too easy? \nChelsea's statisical consultancy service\nbrms package in R (bayesian regression): https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/brms/index.html\nThe JASP stats package\nThe Phantom Tollbooth book\nThe lady tasting tea book\n\n\nOther links\n\n\nChelsea on twitter\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, May 4) \"107: Memes, TikTok, and science communication (with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], Retrieved from https://osf.io/8dywb/Special Guest: Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti.Sponsored By:Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz Promo Code: everythinghertz","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti (Chapman University, USA) about the role of memes and emerging social media in communicating science and statistics.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eStuff we cover + links:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy Chelsea uses memes and social media for science communication\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChelsea\u0026#39;s use of TikTok \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChelsea\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://tiktok.com/@chelseaparlettpelleriti\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eTikTok profile\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChelsea\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://instagram.com/chelseaparlett/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eInstagram profile\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow much time should you spend on science communication vs. science research?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat Twitch is and how this can be used by academics\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChelsea\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://twitch.tv/cmparlettpelleriti\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eTwitch profile\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan\u0026#39;s livestream \u003ca href=\"https://youtu.be/mZkLlT0Jz7M\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eof him writing a paper\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChelsea\u0026#39;s profile \u003ca href=\"https://youtube.com/channel/UCp2HgyofhnTJ-uxdhGNEHCg\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eon YouTube\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCustom Stats themed Quiplash Game Codes: (JNL-HWDN) (DJM-ZDES)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIs Instagram worth it for Science communication?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNeuralNetMemes: \u003ca href=\"https://instagram.com/neuralnetmemes/?hl=en\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://instagram.com/neuralnetmemes/?hl=en\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHave statistical software packages become \u003cem\u003etoo\u003c/em\u003e easy? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChelsea\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://cmparlettpelleriti.github.io/TheChatistician.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003estatisical consultancy service\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ebrms package in R (bayesian regression): \u003ca href=\"https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/brms/index.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/brms/index.html\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://jasp-stats.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eJASP stats package\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/89124/the-phantom-tollbooth-by-norton-juster-illustrated-by-jules-feiffer/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ePhantom Tollbooth book\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe lady tasting tea \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lady_Tasting_Tea\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ebook\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChelsea \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/ChelseaParlett\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eon twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, May 4) \u0026quot;107: Memes, TikTok, and science communication (with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], Retrieved from \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/8dywb/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/8dywb/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: everythinghertz\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"We chat with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti (Chapman University, USA) about the role of memes and emerging social media in communicating science and statistics.","date_published":"2020-05-04T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/6fff5962-f045-4770-b6b9-e3b6527e4967.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":46925113,"duration_in_seconds":3910}]},{"id":"6f3b9f6c-5bcd-47bc-aafc-a63cc71e726f","title":"106: Science on the run","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/106","content_text":"Dan and James discuss whether getting rapid outcomes to address the pandemic is worth the increased risk of mistakes—how can researchers perform research that is both urgent and accurate?\n\nHere's other stuff they discuss...\n\n\nWhiskey as a hobby\nJames' pandemic tips\nHow publication practices have changed during the pandemic \nThe news article that stated bioRxiv papers are peer-reviewed \nPeer review during a pandemic\nThe impact of the corona virus on employment in academia\nBad peer-reviewed studies do more damage than bad preprints\nPreprints that require permission for citation\nIs there a need for the rapid dissemination of psych research, at the risk of making errors?\nHertz merchandise \n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, April 20) \"106: Science on the Run)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], Retrieved from https://osf.io/7ydvz/Sponsored By:Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz Promo Code: everythinghertz","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss whether getting rapid outcomes to address the pandemic is worth the increased risk of mistakes—how can researchers perform research that is both urgent and accurate?\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s other stuff they discuss...\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhiskey as a hobby\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; pandemic tips\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow publication practices have changed during the pandemic \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/sarscov2-virus-able-to-survive-in-60c-temperatures/news-story/20421e370f8e10f675ee296e92928de2\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003enews article\u003c/a\u003e that stated bioRxiv papers are peer-reviewed \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeer review during a pandemic\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe impact of the corona virus on employment in academia\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBad peer-reviewed studies do more damage than bad preprints\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePreprints that require permission for citation\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIs there a need for the rapid dissemination of psych research, at the risk of making errors?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHertz \u003ca href=\"https://teespring.com/en-GB/stores/everything-hertz-podcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003emerchandise\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, April 20) \u0026quot;106: Science on the Run)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], Retrieved from \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/7ydvz/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/7ydvz/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: everythinghertz\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss whether getting rapid outcomes to address the pandemic is worth the increased risk of mistakes—how can scholars perform research that is both swift and accurate?","date_published":"2020-04-20T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/6f3b9f6c-5bcd-47bc-aafc-a63cc71e726f.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mp3","size_in_bytes":36151797,"duration_in_seconds":3012}]},{"id":"0e82b62f-31c1-4412-a7ce-8a7223c25467","title":"105: Tell it like it is (with Marike Schiffer)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/105","content_text":"We chat with Marike Schiffer, who is a Senior Editor at Nature Human Behavior, about her journal's push to increase reproducibility in the behavioral sciences. She also shares how her team evaluates manuscripts and some common misunderstandings about scientific publishing.\n\nHere's what else we cover:\n\n\nMarike's experiencing making the switch from researcher to full-time editorial work\nThe day-to-day tasks of an editor\nThe Manifesto for reproducible science\nWhy has Nature Human Behavior made such a big push towards reproducibility \nThe benefits of transparent peer review comments\nThe importance of posting rich datasets\nTransparency in how journals deal with manuscripts\nThe Editorial describing how Nature Human Behavior deals with manuscripts\nThe future of scientific publishing \nAudio versions of papers\nTwo common misunderstanding that scientists have about scientific publishing\nDan's synthetic data paper\n\n\nOther links\n\n\nMarike on twitter\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n [James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, April 6) \"105: Tell it like it is (with Marike Schiffer)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U9QRN, Retrieved from https://osf.io/u9qrn/Special Guest: Marike Schiffer.Sponsored By:Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz Promo Code: everythinghertz","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat with Marike Schiffer, who is a Senior Editor at Nature Human Behavior, about her journal\u0026#39;s push to increase reproducibility in the behavioral sciences. She also shares how her team evaluates manuscripts and some common misunderstandings about scientific publishing.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what else we cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMarike\u0026#39;s experiencing making the switch from researcher to full-time editorial work\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe day-to-day tasks of an editor\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-016-0021\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eManifesto for reproducible science\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy has Nature Human Behavior made such a big push towards reproducibility \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe benefits of transparent peer review comments\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe importance of posting rich datasets\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTransparency in how journals deal with manuscripts\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Editorial describing how Nature Human Behavior \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-019-0778-0\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003edeals with manuscripts\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe future of scientific publishing \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAudio versions of papers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTwo common misunderstanding that scientists have about scientific publishing\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://elifesciences.org/articles/53275\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003esynthetic data paper\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/marike_cogneuro\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eMarike on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e [James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, April 6) \u0026quot;105: Tell it like it is (with Marike Schiffer)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U9QRN, Retrieved from \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/u9qrn/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/u9qrn/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Marike Schiffer.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: everythinghertz\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"We chat with Marike Schiffer, who is a Senior Editor at Nature Human Behavior, about her journal's push to increase reproducibility in the behavioral sciences. She also shares how her team evaluates manuscripts and some common misunderstandings about scientific publishing.","date_published":"2020-04-06T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/0e82b62f-31c1-4412-a7ce-8a7223c25467.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mp3","size_in_bytes":41586416,"duration_in_seconds":3465}]},{"id":"582037d7-ef98-4d09-b1e9-91f6dfbc64f4","title":"104: Now we'll discover which meetings could've been emails","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/104","content_text":"Dan and James discuss the COVID-19 pandemic and how it's impacting academia\n\nOther things they discuss:\n\n\nRoy and HG's gymnastics commentary from the Sydney 2000 olympics\nNews tickers and collective anxiety\nHow will cancelled talks and events influence our careers?\nUse the promo code \"everythinghertz\" to get $50 in free Prolific credit that you can use to recruit online participants for your next study, more details here\nUsing ‘Second Life’ for conferences \nTools for working from home \n\"It’s just a cough\" skit\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, March 2) \"Now we'll discover which meetings could've been emails\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DHGR6, Retrieved from https://osf.io/dhgr6/Sponsored By:Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz Promo Code: everythinghertz","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss the COVID-19 pandemic and how it\u0026#39;s impacting academia\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOther things they discuss:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRoy and HG\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WxaTXqf85Y\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003egymnastics commentary\u003c/a\u003e from the Sydney 2000 olympics\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNews tickers and collective anxiety\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow will cancelled talks and events influence our careers?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUse the promo code \u0026quot;everythinghertz\u0026quot; to get $50 in free Prolific credit that you can use to recruit online participants for your next study, more details \u003ca href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing ‘Second Life’ for conferences \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTools for working from home \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026quot;It’s just a cough\u0026quot; \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vNJ5Krj7SQ\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eskit\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, March 2) \u0026quot;Now we\u0026#39;ll discover which meetings could\u0026#39;ve been emails\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DHGR6, Retrieved from \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/dhgr6/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/dhgr6/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: everythinghertz\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss the COVID-19 pandemic and how it's impacting academia","date_published":"2020-03-16T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/582037d7-ef98-4d09-b1e9-91f6dfbc64f4.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mp3","size_in_bytes":45395382,"duration_in_seconds":3782}]},{"id":"d612e663-05a3-4be3-be29-8cc44976b6d4","title":"103: Swiping right","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/103","content_text":"Dan and James discuss rejection in academia and emerging science communication mediums. Here are a few links and other things they cover: \n\n\nThe main university of Sydney bar has closed because all the youth are playing Fortnite and on TikTok\nHow should you respond to rejection?\nThe rejected paper on fasting during Ramadan and cognitive control \nWhat if there was Tinder for manuscript submission?\nJosh’s tweet about citations in Wikipedia\nGrant lotteries \nThe Steven Bradbury reference\nThe use of TikTok for science communication\nDan and James argues about whether blogs or twitter threads are better \nDisney princesses \nThe Corona virus and preprints\nUsing instagram for scicomm\nShould twitter remove the ‘likes’ and follower counts?\nBillie Eilish sampling the sound traffic lights make in Sydney\nThe Boston train pigeon \n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, March 2) \"Swiping right\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/5XR2F, Retrieved from https://osf.io/5xr2f/Sponsored By:Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz Promo Code: everythinghertz","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss rejection in academia and emerging science communication mediums. Here are a few links and other things they cover: \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe main university of Sydney bar \u003ca href=\"https://honisoit.com/2020/02/usu-shutters-manning-bar/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehas closed\u003c/a\u003e because all the youth are playing Fortnite and on TikTok\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow should you respond to rejection?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/salarrad/status/1231610843059642368?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003erejected paper\u003c/a\u003e on fasting during Ramadan and cognitive control \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat if there was Tinder for manuscript submission?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJosh’s \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/joshmnicholson/status/1232696333829595136?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etweet\u003c/a\u003e about citations in Wikipedia\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGrant lotteries \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Steven Bradbury \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAADWfJO2qM\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ereference\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe use of TikTok for science communication\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan and James argues about whether blogs or twitter threads are better \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDisney princesses \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Corona virus and preprints\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing instagram for scicomm\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould twitter remove the ‘likes’ and follower counts?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBillie Eilish \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/timduggan/status/1221658406122975234?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003esampling\u003c/a\u003e the sound traffic lights make in Sydney\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Boston\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/jamesheathers/status/1233162498121043969?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e train pigeon\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, March 2) \u0026quot;Swiping right\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/5XR2F, Retrieved from \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/5xr2f/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/5xr2f/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: everythinghertz\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss rejection in academia and emerging science communication platforms ","date_published":"2020-03-02T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/d612e663-05a3-4be3-be29-8cc44976b6d4.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mp3","size_in_bytes":55453988,"duration_in_seconds":4621}]},{"id":"3794fa31-a697-4535-8a08-24af6a29b3bc","title":"102: Master of none","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/102","content_text":"Should research scientists build their knowledge and skillset broadly at the risk of being a master of none? Dan and James discuss this, along with a recent editorial on the use of Twitter in academia.\n\nHere's other stuff they cover:\n\n\nSome tools that Dan's using right now: BioRender, Canva, Slack, 99designs, and Notion.\nDan pre-registers a prediction\nHerchandise! Use the code \"EH102\" to get a 20% discount on Hertz merchandise (valid until March 2, 2020)\nThe k-index editorial \nRoger Ebert's statue\nJames wanted a picture of this fish in the show notes, for some reason\n\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, February 17) \"Master of none\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3A9TN, Retrieved from https://osf.io/3a9tn/Sponsored By:Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz Promo Code: everythinghertz","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eShould research scientists build their knowledge and skillset broadly at the risk of being a master of none? Dan and James discuss this, along with a recent editorial on the use of Twitter in academia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s other stuff they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSome tools that Dan\u0026#39;s using right now: \u003ca href=\"https://biorender.com/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eBioRender\u003c/a\u003e, \u003ca href=\"https://www.canva.com/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eCanva\u003c/a\u003e, \u003ca href=\"https://slack.com/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSlack\u003c/a\u003e, \u003ca href=\"https://99designs.com/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e99designs\u003c/a\u003e, and \u003ca href=\"https://www.notion.so/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eNotion\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan pre-registers a prediction\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHerchandise! Use the code \u0026quot;EH102\u0026quot; to get a 20% discount on \u003ca href=\"https://teespring.com/stores/everything-hertz-podcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eHertz merchandise\u003c/a\u003e (valid until March 2, 2020)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe k-index \u003ca href=\"https://casereports.onlinejacc.org/content/early/2020/01/31/j.jaccas.2020.01.003\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eeditorial\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRoger Ebert\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://time.com/76577/roger-ebert-statue-illinois/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003estatue\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames wanted a picture of this fish in the show notes, for some reason\n\u003cimg src=\"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7e/Napoleon_Fish_by_Gustavo_Gerdel.jpg\" alt=\"\"\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, February 17) \u0026quot;Master of none\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3A9TN, Retrieved from \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/3a9tn/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/3a9tn/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: everythinghertz\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"Should research scientists build their knowledge and skillset broadly at the risk of being a master of none? Dan and James discuss this, along with a recent editorial on the use of Twitter in academia.","date_published":"2020-02-17T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/3794fa31-a697-4535-8a08-24af6a29b3bc.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mp3","size_in_bytes":46258991,"duration_in_seconds":3854}]},{"id":"3176b649-ab44-4413-aa72-2e407b893125","title":"101: Punishing research misconduct","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/101","content_text":"Dan and James cover a new paper which discusses whether research misconduct should be criminalised. If so, where do we draw the line and who should investigate these cases? \n\nHere's an episode overview and links to stuff we mentioned:\n\n\nWe’re a pop science podcast, apparently\nElizabeth Bik’s wikipedia page\nElizabeth’s Patreon page \nThe original consortium letter\nThe apology letter from the APS\nThe “love of science” tweet \nHow James got into science\nTal’s “science is not a jobs program” tweet \nThe 'Should research misconduct be criminalised?' article\nProfessor charged with spending $96k in grant money in strip clubs \nProfessor with huge taxi bill (story is Norwegian, but Google translate does a decent job). The professor has agreed to pay back all trips between home and the office (about $11,000 USD\nData From A Top Geneticist’s Lab Was Flagged To A Major UK University. It Didn’t Launch A Formal Investigation Until A Decade Later. \nThe inaugural “get in the sea” nomination goes to the Editorial office described in this tweet \n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nGet 10% off Everything Hertz merch, like mugs, stickers, shirts, and hoodies, by using the discount code \"HERTZ101\" at our online store. Discount code valid until February 17, 2020.\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, February 3) \"Punishing research misconduct\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/Q86AK, Retrieved from https://osf.io/q86ak/Sponsored By:Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz Promo Code: everythinghertz","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James cover a new paper which discusses whether research misconduct should be criminalised. If so, where do we draw the line and who should investigate these cases? \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s an episode overview and links to stuff we mentioned:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe’re a pop science podcast, apparently\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eElizabeth Bik’s \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elisabeth_Bik\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewikipedia page\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eElizabeth’s \u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/elisabethbik\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ePatreon page\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe original \u003ca href=\"https://presspage-production-content.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/1508/coalitionletteropposinglowerembargoes-864869.pdf?54750\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003econsortium letter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.psychologicalscience.org/policy/to-aps-members-from-the-board-of-directors.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eapology letter\u003c/a\u003e from the APS\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe “\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/NobelPrize/status/1219530825320083456?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003elove of science\u003c/a\u003e” tweet \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow James got into science\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTal’s “\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/talyarkoni/status/960296870080925696?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003escience is not a jobs program\u003c/a\u003e” tweet \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u0026#39;\u003ca href=\"https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1747016119898400\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eShould research misconduct be criminalised?\u003c/a\u003e\u0026#39; article\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eProfessor charged with \u003ca href=\"https://nypost.com/2020/01/15/ex-drexel-professor-arrested-for-spending-96k-in-grant-money-on-strip-clubs/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003espending $96k in grant money in strip clubs\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eProfessor with \u003ca href=\"https://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/i/21LV4B/topp-professor-tok-taxi-for-en-halv-mill-paa-det-offentliges-regning\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehuge taxi bill\u003c/a\u003e (story is Norwegian, but Google translate does a decent job). The professor has agreed to pay back all trips between home and the office (about $11,000 USD\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/peteraldhous/a-uk-university-knew-of-problems-in-a-top-geneticists-lab\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eData From A Top Geneticist’s Lab Was Flagged To A Major UK University. It Didn’t Launch A Formal Investigation Until A Decade Later.\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe inaugural “get in the sea” nomination goes to the Editorial office described in \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/lipangalala/status/1222194449134039040?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ethis tweet\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eGet 10% off Everything Hertz merch, like mugs, stickers, shirts, and hoodies, by using the discount code \u0026quot;HERTZ101\u0026quot; at our\u003ca href=\"https://teespring.com/stores/everything-hertz-podcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e online store\u003c/a\u003e. \u003cem\u003eDiscount code valid until February 17, 2020.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, February 3) \u0026quot;Punishing research misconduct\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/Q86AK, Retrieved from \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/q86ak/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/q86ak/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: everythinghertz\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"Dan and James cover a new paper which discusses whether research misconduct should be criminalised. If so, where do we draw the line and who should investigate these cases? ","date_published":"2020-02-03T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/3176b649-ab44-4413-aa72-2e407b893125.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mp3","size_in_bytes":42671647,"duration_in_seconds":3555}]},{"id":"9ddc7a5f-1088-4c91-9a42-d2ea32c33e63","title":"100: Hundredth episode live special (with Daniel Lakens, Amy Orben, and Chris Chambers)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/100","content_text":"To celebrate our 100th episode, which we video-streamed live, Dan and James were joined by three special guests: Daniel Lakens, Amy Orben, and Chris Chambers.\n\nHere's what they covered in this episode:\n\n\nJames and Dan share their favourite episodes\nThe power of the Twitter direct message\nDaniel Lakens joins us to discuss his recent work on helping people make better statistical decisions \nCan you create cross-discipline effect size guidelines?\nWhat would Jacob Cohen say if we could bring him back to life?\nAcademic backup career plans\nOur new partnership with Prolific\nJames' piece on not treating your research participants like cattle \nAmy Orben joins us to discuss multiverse analysis and the Reproducibilitea community\nThe Latin Modern Roman font \nWe speak with Chris Chambers and get an update of what's happening with Registered reports\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nThis episode was brought you by Prolific,  who is giving away $50 to podcast listeners who want to give online sampling a go! Redeem the free credit here: https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz \n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent linkSpecial Guests: Amy Orben, Chris Chambers, and Daniel Lakens.Sponsored By:Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz Promo Code: everythinghertz","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eTo celebrate our 100th episode, which we video-streamed live, Dan and James were joined by three special guests: Daniel Lakens, Amy Orben, and Chris Chambers.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what they covered in this episode:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames and Dan share their favourite episodes\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe power of the Twitter direct message\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDaniel Lakens joins us to discuss his recent work on helping people make better statistical decisions \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCan you create cross-discipline effect size guidelines?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat would Jacob Cohen say if we could bring him back to life?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAcademic backup career plans\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur new partnership with Prolific\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; piece on \u003ca href=\"https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/stop-treating-your-experimental-participants-like-cattle-b5fab7fbfca7\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003enot treating your research participants like cattle\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAmy Orben joins us to discuss multiverse analysis and the Reproducibilitea community\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.fontsquirrel.com/fonts/latin-modern-roman\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLatin Modern Roman font\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe speak with Chris Chambers and get an update of what\u0026#39;s happening with Registered reports\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThis episode was brought you by \u003ca href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eProlific\u003c/a\u003e,  who is giving away $50 to podcast listeners who want to give online sampling a go! Redeem the free credit here: \u003ca href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guests: Amy Orben, Chris Chambers, and Daniel Lakens.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSponsored By:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific\u003c/a\u003e: \u003ca rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz\"\u003eProlific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe. \r\n\r\nEverything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz\u003c/a\u003e Promo Code: everythinghertz\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"To celebrate our 100th episode, which we video-streamed live, Dan and James were joined by three special guests: Daniel Lakens, Amy Orben, and Chris Chambers.","date_published":"2020-01-27T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/9ddc7a5f-1088-4c91-9a42-d2ea32c33e63.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mp3","size_in_bytes":79571696,"duration_in_seconds":6630}]},{"id":"fc94a836-b7d4-4459-b2a0-14ae0c0a5652","title":"99: Science advocacy","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/99","content_text":"Dan and James answer a listener question on science advocacy. Is this an activity that all scientists should do, and if so, how much advocacy work should we be doing? \n\nHere's other stuff they cover and links to stuff they mention:\n\n\nJames’ thoughts on thanksgiving \nJames’s hot mic tweet\nThe Tom Bartlett story in the Chronicle about the criminologist accused of cooking the books \nThe SCORE DAPRA project\nA listener question from Crystal Steltenpohl:  What is a scientist’s role in advocacy? \nJulieanne Smolinski piece on Hollywood diets \nSunbathe your arsehole, for wellness \nDealing with bad science on Facebook \nFeedback from an older episode on statistical errors in sports science \n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, January 6) \"Science advocacy\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8R5ZD, Retrieved from https://osf.io/8r5zd/","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James answer a listener question on science advocacy. Is this an activity that all scientists should do, and if so, how much advocacy work should we be doing? \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s other stuff they cover and links to stuff they mention:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames’ thoughts on thanksgiving \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames’s hot mic \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/jamesheathers/status/1199676892460261376?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etweet\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Tom Bartlett \u003ca href=\"https://www.chronicle.com/interactives/20190924-Criminology\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003estory in the Chronicle\u003c/a\u003e about the criminologist accused of cooking the books \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe SCORE \u003ca href=\"https://www.darpa.mil/program/systematizing-confidence-in-open-research-and-evidence\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDAPRA project\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA listener question from \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/CNSteltenpohl\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eCrystal Steltenpohl\u003c/a\u003e:  What is a scientist’s role in advocacy? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJulieanne Smolinski \u003ca href=\"https://medium.com/@boobsradley/between-my-hectic-job-and-nourishing-social-life-it-s-not-always-easy-to-find-the-time-to-make-aa9c48a5458b\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epiece\u003c/a\u003e on Hollywood diets \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://jezebel.com/sunbathe-your-asshole-for-wellness-1840031856\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSunbathe your arsehole\u003c/a\u003e, for wellness \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDealing with bad science on Facebook \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFeedback from an older episode on statistical errors in sports science \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, January 6) \u0026quot;Science advocacy\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8R5ZD, Retrieved from \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/8r5zd/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/8r5zd/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James answer a listener question on science advocacy. Is this an activity that all scientists should do, and if so, how much advocacy work should we be doing? ","date_published":"2020-01-06T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/fc94a836-b7d4-4459-b2a0-14ae0c0a5652.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mp3","size_in_bytes":35721717,"duration_in_seconds":2976}]},{"id":"bd98ec30-1db3-4fdf-a2ca-823587fd0538","title":"98: Episode titles are redundant, at best (with Sophia Crüwell)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/98","content_text":"We chat with Sophia Crüwell (Meta-Research Innovation Center Berlin) about pre-registration and her recent work introducing pre-registration templates for cognitive modelling research.\n\nHere's what we cover and some links:\n\n\nSophia’s PhD research\nSophia’s recent preprint: Preregistration in Complex Contexts: A Preregistration Template for the Application of Cognitive Models\nThe first version of the pre-print titled, preregistration is redundant, at best\nThe updated version of the preprint titled, \"Is preregistration worthwhile?\"\nThe Bayesian Spectacles blogpost on the first version of the pre-print\nData simulation from former guest Lisa DeBruine\nThe latest with reproducibilitea\nThe cargo cult science talk\n\n\nOther links\n\n\nSophia on twitter\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, December 16) \"Episode titles are redundant, at best (with Sophia Crüwell)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/R942W, Retrieved from https://osf.io/r942w/Special Guest: Sophia Crüwell.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat with Sophia Crüwell (Meta-Research Innovation Center Berlin) about pre-registration and her recent work introducing pre-registration templates for cognitive modelling research.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what we cover and some links:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSophia’s PhD research\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSophia’s recent preprint: \u003ca href=\"https://psyarxiv.com/2hykx\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ePreregistration in Complex Contexts: A Preregistration Template for the Application of Cognitive Models\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/download/5dbb4af2af84c3000eea7685/?version=1\u0026displayName=Preregistration%20is%20redundant,%20at%20best-2019-10-31T20%3A58%3A26.782Z.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003efirst version of the pre-print\u003c/a\u003e titled, preregistration is redundant, at best\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://psyarxiv.com/x36pz/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eupdated version\u003c/a\u003e of the preprint titled, \u0026quot;Is preregistration worthwhile?\u0026quot;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Bayesian Spectacles \u003ca href=\"https://www.bayesianspectacles.org/a-breakdown-of-preregistration-is-redundant-at-best/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eblogpost\u003c/a\u003e on the first version of the pre-print\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://debruine.github.io/lmem_sim/index.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eData simulation\u003c/a\u003e from former guest Lisa DeBruine\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe latest with \u003ca href=\"https://reproducibilitea.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ereproducibilitea\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe cargo cult science \u003ca href=\"http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/51/2/CargoCult.htm\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etalk\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/cruwelli\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSophia on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, December 16) \u0026quot;Episode titles are redundant, at best (with Sophia Crüwell)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/R942W, Retrieved from \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/r942w/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/r942w/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Sophia Crüwell.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat with Sophia Crüwell (Meta-Research Innovation Center Berlin) about pre-registration and her recent work introducing pre-registration templates for cognitive modelling research.","date_published":"2019-12-16T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/bd98ec30-1db3-4fdf-a2ca-823587fd0538.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mp3","size_in_bytes":42816783,"duration_in_seconds":3568}]},{"id":"9a290b44-7a88-43a4-bd76-8b962e6f9e92","title":"97: Slow science","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/97","content_text":"Dan and James discuss the concept of \"slow science\", which has been proposed in order to improve the quality of scientific research and create a more sustainable work environment.\n\nHere's what they cover in this episode\n\n\n Thank you patrons day!\n Social media algorithms reward outrage, not quality of substance\n A paper on slow science from Uta Frith, which includes a proposal of publication limits\n Is information overload really a problem?\n The META platform for a weekly research digest \n Would reducing the volume of publications really improve quality? \n The working paper that simulated the quality vs. quantity question \n The slow professor book https://utorontopress.com/ca/the-slow-professor-3\n Michael Frank’s paper on N-best evaluation\n Some institutions are now screening papers before submission to check for errors\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, December 2) \"Slow Science\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/XEU42, Retrieved from https://osf.io/xeu42/","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss the concept of \u0026quot;slow science\u0026quot;, which has been proposed in order to improve the quality of scientific research and create a more sustainable work environment.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what they cover in this episode\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Thank you patrons day!\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Social media algorithms reward outrage, not quality of substance\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e \u003ca href=\"https://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/fulltext/S1364-6613(19)30242-6\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eA paper on slow science\u003c/a\u003e from Uta Frith, which includes a proposal of publication limits\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Is information overload really a problem?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e The\u003ca href=\"https://www.meta.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e META platform\u003c/a\u003e for a weekly research digest \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Would reducing the volume of publications \u003cem\u003ereally\u003c/em\u003e improve quality? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e The \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/z47w3/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eworking paper\u003c/a\u003e that simulated the quality vs. quantity question \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e The slow professor book \u003ca href=\"https://utorontopress.com/ca/the-slow-professor-3\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://utorontopress.com/ca/the-slow-professor-3\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Michael Frank’s paper on \u003ca href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364661319302347\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eN-best evaluation\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Some institutions are now screening papers before submission to check for errors\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, December 2) \u0026quot;Slow Science\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/XEU42, Retrieved from \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/xeu42/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/xeu42/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss the concept of \"slow science\", which has been proposed in order to improve the quality of scientific research and create a more sustainable work environment.","date_published":"2019-12-02T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/9a290b44-7a88-43a4-bd76-8b962e6f9e92.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mp3","size_in_bytes":58308230,"duration_in_seconds":3644}]},{"id":"0d91e1f5-3f7f-4115-99d0-ef8ecd8dfcfd","title":"96: The chaotic state of doctoral research","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/96","content_text":"Dan and James discuss the results of this year's Nature survey of PhD students. Despite a majority of students reporting general satisfaction with their decision to undertake a PhD, many described a sense of uncertainty, harassment in the lab, and gruelling work hours.  \n\nThings they discuss...\n\n\nJames met an Australian member of parliament and won a commendation from Sense under Science\nThe Doing Good symposium \nThe Nature PhD survey \nBloat in academia \nWhat people like the most about being a PhD student \nAre we just not hearing that much from people who are having a good time?\nFinancial pressure in PhDs\nHarassment and discrimination in PhD programs\nAlternative academic careers\nJames' cat whisker collection\nSouth Korean kids turn one when they’re born\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, November 18) \"The chaotic state of doctoral research\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/CDZRA, Retrieved from https://osf.io/cdzra/","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss the results of this year\u0026#39;s Nature survey of PhD students. Despite a majority of students reporting general satisfaction with their decision to undertake a PhD, many described a sense of uncertainty, harassment in the lab, and gruelling work hours.  \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThings they discuss...\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/deborahapthorp/status/1192343606985555968?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003emet an Australian member of parliament\u003c/a\u003e and \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/senseaboutsci/status/1195284321617293313?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewon a commendation\u003c/a\u003e from Sense under Science\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.cbs.mpg.de/doing-good\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDoing Good symposium\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003cem\u003eNature\u003c/em\u003e \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03459-7\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ePhD survey\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBloat in academia \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat people like the most about being a PhD student \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAre we just not hearing that much from people who are having a good time?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFinancial pressure in PhDs\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHarassment and discrimination in PhD programs\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlternative academic careers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; cat whisker collection\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSouth Korean kids \u003ca href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jun/02/south-korea-mulls-ending-arcane-age-system-to-match-rest-of-world\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eturn one when they’re born\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, November 18) \u0026quot;The chaotic state of doctoral research\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/CDZRA, Retrieved from \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/cdzra/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/cdzra/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss the results of this year's Nature survey of PhD students. Despite a majority of students reporting general satisfaction with their decision to undertake a PhD, many described a sense of uncertainty, harassment in the lab, and gruelling work hours.  ","date_published":"2019-11-18T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/0d91e1f5-3f7f-4115-99d0-ef8ecd8dfcfd.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mp3","size_in_bytes":45912397,"duration_in_seconds":2869}]},{"id":"9e483938-2670-45e2-9c49-cc60baaa88a1","title":"95: All good presentations are alike; each bad presentation is bad in its own way","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/95","content_text":"Dan and James discuss why academia tolerates bad presentations and the strange distrust of polished presentations. \n\nHere's what else they discuss...\n\n\nJames had a Filipino feast https://twitter.com/jamesheathers/status/1188582859528949766?s=20\nWe’re approaching 100 episodes!\nReproducibiliTea is spreading worldwide!\nWhy do some people not trust polished presentations?\nThe Mike Morrison episode on the Better Poster\nThe “I want a refund for a bad presentation” blog post \nWhat does James consider a ‘good’ presentation?\nConference apps\nWhy don’t we teach PhD students to do things that they’ll need further in their careers, like making presentations and writing emails?\nVague emails\nJames wants to help out an email spammer\nEmail vs. Twitter DM\nAnonymous people on the internet\nJames discovers coin collecting \nBlocking people on Twitter\nDan’s got a show recommendation: Money Heist / Paper house \nWhy do we hate spoilers?\nSpoiling the end of a movie on Pompeii \n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss why academia tolerates bad presentations and the strange distrust of polished presentations. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what else they discuss...\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames had a Filipino feast \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/jamesheathers/status/1188582859528949766?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/jamesheathers/status/1188582859528949766?s=20\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe’re approaching 100 episodes!\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/3qrj6/wiki/home/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eReproducibiliTea\u003c/a\u003e is spreading worldwide!\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy do some people not trust polished presentations?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/87\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eMike Morrison episode\u003c/a\u003e on the Better Poster\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe “I want a refund for a bad presentation” \u003ca href=\"https://www.jratcliffe.net/post/i-want-a-refund-for-your-conference-presentation\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eblog post\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat does James consider a ‘good’ presentation?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eConference apps\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy don’t we teach PhD students to do things that they’ll need further in their careers, like making presentations and writing emails?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVague emails\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames wants to help out an email spammer\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEmail vs. Twitter DM\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnonymous people on the internet\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames discovers coin collecting \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBlocking people on Twitter\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan’s got a show recommendation: \u003ca href=\"https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6468322/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eMoney Heist / Paper house\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy do we hate spoilers?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpoiling the end of a movie on Pompeii \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss why academia tolerates bad presentations and the strange distrust of polished presentations. ","date_published":"2019-11-04T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/9e483938-2670-45e2-9c49-cc60baaa88a1.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mp3","size_in_bytes":61241050,"duration_in_seconds":3827}]},{"id":"00e6acc7-daf5-442f-835e-d2c0189d0d3c","title":"94: Predicting the replicability of research ","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/94","content_text":"Dan and James chat with Fiona Fidler (University of Melbourne), who is leading the repliCATS project, which aims to develop accurate techniques to elicit estimates of the replicability of research. This is also the first time they interview a guest live!\n\nHere's what they discuss...\n\n\nThe story behind repliCATS\nAustralia's best export, Tim Tams\nThe SCORE project organised by DARPA\nCan anyone use the repliCATS methodology?\nDan, Fiona, and James talk about did their honours theses (this is roughly the Australian equivalent of a Masters)\nWhat would a successful repliCATS project look like?\nWhat sort of heuristics do people use to assess replicability?\nThe AIMOS conference  \nThe role of replicability in public policy\nThis is Bob Katter\nShould we be keeping the replication crisis behind closed doors?\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, October 21) \"Predicting the replicability of research \", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KZPYG, Retrieved from https://osf.io/kzpyg/Special Guest: Fiona Fidler.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James chat with Fiona Fidler (University of Melbourne), who is leading the \u003ca href=\"https://replicats.research.unimelb.edu.au/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003erepliCATS project\u003c/a\u003e, which aims to develop accurate techniques to elicit estimates of the replicability of research. This is also the first time they interview a guest live!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what they discuss...\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe story behind repliCATS\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAustralia\u0026#39;s best export, \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Tam\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eTim Tams\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.wired.com/story/darpa-wants-to-solve-sciences-replication-crisis-with-robots/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSCORE project\u003c/a\u003e organised by DARPA\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCan anyone use the repliCATS methodology?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan, Fiona, and James talk about did their honours theses (this is roughly the Australian equivalent of a Masters)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat would a successful repliCATS project look like?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat sort of heuristics do people use to assess replicability?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.aimos2019conference.com/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eAIMOS conference \u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe role of replicability in public policy\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThis is \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1i739SyCu9I\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eBob Katter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould we be keeping the replication crisis behind closed doors?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, October 21) \u0026quot;Predicting the replicability of research \u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KZPYG, Retrieved from \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/kzpyg/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/kzpyg/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Fiona Fidler.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James chat with Fiona Fidler (University of Melbourne), who is leading the repliCATS project, which aims to develop accurate techniques to elicit estimates of the replicability of research. ","date_published":"2019-10-21T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/00e6acc7-daf5-442f-835e-d2c0189d0d3c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mp3","size_in_bytes":55840599,"duration_in_seconds":3490}]},{"id":"9414f388-c0cc-4672-af4f-9b0a7dc05fc6","title":"93: Double-blind peer review vs. open science","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/93","content_text":"Dan and James answer a listener question on how to navigate open science practices, such as preprints and open code repositories, in light of double-blind reviews. \n\nStuff they cover:\n\n\nHow common is double-blind review?\nHow many journals don’t accept preprints?\nBias in the review process\nHow practical is blinded review?\nDo the benefits of preprints outweighs not having blinded review?\nJames' approach to getting comments on his preprints\nConvincing your supervisor to adopt open science practices\nThe preprint that James won’t submit for publication, for some reason\nWe get reviews...\nOur first live guest!\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nCitation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, October 7) \"Double-blind peer review vs. Open Science\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7ZPME","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James answer a listener question on how to navigate open science practices, such as preprints and open code repositories, in light of double-blind reviews. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eStuff they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow common is double-blind review?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow many journals don’t accept preprints?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBias in the review process\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow practical is blinded review?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDo the benefits of preprints outweighs not having blinded review?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; approach to getting comments on his preprints\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eConvincing your supervisor to adopt open science practices\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe preprint that James won’t submit for publication, for some reason\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe get reviews...\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur first live guest!\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, October 7) \u0026quot;Double-blind peer review vs. Open Science\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/7zpme/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e10.17605/OSF.IO/7ZPME\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James answer a listener question on how to navigate open science practices, such as preprints and open code repositories, in light of double-blind reviews. ","date_published":"2019-10-07T04:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/9414f388-c0cc-4672-af4f-9b0a7dc05fc6.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":52578010,"duration_in_seconds":3286}]},{"id":"a2051e29-0383-41cc-9164-41e730e3fc41","title":"92: Chaos in the brickyard","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/92","content_text":"Dan and James discuss the role of Google Scholar in citation patterns and whether we should limit academics to only publishing two papers a year.\n\nLinks and details:\n\n\nJames has a new Hertz-quarters\nThe Metascience conference \nHow is google scholar influencing citation patterns\nA slide from @Jevinwest's presentation on Google Scholars\nIs this a symptom of lazy citaton practices rather than the algorithm?\nWhat are the alternatives to google scholar?\nShould google open up the algorithm?\nGS will find your preprint and link it to the paywall link\nWhy is Google Scholar free?\nWhat would make GS better?\nUsing the Zotero plugin for to collected citation info in bulk from search results in GS\nTop recommended articles in GS are phenomenal \nGS is not great for meta-analysis\nGS reduces friction\nShould we limit academics to only publishing two papers a year, as suggested by former guest, Dorothy Bishop?\nWho would stand to lose from this?\nIs this idea practical? What if only a few countries or institutions implemented this?\nThe Japanese math genius who posts papers on his own website \nChaos in the brickyard paper \nChaos in the brickyard cartoon \nOpen data isn’t a new concept\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, September 16) \"Chaos in the brickyard\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast] https://osf.io/xfd2p/","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss the role of Google Scholar in citation patterns and whether we should limit academics to only publishing two papers a year.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks and details:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames has a new Hertz-quarters\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.metascience2019.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eMetascience conference\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow is google scholar influencing citation patterns\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/gmusser/status/1170466414345375746?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eA slide from @Jevinwest\u0026#39;s presentation\u003c/a\u003e on Google Scholars\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIs this a symptom of lazy citaton practices rather than the algorithm?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat are the alternatives to google scholar?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould google open up the algorithm?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGS will find your preprint and link it to the paywall link\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy is Google Scholar free?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat would make GS better?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing the Zotero plugin for to collected citation info in bulk from search results in GS\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTop recommended articles in GS are phenomenal \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGS is not great for meta-analysis\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGS reduces friction\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould we limit academics to only\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/joseph_fridman/status/1170447576505520128?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e publishing two papers a year\u003c/a\u003e, as suggested by former guest, Dorothy Bishop?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWho would stand to lose from this?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIs this idea practical? What if only a few countries or institutions implemented this?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Japanese math genius who \u003ca href=\"https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/math-mystery-shinichi-mochizuki-and-the-impenetrable-proof/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eposts papers on his own website\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChaos in the brickyard \u003ca href=\"https://science.sciencemag.org/content/142/3590/339.1\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e \nChaos in the brickyard \u003ca href=\"https://massivesci.com/articles/chaos-in-the-brickyard-comic-matteo-farinella/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ecartoon\u003c/a\u003e \nOpen data isn’t a new concept\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, September 16) \u0026quot;Chaos in the brickyard\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast] \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/xfd2p/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/xfd2p/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss the role of Google Scholar in citation patterns and whether we should limit academics to only publishing two papers a year.","date_published":"2019-09-16T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/a2051e29-0383-41cc-9164-41e730e3fc41.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":70614621,"duration_in_seconds":4413}]},{"id":"0b565e74-8574-4b8b-89cb-07dc4343d5f2","title":"91: Shifting the goalposts in statistics (with Kristin Sainani)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/91","content_text":"We chat with Kristin Sainani (Stanford University) about a popular statistical method in sports medicine research (magnitude based inference), which has been banned by some journals, but continues to thrive in some pockets of scholarship. We also discuss the role of statistical inference in the current replication crisis.\n\nLinks and info\n\n\nWhat is magnitude based inference and how did Kristin get involved in this?\nThe response to Kristin’s critiques\nThis is really an issue of small sample sizes\nKristin’s Coursera course on scientific writing\nThe readability of scientific articles is decreasing\nThe role of statistical inference in the replication crisis \nKristin has changed her mind about… Twitter\nDan made international news by posting a picture of a bird on Twitter \nKristin recommends this paper: P values are just the tip of the iceberg as well as the following books: Radium Girls and Bad Blood\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, September 2) \"Shifting the goalposts in statistics (with Kristin Sainani)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], Retrieved from https://osf.io/3q25f/ Special Guest: Kristin Sainani.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat with Kristin Sainani (Stanford University) about a popular statistical method in sports medicine research (magnitude based inference), which has been banned by some journals, but continues to thrive in some pockets of scholarship. We also discuss the role of statistical inference in the current replication crisis.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks and info\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat is magnitude based inference and how did Kristin get involved in this?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe response to Kristin’s critiques\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThis is really an issue of small sample sizes\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKristin’s \u003ca href=\"https://coursera.org/learn/sciwrite\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eCoursera course\u003c/a\u003e on scientific writing\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://elifesciences.org/articles/27725\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ereadability of scientific articles is decreasing\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe role of statistical inference in the replication crisis \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKristin has changed her mind about… Twitter\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan made international news by \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/dsquintana/status/1163083819605475328\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eposting a picture of a bird on Twitter \u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKristin recommends this paper:\u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/news/statistics-p-values-are-just-the-tip-of-the-iceberg-1.17412\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e P values are just the tip of the iceberg\u003c/a\u003e as well as the following books: \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Radium-Girls-Story-Americas-Shining/dp/149264935X\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eRadium Girls\u003c/a\u003e and \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Bad-Blood-Secrets-Silicon-Startup/dp/152473165X\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eBad Blood\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, September 2) \u0026quot;Shifting the goalposts in statistics (with Kristin Sainani)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], Retrieved from \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/3q25f/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/3q25f/\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Kristin Sainani.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat with Kristin Sainani (Stanford University) about a popular statistical method in sports medicine research (magnitude based inference), which has been banned by some journals, but continues to thrive in some pockets of scholarship. We also discuss the role of statistical inference in the current replication crisis.","date_published":"2019-09-02T09:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/0b565e74-8574-4b8b-89cb-07dc4343d5f2.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":61216808,"duration_in_seconds":3826}]},{"id":"7796c00e-defc-4573-8b59-f856599e9f15","title":"90: Mo data mo problems","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/90","content_text":"Dan and James discuss two listener questions on performing secondary data analysis and the potential for prestige to creep into open science reforms.\n\nMore info and links:\n\n\nWhy generate your own dataset when you can get a high impact paper using public data?\nThanks to Stu Murray for the question\nWill people steal your ideas?\nThe journal Scientific Data\nAre we now incentivising data mining rather than data collecting?\nSynthetic data \nDan’s recent synthetic data preprint primer\nEgo and prestige got us into the mess we’re trying to fix with open science, but how can we stop this from happening again?\nThanks to Robin Kok for the question, listen to our episode with him on e-health!\nDid all the people who co-authored the paper to change statistical significance the default p-value threshold to .005 actually do this in subsequent papers?\nVagus nerve brain washing paper\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, August 19) \"Mo data mo problems\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/TQ75J","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss two listener questions on performing secondary data analysis and the potential for prestige to creep into open science reforms.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMore info and links:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy generate your own dataset when you can get a high impact paper using public data?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThanks to \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/DrStuartBMurray\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eStu Murray\u003c/a\u003e for the question\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWill people steal your ideas?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe journal \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/sdata/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eScientific Data\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAre we now incentivising data mining rather than data collecting?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSynthetic data \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan’s recent synthetic data \u003ca href=\"https://psyarxiv.com/dmfb3/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epreprint primer\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEgo and prestige got us into the mess we’re trying to fix with open science, but how can we stop this from happening again?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThanks to \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/robinnkok\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eRobin Kok\u003c/a\u003e for the question, listen to our episode with him on \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/34\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ee-health\u003c/a\u003e!\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDid all the people who co-authored \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0189-z\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ethe paper to change statistical significance the default p-value threshold to .005\u003c/a\u003e actually do this in subsequent papers?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVagus nerve brain washing \u003ca href=\"https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2019/08/13/733410.full.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epaper\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, August 19) \u0026quot;Mo data mo problems\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/tq75j/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e10.17605/OSF.IO/TQ75J\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss listener questions on performing secondary data analysis and the potential for prestige to creep into open science reforms.","date_published":"2019-08-19T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/7796c00e-defc-4573-8b59-f856599e9f15.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":55759515,"duration_in_seconds":3484}]},{"id":"b87b0438-366c-4f5e-97d8-0673cdf125ac","title":"89: Conflicts of interest in psychology (with Tom Chivers)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/89","content_text":"We chat with Tom about whether psychology has a conflict-of-interest problem and how to best define such conflicts.\n\nLinks and other stuff we cover...\n\n\nTom's article on conflicts of interest in psychology\nHow can we define a conflict an interest without falling down a rabbit hole?\nCommunication statistics to the layperson\nHow science journalism focuses on single studies rather than the larger story\nTom’s new book: The AI does not hate you\nWin Tom’s book! Tweet your favourite Hertz episode and we’ll pick one at random, who'll get sent Tom's book\nHow do journalists go about hearing from new voices for story comments?\nWhat has Tom changes his mind about?\nTom’s book recommendation: Galileo's Middle Finger\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, August 5) \"Conflicts of interest in psychology (with Tom Chivers)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/F9WBMSpecial Guest: Tom Chivers.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat with Tom about whether psychology has a conflict-of-interest problem and how to best define such conflicts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks and other stuff we cover...\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02041-5\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eTom\u0026#39;s article\u003c/a\u003e on conflicts of interest in psychology\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow can we define a conflict an interest without falling down a rabbit hole?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCommunication statistics to the layperson\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow science journalism focuses on single studies rather than the larger story\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTom’s new book: \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Does-Not-Hate-You-Superintelligence-ebook/dp/B07K258VCV\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eThe AI does not hate you\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWin Tom’s book! Tweet your favourite Hertz episode and we’ll pick one at random, who\u0026#39;ll get sent Tom\u0026#39;s book\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow do journalists go about hearing from new voices for story comments?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat has Tom changes his mind about?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTom’s book recommendation: \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Galileos-Middle-Finger-Heretics-Activists/dp/0143108115\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eGalileo\u0026#39;s Middle Finger\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, August 5) \u0026quot;Conflicts of interest in psychology (with Tom Chivers)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/f9wbm/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e10.17605/OSF.IO/F9WBM\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Tom Chivers.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat with Tom about whether psychology has a conflict-of-interest problem and how to best define conflicts.","date_published":"2019-08-05T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b87b0438-366c-4f5e-97d8-0673cdf125ac.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":57476910,"duration_in_seconds":3592}]},{"id":"31e6f18b-ad36-4394-a7c3-6a3a6184271f","title":"88: The pomodoro episode","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/88","content_text":"Dan and James apply the pomodoro principle by tackling four topics within a strict ten-minute time limit each: James' new error detection tool, academic dress codes, the \"back in my day...\" defence for QRPs, and p-slacking.   \n\nHere are links and details...\n\n\nJames won an award\nJames’ new error detection tool, DEBIT\nAcademic dress codes\nP-slacking \nThe p-slacking paper\nMarcus Crede’s paper: A Negative Effect of a Contractive Pose Is Not Evidence for the Positive Effect of an Expansive Pose\nA preview of our next episode on conflicts of interest in psychology\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, July 15) \"The pomodoro episode\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VTDQ8","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James apply the pomodoro principle by tackling four topics within a strict ten-minute time limit each: James\u0026#39; new error detection tool, academic dress codes, the \u0026quot;back in my day...\u0026quot; defence for QRPs, and p-slacking.   \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere are links and details...\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames won an award\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames’ new error detection tool, \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/pm825/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDEBIT\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAcademic dress codes\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eP-slacking \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3408200\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ep-slacking paper\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMarcus Crede’s paper: \u003ca href=\"https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3198470\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eA Negative Effect of a Contractive Pose Is Not Evidence for the Positive Effect of an Expansive Pose\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA preview of our next episode on conflicts of interest in psychology\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, July 15) \u0026quot;The pomodoro episode\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/vtdq8/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e10.17605/OSF.IO/VTDQ8\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James apply the pomodoro principle by tackling four topics within a strict ten-minute time limit each: James' new error detection tool, academic dress codes, the \"back in my day...\" defence for QRPs, and p-slacking.   ","date_published":"2019-07-15T08:45:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/31e6f18b-ad36-4394-a7c3-6a3a6184271f.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":57702608,"duration_in_seconds":3606}]},{"id":"0b18a77f-d3e4-48be-812b-eb2a76916abe","title":"87: Improving the scientific poster (with Mike Morrison)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/87","content_text":"We chat with Mike Morrison, a former User Experience (UX) designer who quit his tech career to research how we can bring UX design principles to science. We discuss Mike's recently introduced 'better poster' format and why scientists should think carefully about UX.\n\nHere's what we cover:\n\n\nWhat’s the story behind the “better poster?”\nThe Better Poster video \nThe Better Poster template\nThe importance of minimising cognitive load\nScience isn’t badly designed, it’s not even designed at all\nWhat is good User Experience (UX)?\nThe most important feature of SciHub\nVersion 2 of the ‘better poster’\nWeird poster designs that James has seen over the years\nThe Fish Market study \nCommon misunderstandings of the better poster\nEmpirically investigating the performance of the Better Poster\nThe meta-meta poster\nHow better posters get better questions\nMike’s next target: Better Presentations\nAndrew York’s Github paper\nA special give-away! \n\n\nOther links\n\n\nMike on twitter\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, July 1) \"Improving the scientific poster (with Mike Morrison)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BNP7ESpecial Guest: Mike Morrison.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat with Mike Morrison, a former User Experience (UX) designer who quit his tech career to research how we can bring UX design principles to science. We discuss Mike\u0026#39;s recently introduced \u0026#39;better poster\u0026#39; format and why scientists should think carefully about UX.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what we cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat’s the story behind the “better poster?”\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RwJbhkCA58\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eBetter Poster video\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/ef53g/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eBetter Poster template\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe importance of minimising cognitive load\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScience isn’t badly designed, it’s not even designed at all\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat is good User Experience (UX)?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe most important feature of SciHub\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVersion 2 of the ‘better poster’\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWeird poster designs that James has seen over the years\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://peerj.com/articles/7138/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eFish Market study\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCommon misunderstandings of the better poster\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEmpirically investigating the performance of the Better Poster\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe meta-meta poster\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow better posters get better questions\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMike’s next target: Better Presentations\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAndrew York’s \u003ca href=\"https://andrewgyork.github.io/remote_refocus/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eGithub paper\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA special give-away! \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/mikemorrison\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eMike on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, July 1) \u0026quot;Improving the scientific poster (with Mike Morrison)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/bnp7e/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e10.17605/OSF.IO/BNP7E\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Mike Morrison.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat with Mike Morrison, a former User Experience (UX) designer who quit his tech career to research how we can bring UX design principles to science. We discuss Mike's recently introduced 'better poster' format and why scientists should think carefully about UX.","date_published":"2019-07-01T09:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/0b18a77f-d3e4-48be-812b-eb2a76916abe.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49220962,"duration_in_seconds":3076}]},{"id":"796930b0-e6ef-40e4-8730-b4ade1846629","title":"86: Should I stay or should I go?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/86","content_text":"Dan and James answer a listener question on whether they should stick it out for a few months in a toxic lab to get one more paper or if they should leave.\n\nOther stuff they cover:\n\n\nWe don’t like cricket, oh no, we love it\nJames is bad at tribalism\nWe answer a listener question about a bad lab environment \nThe “Dutch Bounce”\nThe Golden Lab Child\nDemonstrating independence by writing a sole author paper\nWhat should you do if there’s a late authorship switch on your paper?\nHaving an upfront conversation about authorship\nJames on NPR\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, June 17) \"Should I stay or should I go?\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/RX7FB","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James answer a listener question on whether they should stick it out for a few months in a toxic lab to get one more paper or if they should leave.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOther stuff they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe don’t like cricket, oh no, \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cewfIUQ6q8o\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewe love it\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames is bad at tribalism\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe answer a listener question about a bad lab environment \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe “Dutch Bounce”\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Golden Lab Child\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDemonstrating independence by writing a sole author paper\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat should you do if there’s a late authorship switch on your paper?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHaving an upfront conversation about authorship\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames \u003ca href=\"https://www.npr.org/2019/02/17/695536889/volunteers-fight-bad-science?t=1560712522537\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eon NPR\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, June 17) \u0026quot;Should I stay or should I go?\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/rx7fb/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e10.17605/OSF.IO/RX7FB\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James answer a listener question on whether they should stick it out for a few months in a toxic lab to get one more paper or if they should leave.","date_published":"2019-06-17T09:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/796930b0-e6ef-40e4-8730-b4ade1846629.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":61922741,"duration_in_seconds":3870}]},{"id":"1d1baca8-a4ac-429e-81b7-f85d6bf4d699","title":"85: GWAS big teeth you have, grandmother (with Kevin Mitchell)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/85","content_text":"We chat with Kevin Mitchell (Trinity College Dublin) about what the field of psychology can learn from genetics research, how our research theories tend to be constrained by our research tools, and his new book, \"Innate\". \n\nOther stuff we cover:\n\n\nKevin's book, \"Innate: How the Wiring of Our Brains Shapes Who We Are\"\nThe story with link between Serotonin transporter gene 5-HTTLPR variation and it’s link to depression\nGene wide association studies (GWAS) vs. candidate gene studies\nCorrecting for multiple tests in GWAS\nWhat can psychology learn from genetics when it comes to improving methods?\nWhen did people lose faith in candidate gene studies?\nCommon vs. rare gene mutations \nHow our theories are shaped by our technology and resources \nThe third overlooked area of genetic variation (other than nature and nurture): How the developmental program plays out\nWhy intelligence is just an index of how well your brain is put together\nWhat happened to identifying new therapeutic targets via genetics?\nWhat Kevin has changed his mind about\nA few papers on mice behavior relevant to what Kevin mentioned, Matias et al (2017), Menegas et al (2018), Zalocusky et al (2016), Miyazaki et al (2018), Bercovici et al (2018), Orsini et al (2018) \nRobustness and Evolvability in Living Systems (Wagner, A)\nThe Strategy of the Genes (Waddington, C) \nCybernetics : Or the Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine (Wiener, N)\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, June 3) \"GWAS big teeth you have, grandmother (with Kevin Mitchell)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/RS4HXSpecial Guest: Kevin Mitchell.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat with Kevin Mitchell (Trinity College Dublin) about what the field of psychology can learn from genetics research, how our research theories tend to be constrained by our research tools, and his new book, \u0026quot;\u003ca href=\"https://press.princeton.edu/titles/13255.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eInnate\u003c/a\u003e\u0026quot;. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOther stuff we cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKevin\u0026#39;s book, \u0026quot;\u003ca href=\"https://press.princeton.edu/titles/13255.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eInnate: How the Wiring of Our Brains Shapes Who We Are\u003c/a\u003e\u0026quot;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe story with link between Serotonin transporter gene 5-HTTLPR variation and it’s link to depression\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGene wide association studies (GWAS) vs. candidate gene studies\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCorrecting for multiple tests in GWAS\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat can psychology learn from genetics when it comes to improving methods?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhen did people lose faith in candidate gene studies?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCommon vs. rare gene mutations \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow our theories are shaped by our technology and resources \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe third overlooked area of genetic variation (other than nature and nurture): How the developmental program plays out\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy intelligence is just an index of how well your brain is put together\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat happened to identifying new therapeutic targets via genetics?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat Kevin has changed his mind about\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA few papers on mice behavior relevant to what Kevin mentioned, \u003ca href=\"https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/20552/elife-20552-v2.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eMatias et al\u003c/a\u003e (2017), \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-018-0222-1\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eMenegas et al\u003c/a\u003e (2018), \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/nature17400\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eZalocusky et al\u003c/a\u003e (2016), \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04496-y\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eMiyazaki et al\u003c/a\u003e (2018), \u003ca href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6325538/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eBercovici et al\u003c/a\u003e (2018), \u003ca href=\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13415-018-00649-0\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eOrsini et al\u003c/a\u003e (2018) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://press.princeton.edu/titles/8002.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eRobustness and Evolvability in Living Systems\u003c/a\u003e (Wagner, A)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Strategy-Genes-C-H-Waddington/dp/1138017310\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eThe Strategy of the Genes\u003c/a\u003e (Waddington, C) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Cybernetics-Second-Control-Communication-Machine/dp/026273009X\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eCybernetics : Or the Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine\u003c/a\u003e (Wiener, N)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, June 3) \u0026quot;GWAS big teeth you have, grandmother (with Kevin Mitchell)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/rs4hx/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e10.17605/OSF.IO/RS4HX\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Kevin Mitchell.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat with Kevin Mitchell (Trinity College Dublin) about what the field of psychology can learn from genetics research, how our research theories tend to be constrained by our research tools, and his new book, \"Innate\". ","date_published":"2019-06-03T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/1d1baca8-a4ac-429e-81b7-f85d6bf4d699.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":79703561,"duration_in_seconds":4981}]},{"id":"a5463aa9-a8e2-425c-824a-b7230f894662","title":"84: A GPS in the Garden of Forking Paths (with Amy Orben)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/84","content_text":"We chat with Amy Orben, who applies \"multiverse\" methodology to combat and expose analytical flexibility in her research area of the impact of digital technologies on psychological wellbeing. We also discuss ReproducibiliTea, an early career researcher-led journal club initiative she co-founded, which helps young researchers create local open science groups. \n\nHere are some more details and links:\n\n\nThe tweet pointing our Dan's gramatical error in his usual introduction. THANKS DENIS\nIs Twitter melting our brains?\nThe history of \"new technology\" panic \nWhat's the next panic?\nMoral entrepreneurs: profiting from moral panic\nSpecification curve analysis: a way to run all theoretically defensible analysis options on a given dataset \nAmy's Nature Human Behavior paper\nAmy's PNAS paper \nThe longitudincal effect of social media use on life satisfaction\nHow should scientists speak out against dodgy science?\nThe story behind Reproducabilitea \nThe ReproducibiliTea podcast\nReproducibiliTea stickers!\nThe UK Reproducibility network\nDaniel Lakens' Coursera course\nA multiverse of multiverses\nPress releasing every paper might not be the best idea\nAmy's book recommendation: The long way to a small angry planet\n\n\nOther links\n\n\nAmy on Twitter\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, May 21) \"A GPS in the Garden of Forking Paths (with Amy Orben)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/38KPESpecial Guest: Amy Orben.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat with Amy Orben, who applies \u0026quot;multiverse\u0026quot; methodology to combat and expose analytical flexibility in her research area of the impact of digital technologies on psychological wellbeing. We also discuss ReproducibiliTea, an early career researcher-led journal club initiative she co-founded, which helps young researchers create local open science groups. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere are some more details and links:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/_vdeni_/status/1126485212337143808\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etweet\u003c/a\u003e pointing our Dan\u0026#39;s gramatical error in his usual introduction. THANKS DENIS\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIs Twitter melting our brains?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe history of \u0026quot;new technology\u0026quot; panic \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat\u0026#39;s the next panic?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMoral entrepreneurs: profiting from moral panic\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://socialsciences.nature.com/users/200472-amy-orben/posts/42763-beyond-cherry-picking\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSpecification curve analysis\u003c/a\u003e: a way to run all theoretically defensible analysis options on a given dataset \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAmy\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0506-1\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eNature Human Behavior paper\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAmy\u0026#39;s\u003ca href=\"https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2019/04/30/1902058116\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e PNAS paper \u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe longitudincal effect of social media use on life satisfaction\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow should scientists speak out against dodgy science?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe story behind Reproducabilitea \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://soundcloud.com/reproducibilitea\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eReproducibiliTea podcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eReproducibiliTea \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/OrbenAmy/status/1125712657334571008\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003estickers\u003c/a\u003e!\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.bristol.ac.uk/psychology/research/ukrn/about/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eUK Reproducibility network\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDaniel Lakens\u0026#39; \u003ca href=\"https://www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eCoursera course\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/9qke2/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003emultiverse of multiverses\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePress releasing every paper might not be the best idea\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAmy\u0026#39;s book recommendation: \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Long-Small-Angry-Planet-Wayfarers/dp/0062444131%0Ahttps://www.amazon.com/Long-Small-Angry-Planet-Wayfarers/dp/0062444131\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eThe long way to a small angry planet\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/OrbenAmy\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eAmy on Twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, May 21) \u0026quot;A GPS in the Garden of Forking Paths (with Amy Orben)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/38kpe/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e10.17605/OSF.IO/38KPE\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Amy Orben.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat with Amy Orben, who applies \"multiverse\" methodology to combat and expose analytical flexibility in her research area of the impact of digital technologies on psychological wellbeing. We also discuss ReproducibiliTea, an early career researcher-led journal club initiative she co-founded, which helps young researchers create local open science groups. ","date_published":"2019-05-21T18:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/a5463aa9-a8e2-425c-824a-b7230f894662.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":50282996,"duration_in_seconds":3142}]},{"id":"ef3e1d0d-ca2b-41c4-ac54-9924d75cb0bd","title":"83: Back to our dirty unwashed roots","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/83","content_text":"By popular demand, Dan and James are kicking it old school and just shooting the breeze. They cover whether scientists should be on Twitter, if Fortnite is ruining our youth, book recommendations, and null oxytocin studies.\n\nStuff they cover and links to obsure references\n\n\nShould scientists be on twitter?\nJames runs a Twitter experiment\nScite has now gone live, listen to our episode on this platform\nOur dreams of a live Hertz episode\nIs Fortnite killing our youth and the parallels with the “heavy metal” scare\nAmy Orben’s screen time study \nMultiverse analysis \nBook recommendations: Kevin Mitchell’s \"Innate\", Gareth Leng's \"Heart of the brain\" \nDaryl dug a hole reference, from the Aussie classic, \"The Castle\"\nA new null oxytocin paper and the twitter response, and Dan's response \nThe SANS meeting venue\nQR codes on posters\nThe slides to Dan’s oxytocin talk at SANS\nThe Hertz Hype Cycle\nDan recollects one of the first conversations he had with James\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, May 8) \"Back to our dirty unwashed roots\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/N9BGX","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eBy popular demand, Dan and James are kicking it old school and just shooting the breeze. They cover whether scientists should be on Twitter, if Fortnite is ruining our youth, book recommendations, and null oxytocin studies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eStuff they cover and links to obsure references\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould scientists be on twitter?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames runs a Twitter experiment\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScite has now gone live, \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/80\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003elisten to our episode\u003c/a\u003e on this platform\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur dreams of a live Hertz episode\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIs \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortnite\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eFortnite\u003c/a\u003e killing our youth and the parallels with the “heavy metal” scare\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAmy Orben’s \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0506-1\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003escreen time study\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMultiverse analysis \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBook recommendations: \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Innate-How-Wiring-Brains-Shapes/dp/0691173885\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eKevin Mitchell’s \u0026quot;Innate\u0026quot;\u003c/a\u003e, Gareth Leng\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/heart-brain\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e\u0026quot;Heart of the brain\u0026quot; \u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDaryl \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDl1i3mpKwM\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003edug a hole reference\u003c/a\u003e, from the Aussie classic, \u0026quot;The Castle\u0026quot;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA new \u003ca href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306453019300800\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003enull oxytocin paper\u003c/a\u003e and the twitter response, and \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/dsquintana/status/1122962998069485573?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDan\u0026#39;s response\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe SANS \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/dsquintana/status/1124386664758095877?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003emeeting venue\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eQR codes on posters\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/q7a4w/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eslides to Dan’s oxytocin talk\u003c/a\u003e at SANS\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Hertz Hype Cycle\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan recollects one of the first conversations he had with James\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, May 8) \u0026quot;Back to our dirty unwashed roots\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/n9bgx/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003edoi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/N9BGX\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"By popular demand, Dan and James are kicking it old school and just shooting the breeze. They cover whether scientists should be on Twitter, if Fortnite is ruining our youth, book recommendations, and null oxytocin studies.","date_published":"2019-05-08T10:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/ef3e1d0d-ca2b-41c4-ac54-9924d75cb0bd.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":56816116,"duration_in_seconds":3551}]},{"id":"50ad0116-57d4-42a8-922a-1f64d2a74640","title":"82: More janitors and fewer architects","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/82","content_text":"We answer a listener question on the possible negative consequences of the open science movement—are things moving too quickly?\n\nLinks and things we discuss in the episode:\n\n\nWe have a new logo, if you haven't already noticed...\nContact us via our website form!\nConsidering the potential downsides of open science \nHere come dat boi meme explination\nThe dangers of open access by fiat\nThe role of commercial entities in open science \nThe “University of Oslo fancy Norway people-pay-taxes oil money bloody library” \nDropping the success rate of grants to increase the quality of evaluation\nReframing open science reform efforts to a mission of equity and fairness\nWe don’t know the process behind university sexual harassment/misconduct investigations \nDoes transparency even matter if people won’t follow up on problems?\nJames' prediction: If someone starts a journal that ONLY does Registered Report, this will be very successful \nThe milkshake duck tweet and an explanation\nPaul Roos and his “no dickheads” policy\nLinking DOIs\nWe can't let edge case scenarios, which may not even play out, hobble progress\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, April 15) \"More janitors and fewer architects\" Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7ZR9J","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe answer a listener question on the possible negative consequences of the open science movement—are things moving too quickly?\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks and things we discuss in the episode:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe have a new logo, if you haven\u0026#39;t already noticed...\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eContact us via our \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/contact\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewebsite form\u003c/a\u003e!\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eConsidering the potential downsides of open science \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHere come dat boi \u003ca href=\"https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/dat-boi\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ememe explination\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe dangers of open access by fiat\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe role of commercial entities in open science \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe “\u003ca href=\"https://www.ub.uio.no/english/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eUniversity of Oslo fancy Norway people-pay-taxes oil money bloody library\u003c/a\u003e” \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDropping the success rate of grants to increase the quality of evaluation\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eReframing open science reform efforts to a mission of equity and fairness\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe don’t know the process behind university sexual harassment/misconduct investigations \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDoes transparency even matter if people won’t follow up on problems?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; prediction: If someone starts a journal that ONLY does Registered Report, this will be very successful \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe milkshake duck \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/pixelatedboat/status/741904787361300481\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etweet\u003c/a\u003e and an \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milkshake_Duck\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eexplanation\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePaul Roos and his \u003ca href=\"https://www.sydneyswans.com.au/news/2011-12-16/the-swan-way\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e“no dickheads” policy\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLinking DOIs\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe can\u0026#39;t let edge case scenarios, which may not even play out, hobble progress\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, April 15) \u0026quot;More janitors and fewer architects\u0026quot; Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/7zr9j/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e10.17605/OSF.IO/7ZR9J\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We answer a listener question on the possible negative consequences of the open science movement—are things moving too quickly?","date_published":"2019-04-15T08:45:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/50ad0116-57d4-42a8-922a-1f64d2a74640.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":68625135,"duration_in_seconds":4289}]},{"id":"d5c64227-a753-4674-bc9f-16698af46496","title":"81: Too Young To Know, Too Old To Care","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/81","content_text":"We answer our first audio question, on whether academia is too broken to fix, and a second question on whether we’ve ever worried about the possible repercussions of our public critiques and commentary on academia.\n\nShow details:\n\n\nOur first audio question is from Erin Williams (@DrErinWill), who asks whether academia is too broken to fix\nThe letter to the editor that got rejected, despite the publication of the response to the letter\nHarassment in academia\nHave we ever been worried that someone might say, \"I'd never hire those dudes\" because of what we say?\nOther stuff that has happened to us as a result of the podcast\nFahrenheit vs. Celsius \nSupply and demand for academic jobs\nThe criticism that comes with putting yourself out there\n\n\nLinks\n\n\n@ReproRocks: for those working in reproduction to share their work through twitter \nThe Steven Pinker book - The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined\nTwitter thread from @drderringer\nMe too Stem blog\nGideon on Twitter:  @GidMK\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, April 1) \"Too Young To Know, Too Old To Care\" Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/W6MER","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe answer our first audio question, on whether academia is too broken to fix, and a second question on whether we’ve ever worried about the possible repercussions of our public critiques and commentary on academia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eShow details:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur first audio question is from Erin Williams (@DrErinWill), who asks whether academia is too broken to fix\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe letter to the editor that got rejected, despite the publication \u003cem\u003eof the response\u003c/em\u003e to the letter\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHarassment in academia\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHave we ever been worried that someone might say, \u0026quot;I\u0026#39;d never hire those dudes\u0026quot; because of what we say?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOther stuff that has happened to us as a result of the podcast\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFahrenheit vs. Celsius \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSupply and demand for academic jobs\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe criticism that comes with putting yourself out there\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/ReproRocks\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e@ReproRocks\u003c/a\u003e: for those working in reproduction to share their work through twitter \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Steven Pinker book - \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Better-Angels-Our-Nature-Violence/dp/0143122010\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eThe Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/drderringer/status/1110593951105540096?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eTwitter thread\u003c/a\u003e from @drderringer\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMe too Stem \u003ca href=\"https://metoostem.com/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eblog\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGideon on Twitter: \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/GidMK\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e @GidMK\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, April 1) \u0026quot;Too Young To Know, Too Old To Care\u0026quot; Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/345dk/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e10.17605/OSF.IO/W6MER\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We answer our first audio question, on whether academia is too broken to fix, and a second question on whether we’ve ever worried about the possible repercussions of our public critiques and commentary on academia","date_published":"2019-04-01T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/d5c64227-a753-4674-bc9f-16698af46496.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":53908792,"duration_in_seconds":3369}]},{"id":"07dbec38-7a70-44fd-9ef4-f590a1a7a2a8","title":"80: Cites are not endorsements (with Sean Rife)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/80","content_text":"We chat with Sean Rife, who the co-founder of scite.ai, a start-up that combines natural language processing with a network of experts to evaluate the veracity of scientific work.\n\nHere's what we cover and links for a few things we mention\n\n\nWhat is scite.ai?\nThe Winnower\nWhy is there no good (and free) plagiarism detector?\nGrobid - A machine learning library for extracting, parsing and re-structuring PDFs\nMeta-analysis can prop up flawed bodies of literature\nThe \"Too meta\" XKCD cartoon\nWhat’s the end game for scite?\nThe 80,000 hours game\nSpooner, a utility that allows authors of scientific publications to make their work available to the general public (probably) without violating publishing agreements\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Sean on twitter](www.twitter.com/seanrife)\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, March 18) \"Cites are not endorsements\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/Q9EYGSpecial Guest: Sean Rife.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat with Sean Rife, who the co-founder of \u003ca href=\"https://scite.ai\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003escite.ai\u003c/a\u003e, a start-up that combines natural language processing with a network of experts to evaluate the veracity of scientific work.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what we cover and links for a few things we mention\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat is scite.ai?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://thewinnower.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eThe Winnower\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy is there no good (and free) plagiarism detector?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://grobid.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Introduction/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eGrobid\u003c/a\u003e - A machine learning library for extracting, parsing and re-structuring PDFs\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMeta-analysis can prop up flawed bodies of literature\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u0026quot;\u003ca href=\"https://xkcd.com/1447/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eToo meta\u003c/a\u003e\u0026quot; XKCD cartoon\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat’s the end game for scite?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe 80,000 hours \u003ca href=\"https://80000hours.org/articles/can-you-guess/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003egame\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://spooner.lyceum.ws\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSpooner\u003c/a\u003e, a utility that allows authors of scientific publications to make their work available to the general public (probably) without violating publishing agreements\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Sean on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/seanrife\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/seanrife\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, March 18) \u0026quot;Cites are not endorsements\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/q9eyg/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e10.17605/OSF.IO/Q9EYG\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Sean Rife.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat with Sean Rife, who the co-founder of scite.ai, a start-up that combines natural language processing with a network of experts to evaluate the veracity of scientific work","date_published":"2019-03-17T23:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/07dbec38-7a70-44fd-9ef4-f590a1a7a2a8.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49490546,"duration_in_seconds":3093}]},{"id":"7f36586f-f5fa-4815-900e-52672625bf33","title":"79: Clinical trial reporting (with Henry Drysdale)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/79","content_text":"We chat with Henry Drysdale (University of Oxford), co-founder of the COMPare trials project, which compared clinical trial registrations with reported outcomes in five top medical journals and qualitatively analysed the responses to critical correspondence. \n\nDiscussion points and links galore:\n\n\nThe history behind the COMPare project\nThe two papers that were published: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials and a qualitative analysis of researchers’ responses to critical correspondence \nBen Goldacre's books\nWhat is outcome switching?\nWhat were some of the responses to query letters from the authors and journals?\nMisreporting trials (usually) doesn't lead to patient harm, but it harms the evidence base\nWhere should the buck stop with outcome switching?\nWould Registered Reports solve this problem?\nThe CONSORT guidelines\nHave the journals changed their practices?\nCOMPare on twitter\nThe COMPare website\nHere is Henry on Twitter - @HenryMDrysdale\nHere is Ben Goldacre on Twitter - @bengoldacre\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, March 4) \"Clinical trial reporting (with Henry Drysdale)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HBX8RSpecial Guest: Henry Drysdale.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe chat with Henry Drysdale (University of Oxford), co-founder of the \u003ca href=\"http://compare-trials.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eCOMPare trials project\u003c/a\u003e, which compared clinical trial registrations with reported outcomes in five top medical journals and qualitatively analysed the responses to critical correspondence. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDiscussion points and links galore:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe history behind the COMPare project\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe two papers that were published: \u003ca href=\"https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-019-3173-2\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ea prospective cohort study\u003c/a\u003e correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials and \u003ca href=\"https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-019-3172-3\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ea qualitative analysis\u003c/a\u003e of researchers’ responses to critical correspondence \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBen Goldacre\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.co.uk/l/B002C1VRBQ?_encoding=UTF8\u0026redirectedFromKindleDbs=true\u0026rfkd=1\u0026shoppingPortalEnabled=true\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ebooks\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat is outcome switching?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat were some of the responses to query letters from the authors and journals?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMisreporting trials (usually) doesn\u0026#39;t lead to patient harm, but it harms the evidence base\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhere should the buck stop with outcome switching?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWould Registered Reports solve this problem?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"http://www.consort-statement.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eCONSORT guidelines\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHave the journals changed their practices?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/compare_trials\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eCOMPare on twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe COMPare \u003ca href=\"http://compare-trials.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewebsite\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHere is Henry on Twitter - \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/HenryMDrysdale\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e@HenryMDrysdale\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHere is Ben Goldacre on Twitter - \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/bengoldacre\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e@bengoldacre\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, March 4) \u0026quot;Clinical trial reporting (with Henry Drysdale)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/hbx8r/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e10.17605/OSF.IO/HBX8R\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Henry Drysdale.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat with Henry Drysdale (University of Oxford), co-founder of the COMPare trials project, which compared clinical trial registrations with reported outcomes in five top medical journals and qualitatively analysed the responses to critical correspondence.","date_published":"2019-03-03T21:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/7f36586f-f5fa-4815-900e-52672625bf33.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":53558542,"duration_in_seconds":3347}]},{"id":"2fbb6ba6-d090-43af-a51c-68181ec46d5b","title":"78: Large-scale collaborative science (with Lisa DeBruine)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/78","content_text":"In this episde, we chat with Lisa DeBruine (University of Glasgow) about her experience with large-scale collaborative science and how her psychology department made the switch from SPSS to R.\n\nDiscussion points and links galore:\n\n\nDeborah Apthorp's tweet on having to teach SPSS, \"because that's what students know\"\nPeople who are involved with teaching R for psychology at the University of Glasgow: @Eavanmac @dalejbarr @McAleerP @clelandwoods @PatersonHelena @emilynordmann\nWhy the #psyTeachR started teaching R for reproducible science\nData wrangling vs. statistical analysis\nThe psyTeachR website\nDanielle Navarro, and her R text book that you should read\nLisa's \"faux\" package for data simulation\nSometimes you can't share data, simulations are a good way around this problem\n\"synthpop\" is the name of the package that Dan mentioned that can simulate census data\nPower analysis can be hard once you go beyond the more conventional statistical tests (e.g., t-tests, ANOVAs etc...)\nLisa's OSF page \nDirty code is always better than no code (but the cleaner the better)\nLive coding is terrifying but a useful teaching tool. Here's Dan live coding how to build a website in R, typos and all\nUsing a Slack group for help\nThe psychological science accelerator \nChris Chartier (Psych Science Accelerator Director) on Twitter\nA few of the other (hundreds) of folks involved with the Psych Science Accelerator Director: @PsySciAcc: @CRChartier @Ben_C_J @JkayFlake  @hmoshontz\nLisa's Registered Report project on face rating\nThe challenges associated with collaborating with 100+ labs\nAuthorship order\nAuthor contributions: CRediT taxonomy\nThe DARPA-funding project on using AI to determine reproducibility \nInteracting Minds workshop in Denmark in March on open science and reproducibility\nLisa shares what Glasgow is like\nLisa has changed her mind about the importance of research metrics (h-index, impact factors etc...)\nLisa thinks you should read this paper on equivalence testing, which includes two former guests, Daniel Lakens, Anne Scheel, and friend of the show Peder Isager.\nHere's the latest episode from Psych Soc O'Clock\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the first tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, February 18) \"Large-scale collaborative science (with Lisa DeBruine)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JDT6FSpecial Guest: Lisa DeBruine.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episde, we chat with Lisa DeBruine (University of Glasgow) about her experience with large-scale collaborative science and how her psychology department made the switch from SPSS to R.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDiscussion points and links galore:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDeborah Apthorp\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/deborahapthorp/status/1092599860212068352\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003etweet on having to teach SPSS\u003c/a\u003e, \u0026quot;because that\u0026#39;s what students know\u0026quot;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeople who are involved with teaching R for psychology at the University of Glasgow: @Eavanmac @dalejbarr @McAleerP @clelandwoods @PatersonHelena @emilynordmann\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy the #psyTeachR started teaching R for reproducible science\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eData wrangling vs. statistical analysis\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://psyteachr.github.io\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epsyTeachR website\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://djnavarro.net\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDanielle Navarro\u003c/a\u003e, and her \u003ca href=\"https://learningstatisticswithr.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eR text book\u003c/a\u003e that you should read\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLisa\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://github.com/debruine/faux\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e\u0026quot;faux\u0026quot; package\u003c/a\u003e for data simulation\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSometimes you can\u0026#39;t share data, simulations are a good way around this problem\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/synthpop/vignettes/synthpop.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e\u0026quot;synthpop\u0026quot; is the name of the package\u003c/a\u003e that Dan mentioned that can simulate census data\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePower analysis can be hard once you go beyond the more conventional statistical tests (e.g., t-tests, ANOVAs etc...)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLisa\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/4i578/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eOSF page\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDirty code is always better than no code (but the cleaner the better)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLive coding is terrifying but a useful teaching tool. Here\u0026#39;s Dan live coding \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/dsquintana/status/1070392412445401088\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehow to build a website in R\u003c/a\u003e, typos and all\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing a Slack group for help\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://psysciacc.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epsychological science accelerator\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChris Chartier (Psych Science Accelerator Director) \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/CRChartier\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eon Twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA few of the other (hundreds) of folks involved with the Psych Science Accelerator Director: @PsySciAcc: @CRChartier @Ben_C_J @JkayFlake  @hmoshontz\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLisa\u0026#39;s \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/f7v3n/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eRegistered Report project\u003c/a\u003e on face rating\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe challenges associated with collaborating with 100+ labs\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAuthorship order\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAuthor contributions: \u003ca href=\"http://dev.biologists.org/content/author-contributions\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eCRediT taxonomy\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u003ca href=\"https://www.wired.com/story/darpa-wants-to-solve-sciences-replication-crisis-with-robots/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDARPA-funding project\u003c/a\u003e on using AI to determine reproducibility \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://interactingminds.au.dk/events/single-events/artikel/2-day-workshop-open-science-and-reproducibility/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eInteracting Minds workshop\u003c/a\u003e in Denmark in March on open science and reproducibility\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLisa shares what Glasgow is like\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLisa has changed her mind about the importance of research metrics (h-index, impact factors etc...)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLisa thinks you should read \u003ca href=\"https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2515245918770963\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ethis paper\u003c/a\u003e on equivalence testing, which includes two former guests, \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/guests/daniel-lakens\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDaniel Lakens\u003c/a\u003e, \u003ca href=\"https://everythinghertz.com/guests/anne-scheel\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eAnne Scheel\u003c/a\u003e, and friend of the show Peder Isager.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHere\u0026#39;s the \u003ca href=\"https://anchor.fm/psychsococlock/episodes/Making-and-breaking-habits---Psych-Soc-OClock---Episode-4-e3327v\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003elatest episode\u003c/a\u003e from Psych Soc O\u0026#39;Clock\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the first tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, February 18) \u0026quot;Large-scale collaborative science (with Lisa DeBruine)\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/jdt6f/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e10.17605/OSF.IO/JDT6F\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Lisa DeBruine.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We chat with Lisa DeBruine (University of Glasgow) about large-scale collaborative science and how her psychology department made the switch from SPSS to R ","date_published":"2019-02-17T21:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2fbb6ba6-d090-43af-a51c-68181ec46d5b.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":56302444,"duration_in_seconds":3518}]},{"id":"b907f238-ff9d-46be-a2b9-f683a0b4ad6d","title":"77: Promiscuous expertise","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/77","content_text":"Dan and James discuss how to deal with the problem of scientists who start talking about topics outside their area of expertise. They also discuss what they would do differently if they would do their PhDs again\n\nHere's what they cover...\n\n\nThe podcast will now be permanently archived on Open Science Framework\nJames did a talk at the Sound Education conference on podcasting for early career researchers. Here's the video if you want to see him squirm uncomfortably in his chair for 20 minutes and/or hear his thoughts our approach to podcasting\n  The temptation for academics to believe their own press and to have their thoughts reinforced by the praise they get\n  Keeping a handle on what you know and don't know\n  Nassim Nicholas Taleb has FANS\n  The \"Pete Evans\" effect, James' solution, that we should eat Pete Evans, pesca-pescaterianism, and the spectacularly bad advice that we should stare into the sun \n  You should  follow gynecologist Jennifer Gunter on Twitter\n  How much money would you pay for 100,000 engaged twitter followers? Here's the tweet James was referring to \n  Should researchers have something like a Hippocratic Oath? How would we police this?\n  Researchers are not good at admitting they're wrong, do we need to approach retractions differently?\n  Would a bounty system, in which journals offer rewards, for finding errors in their papers, work well?\n  The \"Loss of confidence\" project, and Rebecca Willen's CV \n  The \"Nobel disease\"\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, February 4) \"Promiscuous expertise\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VYCAH","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss how to deal with the problem of scientists who start talking about topics outside their area of expertise. They also discuss what they would do differently if they would do their PhDs again\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what they cover...\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe podcast will now be \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/zj7y3/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epermanently archived on Open Science Framework\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames did a talk at the Sound Education conference on podcasting for early career researchers. \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26t6660_f-A\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eHere\u0026#39;s the video\u003c/a\u003e if you want to see him squirm uncomfortably in his chair for 20 minutes and/or hear his thoughts our approach to podcasting\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e  The temptation for academics to believe their own press and to have their thoughts reinforced by the praise they get\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e  Keeping a handle on what you know and don\u0026#39;t know\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e  \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/nntaleb\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eNassim Nicholas Taleb\u003c/a\u003e has FANS\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e  The \u0026quot;Pete Evans\u0026quot; effect, James\u0026#39; solution, that \u003ca href=\"https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/i-think-i-have-a-solution-i-m-going-to-eat-pete-evans-7e2da6f3967f\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewe should eat Pete Evans\u003c/a\u003e, \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IC-ZBJ-Kw2E\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003epesca-pescaterianism\u003c/a\u003e, and the spectacularly \u003ca href=\"https://www.sciencealert.com/please-don-t-stare-at-the-sun-even-if-pete-evans-says-it-s-good-for-you\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ebad advice that we should stare into the sun\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e  You should \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/DrJenGunter\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e follow gynecologist Jennifer Gunter on Twitter\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e  How much money would you pay for 100,000 engaged twitter followers? \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/ImHardcory/status/1090213113352372224\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eHere\u0026#39;s the tweet\u003c/a\u003e James was referring to \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e  Should researchers have something like a \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eHippocratic Oath\u003c/a\u003e? How would we police this?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e  Researchers are not good at admitting they\u0026#39;re wrong, do we need to approach retractions differently?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e  Would a bounty system, in which journals offer rewards, for finding errors in their papers, work well?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e  The \u0026quot;\u003ca href=\"https://lossofconfidence.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eLoss of confidence\u003c/a\u003e\u0026quot; project, and \u003ca href=\"https://rmwillen.info/publications/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eRebecca Willen\u0026#39;s CV\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e  The \u003ca href=\"http://skepdic.com/nobeldisease.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e\u0026quot;Nobel disease\u0026quot;\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther links\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Dan on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[James on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on twitter](\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e[Everything Hertz on Facebook](\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eSupport us on Patreon\u003c/a\u003e and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eEpisode citation and permanent link\u003cbr\u003e\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, February 4) \u0026quot;Promiscuous expertise\u0026quot;, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VYCAH\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e10.17605/OSF.IO/VYCAH\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss how to deal with the problem of scientists who start talking about topics outside their area of expertise. They also discuss what they were to do different if they were to do their PhDs all over again","date_published":"2019-02-04T08:30:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b907f238-ff9d-46be-a2b9-f683a0b4ad6d.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":53070366,"duration_in_seconds":3316}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/562258473","title":"76: Open peer review","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/76","content_text":"Peer review is typically conducted behind closed doors. There's been a recent push to make open peer review standard, but what's often left out of these conversations are the potential downsides. To illustrate this, Dan and James discuss a recent instance of open peer review that led to considerable online debate.\n\nHere's what they cover...\n\n\nHow should we navigate the open review of preprints?\nGate keepers gonna gate keep, but is this better out in the open?\nWeaponising openness \nSome people don't realise that some data can’t be shared\nShould the reviewers of rejected papers follow them to the next journal?\nWhen bad papers that you reject pop up in another journal, unchanged\nDoes the venue and timing of the open peer review matter?\nSigning your reviews\nUsing publons to track your reviews\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nBrad Love’s blog post: http://bradlove.org/blog/open-review\nNiko’s blog post: https://nikokriegeskorte.org/2019/01/09/whats-the-best-measure-of-representational-dissimilarity/\nPublons: https://publons.com\nDan on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n","content_html":"\u003cp\u003ePeer review is typically conducted behind closed doors. There\u0026#39;s been a recent push to make open peer review standard, but what\u0026#39;s often left out of these conversations are the potential downsides. To illustrate this, Dan and James discuss a recent instance of open peer review that led to considerable online debate.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what they cover...\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow should we navigate the open review of preprints?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGate keepers gonna gate keep, but is this better out in the open?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWeaponising openness \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSome people don\u0026#39;t realise that some data can’t be shared\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould the reviewers of rejected papers follow them to the next journal?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhen bad papers that you reject pop up in another journal, unchanged\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDoes the venue and timing of the open peer review matter?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSigning your reviews\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing publons to track your reviews\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBrad Love’s blog post: \u003ca href=\"http://bradlove.org/blog/open-review\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://bradlove.org/blog/open-review\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNiko’s blog post: \u003ca href=\"https://nikokriegeskorte.org/2019/01/09/whats-the-best-measure-of-representational-dissimilarity/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://nikokriegeskorte.org/2019/01/09/whats-the-best-measure-of-representational-dissimilarity/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePublons: \u003ca href=\"https://publons.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://publons.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan on twitter: \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames on twitter: \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter: \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook: \u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"Peer review is typically conducted behind closed doors. There's been a recent push to make open peer review standard, but what's often left out of these conversations are the potential downsides. To illustrate this, Dan and James discuss a recent instance of open peer review that led to considerable online debate","date_published":"2019-01-21T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/9c5a7a1b-9b0b-441e-96eb-88b903d11bac.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":46217089,"duration_in_seconds":2888}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/555381549","title":"75: Overlay journals (with Daniele Marinazzo)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/75","content_text":"We’re joined by Daniele Marinazzo (University of Ghent) to chat about the recently launched overlay journal Neurons, Behavior, Data analysis and Theory (NBDT), for which he on the Editorial Board. \n\nAn overlay journal is organised a set of manuscripts that is published and hosted by a seperate entity (in this case, the Arxiv server), a feature that dramatically reduces publication costs. We discuss the unique overlay model, how this can drive article fees to essentially zero, and what it takes to build a good community journal.\n\nHere’s what we cover:\n\n\nWhy launch a new neuroscience journal and how is it different from currently established journals?\nThe unique way that editor’s decide which papers to send out for review\nHow does the journal operate when it’s open access and submissions only cost $10?\nHow do you build a journal that your target community will recognise as a ‘good’ journal?\nThe process of submitting a manuscript to NBDT\nShould journals allow or encourage authors to suggest potential reviewers for their papers?\nUsing Twitter to find reviewers based on who’s ‘liked’ the preprint \nIs posting a preprint on twitter actually useful?\nWhat can neuroscience learn from the field of physics?\nAuthorship attribution\nHow can a journal better champion early career researchers?\n\n\nLinks...\n\nNBDT journal: https://nbdt.scholasticahq.com\nDanielle on twitter: https://twitter.com/dan_marinazzo\nDan on twitter https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\nSpecial Guest: Daniele Marinazzo.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe’re joined by Daniele Marinazzo (University of Ghent) to chat about the recently launched overlay journal Neurons, Behavior, Data analysis and Theory (NBDT), for which he on the Editorial Board. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eAn overlay journal is organised a set of manuscripts that is published and hosted by a seperate entity (in this case, the Arxiv server), a feature that dramatically reduces publication costs. We discuss the unique overlay model, how this can drive article fees to essentially zero, and what it takes to build a good community journal.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere’s what we cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy launch a new neuroscience journal and how is it different from currently established journals?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe unique way that editor’s decide which papers to send out for review\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow does the journal operate when it’s open access and submissions only cost $10?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow do you build a journal that your target community will recognise as a ‘good’ journal?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe process of submitting a manuscript to NBDT\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould journals allow or encourage authors to suggest potential reviewers for their papers?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing Twitter to find reviewers based on who’s ‘liked’ the preprint \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIs posting a preprint on twitter actually useful?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat can neuroscience learn from the field of physics?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAuthorship attribution\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow can a journal better champion early career researchers?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks...\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eNBDT journal: \u003ca href=\"https://nbdt.scholasticahq.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://nbdt.scholasticahq.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nDanielle on twitter: \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/dan_marinazzo\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/dan_marinazzo\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nDan on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nJames on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nEverything Hertz on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nEverything Hertz on Facebook \u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Daniele Marinazzo.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We’re joined by Daniele Marinazzo (University of Ghent) to chat about the recently launched overlay journal Neurons, Behavior, Data analysis and Theory (NBDT), for which he on the Editorial Board","date_published":"2019-01-07T16:45:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2a0eac45-615e-4729-90d6-683e999ab398.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":55982288,"duration_in_seconds":3498}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/547152000","title":"74: Seeing double (with Elisabeth Bik)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/74","content_text":"In this episode, Dan and James chat with microbiologist Elisabeth Bik about about the detection of problematic images in scientific papers, the state of microbiome research, and making the jump from academia to industry.\n\nMore info on what they cover:\n\n\nHow Elisabeth get into error detection of scientific images\nThe process of detecting errors in images \nHow groups of authors tend to publish multiple papers with problematic images\nThe association between journal prestige and problematic images\nProviding monetary incentives for publications\nMaking the jump from academia to industry \nThe current state of microbiome research\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nPatreon: www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\nElisabeth on Twitter:  www.twitter.com/microbiomdigest\nElisabeth online: https://microbiomedigest.com \nThe problematic image paper: https://mbio.asm.org/content/7/3/e00809-16.short\nPubpeer: https://pubpeer.com\nDan on twitter: www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter: www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter: www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook: www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\nSpecial Guest: Elisabeth Bik.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode, Dan and James chat with microbiologist Elisabeth Bik about about the detection of problematic images in scientific papers, the state of microbiome research, and making the jump from academia to industry.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMore info on what they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow Elisabeth get into error detection of scientific images\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe process of detecting errors in images \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow groups of authors tend to publish multiple papers with problematic images\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe association between journal prestige and problematic images\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eProviding monetary incentives for publications\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMaking the jump from academia to industry \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe current state of microbiome research\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePatreon: \u003ca href=\"http://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eElisabeth on Twitter:  www.twitter.com/microbiomdigest\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eElisabeth online: \u003ca href=\"https://microbiomedigest.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://microbiomedigest.com\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe problematic image paper: \u003ca href=\"https://mbio.asm.org/content/7/3/e00809-16.short\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://mbio.asm.org/content/7/3/e00809-16.short\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePubpeer: \u003ca href=\"https://pubpeer.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://pubpeer.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan on twitter: \u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames on twitter: \u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter: \u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook: \u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/h2\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Elisabeth Bik.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"In this episode, Dan and James chat with microbiologist Elisabeth Bik about about the detection of problematic images in scientific papers, the state of microbiome research, and making the jump from academia to industry","date_published":"2018-12-19T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/1e242f99-6351-4e4c-a168-7d4cfd300960.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49653550,"duration_in_seconds":3103}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/539084586","title":"73: Update your damn syllabus","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/73","content_text":"Dan and James discuss what's missing from biobehavioral science course syllabi.\n\nHere's the episode lowdown:\n\n\nA thank you to our new Patron supporters\nThe (supposed)CRISPR baby\nSPSS vs. R: What should be used for instruction?\nWhat would Dan and James include in a new syllabus?\nShould students be taught scientific communication?\nIf we’re going to add new stuff to a syllabus, what gets removed?\nAre courses too big these days?\nShould students be taught how to set up a side hustle to apply their research skills outside of academia?\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\nCRISPR baby story: https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/11/30/18119589/crispr-technology-he-jiankui\nDan on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss what\u0026#39;s missing from biobehavioral science course syllabi.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s the episode lowdown:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA thank you to our new Patron supporters\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe (supposed)CRISPR baby\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSPSS vs. R: What should be used for instruction?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat would Dan and James include in a new syllabus?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould students be taught scientific communication?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIf we’re going to add new stuff to a syllabus, what gets removed?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAre courses too big these days?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould students be taught how to set up a side hustle to apply their research skills outside of academia?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePatreon: \u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCRISPR baby story: \u003ca href=\"https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/11/30/18119589/crispr-technology-he-jiankui\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/11/30/18119589/crispr-technology-he-jiankui\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan on twitter: \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames on twitter: \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter: \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook: \u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos \u0026amp; video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss what's missing from biobehavioral science course syllabi","date_published":"2018-12-03T11:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5cd95a95-1a54-49c7-83c5-e1f16a78dfd9.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":58913853,"duration_in_seconds":3682}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/530708049","title":"72: Anonymity in scientific publishing","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/72","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a new journal of \"controversial ideas\" that will allow authors to publish articles anonymously. They also launch their Patreon page, in which listeners can support the show and get bonus features.\n\nHere's the episode lowdown\n\n\nJames describes his first experience eating a “ding dong”\nWhy James and Dan do the show\nWhat is Patreon?\nThe Journal of Controversial Ideas\nThe link between a vaccine batch and narcolepsy in Norway\nCan you “claim” our anonymous article a few years into the future? \nWhat’s the difference between anonymous blogging and anonymous journal articles?\nThe new Neurons, Behavior, Data analysis and Theory journal\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\nNarcolepsy paper: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945713001548\nJournal of Controversial ideas story: https://www.bbc.com/news/education-46146766 \nPsyBrief twitter account: twitter.com/psybrief \nNBDT journal: nbdt.scholasticahq.com\nDan on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + bonus audio (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss a new journal of \u0026quot;controversial ideas\u0026quot; that will allow authors to publish articles anonymously. They also launch their Patreon page, in which listeners can support the show and get bonus features.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s the episode lowdown\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames describes his first experience eating a “ding dong”\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy James and Dan do the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat is Patreon?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Journal of Controversial Ideas\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe link between a vaccine batch and narcolepsy in Norway\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCan you “claim” our anonymous article a few years into the future? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat’s the difference between anonymous blogging and anonymous journal articles?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe new Neurons, Behavior, Data analysis and Theory journal\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePatreon: \u003ca href=\"https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNarcolepsy paper: \u003ca href=\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945713001548\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945713001548\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJournal of Controversial ideas story: \u003ca href=\"https://www.bbc.com/news/education-46146766\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.bbc.com/news/education-46146766\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePsyBrief twitter account: twitter.com/psybrief \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNBDT journal: nbdt.scholasticahq.com\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan on twitter: \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames on twitter: \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter: \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook: \u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + the warm feeling you\u0026#39;re supporting the show\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e$5 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + bonus audio (extras + the bits we couldn\u0026#39;t include in our regular episodes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss a new journal of \"controversial ideas\" that will allow authors to publish articles anonymously. They also launch their Patreon page, in which listeners can support the show and get bonus features","date_published":"2018-11-16T07:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/17bfa005-afcd-47f5-b729-752ed226ec59.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":55751156,"duration_in_seconds":3484}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/525053169","title":"71: Moving for your job","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/71","content_text":"In this episode, we chat about whether it’s necessary to move for an academic job to demonstrate “independence”. \n\nHere's a rundown of the other stuff we cover: \n\n\nJames' appearance at the “Sound education” conference\nDan’s first day of school as a latino in a white neighbourhood \nOur thoughts on the restrictive social media policy at the SfN (Society for Neuroscience)conference\nWhy and how Dan and James moved overseas from Australia\nDo you really need to move overseas to demonstrate independence?\nThe two-body problem\nCan you demonstrate independence with sole-author papers?\n\n\nLinks\n\nSFN social media policy https://twitter.com/fedeadolfi/status/1058760331747581953\nDan on twitter https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode, we chat about whether it’s necessary to move for an academic job to demonstrate “independence”. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s a rundown of the other stuff we cover: \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; appearance at the “Sound education” conference\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan’s first day of school as a latino in a white neighbourhood \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur thoughts on the restrictive social media policy at the SfN (Society for Neuroscience)conference\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy and how Dan and James moved overseas from Australia\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDo you really need to move overseas to demonstrate independence?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe two-body problem\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCan you demonstrate independence with sole-author papers?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSFN social media policy \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/fedeadolfi/status/1058760331747581953\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/fedeadolfi/status/1058760331747581953\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nDan on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nJames on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nEverything Hertz on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nEverything Hertz on Facebook \u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"In this episode, we chat about whether it’s necessary to move for an academic job to demonstrate “independence”","date_published":"2018-11-05T13:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/efe6bd65-d871-41b8-83a0-7e1e793d2eb5.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":52093177,"duration_in_seconds":3255}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/514457976","title":"70:  Doubling-blinding dog balls","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/70","content_text":"Dan and James discuss the recent \"grievance studies\" hoax, whereby three people spent a year writing twenty-one fake manuscripts for submission to various cultural studies journals. They also discuss a new proposal to shift publication culture in which researchers pledge to publish exclusively in community-run journals but only when a pre-specified threshold of support for this commitment by the research community has been met.\n\nHere's an overview of the episode:\n\n\nIt’s fat bear week!\nThe new proposal to fix the stranglehold of commercial publishers in academia \nFlipping journals to open access\nThe ‘grievance studies’ hoax\nWhen James first came across the “dog rape” paper\nWhat if you were to design the dog study properly? \nShould we systematically try and hoax journals?\nAstronomy already injects fake data, can we learn from this?\nShould these new hoaxes all be associated with Sokal?\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nBrian Resnick’s fat bear week story: https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/10/9/17955432/fat-bear-week-katmai-national-park-409-747-salmon\nhttps://freeourknowledge.org\nPaywall the movie: https://paywallthemovie.com\nThe ‘grievance studies’ hoax: https://areomagazine.com/2018/10/02/academic-grievance-studies-and-the-corruption-of-scholarship/\nJames’ thread on the “dog-rape” study: https://twitter.com/jamesheathers/status/1048313273563668486\nThe proposal for systematic hoaxing: https://twitter.com/Meaningness/status/1047507838493499392\nA tweet from one of the reviewers of the dog paper: https://twitter.com/dwschieber/status/1047497301021798400 \nFake (a.k.a. blind) injection in astronomy: https://www.ligo.org/news/blind-injection\nThe original Sokal paper: http://www.physics.nyu.edu/sokal/transgress_v2/transgress_v2_singlefile.html\nDan on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss the recent \u0026quot;grievance studies\u0026quot; hoax, whereby three people spent a year writing twenty-one fake manuscripts for submission to various cultural studies journals. They also discuss a new proposal to shift publication culture in which researchers pledge to publish exclusively in community-run journals but only when a pre-specified threshold of support for this commitment by the research community has been met.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s an overview of the episode:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIt’s fat bear week!\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe new proposal to fix the stranglehold of commercial publishers in academia \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFlipping journals to open access\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe ‘grievance studies’ hoax\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhen James first came across the “dog rape” paper\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat if you were to design the dog study properly? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould we systematically try and hoax journals?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAstronomy \u003cem\u003ealready\u003c/em\u003e injects fake data, can we learn from this?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould these new hoaxes all be associated with Sokal?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBrian Resnick’s fat bear week story: \u003ca href=\"https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/10/9/17955432/fat-bear-week-katmai-national-park-409-747-salmon\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/10/9/17955432/fat-bear-week-katmai-national-park-409-747-salmon\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://freeourknowledge.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://freeourknowledge.org\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePaywall the movie: \u003ca href=\"https://paywallthemovie.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://paywallthemovie.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe ‘grievance studies’ hoax: \u003ca href=\"https://areomagazine.com/2018/10/02/academic-grievance-studies-and-the-corruption-of-scholarship/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://areomagazine.com/2018/10/02/academic-grievance-studies-and-the-corruption-of-scholarship/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames’ thread on the “dog-rape” study: \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/jamesheathers/status/1048313273563668486\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/jamesheathers/status/1048313273563668486\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe proposal for systematic hoaxing: \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/Meaningness/status/1047507838493499392\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/Meaningness/status/1047507838493499392\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA tweet from one of the reviewers of the dog paper: \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/dwschieber/status/1047497301021798400\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/dwschieber/status/1047497301021798400\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFake (a.k.a. blind) injection in astronomy: \u003ca href=\"https://www.ligo.org/news/blind-injection\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ligo.org/news/blind-injection\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe original Sokal paper: \u003ca href=\"http://www.physics.nyu.edu/sokal/transgress_v2/transgress_v2_singlefile.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.physics.nyu.edu/sokal/transgress_v2/transgress_v2_singlefile.html\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan on twitter: \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames on twitter: \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverything Hertz on twitter: \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook: \u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss the recent \"grievance studies\" hoax, whereby three people spent a year writing twenty-one fake manuscripts for submission to various cultural studies journals. They also discuss a new proposal to shift publication culture in which researchers pledge to publish exclusively in community-run journals but only when a pre-specified threshold of support for this commitment by the research community has been met","date_published":"2018-10-15T06:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5579f405-f4f1-499d-89c2-f2ef66013f35.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":63900106,"duration_in_seconds":3993}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/511707519","title":"69: Open science tools (with Brian Nosek)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/69","content_text":"We’re joined by Brian Nosek (Centre for Open Science and University of Virginia) to chat about building technology to make open science easier to implement, and shifting the norms of science to make it more open. We also discuss his recent social sciences replication project in which researchers accurately predicted which studies would replicate. \n\nHere’s what we cover:\n\n\nWhat is the Centre for Open Science?\nHow did Brian go from Psychology professor to the director of tech organisation?\nHow can researchers use the Open Science Framework (OSF)?\nHow does OSF remove friction for conducting open science?\nRegistered reports (now available at 131 journals!)\nWhat factors converged to cause the emerging acceptance of open science? \nThe social sciences replication project\nCan researchers anticipate which findings can replicate?\nWhat happened when Brian and his team tried to submit their replication attempts of Science papers to Science?\nThe experience of reviewing registered reports\n\n\nLinks:\nCentre for open science https://cos.io\nOpen Science Framework https://osf.io\nProject Implicit https://www.projectimplicit.net/index.html\nThe social sciences replication project paper https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0399-z\nBrian on Twitter https://www.twitter.com/briannosek\nDan on twitter https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Brian Nosek.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe’re joined by Brian Nosek (Centre for Open Science and University of Virginia) to chat about building technology to make open science easier to implement, and shifting the norms of science to make it more open. We also discuss his recent social sciences replication project in which researchers accurately predicted which studies would replicate. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere’s what we cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat is the Centre for Open Science?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow did Brian go from Psychology professor to the director of tech organisation?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow can researchers use the Open Science Framework (OSF)?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow does OSF remove friction for conducting open science?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRegistered reports (now available at 131 journals!)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat factors converged to cause the emerging acceptance of open science? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe social sciences replication project\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCan researchers anticipate which findings can replicate?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat happened when Brian and his team tried to submit their replication attempts of Science papers to Science?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe experience of reviewing registered reports\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks:\u003cbr\u003e\nCentre for open science \u003ca href=\"https://cos.io\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://cos.io\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nOpen Science Framework \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nProject Implicit \u003ca href=\"https://www.projectimplicit.net/index.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.projectimplicit.net/index.html\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThe social sciences replication project paper \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0399-z\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0399-z\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nBrian on Twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/briannosek\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/briannosek\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nDan on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nJames on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nEverything Hertz on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nEverything Hertz on Facebook \u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Brian Nosek.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We’re joined by Brian Nosek (Centre for Open Science and University of Virginia) to chat about building technology to make open science easier to implement, and shifting the norms of science to make it more open. We also discuss his recent social sciences replication project in which researchers accurately predicted which studies would replicate","date_published":"2018-10-09T11:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/796d65be-d183-42b3-90e1-44b928b387a0.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":47076831,"duration_in_seconds":2942}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/494537697","title":"68:  Friends don’t let friends believe in impact factors (with Nathan Hall)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/68","content_text":"This episode includes part two of a chat with Nathan Hall (McGill University), who is the person behind the ’Shit academics say’ account (@AcademicsSay), which pokes fun of all the weird stuff that academics say. Before getting to the discussion, James and Dan answer two listener questions on grants and data cleaning.\n\nHere’s what is covered in the episode:\n\n\nPeople talk about papers all the time, but the grant process is not discussed openly—why? \nSpeaking to your funding body’s relevant program officer\nAssembling a team that complements your weaknesses\nData carpentry and the tidyverse\nOutlier analysis\nNathan Hall on big publishing \nUpending the publication system by getting journals to bid for papers\nUsing peer review quality to judge the quality of journals \nDebunking learning styes\nAcademics chasing after celebrity and hype\nThe cost of chasing academic prestige \nUsing twitter hashtags like #PhDChat and #ECRchat to learn more about the experiences of other people\n\n\nLinks\nData carpentry https://datacarpentry.org/\nThe paper with detailed code https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03811-x\nThe podcast conference https://www.soundeducation.fm/\nCern and comic sans https://www.theverge.com/2012/7/4/3136652/cern-scientists-comic-sans-higgs-boson\nShit Academics Say on twitter https://www.twitter.com/AcademicsSay\nNathan on Twitter https://www.twitter.com/prof_nch\nDan on twitter https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Nathan Hall.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eThis episode includes part two of a chat with Nathan Hall (McGill University), who is the person behind the ’Shit academics say’ account (@AcademicsSay), which pokes fun of all the weird stuff that academics say. Before getting to the discussion, James and Dan answer two listener questions on grants and data cleaning.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere’s what is covered in the episode:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeople talk about papers all the time, but the grant process is not discussed openly—why? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaking to your funding body’s relevant program officer\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAssembling a team that complements your weaknesses\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eData carpentry and the tidyverse\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOutlier analysis\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNathan Hall on big publishing \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUpending the publication system by getting journals to bid for papers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing peer review quality to judge the quality of journals \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDebunking learning styes\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAcademics chasing after celebrity and hype\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe cost of chasing academic prestige \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing twitter hashtags like #PhDChat and #ECRchat to learn more about the experiences of other people\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003cbr\u003e\nData carpentry \u003ca href=\"https://datacarpentry.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://datacarpentry.org/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThe paper with detailed code \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03811-x\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03811-x\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThe podcast conference \u003ca href=\"https://www.soundeducation.fm/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.soundeducation.fm/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nCern and comic sans \u003ca href=\"https://www.theverge.com/2012/7/4/3136652/cern-scientists-comic-sans-higgs-boson\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.theverge.com/2012/7/4/3136652/cern-scientists-comic-sans-higgs-boson\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nShit Academics Say on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/AcademicsSay\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/AcademicsSay\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nNathan on Twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/prof_nch\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/prof_nch\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nDan on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nJames on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nEverything Hertz on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nEverything Hertz on Facebook \u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Nathan Hall.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"This episode includes part two of a chat with Nathan Hall (McGill University), who is the person behind the ’Shit academics say’ account (@AcademicsSay), which pokes fun of all the weird stuff that academics say. Before getting to the discussion, James and Dan answer two listener questions on grants and data cleaning.","date_published":"2018-09-03T13:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/ca0bf96b-9732-4963-96be-a238d4bee23b.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":71207287,"duration_in_seconds":4450}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/487974981","title":"67: Shit Academics Say (with Nathan Hall)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/67","content_text":"We’re joined by Nathan Hall (McGill University) to chat about the role of humour in academia.  Nathan is the person behind the ’Shit academics say’ Twitter account (@AcademicsSay), which pokes fun of all the weird stuff that academics say. \n\nHere’s what we cover:\n\n\nHow Nathan got started with the account\nThe story behind Nathan's 'Research Wahlberg' Twitter account (@ResearchMark) \nThe risk of social media usage being perceived as “unprofessional”\nThe amount of free labor that academics are pressured to do\nHow alcohol is becoming an unspoken coping strategy in academia\nAcademic guilt and glamorising overwork\nWhy Nathan changed his mind about making Imposter Syndrome jokes\nLeaving tweets in your draft folder\n\n\nLinks\nNein Quarterly https://twitter.com/NeinQuarterly\nShit my Dad says https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays\nCern and comic sans https://www.theverge.com/2012/7/4/3136652/cern-scientists-comic-sans-higgs-boson\nAte the onion https://www.reddit.com/r/AteTheOnion/\nShit Academics Say on twitter https://www.twitter.com/AcademicsSay\nNathan on Twitter https://www.twitter.com/prof_nch\nDan on twitter https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Nathan Hall.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe’re joined by Nathan Hall (McGill University) to chat about the role of humour in academia.  Nathan is the person behind the ’Shit academics say’ Twitter account (@AcademicsSay), which pokes fun of all the weird stuff that academics say. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere’s what we cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow Nathan got started with the account\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe story behind Nathan\u0026#39;s \u0026#39;Research Wahlberg\u0026#39; Twitter account (@ResearchMark) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe risk of social media usage being perceived as “unprofessional”\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe amount of free labor that academics are pressured to do\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow alcohol is becoming an unspoken coping strategy in academia\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAcademic guilt and glamorising overwork\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy Nathan changed his mind about making Imposter Syndrome jokes\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLeaving tweets in your draft folder\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003cbr\u003e\nNein Quarterly \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/NeinQuarterly\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/NeinQuarterly\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nShit my Dad says \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/shitmydadsays\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nCern and comic sans \u003ca href=\"https://www.theverge.com/2012/7/4/3136652/cern-scientists-comic-sans-higgs-boson\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.theverge.com/2012/7/4/3136652/cern-scientists-comic-sans-higgs-boson\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nAte the onion \u003ca href=\"https://www.reddit.com/r/AteTheOnion/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.reddit.com/r/AteTheOnion/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nShit Academics Say on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/AcademicsSay\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/AcademicsSay\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nNathan on Twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/prof_nch\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/prof_nch\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nDan on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nJames on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nEverything Hertz on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nEverything Hertz on Facebook \u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Nathan Hall.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"We’re joined by Nathan Hall (McGill University) to chat about the role of humour in academia.  Nathan is the person behind the ’Shit academics say’ Twitter account (@AcademicsSay), which pokes fun of all the weird stuff that academics say. ","date_published":"2018-08-20T09:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/0bd3c084-233f-4a2a-b4a2-3dd53d4e8256.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":60517145,"duration_in_seconds":3782}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/481678263","title":"66: Ideal worlds vs grim truths","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/66","content_text":"Dan and James answer listener questions on tips for starting your PhD and the role of statistics in exploratory research. \n\nOther stuff they cover:\n\n\nJames new paper on people that voluntarily give themselves goosebumps\nDan’s new podcast: Physiology and Behavior \nA preview of next weeks guest, Nathan Hall\nWhen things are taken out of context on Twitter\nWhat do you do when people are angry with you on the internet?\nTips for people starting a PhD\nCan inferential statistics play a role in exploratory research?\nWhy don’t journals publish peer review reports?\nWhy is PsycNet so bad?\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nJames’ paper https://peerj.com/articles/5292/\nPhysiology and Behavior podcast from Dan  https://shows.pippa.io/dsquintana\nThe tweet we discuss https://twitter.com/andpru/status/1024005699737509888?s=21\n\n\nDan on twitter https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James answer listener questions on tips for starting your PhD and the role of statistics in exploratory research. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOther stuff they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames new paper on people that voluntarily give themselves goosebumps\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan’s new podcast: Physiology and Behavior \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA preview of next weeks guest, Nathan Hall\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhen things are taken out of context on Twitter\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat do you do when people are angry with you on the internet?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTips for people starting a PhD\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCan inferential statistics play a role in exploratory research?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy don’t journals publish peer review reports?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy is PsycNet so bad?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames’ paper \u003ca href=\"https://peerj.com/articles/5292/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://peerj.com/articles/5292/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePhysiology and Behavior podcast from Dan  \u003ca href=\"https://shows.pippa.io/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://shows.pippa.io/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe tweet we discuss \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/andpru/status/1024005699737509888?s=21\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/andpru/status/1024005699737509888?s=21\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDan on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nJames on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nEverything Hertz on twitter \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nEverything Hertz on Facebook \u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James answer listener questions on tips for starting your PhD and the role of statistics in exploratory research","date_published":"2018-08-06T05:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/4e9780a2-2e26-484a-8a3f-bc0c85c430e4.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":52208952,"duration_in_seconds":3263}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/472240959","title":"65: Blockchain and open science (with Jon Brock)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/65","content_text":"Dan and James chat with Jon Brock (Cognitive scientist at Frankl) about the use of blockchain technology for open science.\n\nHere's what they cover:\n\nWhat is the blockchain?\nWhy Jon made the jump from academia to Frankl\nA cryptocurrency for open science\nWhat do institutional review boards think about using blockchain for data collection and storage?\nAutism heterogeneity \nHow will this approach scale to biological signals and genetics data?\nWhat’s something that Jon’s changed him mind about in regards to academia?\n\nLinks\n\nFrankl https://frankl.io\nFive reasons Frankl has a token  https://medium.com/franklopenscience/why-does-frankl-need-a-frankl-token-4129d718ab74\nBjoern Brembs blog post http://bjoern.brembs.net/2018/05/after-24-years-when-will-academic-culture-finally-shift/\nAn explainer on cryptographic hashes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_hash_function#Illustration\nFrankl in a nutshell https://medium.com/franklopenscience/frankl-in-a-nutshell-9b488c554dea\nFrankl for autism https://medium.com/franklopenscience/frankl-for-autism-e74f0108bf5a\nRethinking Innateness https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/rethinking-innateness\n\nJon on Twitter twitter.com/DrBrocktagon\nDan on Twitter twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on Twitter twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on Twitter twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Jon Brock.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James chat with Jon Brock (Cognitive scientist at Frankl) about the use of blockchain technology for open science.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eWhat is the blockchain?\u003cbr\u003e\nWhy Jon made the jump from academia to Frankl\u003cbr\u003e\nA cryptocurrency for open science\u003cbr\u003e\nWhat do institutional review boards think about using blockchain for data collection and storage?\u003cbr\u003e\nAutism heterogeneity \u003cbr\u003e\nHow will this approach scale to biological signals and genetics data?\u003cbr\u003e\nWhat’s something that Jon’s changed him mind about in regards to academia?\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFrankl \u003ca href=\"https://frankl.io\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://frankl.io\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nFive reasons Frankl has a token  \u003ca href=\"https://medium.com/franklopenscience/why-does-frankl-need-a-frankl-token-4129d718ab74\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://medium.com/franklopenscience/why-does-frankl-need-a-frankl-token-4129d718ab74\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nBjoern Brembs blog post \u003ca href=\"http://bjoern.brembs.net/2018/05/after-24-years-when-will-academic-culture-finally-shift/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://bjoern.brembs.net/2018/05/after-24-years-when-will-academic-culture-finally-shift/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nAn explainer on cryptographic hashes \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_hash_function#Illustration\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_hash_function#Illustration\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nFrankl in a nutshell \u003ca href=\"https://medium.com/franklopenscience/frankl-in-a-nutshell-9b488c554dea\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://medium.com/franklopenscience/frankl-in-a-nutshell-9b488c554dea\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nFrankl for autism \u003ca href=\"https://medium.com/franklopenscience/frankl-for-autism-e74f0108bf5a\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://medium.com/franklopenscience/frankl-for-autism-e74f0108bf5a\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nRethinking Innateness \u003ca href=\"https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/rethinking-innateness\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://mitpress.mit.edu/books/rethinking-innateness\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eJon on Twitter twitter.com/DrBrocktagon\u003cbr\u003e\nDan on Twitter twitter.com/dsquintana\u003cbr\u003e\nJames on Twitter twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003cbr\u003e\nEverything Hertz on Twitter twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003cbr\u003e\nEverything Hertz on Facebook \u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Jon Brock.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James chat with Jon Brock (Cognitive scientist at Frankl) about the use of blockchain technology for open science","date_published":"2018-07-16T06:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/75c2531f-801d-477d-a398-ec9ab7e5d79d.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":52328070,"duration_in_seconds":3270}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/466151316","title":"64: Salami slicing","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/64","content_text":"Dan and James talk about the recent SIPS conference answer a listener question on \"salami slicing\" the outcomes from one study into multiple papers.\n\nHere's what they cover:\n\n\nWhat is the SIPS conference? [0:24]\nA SIPS proposal for Google scholar to highlight commentaries and replication attempts on specific articles [15:42]\nJames and Dan’s favourite Hertz episodes [20:43]\nWe answer a listener question on Salami slicing [28:45]\nCan you publish too much? [48:10]\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nSIPS conference: https://www.improvingpsych.org/SIPS2018/\nReproducibilitea podcast:  https://soundcloud.com/reproducibilitea\nSalami slicing tweet: https://twitter.com/academicswrite/status/1008719899940786176\nCumulative impact factors: http://khakhalin.blogspot.com/2012/11/cumulative-impact-factor-benchmarking.html\nA working document from SIPS on making replications discoverable (including Google scholar) https://osf.io/57zxa/\n\n\nFind us on Twitter:\nwww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nwww.twitter.com/dsquintana\nwww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James talk about the recent SIPS conference answer a listener question on \u0026quot;salami slicing\u0026quot; the outcomes from one study into multiple papers.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat is the SIPS conference? [0:24]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA SIPS proposal for Google scholar to highlight commentaries and replication attempts on specific articles [15:42]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames and Dan’s favourite Hertz episodes [20:43]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe answer a listener question on Salami slicing [28:45]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCan you publish \u003cem\u003etoo\u003c/em\u003e much? [48:10]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSIPS conference: \u003ca href=\"https://www.improvingpsych.org/SIPS2018/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.improvingpsych.org/SIPS2018/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eReproducibilitea podcast:  \u003ca href=\"https://soundcloud.com/reproducibilitea\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://soundcloud.com/reproducibilitea\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSalami slicing tweet: \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/academicswrite/status/1008719899940786176\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/academicswrite/status/1008719899940786176\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCumulative impact factors: \u003ca href=\"http://khakhalin.blogspot.com/2012/11/cumulative-impact-factor-benchmarking.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://khakhalin.blogspot.com/2012/11/cumulative-impact-factor-benchmarking.html\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA working document from SIPS on making replications discoverable (including Google scholar) \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/57zxa/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/57zxa/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFind us on Twitter:\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James talk about the recent SIPS conference and answer a listener question on \"salami slicing\" the outcomes from one study into multiple papers","date_published":"2018-07-02T05:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/23b978a6-baa3-4c8b-835d-86b7a1c959cc.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":59478098,"duration_in_seconds":3717}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/459832776","title":"63: Science journalism (with Brian Resnick)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/63","content_text":"Dan and James chat about science journalism with Brian Resnick (@b_resnick), who is a science reporter at Vox.com.\n\nHere’s what they cover:\n\nShould scientists be worried that their work will be misrepresented when talking to the media? [0:58]\nHow Brian approaches science journalism [8:53]\nIt’s ok to challenge the assumptions of science journalists [16:57]\nHow do you write a great headline? [19:13]\nHow does Brian appraise the quality of research? [29:50]\nShould psychiatrists (or journalists) diagnose the US President? [32:50] \nStories in science that no one knows the answer to [36:58] \nHow to promote your research without going via your institution’s media department [40:24]\nThe best way to pitch your research to a science journalist [44:25]\nHow pre-preprints are great for research addressing current events [48:45]\nHow scientists can improve their science communication writing [53:15]\nDick jokes in science writing — yes or no? [54:30]\nWhat has Brian changed his mind about? [56:37]\nBrian’s book recommendation [58:05]\n\nLinks:\nBrian’s pieces at Vox - https://www.vox.com/authors/brian-resnick\nThe twitter poll that Dan was referring to - https://twitter.com/kylejasmin/status/960065733551181824?lang=en\nThe Weeds podcast episode on the Goldwater rule - https://art19.com/shows/the-weeds/episodes/72d4c65f-2d2a-4925-8bb6-7d6ca93cb561 \nBrian’s email - Brian@vox.com\nBrian on Twitter - https://www.twitter.com/b_resnick\n\nBooks mentioned:\nWe have no idea - https://www.amazon.com/We-Have-No-Idea-Universe/dp/0735211515\nDoes it fart? - https://www.amazon.com/Does-Fart-Definitive-Animal-Flatulence/dp/0316484156/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8\n\nFind us on Twitter:\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nhttps://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nhttps://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Brian Resnick.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James chat about science journalism with Brian Resnick (@b_resnick), who is a science reporter at Vox.com.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere’s what they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eShould scientists be worried that their work will be misrepresented when talking to the media? [0:58]\u003cbr\u003e\nHow Brian approaches science journalism [8:53]\u003cbr\u003e\nIt’s ok to challenge the assumptions of science journalists [16:57]\u003cbr\u003e\nHow do you write a great headline? [19:13]\u003cbr\u003e\nHow does Brian appraise the quality of research? [29:50]\u003cbr\u003e\nShould psychiatrists (or journalists) diagnose the US President? [32:50] \u003cbr\u003e\nStories in science that no one knows the answer to [36:58] \u003cbr\u003e\nHow to promote your research without going via your institution’s media department [40:24]\u003cbr\u003e\nThe best way to pitch your research to a science journalist [44:25]\u003cbr\u003e\nHow pre-preprints are great for research addressing current events [48:45]\u003cbr\u003e\nHow scientists can improve their science communication writing [53:15]\u003cbr\u003e\nDick jokes in science writing — yes or no? [54:30]\u003cbr\u003e\nWhat has Brian changed his mind about? [56:37]\u003cbr\u003e\nBrian’s book recommendation [58:05]\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks:\u003cbr\u003e\nBrian’s pieces at Vox - \u003ca href=\"https://www.vox.com/authors/brian-resnick\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.vox.com/authors/brian-resnick\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThe twitter poll that Dan was referring to - \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/kylejasmin/status/960065733551181824?lang=en\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/kylejasmin/status/960065733551181824?lang=en\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThe Weeds podcast episode on the Goldwater rule - \u003ca href=\"https://art19.com/shows/the-weeds/episodes/72d4c65f-2d2a-4925-8bb6-7d6ca93cb561\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://art19.com/shows/the-weeds/episodes/72d4c65f-2d2a-4925-8bb6-7d6ca93cb561\u003c/a\u003e \u003cbr\u003e\nBrian’s email - \u003ca href=\"mailto:Brian@vox.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eBrian@vox.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nBrian on Twitter - \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/b_resnick\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/b_resnick\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eBooks mentioned:\u003cbr\u003e\nWe have no idea - \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/We-Have-No-Idea-Universe/dp/0735211515\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.amazon.com/We-Have-No-Idea-Universe/dp/0735211515\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nDoes it fart? - \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Does-Fart-Definitive-Animal-Flatulence/dp/0316484156/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.amazon.com/Does-Fart-Definitive-Animal-Flatulence/dp/0316484156/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFind us on Twitter:\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Brian Resnick.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James chat about science journalism with Brian Resnick, who is a science reporter at Vox.com.","date_published":"2018-06-18T07:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/7723e5ff-0e78-4e72-8f3a-b091d3b0c14a.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":58160140,"duration_in_seconds":3634}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/453429525","title":"62: Adopting open science practices (with Dorothy Bishop)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/62","content_text":"Dan and James chat about the adoption of open science practices with Dorothy Bishop, Professor of Developmental Neuropsychology at the University of Oxford.\n\nHere are some highlights from the show:\n\n\nWhy Dorothy starting adopting open science practices\nForking paths of analysis\nDorothy’s experience with her first registered report\nIssues around data deposition\nWhen someone finds an error in your data\nWhat happens when a senior researcher is using questionable research practices?\nWhat to do when you’re caught doing something wrong\nDetecting errors in other papers\nThe potential for open data to be weaponised\nHow error detection is interpersonally difficult \nCarving out time for non-work pursuits\nThe benefits of writing fiction when you're a scientist\nUsing video for science communication \nJames Heathers: Cat dealer\nPromoting your research vs. promoting yourself\nDorothy’s book recommendation\n\n\nLinks\nDan Gilbert’s paper: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/351/6277/1037.2\nMerchants of doubt [book]: https://www.amazon.com/Merchants-Doubt-Handful-Scientists-Obscured/dp/1608193942\nDorothy's blog: deevybee.blogspot.com\nDorothy's crime novels: https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_ebooks_1?ie=UTF8\u0026amp;field-author=Deevy+Bishop\u0026amp;search-alias=digital-text\u0026amp;text=Deevy+Bishop\u0026amp;sort=relevancerank\nDorothy on Twitter: twitter.com/deevybee\n\nFind us on Twitter\ntwitter.com/hertzpodcast\ntwitter.com/dsquintana\ntwitter.com/jamesheathers\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Dorothy Bishop.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James chat about the adoption of open science practices with Dorothy Bishop, Professor of Developmental Neuropsychology at the University of Oxford.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere are some highlights from the show:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy Dorothy starting adopting open science practices\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eForking paths of analysis\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDorothy’s experience with her first registered report\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIssues around data deposition\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhen someone finds an error in your data\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat happens when a senior researcher is using questionable research practices?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat to do when you’re caught doing something wrong\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDetecting errors in other papers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe potential for open data to be weaponised\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow error detection is interpersonally difficult \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCarving out time for non-work pursuits\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe benefits of writing fiction when you\u0026#39;re a scientist\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing video for science communication \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames Heathers: Cat dealer\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePromoting your research vs. promoting yourself\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDorothy’s book recommendation\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003cbr\u003e\nDan Gilbert’s paper: \u003ca href=\"http://science.sciencemag.org/content/351/6277/1037.2\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://science.sciencemag.org/content/351/6277/1037.2\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nMerchants of doubt [book]: \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Merchants-Doubt-Handful-Scientists-Obscured/dp/1608193942\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.amazon.com/Merchants-Doubt-Handful-Scientists-Obscured/dp/1608193942\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nDorothy\u0026#39;s blog: deevybee.blogspot.com\u003cbr\u003e\nDorothy\u0026#39;s crime novels: \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_ebooks_1?ie=UTF8\u0026field-author=Deevy+Bishop\u0026search-alias=digital-text\u0026text=Deevy+Bishop\u0026sort=relevancerank\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_ebooks_1?ie=UTF8\u0026amp;field-author=Deevy+Bishop\u0026amp;search-alias=digital-text\u0026amp;text=Deevy+Bishop\u0026amp;sort=relevancerank\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nDorothy on Twitter: twitter.com/deevybee\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFind us on Twitter\u003cbr\u003e\ntwitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003cbr\u003e\ntwitter.com/dsquintana\u003cbr\u003e\ntwitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Dorothy Bishop.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James chat about the adoption of open science practices with Dorothy Bishop, Professor of Developmental Neuropsychology at the University of Oxford.","date_published":"2018-06-04T06:15:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2cc5a0ae-b9b2-40b9-8000-290e5a5732d5.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48300280,"duration_in_seconds":3449}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/446945370","title":"61: Performance enhancing thugs (with Greg Nuckols)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/61","content_text":"Dan and James chat with Greg Nuckols, who is grad student in exercise physiology, strength coach, and writer at strongerbyscience.com\n\nWhat they cover in this episode:\n\n\nWhy Greg blogs his papers before preprints \nHow Greg combines his business with his grad study\nGetting your research to your audience without publishing in scientific journals \nThe limitations of traditional publishing\nAddressing popular misconceptions in research \nAre questionable research practices as bad in sports science as they are in psychology?\nBeing an “academic outsider” can be tough, but it has some advantages\nThe work that goes into exercise physiology studies\nHow practical are multilab research projects in sports science?\nExercise “experts” on Instagram \nUsing Instagram to disseminate research \nGreg’s go-to resources for learning about open science\nWhat Greg’s changed his mind about\nHow Greg’s planning on funding his future research without grants\n\n\nLinks\n\nScihub - whereisscihub.now.sh\nGreg on Twitter - twitter.com/GregNuckols\nGreg's website and newsletter - https://www.strongerbyscience.com\nStronger by Science on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/strongerbyscience/\nChris Beardsly on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chrisabeardsley/\nData colada - http://datacolada.org\nSlatestar codex - http://slatestarcodex.com\nJordan Anaya's blog - https://medium.com/@OmnesRes\nSportRXiv - http://sportrxiv.org\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Greg Nuckols.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James chat with Greg Nuckols, who is grad student in exercise physiology, strength coach, and writer at strongerbyscience.com\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eWhat they cover in this episode:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy Greg blogs his papers before preprints \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow Greg combines his business with his grad study\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGetting your research to your audience without publishing in scientific journals \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe limitations of traditional publishing\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAddressing popular misconceptions in research \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAre questionable research practices as bad in sports science as they are in psychology?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBeing an “academic outsider” can be tough, but it has some advantages\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe work that goes into exercise physiology studies\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow practical are multilab research projects in sports science?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExercise “experts” on Instagram \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing Instagram to disseminate research \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGreg’s go-to resources for learning about open science\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat Greg’s changed his mind about\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow Greg’s planning on funding his future research without grants\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eScihub - whereisscihub.now.sh\u003cbr\u003e\nGreg on Twitter - twitter.com/GregNuckols\u003cbr\u003e\nGreg\u0026#39;s website and newsletter - \u003ca href=\"https://www.strongerbyscience.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.strongerbyscience.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nStronger by Science on Facebook - \u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/strongerbyscience/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/strongerbyscience/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nChris Beardsly on Instagram \u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/chrisabeardsley/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.instagram.com/chrisabeardsley/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nData colada - \u003ca href=\"http://datacolada.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://datacolada.org\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nSlatestar codex - \u003ca href=\"http://slatestarcodex.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://slatestarcodex.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nJordan Anaya\u0026#39;s blog - \u003ca href=\"https://medium.com/@OmnesRes\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://medium.com/@OmnesRes\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nSportRXiv - \u003ca href=\"http://sportrxiv.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://sportrxiv.org\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Greg Nuckols.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James chat with Greg Nuckols, who is grad student in exercise physiology, strength coach, and writer at strongerbyscience.com","date_published":"2018-05-21T06:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/8eed66d1-78a2-480e-b0c4-cfa54ee77904.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":47139495,"duration_in_seconds":3367}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/440998464","title":"60: This is more of a comment than a question","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/60","content_text":"Dan and James answer listener questions on academic conferences, getting abreast of the literature, and conflicts of interest.\n\nHere are more details of what's on this episode:\n\n\nHow question times during conference seminars are useless \nChoosing which conferences to attend as a PhD student\nFeedback from our Registered Reports episode with Chris Chambers (Episode 56)\nPeople that have binged our entire back catalogue\nThe amount of reading do you need to do to keep track of the field you work in \nPhD students need time to make time to read the literature \nPeople sending out half-arsed work hoping that peer-review will “fix it”\nGuest authorship\nWhen you’re a native English speaker and get asked to have your manuscript proofed by a native English speaker \nIs it a conflict of interest to a review a paper with that includes someone you’ve co-authored with in the past on a different topic?\nThe Frontiers journal model\nReviewing papers so that authors are actually grateful for your criticism \n\n\nLinks\n\nNuzzle: http://nuzzel.com\nPocket: https://getpocket.com\nMendeley: http://mendeley.com\n\nFind us on Twitter:\n\ntwitter.com/hertzpodcast\ntwitter.com/dsquintana\ntwitter.com/jamesheathers\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James answer listener questions on academic conferences, getting abreast of the literature, and conflicts of interest.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere are more details of what\u0026#39;s on this episode:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow question times during conference seminars are useless \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChoosing which conferences to attend as a PhD student\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFeedback from our Registered Reports episode with Chris Chambers (Episode 56)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeople that have binged our entire back catalogue\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe amount of reading do you need to do to keep track of the field you work in \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePhD students need time to make time to read the literature \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeople sending out half-arsed work hoping that peer-review will “fix it”\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGuest authorship\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhen you’re a native English speaker and get asked to have your manuscript proofed by a native English speaker \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIs it a conflict of interest to a review a paper with that includes someone you’ve co-authored with in the past on a different topic?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Frontiers journal model\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eReviewing papers so that authors are actually grateful for your criticism \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eNuzzle: \u003ca href=\"http://nuzzel.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://nuzzel.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nPocket: \u003ca href=\"https://getpocket.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://getpocket.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nMendeley: \u003ca href=\"http://mendeley.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://mendeley.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFind us on Twitter:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003etwitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003cbr\u003e\ntwitter.com/dsquintana\u003cbr\u003e\ntwitter.com/jamesheathers\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James answer listener questions on academic conferences, getting abreast of the literature, and conflicts of interest","date_published":"2018-05-08T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5055237e-6754-4dd7-8e8d-3660bdc99433.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":64851665,"duration_in_seconds":4053}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/430358043","title":"59: Rethinking the scientific journal (with Rickard Carlsson)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/59","content_text":"Despite cosmetic changes, scientific journals haven't changed that much over the past few decades. So what if we were to completely rethink how a scientific journal should operate in today's environment?  \n\nDan and James are joined by Rickard Carlsson (Linnaeus University, Sweden), who is the Co-Editor of the new \"Meta-Psychology\" journal.\n\nHere's what they cover:\n\n\nWhy start a new psychology journal?\nWhat’s new about this journal?\nHow does the journal have no subscription fees and no article processing fees?\nHow does a new journal increase its profile?\nThe difficulties in publishing negative results\nThe limits of study pre-registration\nAre data archiving requirements unrealistic?\nOpen polices and the Swedish constitution \nHow can we make data anonymous?\nWhat’s the hardest thing about starting a journal?\nWhat would success look like for this new journal? \nWhat has Rickard changed his mind about recently?\nWhat’s one book or paper that Rickard thinks everyone should read\n\n\nLinks\n\nThe Daniel Lakens blog post on JPSP (The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology) http://daniellakens.blogspot.no/2018/03/the-journal-of-personality-and-social.html\nStatistical rethinking book http://xcelab.net/rm/statistical-rethinking/\nPsych methods Facebook group https://www.facebook.com/groups/853552931365745/\n\nTwitter handles\nEverything Hertz - @hertzpodcast\nRickard - @RickCarlsson\nDan - @dsquintana\nJames - @JamesHeathers\n\nMusic credits - Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Rickard Carlsson.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDespite cosmetic changes, scientific journals haven\u0026#39;t changed that much over the past few decades. So what if we were to completely rethink how a scientific journal should operate in today\u0026#39;s environment?  \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDan and James are joined by Rickard Carlsson (Linnaeus University, Sweden), who is the Co-Editor of the new \u0026quot;Meta-Psychology\u0026quot; journal.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy start a new psychology journal?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat’s new about this journal?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow does the journal have no subscription fees and no article processing fees?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow does a new journal increase its profile?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe difficulties in publishing negative results\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe limits of study pre-registration\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAre data archiving requirements unrealistic?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOpen polices and the Swedish constitution \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow can we make data anonymous?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat’s the hardest thing about starting a journal?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat would success look like for this new journal? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat has Rickard changed his mind about recently?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat’s one book or paper that Rickard thinks everyone should read\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe Daniel Lakens blog post on JPSP (The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology) \u003ca href=\"http://daniellakens.blogspot.no/2018/03/the-journal-of-personality-and-social.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://daniellakens.blogspot.no/2018/03/the-journal-of-personality-and-social.html\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nStatistical rethinking book \u003ca href=\"http://xcelab.net/rm/statistical-rethinking/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://xcelab.net/rm/statistical-rethinking/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nPsych methods Facebook group \u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/groups/853552931365745/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/groups/853552931365745/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter handles\u003cbr\u003e\nEverything Hertz - @hertzpodcast\u003cbr\u003e\nRickard - @RickCarlsson\u003cbr\u003e\nDan - @dsquintana\u003cbr\u003e\nJames - @JamesHeathers\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits - Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Rickard Carlsson.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Despite cosmetic changes, scientific journals hav…","date_published":"2018-04-16T07:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/eae37317-90df-46b7-907c-3b0c1d39caf6.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":60223319,"duration_in_seconds":3763}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/423522429","title":"58: Lessons from podcasting (with Simine Vazire)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/58","content_text":"Dan and James are joined by Simine Vazire (University of California, Davis and co-host of the Black Goat podcast) to chat about the role of podcasting in scientific communication. Dan's wife also starts going into labor during the episode, so this is an extra special one - make sure you listen through the ENTIRE episode.\n\nHere's what the cover:\n\n\nWhy Simine started podcasting\nThe perils of being a \"methodologist terrorist\" researcher \nWhy podcast when you could blog or tweet?\nDan and James’ favourite things about podcasting\nThe current role of blogs\nNavigating the public/private crossover of science communication\nHow much do we censor our podcasts?\nShould Journal editors tweet and podcast in a personal capacity?\nShould early career researchers podcast?\nThe costs of not speaking above your station\nWhat equipment does we use to record podcasts?\nTwo vs. three podcast hosts?\nHow do you know when you have a good podcast?\nWhat type of person is suited to podcasting?\nWhat book does Simine think everyone should read?\nWhat’s something Simine’s changed her mind about recently?\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nEd Vul Social neuroscience paper https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/wiki/whynhow/images/e/ef/Vul_et_al_orig_paper.pdf\nSnowball ice microphone https://www.bluedesigns.com/products/snowball/\nBlack Goat podcast http://www.theblackgoatpodcast.com\nJames’ advice for PhDs https://medium.com/age-of-awareness/12-thing-you-should-know-before-you-start-a-phd-9c064a979e8\nUnderstanding Psychology as a Science https://www.macmillanihe.com/page/detail/Understanding-Psychology-as-a-Science/?K=9780230542303\nWhat is this thing called science? https://www.amazon.com/What-This-Thing-Called-Science/dp/162466038X/ref=dp_ob_title_bk\n\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Simine Vazire.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James are joined by Simine Vazire (University of California, Davis and co-host of the Black Goat podcast) to chat about the role of podcasting in scientific communication. Dan\u0026#39;s wife also starts going into labor during the episode, so this is an extra special one - make sure you listen through the ENTIRE episode.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what the cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy Simine started podcasting\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe perils of being a \u0026quot;methodologist terrorist\u0026quot; researcher \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy podcast when you could blog or tweet?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan and James’ favourite things about podcasting\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe current role of blogs\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNavigating the public/private crossover of science communication\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow much do we censor our podcasts?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould Journal editors tweet and podcast in a personal capacity?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould early career researchers podcast?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe costs of \u003cem\u003enot\u003c/em\u003e speaking above your station\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat equipment does we use to record podcasts?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTwo vs. three podcast hosts?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow do you know when you have a good podcast?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat type of person is suited to podcasting?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat book does Simine think everyone should read?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat’s something Simine’s changed her mind about recently?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEd Vul Social neuroscience paper \u003ca href=\"https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/wiki/whynhow/images/e/ef/Vul_et_al_orig_paper.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/wiki/whynhow/images/e/ef/Vul_et_al_orig_paper.pdf\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSnowball ice microphone \u003ca href=\"https://www.bluedesigns.com/products/snowball/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.bluedesigns.com/products/snowball/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBlack Goat podcast \u003ca href=\"http://www.theblackgoatpodcast.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.theblackgoatpodcast.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames’ advice for PhDs \u003ca href=\"https://medium.com/age-of-awareness/12-thing-you-should-know-before-you-start-a-phd-9c064a979e8\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://medium.com/age-of-awareness/12-thing-you-should-know-before-you-start-a-phd-9c064a979e8\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnderstanding Psychology as a Science \u003ca href=\"https://www.macmillanihe.com/page/detail/Understanding-Psychology-as-a-Science/?K=9780230542303\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.macmillanihe.com/page/detail/Understanding-Psychology-as-a-Science/?K=9780230542303\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat is this thing called science? \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/What-This-Thing-Called-Science/dp/162466038X/ref=dp_ob_title_bk\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.amazon.com/What-This-Thing-Called-Science/dp/162466038X/ref=dp_ob_title_bk\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Simine Vazire.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James are joined by Simine Vazire (University of California, Davis and co-host of the Black Goat podcast) to chat about the role of podcasting in scientific communication. Dan's wife also starts going into labor during the episode, so this is an extra special one","date_published":"2018-04-02T07:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/81b3ab81-a22b-4f6d-b668-005b856e6bf1.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":51375943,"duration_in_seconds":3669}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/414317748","title":"57: Radical Transparency (with Rebecca Willén)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/57","content_text":"Dan and James are joined by Rebecca Willén (Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education) to discuss transparency in scientific research and how she started her own independent research institute in Bali.\n\nHere's what they cover:\n\n\nRebecca explains the story behind her practice of sharing disclosure statements for her published work\nMany people are changing their research practices for the better for current research - but what about their past research?\nThe 21 word solution\nUsing disclosure statements in your pHD\nThe state of research openness in forensic psychology\nThe flexibility in determining a primary outcome\nHow and why Rebecca founded the IGDORE research institute \nThe drawbacks to starting your own research institute \nRebecca’s recommendation for getting started with open science\nThe story behind the RONIN institute \n\n\nLinks - \nIGDORE https://igdore.org\nRebecca’s website https://rmwillen.info\n21 word solution https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2160588\nPNAS article questioning whether there’s a reporducability crisis http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/03/08/1708272114\nIGDORE Open Science meetup https://igdore.org/open-science-meetup-bali-2018/\nIGDORE affiliation https://igdore.org/affiliation/\nRONIN institute http://ronininstitute.org\nXKCD theme for R http://xkcd.r-forge.r-project.org\nGNU manifesto https://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.html\nTwitter: @hertzpodcast, @dsquintana, @jamesheathers, and @rmwillen\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Rebecca Willén.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James are joined by Rebecca Willén (Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education) to discuss transparency in scientific research and how she started her own independent research institute in Bali.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRebecca explains the story behind her practice of sharing disclosure statements for her published work\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMany people are changing their research practices for the better for current research - but what about their \u003cem\u003epast\u003c/em\u003e research?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe 21 word solution\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing disclosure statements in your pHD\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe state of research openness in forensic psychology\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe flexibility in determining a primary outcome\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow and why Rebecca founded the IGDORE research institute \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe drawbacks to starting your own research institute \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRebecca’s recommendation for getting started with open science\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe story behind the RONIN institute \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks - \u003cbr\u003e\nIGDORE \u003ca href=\"https://igdore.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://igdore.org\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nRebecca’s website \u003ca href=\"https://rmwillen.info\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://rmwillen.info\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n21 word solution \u003ca href=\"https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2160588\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2160588\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nPNAS article questioning whether there’s a reporducability crisis \u003ca href=\"http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/03/08/1708272114\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/03/08/1708272114\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nIGDORE Open Science meetup \u003ca href=\"https://igdore.org/open-science-meetup-bali-2018/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://igdore.org/open-science-meetup-bali-2018/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nIGDORE affiliation \u003ca href=\"https://igdore.org/affiliation/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://igdore.org/affiliation/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nRONIN institute \u003ca href=\"http://ronininstitute.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://ronininstitute.org\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nXKCD theme for R \u003ca href=\"http://xkcd.r-forge.r-project.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://xkcd.r-forge.r-project.org\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nGNU manifesto \u003ca href=\"https://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.html\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nTwitter: @hertzpodcast, @dsquintana, @jamesheathers, and @rmwillen\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Rebecca Willén.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James are joined by Rebecca Willén (Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education) to discuss transparency in scientific research and how she started her own independent research institute in Bali","date_published":"2018-03-15T23:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2d89e6e9-e736-4902-8457-ac602914b835.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":47292435,"duration_in_seconds":2955}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/393307968","title":"56: Registered reports (with Chris Chambers)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/56","content_text":"Dan and James are joined by Chris Chambers (Cardiff University) to discuss the Registered Reports format.\n\nHere’s an overview of what they covered:\n\nWhat is a registered report and why should we implement them? [1:47]\nThe impact of conscious and unconscious bias on scientific publication [6:17]\nCommon objections to registered reports [8:21]\nThe slippery slope fallacy [14:33] \nThe advantages of registered reports for early career researchers [15:47] \nThe generational divide for embracing methodological reforms [19:13] \nThe launch of registered reports in 2013 [23:30] \nThe “tone debate” in psychology [24:50] \nDealing with publishing decisions as an early career researcher [27:30]\nUsing registered reports to disarm your research rivals [30:52]\nA peek behind the curtain of peer-review [34:40]\nHow do we convince journals to take up the registered report format? [36:28]\nUsing registered reports for meta-analysis [38:40]\nWhat’s something that Chris has changed his mind about recently? [43:14]\nWhat’s Chris’ favourite failure? [48:23]\nChris’ opinion of Wales [51:49]\n\nLinks\n\nThe Seven Deadly Sins of Psychology https://www.amazon.com/Seven-Deadly-Sins-Psychology-Scientific/dp/0691158908\nChris Chambers on Twitter @chrisdc77\nDorothy Bishop’s blog on how registered reports provides better control of the publication timeline http://deevybee.blogspot.no/2016/03/better-control-of-publication-time-line.html\nThe Startup Scientist podcast https://shows.pippa.io/startupscientist\nStartup scientist on Twitter @Startup_sci\nThe open science pyramid (slide 8) https://osf.io/yq59d/\nThe Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology “power posing” issue http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rrsp20/2/1?nav=tocList\nDan on Twitter @dsquintana\nJames on Twitter @JamesHeathers\n\nMusic credits Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Chris Chambers.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James are joined by Chris Chambers (Cardiff University) to discuss the Registered Reports format.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere’s an overview of what they covered:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eWhat is a registered report and why should we implement them? [1:47]\u003cbr\u003e\nThe impact of conscious and unconscious bias on scientific publication [6:17]\u003cbr\u003e\nCommon objections to registered reports [8:21]\u003cbr\u003e\nThe slippery slope fallacy [14:33] \u003cbr\u003e\nThe advantages of registered reports for early career researchers [15:47] \u003cbr\u003e\nThe generational divide for embracing methodological reforms [19:13] \u003cbr\u003e\nThe launch of registered reports in 2013 [23:30] \u003cbr\u003e\nThe “tone debate” in psychology [24:50] \u003cbr\u003e\nDealing with publishing decisions as an early career researcher [27:30]\u003cbr\u003e\nUsing registered reports to disarm your research rivals [30:52]\u003cbr\u003e\nA peek behind the curtain of peer-review [34:40]\u003cbr\u003e\nHow do we convince journals to take up the registered report format? [36:28]\u003cbr\u003e\nUsing registered reports for meta-analysis [38:40]\u003cbr\u003e\nWhat’s something that Chris has changed his mind about recently? [43:14]\u003cbr\u003e\nWhat’s Chris’ favourite failure? [48:23]\u003cbr\u003e\nChris’ opinion of Wales [51:49]\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe Seven Deadly Sins of Psychology \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Seven-Deadly-Sins-Psychology-Scientific/dp/0691158908\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.amazon.com/Seven-Deadly-Sins-Psychology-Scientific/dp/0691158908\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nChris Chambers on Twitter @chrisdc77\u003cbr\u003e\nDorothy Bishop’s blog on how registered reports provides better control of the publication timeline \u003ca href=\"http://deevybee.blogspot.no/2016/03/better-control-of-publication-time-line.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://deevybee.blogspot.no/2016/03/better-control-of-publication-time-line.html\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThe Startup Scientist podcast \u003ca href=\"https://shows.pippa.io/startupscientist\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://shows.pippa.io/startupscientist\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nStartup scientist on Twitter @Startup_sci\u003cbr\u003e\nThe open science pyramid (slide 8) \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/yq59d/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/yq59d/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThe Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology “power posing” issue \u003ca href=\"http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rrsp20/2/1?nav=tocList\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rrsp20/2/1?nav=tocList\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nDan on Twitter @dsquintana\u003cbr\u003e\nJames on Twitter @JamesHeathers\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Chris Chambers.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James are joined by Chris Chambers (Cardiff University) to discuss the Registered Reports format","date_published":"2018-02-02T07:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/788e6063-8915-4727-94b5-26c7b7ebf000.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":51894274,"duration_in_seconds":3239}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/385439813","title":"55: The proposal to redefine clinical trials","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/55","content_text":"In this episode, Dan and James discuss the US National Institutes of Health's new definition of a “clinical trial”, which comes into effect on the 25th of January.  \n\nHere’s the new definition: “A research study in which one or more human subjects are prospectively assigned to one or more interventions (which may include placebo or other control) to evaluate the effects of those interventions on health-related biomedical or behavioural outcomes”. \n\nOver the course of this episode, they cover the pros and cons of this decision along with the implications for researchers and science in general.\n\nHere are a few things they cover:\n\n\nThe traditional definition of a clinical trial\nWe go through James’ old work to determine if he’s been a clinical trialist all along\nThe lack of clarity surrounding the new definition\nWhy are adopting a clinical trial approach when this approach has obvious weaknesses?\nWhat do you actually have to do when running a clinical trial?\nWill institutions also adopt this new definition, thus putting basic research through clinical trial IRBs?\nWhat if this extra red tape actually improves science?\nOne argument against the proposal is that registering more studies on clinicaltrials.gov will confuse the public. We don’t buy that.\nClinical trial registrations generally miss the many nuances of study design\nThe new clinical trial definition will eliminate some of the ‘forking paths’ when analysing and reporting data\nHow this new definition will affect grant applications for early career researchers? \nWhat happens to exploratory research?\nNIH case studies of what may constitute a clinical trial \n\n\nLinks\n\nNIH clinical trial definition https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/definition.htm\nThe NIH “clinical trial decision tree” https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/CT-decision-tree.pdf\nNIH case studies of what may constitute a clinical trial  https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/case-studies.htm#case1","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode, Dan and James discuss the US National Institutes of Health\u0026#39;s new definition of a “clinical trial”, which comes into effect on the 25th of January.  \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere’s the new definition: “A research study in which one or more human subjects are prospectively assigned to one or more interventions (which may include placebo or other control) to evaluate the effects of those interventions on health-related biomedical or behavioural outcomes”. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOver the course of this episode, they cover the pros and cons of this decision along with the implications for researchers and science in general.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere are a few things they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe traditional definition of a clinical trial\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe go through James’ old work to determine if he’s been a clinical trialist all along\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe lack of clarity surrounding the new definition\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy are adopting a clinical trial approach when this approach has obvious weaknesses?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat do you actually have to do when running a clinical trial?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWill institutions also adopt this new definition, thus putting basic research through clinical trial IRBs?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat if this extra red tape actually improves science?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOne argument against the proposal is that registering more studies on clinicaltrials.gov will confuse the public. We don’t buy that.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eClinical trial registrations generally miss the many nuances of study design\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe new clinical trial definition will eliminate some of the ‘forking paths’ when analysing and reporting data\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow this new definition will affect grant applications for early career researchers? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat happens to exploratory research?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNIH case studies of what may constitute a clinical trial \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eNIH clinical trial definition \u003ca href=\"https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/definition.htm\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/definition.htm\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThe NIH “clinical trial decision tree” \u003ca href=\"https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/CT-decision-tree.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/CT-decision-tree.pdf\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nNIH case studies of what may constitute a clinical trial  \u003ca href=\"https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/case-studies.htm#case1\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/case-studies.htm#case1\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss the US National Institutes of Health's new definition of a “clinical trial”, which comes into effect on the 25th of January","date_published":"2018-01-18T13:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/7a254140-8676-4af7-a5c2-414efa2617ea.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":56822803,"duration_in_seconds":3551}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/369834365","title":"54: Cuckoo Science","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/54","content_text":"In this episode, James sits in the guest chair as Dan interviews him on his recent work find and exposing inconsistent results in the scientific literature.\n\nStuff they cover:\n\n\nHow James got into finding and exposing inconsistent results\nThe critiques of James’ critiques\nHow James would do things differently, if he were start over again? \nSeparating nefarious motives from sloppiness\nThe indirect victims of sloppy science\nGrants that fund sloppy science take resources from responsible science projects\nIf people actually posted their data and methods, James’ job would be much easier \nRegistered reports improve the quality of science \nIf James could show one slide to every introductory psychology lecture what would it say?\nThe one thing James believes that others think is crazy\nWhat James has changed his mind about in the last year\n\n\nLinks\n\nThe Sokal hoax: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair\nJames’ Psychological Science paper: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0956797615572908 \nThe @IamSciComm Tweetstorm on podcasting: https://twitter.com/iamscicomm/status/935851867661357057","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode, James sits in the guest chair as Dan interviews him on his recent work find and exposing inconsistent results in the scientific literature.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eStuff they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow James got into finding and exposing inconsistent results\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe critiques of James’ critiques\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow James would do things differently, if he were start over again? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSeparating nefarious motives from sloppiness\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe indirect victims of sloppy science\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGrants that fund sloppy science take resources from responsible science projects\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIf people actually posted their data and methods, James’ job would be much easier \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRegistered reports improve the quality of science \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIf James could show one slide to every introductory psychology lecture what would it say?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe one thing James believes that others think is crazy\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat James has changed his mind about in the last year\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe Sokal hoax: \u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nJames’ Psychological Science paper: \u003ca href=\"http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0956797615572908\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0956797615572908\u003c/a\u003e \u003cbr\u003e\nThe @IamSciComm Tweetstorm on podcasting: \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/iamscicomm/status/935851867661357057\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/iamscicomm/status/935851867661357057\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"In this episode, James sits in the guest chair as Dan interviews him on his recent work find and exposing inconsistent results in the scientific literature","date_published":"2017-12-15T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/27108e68-24c8-4293-ac56-e9c63a4ce183.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":53280639,"duration_in_seconds":3314}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/357079817","title":"53: Skin in the game","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/53","content_text":"Dan and James discuss whether you need to have “skin in the game” to critique research.\n\nHere's what else they cover in the episode:\n\n\nShould scientists be required to communicate their science?\nIf your research is likely to be misinterpreted try and get out of in front of what's going to be said\nWill science communication just become another metric? \nThe distinction between “science communication” and “science media”\nWho’s going to pay for all science communicators that we’ll need to communicate everyone’s science? \n Dan and James mispronounce Dutch and German names and give a formal apology to the nation of The Netherlands\nOutcome switching in clinical trials \nDoes having skin in the game guarantee expertise, or just wild biases?\nJames’ recent desk rejection from a Journal Editor\nDan’s method to invite manuscript reviewers as an Associate Editor\n\n\nLinks:\nThe science communication Twitter thread  https://twitter.com/ocaptmycapt/status/927193779693645825\nERC comics https://www.erccomics.com\nThe “skin in the game” tweet https://twitter.com/paperbag1/status/914923706648055813\nThat study in neuopsychopharmacology on a IL-6 receptor antibody to treat residual symptoms in schizophrenia https://www.nature.com/articles/npp2017258","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss whether you need to have “skin in the game” to critique research.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s what else they cover in the episode:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould scientists be required to communicate their science?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIf your research is likely to be misinterpreted try and get out of in front of what\u0026#39;s going to be said\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWill science communication just become \u003cem\u003eanother\u003c/em\u003e metric? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe distinction between “science communication” and “science media”\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWho’s going to pay for all science communicators that we’ll need to communicate everyone’s science? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Dan and James mispronounce Dutch and German names and give a formal apology to the nation of The Netherlands\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOutcome switching in clinical trials \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDoes having skin in the game guarantee expertise, or just wild biases?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames’ recent desk rejection from a Journal Editor\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan’s method to invite manuscript reviewers as an Associate Editor\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks:\u003cbr\u003e\nThe science communication Twitter thread  \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/ocaptmycapt/status/927193779693645825\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/ocaptmycapt/status/927193779693645825\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nERC comics \u003ca href=\"https://www.erccomics.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.erccomics.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThe “skin in the game” tweet \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/paperbag1/status/914923706648055813\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/paperbag1/status/914923706648055813\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThat study in neuopsychopharmacology on a IL-6 receptor antibody to treat residual symptoms in schizophrenia \u003ca href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/npp2017258\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.nature.com/articles/npp2017258\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss whether you need to have “skin in the game” to critique research.","date_published":"2017-11-17T13:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/e54ed3d0-e6de-4dce-91d3-6864fbc0b55b.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48161913,"duration_in_seconds":4013}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/347738049","title":"52: Give p's a chance (with Daniel Lakens)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/52","content_text":"In this episode, Dan and James welcome back Daniel Lakens (Eindhoven University of Technology) to discuss his new paper on justifying your alpha level.\n\nHighlights:\n\n\nWhy did Daniel write this paper?\nTurning away from mindless statistics \nIncremental vs. seismic change in statistical practice\nThe limitations to justifying your alpha\nThe benefits of registered reports\nDaniel’s coursera course \nWhat’s better? Two pre-registered studies at .05 or one unregistered study at .005?\nTesting at the start of semester vs. the end of semester\nThinking of controlling for Type 1 errors as driving speed limits\nError rates mean different things between fields \nWhat if we applied the “5 Sigma” threshold used in physics to the biobehavioral sciences?\nWhat about abandoning statistical significance \nHow did Daniel co-ordinate a paper with 88 co-authors?\nUsing time zones to your benefit when collaborating \nHow can junior researchers contribute to these types of discussions?\nScience by discussion, not manifesto\nThe dangers of blanket recommendations \nHow do you actually justify your alpha from scratch? \n\n\nLinks\n\nDaniel on Twitter - https://www.twitter.com/lakens\nDaniel’s courser course - https://www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences\nJustify your alpha paper -  https://psyarxiv.com/9s3y6\nAbandon statistical significance - https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.07588\nUsing the costs of error rates to set your alpha - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00625.xSpecial Guest: Daniel Lakens.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode, Dan and James welcome back Daniel Lakens (Eindhoven University of Technology) to discuss his new paper on justifying your alpha level.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHighlights:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy did Daniel write this paper?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTurning away from mindless statistics \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIncremental vs. seismic change in statistical practice\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe limitations to justifying your alpha\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe benefits of registered reports\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDaniel’s coursera course \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat’s better? Two pre-registered studies at .05 or one unregistered study at .005?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTesting at the start of semester vs. the end of semester\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThinking of controlling for Type 1 errors as driving speed limits\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eError rates mean different things between fields \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat if we applied the “5 Sigma” threshold used in physics to the biobehavioral sciences?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat about abandoning statistical significance \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow did Daniel co-ordinate a paper with 88 co-authors?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing time zones to your benefit when collaborating \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow can junior researchers contribute to these types of discussions?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScience by discussion, not manifesto\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe dangers of blanket recommendations \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow do you actually justify your alpha from scratch? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDaniel on Twitter - \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/lakens\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/lakens\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nDaniel’s courser course - \u003ca href=\"https://www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nJustify your alpha paper -  \u003ca href=\"https://psyarxiv.com/9s3y6\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://psyarxiv.com/9s3y6\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nAbandon statistical significance - \u003ca href=\"https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.07588\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://arxiv.org/abs/1709.07588\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nUsing the costs of error rates to set your alpha - \u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00625.x\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00625.x\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Daniel Lakens.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"In this episode, Dan and James welcome back Daniel Lakens (Eindhoven University of Technology) to discuss his new paper on justifying your alpha level","date_published":"2017-10-20T06:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b484d21b-7507-4a56-9cb0-8210eedb690c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":45040799,"duration_in_seconds":3753}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/345597190","title":"51: Preprints (with Jessica Polka)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/51","content_text":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Jessica Polka, Director of ASAPbio, to chat about preprints.\n\nHighlights:\n\n\nWhat is ASAPbio?\nDifferences between the publication processes in the biological sciences vs. the biomedical sciences\nCommon concerns with preprints\nMedia embargoes \nHow peer review isn’t necessarily a mark of quality\nDo preprints make it harder to curate information?\nSpecialty preprint servers vs. broad servers?\nHow well do you need to format your preprint?\nHow do you bring up preprints to lab heads and PIs?\nAn example of a good preprint experience from Dan\nUsing preprints for your grant applications\nWhat Jessica has changed her mind about\nThe one article that Jessica thinks everyone should read\n\n\nLinks\n\nJessica's Twitter account - @jessicapolka\nASAPbio - http://asapbio.org \u0026amp; @asapbio_\nRescuing Biomedical science conference 2014 resources - http://rescuingbiomedicalresearch.org/events/\nSherpa/Romeo - http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/index.php\nPaleoArxiv - https://osf.io/preprints/paleorxiv\nPrinciples for Open Scholarly Infrastructures paper -  https://figshare.com/articles/Principles_for_Open_Scholarly_Infrastructures_v1/1314859Special Guest: Jessica Polka.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode, Dan and James are joined by Jessica Polka, Director of ASAPbio, to chat about preprints.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHighlights:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat is ASAPbio?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDifferences between the publication processes in the biological sciences vs. the biomedical sciences\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCommon concerns with preprints\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMedia embargoes \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow peer review isn’t necessarily a mark of quality\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDo preprints make it harder to curate information?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpecialty preprint servers vs. broad servers?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow well do you need to format your preprint?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow do you bring up preprints to lab heads and PIs?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAn example of a good preprint experience from Dan\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing preprints for your grant applications\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat Jessica has changed her mind about\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe one article that Jessica thinks everyone should read\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eJessica\u0026#39;s Twitter account - @jessicapolka\u003cbr\u003e\nASAPbio - \u003ca href=\"http://asapbio.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://asapbio.org\u003c/a\u003e \u0026amp; @asapbio_\u003cbr\u003e\nRescuing Biomedical science conference 2014 resources - \u003ca href=\"http://rescuingbiomedicalresearch.org/events/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://rescuingbiomedicalresearch.org/events/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nSherpa/Romeo - \u003ca href=\"http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/index.php\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/index.php\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nPaleoArxiv - \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/preprints/paleorxiv\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/preprints/paleorxiv\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nPrinciples for Open Scholarly Infrastructures paper -  \u003ca href=\"https://figshare.com/articles/Principles_for_Open_Scholarly_Infrastructures_v1/1314859\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://figshare.com/articles/Principles_for_Open_Scholarly_Infrastructures_v1/1314859\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Jessica Polka.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Jessica Polka, Director of ASAPbio, to chat about preprints","date_published":"2017-10-06T09:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/472fc280-7e8a-40fd-8fcf-b28afe4c4c0c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":40495920,"duration_in_seconds":3374}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/342333229","title":"50: Special 50th episode (LIVE)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/50","content_text":"Dan and James celebrate their 50th episode with a live recording! They cover a blog post that argues grad students shouldn’t be publishing, what’s expected of today’s postdocs, and the ‘tone’ debate in psychology.\n\nBONUS: You can also watch the video of this episode on the Everything Hertz podcast channel (link below)\n\nOther stuff they cover:\n\n\nJames offends a sociologist, as is his wont\nThe argument for why grad students shouldn’t publish\nGatekeepers controlling what’s being published \nEditors that Google authors before sending papers out for review\nJudging researchers on their institution’s location\nJames on networking \nHow do you challenge reviewers when they say you are \"too junior\"\nThe standards of Frontiers papers\nWriting review papers for the wrong reasons\nWhy are there so many meta-analyses?\nPre-registering your meta-analysis\nRegistered reports vs. pre-registration\nWhat’s expected of today’s postdocs\nHow many papers should you peer review?\nHow James tried to ward off review requests \nThings that millennials are ruining \nThe role of humour in the tone debate\n\n\nLinks\nEpisode video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj3WsTiUuLo\u0026amp;t=3s\n\nThe “should grad students publish\" article: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/08/23/renewed-debate-over-whether-graduate-students-should-publish#.WaGAeN_v8jI.link\n\nProspero meta-analysis registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/\n\nEiko Fried’s tweet on postdoc expectations: https://twitter.com/eikofried/status/902470702892290048\n\nJames’ publons profile: https://publons.com/author/1171358/james-aj-heathers#profile\n\nJANE: http://jane.biosemantics.org\n\nAnonymous PubPeer comments: https://pubpeer.com/publications/0E0DAEBEC6183646F18F4FAED03B1A#7","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James celebrate their 50th episode with a live recording! They cover a blog post that argues grad students shouldn’t be publishing, what’s expected of today’s postdocs, and the ‘tone’ debate in psychology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eBONUS: You can also watch the video of this episode on the Everything Hertz podcast channel (link below)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOther stuff they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames offends a sociologist, as is his wont\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe argument for why grad students shouldn’t publish\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGatekeepers controlling what’s being published \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEditors that Google authors before sending papers out for review\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJudging researchers on their institution’s location\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames on networking \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow do you challenge reviewers when they say you are \u0026quot;too junior\u0026quot;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe standards of Frontiers papers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWriting review papers for the wrong reasons\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy are there so many meta-analyses?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePre-registering your meta-analysis\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRegistered reports vs. pre-registration\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat’s expected of today’s postdocs\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow many papers should you peer review?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow James tried to ward off review requests \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThings that millennials are ruining \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe role of humour in the tone debate\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003cbr\u003e\nEpisode video: \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj3WsTiUuLo\u0026t=3s\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj3WsTiUuLo\u0026amp;t=3s\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe “should grad students publish\u0026quot; article: \u003ca href=\"https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/08/23/renewed-debate-over-whether-graduate-students-should-publish#.WaGAeN_v8jI.link\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/08/23/renewed-debate-over-whether-graduate-students-should-publish#.WaGAeN_v8jI.link\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eProspero meta-analysis registration: \u003ca href=\"https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eEiko Fried’s tweet on postdoc expectations: \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/eikofried/status/902470702892290048\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/eikofried/status/902470702892290048\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eJames’ publons profile: \u003ca href=\"https://publons.com/author/1171358/james-aj-heathers#profile\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://publons.com/author/1171358/james-aj-heathers#profile\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eJANE: \u003ca href=\"http://jane.biosemantics.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://jane.biosemantics.org\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eAnonymous PubPeer comments: \u003ca href=\"https://pubpeer.com/publications/0E0DAEBEC6183646F18F4FAED03B1A#7\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://pubpeer.com/publications/0E0DAEBEC6183646F18F4FAED03B1A#7\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James celebrate their 50th episode with a live recording! They cover a blog post that argues grad students shouldn’t be publishing, what’s expected of today’s postdocs, and the ‘tone’ debate in psychology. You can also watch the video of this episode on the Everything Hertz YouTube channel (link in show notes)","date_published":"2017-09-14T16:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/116794c5-bf4a-4450-b9bc-d1e19ed8e913.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":71815500,"duration_in_seconds":5984}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/335690637","title":"49: War and p's","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/49","content_text":"In this episode Dan and James discuss a forthcoming paper that's causing a bit of a stir by proposing that biobehavioral scientists should use a 0.005 p-value statistical significance threshold instead of 0.05.\n\nStuff they cover:\n\n\nA summary of the paper and how they decided on 0.005.\nWhether raising the threshold the best way to improve reproducibility?\nIs 0.005 too stringent?\nWould this new threshold unfairly favour “super” labs? \nIf we keep shifting the number does any threshold really matter?\nDan and James’ first impressions of the paper\nA crash course on Mediterranean taxation systems\nWhat would a 0.005 threshold practically mean for researchers? \n\n\nLinks\nThe paper https://osf.io/mky9j/\nENIGMA consortium http://enigma.ini.usc.edu\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode Dan and James discuss a forthcoming paper that\u0026#39;s causing a bit of a stir by proposing that biobehavioral scientists should use a 0.005 p-value statistical significance threshold instead of 0.05.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eStuff they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA summary of the paper and how they decided on 0.005.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhether raising the threshold the best way to improve reproducibility?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIs 0.005 \u003cem\u003etoo\u003c/em\u003e stringent?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWould this new threshold unfairly favour “super” labs? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIf we keep shifting the number does any threshold really matter?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan and James’ first impressions of the paper\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA crash course on Mediterranean taxation systems\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat would a 0.005 threshold practically mean for researchers? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003cbr\u003e\nThe paper \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/mky9j/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/mky9j/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nENIGMA consortium \u003ca href=\"http://enigma.ini.usc.edu\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://enigma.ini.usc.edu\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss a forthcoming paper that's causing a bit of a stir by proposing that biobehavioral scientists should use a 0.005 p-value statistical significance threshold instead of 0.05.","date_published":"2017-07-31T22:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b975600d-2fd4-4a85-b29f-c22e5fe0c9bb.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":40312548,"duration_in_seconds":3359}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/334138423","title":"48: Breaking up with the impact factor (with Jason Hoyt)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/48","content_text":"Dan and James are joined by Jason Hoyt, who is the CEO and co-founder of PeerJ, an open access journal for the biological and medical sciences.\n\nHere's some of what they cover:\n\n\nPeerJ’s model and how it got started\nWhat goes into running a journal\nImpact factors vs. low-cost publishing\nWhen the journal user experience is too good\nGetting a quick reviewer turnaround \nThe need scientists to change their practices (not publishers)\nPeerJ’s membership model\nGlamour journals \nFuture plans for PeerJ\nPredatory journals\nResearchers don’t want cheap journals, only impact factors\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nPeerJ: https://peerj.com\nThe Phoenix project: https://www.amazon.com/Phoenix-Project-DevOps-Helping-Business-ebook/dp/B00AZRBLHO\nThe Goal:  https://www.amazon.com/Goal-Process-Ongoing-Improvement-ebook/dp/B002LHRM2O/ref=pd_sim_351_2?_encoding=UTF8\u0026amp;psc=1\u0026amp;refRID=EMTE1M9W2XW5Q24X4GE8\n\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Jason Hoyt.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James are joined by Jason Hoyt, who is the CEO and co-founder of PeerJ, an open access journal for the biological and medical sciences.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere\u0026#39;s some of what they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeerJ’s model and how it got started\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat goes into running a journal\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eImpact factors vs. low-cost publishing\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhen the journal user experience is \u003cem\u003etoo\u003c/em\u003e good\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGetting a quick reviewer turnaround \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe need scientists to change their practices (not publishers)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeerJ’s membership model\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGlamour journals \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFuture plans for PeerJ\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePredatory journals\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eResearchers don’t want cheap journals, only impact factors\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeerJ: \u003ca href=\"https://peerj.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://peerj.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Phoenix project: \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Phoenix-Project-DevOps-Helping-Business-ebook/dp/B00AZRBLHO\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.amazon.com/Phoenix-Project-DevOps-Helping-Business-ebook/dp/B00AZRBLHO\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Goal:  \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Goal-Process-Ongoing-Improvement-ebook/dp/B002LHRM2O/ref=pd_sim_351_2?_encoding=UTF8\u0026psc=1\u0026refRID=EMTE1M9W2XW5Q24X4GE8\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.amazon.com/Goal-Process-Ongoing-Improvement-ebook/dp/B002LHRM2O/ref=pd_sim_351_2?_encoding=UTF8\u0026amp;psc=1\u0026amp;refRID=EMTE1M9W2XW5Q24X4GE8\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Jason Hoyt.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James are joined by Jason Hoyt, who is the CEO and co-founder of PeerJ, an open access journal for the biological and medical sciences","date_published":"2017-07-21T07:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/581dcd2b-2081-4f04-be5a-3c75975799a9.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":38849775,"duration_in_seconds":3237}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/332056747","title":"47: Truth bombs from a methodological freedom fighter (with Anne Scheel)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/47","content_text":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Anne Scheel (LMU Munich) to discuss open science advocacy. \n\nHighlights:\n\n\nHow Anne became an open science advocate\nOpen science is better science\nMethodological terrorists/freedom fighters \nThe time Anne stood up after a conference keynote and asked a question\nAsking poor PhD students to pay for conference costs upfront and then reimbursing them 6 months later \nIs it worth if for early career researchers to push open science practices?\nHow to begin with implementing open science practices\nPower analysis should be normal practice, it shouldn’t be controversial \nAnne’s going to start a podcast\nThe 100%CI: A long copy blog with 4 writers \nThe benefits of preprints and blogging \nScience communication in English for non-native English speakers\nDoing stuff that interests you vs. stuff that’s meant to advance your career\n\n\nTwitter accounts of people/things we mentioned: \n@dalejbarr - 2:10\n@siminevazire - 2:45\n@lakens - 2:45\n@nicebread303 (Felix Schönbrodt)- 3:50\n@annaveer - 21:40\n@methodpodcast - 29:20\n@the100ci - 30:40\n@realscientists - 31:40\n@upulie - 31:55\n@fMRI_guy (Jens Foell) - 32:20\n@realsci_DE (Real scientists Germany) - 32:30\n@maltoesermalte, @_r_c_a, @dingding_peng (100% CI team) - 33:55\n@stuartJRitchie - 65:05\n\nLinks\n\n\nEarly Career Researchers and publishing practices: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1102/full (paywalled)\nPre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template” Paywalled link: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103116301925, Preprint link: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/4frms/\nThe CI 100%:  http://www.the100.ci\n\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Anne Scheel.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode, Dan and James are joined by Anne Scheel (LMU Munich) to discuss open science advocacy. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHighlights:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow Anne became an open science advocate\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOpen science is better science\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMethodological terrorists/freedom fighters \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe time Anne stood up after a conference keynote and asked a question\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAsking poor PhD students to pay for conference costs upfront and then reimbursing them 6 months later \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIs it worth if for early career researchers to push open science practices?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow to begin with implementing open science practices\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePower analysis should be normal practice, it shouldn’t be controversial \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnne’s going to start a podcast\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe 100%CI: A long copy blog with 4 writers \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe benefits of preprints and blogging \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScience communication in English for non-native English speakers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDoing stuff that interests you vs. stuff that’s meant to advance your career\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter accounts of people/things we mentioned: \u003cbr\u003e\n@dalejbarr - 2:10\u003cbr\u003e\n@siminevazire - 2:45\u003cbr\u003e\n@lakens - 2:45\u003cbr\u003e\n@nicebread303 (Felix Schönbrodt)- 3:50\u003cbr\u003e\n@annaveer - 21:40\u003cbr\u003e\n@methodpodcast - 29:20\u003cbr\u003e\n@the100ci - 30:40\u003cbr\u003e\n@realscientists - 31:40\u003cbr\u003e\n@upulie - 31:55\u003cbr\u003e\n@fMRI_guy (Jens Foell) - 32:20\u003cbr\u003e\n@realsci_DE (Real scientists Germany) - 32:30\u003cbr\u003e\n@maltoesermalte, @_r_c_a, @dingding_peng (100% CI team) - 33:55\u003cbr\u003e\n@stuartJRitchie - 65:05\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEarly Career Researchers and publishing practices: \u003ca href=\"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1102/full\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1102/full\u003c/a\u003e (paywalled)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template” Paywalled link: \u003ca href=\"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103116301925\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103116301925\u003c/a\u003e, Preprint link: \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/4frms/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/4frms/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe CI 100%:  \u003ca href=\"http://www.the100.ci\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.the100.ci\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Anne Scheel.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Anne Scheel (LMU Munich) to discuss open science advocacy","date_published":"2017-07-07T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/ea9e5210-b583-4e73-95aa-57cd496206b2.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49982512,"duration_in_seconds":4165}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/329621084","title":"46: Statistical literacy (with Andy Field)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/46","content_text":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Andy Field (University of Sussex), author of the “Discovering Statistics” textbook series, to chat about statistical literacy. \n\nHighlights:\n\n\nThe story behind Andy’s new book\nSPSS and Bayesian statistics\nAndy explains why he thinks the biggest problem in science is statistical illiteracy \nResearcher degrees of freedom and p-hacking\nThe story behind the the first version of ‘Discovering statistics’\nHow to improve your statistical literacy\nDoes peer review improve the statistics of papers\nResearchers will draw different conclusions on the same dataset\nThe American Statistical Association’s statement on p-values\nHow has the teaching of statistics for psychology degrees changed over the years\nAndy fact checks his own Wikipedia page\nAndy’s thoughts on Bayesian statistics and how he applied it in a recent paper\nThe peer review of new statistical methods\nAndy’s future textbook plans\nThe rudeness of mailing lists/discussion forums\nWhat is something academia or stats-related that Andy believes that others think is crazy? \nThe one book that Andy recommends that everyone should read\nWe learn the crossover in James and Andy’s taste in metal bands\n\n\nLinks\n\nAndy’s books: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/author/andy-field-0\nThe ‘PENIS of statistics’ lecture from Andy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oe3_DeLC2JE\nDaniel Lakens’ Coursera course: https://www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences\nThe American Statistical Association’s statement on p-values: http://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108\nThe refereeing decision paper: https://osf.io/gvm2z/\nR stan: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rstan/index.html\nStatistical rethinking book: https://www.crcpress.com/Statistical-Rethinking-A-Bayesian-Course-with-Examples-in-R-and-Stan/McElreath/p/book/9781482253443\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Andy Field.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode, Dan and James are joined by Andy Field (University of Sussex), author of the “Discovering Statistics” textbook series, to chat about statistical literacy. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHighlights:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe story behind Andy’s new book\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSPSS and Bayesian statistics\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAndy explains why he thinks the biggest problem in science is statistical illiteracy \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eResearcher degrees of freedom and p-hacking\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe story behind the the first version of ‘Discovering statistics’\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow to improve your statistical literacy\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDoes peer review improve the statistics of papers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eResearchers will draw different conclusions on the same dataset\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe American Statistical Association’s statement on p-values\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow has the teaching of statistics for psychology degrees changed over the years\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAndy fact checks his own Wikipedia page\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAndy’s thoughts on Bayesian statistics and how he applied it in a recent paper\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe peer review of new statistical methods\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAndy’s future textbook plans\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe rudeness of mailing lists/discussion forums\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat is something academia or stats-related that Andy believes that others think is crazy? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe one book that Andy recommends that everyone should read\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe learn the crossover in James and Andy’s taste in metal bands\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eAndy’s books: \u003ca href=\"https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/author/andy-field-0\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/author/andy-field-0\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThe ‘PENIS of statistics’ lecture from Andy: \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oe3_DeLC2JE\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oe3_DeLC2JE\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nDaniel Lakens’ Coursera course: \u003ca href=\"https://www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThe American Statistical Association’s statement on p-values: \u003ca href=\"http://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThe refereeing decision paper: \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/gvm2z/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/gvm2z/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nR stan: \u003ca href=\"https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rstan/index.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rstan/index.html\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nStatistical rethinking book: \u003ca href=\"https://www.crcpress.com/Statistical-Rethinking-A-Bayesian-Course-with-Examples-in-R-and-Stan/McElreath/p/book/9781482253443\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.crcpress.com/Statistical-Rethinking-A-Bayesian-Course-with-Examples-in-R-and-Stan/McElreath/p/book/9781482253443\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Andy Field.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Andy Field (University of Sussex), author of the “Discovering Statistics” textbook series, to chat about statistical literacy","date_published":"2017-06-23T10:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/bbcec718-9708-49e6-8ef7-22c15da2bad9.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":57522916,"duration_in_seconds":4793}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/325695962","title":"45: Conferences and conspiracy theories","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/45","content_text":"It’s conference season so in this episode Dan and James discuss the ins and outs of scientific conferences. \n\nHere’s what they cover: \n\n\nResearch parasite award\nHow much do you save when you don’t run an fMRI study\nThey come up with an even better name than “Research parasite”\nCould the GOP weaponise the open science movement? \nConspiracy theories \nAttempts to slow down science by taking science out of context\nThe Black Goat Podcast \nThe conference backchannel\nContacting people at conferences\nSitting though seminars (and not falling asleep)\nTwitter conferences\nGood presentations vs. bad presentations\nStarting collaborations at conferences \nDo conference locations matter?\nPeriscoping conference presentations\n\n\nLinks\n\nThe research parasite award: http://researchparasite.com\nThe GOP and science reform https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/04/reproducibility-science-open-judoflip/521952/\nThe Crackpot index http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html\nThe Brain Twitter conference https://brain.tc\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIt’s conference season so in this episode Dan and James discuss the ins and outs of scientific conferences. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere’s what they cover: \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eResearch parasite award\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow much do you save when you \u003cem\u003edon’t\u003c/em\u003e run an fMRI study\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThey come up with an even better name than “Research parasite”\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCould the GOP weaponise the open science movement? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eConspiracy theories \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAttempts to slow down science by taking science out of context\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Black Goat Podcast \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe conference backchannel\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eContacting people at conferences\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSitting though seminars (and not falling asleep)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTwitter conferences\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGood presentations vs. bad presentations\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStarting collaborations at conferences \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDo conference locations matter?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeriscoping conference presentations\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe research parasite award: \u003ca href=\"http://researchparasite.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://researchparasite.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThe GOP and science reform \u003ca href=\"https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/04/reproducibility-science-open-judoflip/521952/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/04/reproducibility-science-open-judoflip/521952/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThe Crackpot index \u003ca href=\"http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThe Brain Twitter conference \u003ca href=\"https://brain.tc\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://brain.tc\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"It’s conference season so in this episode Dan and James discuss the ins and outs of scientific conferences","date_published":"2017-06-02T15:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b060c465-539f-499c-8606-03e36bee9656.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":44362896,"duration_in_seconds":3696}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/323415633","title":"44: Who’s afraid of the New Bad People? (with Nick Brown)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/44","content_text":"James and Dan are joined by Nick Brown (University of Groningen) to discuss how the New Bad People — also known as shameless little bullies, vigilantes, the self-appointed data police, angry nothings, scientific McCarthyites, second-stringers, whiners, the Stasi, destructo-critics, and wackaloons* — are trying to improve science\n\nHere’s what they cover \n\n\nPower imbalances in academia\nPublication bias\nEuphemisms for people who are publicly critical of science\nHow to go about questioning the scientific record\nPeer reviewed criticism vs. blog posts\nMaking meta-analysis easier\nData-recycling\nWell-being and genomics\nPopular science books and conflicts of interest\nThe ‘typical’ response to a Letter to an Editor\nWhat Dan and James do during the breaks\nWhy don’t people report descriptive statistics anymore?\nPriming studies \nScience in the media\nWhat Nick has changed his mind about\n\n\nLinks\nNick on Twitter - @sTeamTraen\nNick’s blog - http://steamtraen.blogspot.no\n\n\nThis list is from one of James’ blog posts https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/meet-the-new-bad-people-4922137949a1\n\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Nick Brown.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eJames and Dan are joined by Nick Brown (University of Groningen) to discuss how the New Bad People — also known as shameless little bullies, vigilantes, the self-appointed data police, angry nothings, scientific McCarthyites, second-stringers, whiners, the Stasi, destructo-critics, and wackaloons* — are trying to improve science\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere’s what they cover \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePower imbalances in academia\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePublication bias\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEuphemisms for people who are publicly critical of science\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow to go about questioning the scientific record\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeer reviewed criticism vs. blog posts\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMaking meta-analysis easier\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eData-recycling\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWell-being and genomics\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePopular science books and conflicts of interest\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe ‘typical’ response to a Letter to an Editor\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat Dan and James do during the breaks\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy don’t people report descriptive statistics anymore?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePriming studies \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScience in the media\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat Nick has changed his mind about\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003cbr\u003e\nNick on Twitter - @sTeamTraen\u003cbr\u003e\nNick’s blog - \u003ca href=\"http://steamtraen.blogspot.no\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://steamtraen.blogspot.no\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThis list is from one of James’ blog posts \u003ca href=\"https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/meet-the-new-bad-people-4922137949a1\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://medium.com/@jamesheathers/meet-the-new-bad-people-4922137949a1\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Nick Brown.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"James and Dan are joined by Nick Brown (University of Groningen) to discuss how the New Bad People—also known as shameless little bullies, vigilantes, the self-appointed data police, angry nothings, scientific McCarthyites, second-stringers, whiners, the Stasi, destructo-critics, and wackaloons—are trying to improve science","date_published":"2017-05-19T18:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/391df644-cd0b-48b4-9245-7da858b494ca.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49596553,"duration_in_seconds":4132}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/321067772","title":"43: Death, taxes, and publication bias in meta-analysis (with Daniel Lakens)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/43","content_text":"Daniel Lakens (Eindhoven University of Technology) joins James and Dan to talk meta-analysis. \n\nHere’s what they cover: \n\n\nDaniel’s opinion on the current state of meta-analysis\nThe benefit of reporting guidelines (even though hardly anyone actually follows them)\nHow fixing publication bias can fix science\nMeta-analysis before and after that Bem paper \nHow to correct for publication bias\nWhether meta-analyses are just published for the citations\nThe benefits of pre-registering meta-analysis\nHow we get people to share their data\nHow sharing data doesn’t just benefit others - it also helps you replicate your own analyses later\nSuccess is tied to funding, no matter how “cheap” your research is\nHow people can say “yes” to cumulative science, but “no” to sharing data\nResponding to mistakes\nHow to find errors in your own papers before submission\nWe ask Daniel: i) If he could should one slide to every introductory psychology lecture in the world, what would say?, ii) What has he changed his mind about in the last few years?, iii) The one book/paper he thinks everyone should read\nDaniel also gives James and Dan ideas for their 50th episode \n\n\nLinks\nDaniel on Twitter - @lakens\nDaniel’s course - www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences\nDaniel’s blog - daniellakens.blogspot.no\nDaniel’s recommended book - Understanding Psychology as a science https://he.palgrave.com/page/detail/?sf1=barcode\u0026amp;st1=9780230542303\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Daniel Lakens.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDaniel Lakens (Eindhoven University of Technology) joins James and Dan to talk meta-analysis. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere’s what they cover: \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDaniel’s opinion on the current state of meta-analysis\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe benefit of reporting guidelines (even though hardly anyone actually follows them)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow fixing publication bias can fix science\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMeta-analysis before and after \u003cem\u003ethat\u003c/em\u003e Bem paper \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow to correct for publication bias\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhether meta-analyses are just published for the citations\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe benefits of pre-registering meta-analysis\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow we get people to share their data\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow sharing data doesn’t just benefit others - it also helps \u003cem\u003eyou\u003c/em\u003e replicate your own analyses later\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSuccess is tied to funding, no matter how “cheap” your research is\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow people can say “yes” to cumulative science, but “no” to sharing data\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eResponding to mistakes\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow to find errors in your own papers before submission\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe ask Daniel: i) If he could should one slide to every introductory psychology lecture in the world, what would say?, ii) What has he changed his mind about in the last few years?, iii) The one book/paper he thinks everyone should read\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDaniel also gives James and Dan ideas for their 50th episode \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003cbr\u003e\nDaniel on Twitter - @lakens\u003cbr\u003e\nDaniel’s course - \u003ca href=\"http://www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nDaniel’s blog - daniellakens.blogspot.no\u003cbr\u003e\nDaniel’s recommended book - Understanding Psychology as a science \u003ca href=\"https://he.palgrave.com/page/detail/?sf1=barcode\u0026st1=9780230542303\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://he.palgrave.com/page/detail/?sf1=barcode\u0026amp;st1=9780230542303\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Daniel Lakens.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Daniel Lakens (Eindhoven University of Technology) joins James and Dan to talk meta-analysis","date_published":"2017-05-05T09:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/e5bf1750-891c-4f77-adfe-b48424cfa3f8.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":45129974,"duration_in_seconds":3760}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/318762756","title":"42: Some of my best friends are Bayesians (with Daniel Lakens)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/42","content_text":"Daniel Lakens (Eindhoven University of Technology) drops in to talk statistical inference with James and Dan. \n\nHere’s what they cover: \n\n\nHow did Daniel get into statistical inference?\nAre we overdoing the Frequentist vs. Bayes debate?\nWhat situations better suit Bayesian inference?\nThe over advertising of Bayesian inference \nStudy design is underrated \nThe limits of p-values\nWhy not report both p-values and Bayes factors?\nThe “perfect t-test” script and the difference between Student’s and Welch’s t-tests\nThe two-one sided test\nFrequentist and Bayesian approaches for stopping procedures \nWhy James and Dan started the podcast\nThe worst bits of advice that Daniel has heard about statistical inference\nDan discuss a new preprint on Bayes factors in psychiatry \nStatistical power \nExcel isn’t all bad…\nThe importance of accessible software\nWe ask Daniel about his research workflow - how does he get stuff done?\nUsing blog posts as a way of gauging interest in a topic\nChris Chambers’ new book: The seven deadly sins of psychology\nEven more names for methodological terrorists\n\n\nLinks\n\nDaniel on Twitter - @lakens\nDaniel’s course - https://www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences\nDaniel’s blog - http://daniellakens.blogspot.no\nTOSTER - http://daniellakens.blogspot.no/2016/12/tost-equivalence-testing-r-package.html\nDan’s preprint on Bayesian alternatives for psychiatry research - https://osf.io/sgpe9/\nUnderstanding the new statistics - https://www.amazon.com/Understanding-New-Statistics-Meta-Analysis-Multivariate/dp/041587968X\nDaniel’s effect size paper - http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863/full\nThe seven deadly sins of Psychology - http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10970.htmlSpecial Guest: Daniel Lakens.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDaniel Lakens (Eindhoven University of Technology) drops in to talk statistical inference with James and Dan. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHere’s what they cover: \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow did Daniel get into statistical inference?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAre we overdoing the Frequentist vs. Bayes debate?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat situations better suit Bayesian inference?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe over advertising of Bayesian inference \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStudy design is underrated \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe limits of p-values\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy not report both p-values and Bayes factors?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe “perfect t-test” script and the difference between Student’s and Welch’s t-tests\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe two-one sided test\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFrequentist and Bayesian approaches for stopping procedures \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy James and Dan started the podcast\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe worst bits of advice that Daniel has heard about statistical inference\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan discuss a new preprint on Bayes factors in psychiatry \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStatistical power \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExcel isn’t all bad…\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe importance of accessible software\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe ask Daniel about his research workflow - how does he get stuff done?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing blog posts as a way of gauging interest in a topic\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChris Chambers’ new book: The seven deadly sins of psychology\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEven more names for methodological terrorists\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDaniel on Twitter - @lakens\u003cbr\u003e\nDaniel’s course - \u003ca href=\"https://www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nDaniel’s blog - \u003ca href=\"http://daniellakens.blogspot.no\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://daniellakens.blogspot.no\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nTOSTER - \u003ca href=\"http://daniellakens.blogspot.no/2016/12/tost-equivalence-testing-r-package.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://daniellakens.blogspot.no/2016/12/tost-equivalence-testing-r-package.html\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nDan’s preprint on Bayesian alternatives for psychiatry research - \u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/sgpe9/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/sgpe9/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nUnderstanding the new statistics - \u003ca href=\"https://www.amazon.com/Understanding-New-Statistics-Meta-Analysis-Multivariate/dp/041587968X\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.amazon.com/Understanding-New-Statistics-Meta-Analysis-Multivariate/dp/041587968X\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nDaniel’s effect size paper - \u003ca href=\"http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863/full\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863/full\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\nThe seven deadly sins of Psychology - \u003ca href=\"http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10970.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://press.princeton.edu/titles/10970.html\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Daniel Lakens.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Daniel Lakens (Eindhoven University of Technology) drops in to talk statistical inference with James and Dan","date_published":"2017-04-21T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2ca44b55-dfa1-4455-b3dc-12e6c32f29e2.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48277247,"duration_in_seconds":4023}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/316584965","title":"41: Objecting to published research (with William Gunn)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/41","content_text":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by William Gunn (Director of Scholarly communications at Elsevier) to discuss ways in which you can object to published research.\n\nThey also cover:\n\n\nWhat differentiates an analytics company from a publishing company?\nHow scientific journals are one of the last areas to fully adopt the dynamic nature of the internet\nData repositories \nHow to make a correction in a journal\nThe benefits of Registered Reports\nWhen everyone asked Elsevier for a journal of negative results but no one submitted to them\nHow unit of publication isn’t really indicative of science as a process\nAltmetrics and gaming the system\nHow to appeal to a journal about a paper\nCitation cartels: the dumbest crime\nWilliam’s switch from research to publishing and his shift in perspective \nThe crackpot index\nJames’ flowchart on how to contact an editor\nThe copyediting process\nElsevier’s approach to open peer review: should junior researchers be worried?\nThe one thing William thinks that everyone else thinks is crazy\nWilliam’s most worthwhile career investment \nThe one paper that William thinks everyone should read\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nWilliams’s twitter account: @mrgunn \nWilliams’s blog: http://synthesis.williamgunn.org\nThe Crackpot index: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html\nThe paper William thinks everyone should read: http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/8/341/341ps12.full\nSpecial Guest: William Gunn.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode, Dan and James are joined by William Gunn (Director of Scholarly communications at Elsevier) to discuss ways in which you can object to published research.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThey also cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat differentiates an analytics company from a publishing company?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow \u003cem\u003escientific\u003c/em\u003e journals are one of the last areas to fully adopt the dynamic nature of the internet\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eData repositories \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow to make a correction in a journal\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe benefits of Registered Reports\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhen everyone asked Elsevier for a journal of negative results but no one submitted to them\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow unit of publication isn’t really indicative of science as a process\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAltmetrics and gaming the system\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow to appeal to a journal about a paper\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCitation cartels: the dumbest crime\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWilliam’s switch from research to publishing and his shift in perspective \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe crackpot index\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames’ flowchart on how to contact an editor\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe copyediting process\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eElsevier’s approach to open peer review: should junior researchers be worried?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe one thing William thinks that everyone else thinks is crazy\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWilliam’s most worthwhile career investment \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe one paper that William thinks everyone should read\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWilliams’s twitter account: @mrgunn \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWilliams’s blog: \u003ca href=\"http://synthesis.williamgunn.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://synthesis.williamgunn.org\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Crackpot index: \u003ca href=\"http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe paper William thinks everyone should read: \u003ca href=\"http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/8/341/341ps12.full\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://stm.sciencemag.org/content/8/341/341ps12.full\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: William Gunn.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by William Gunn (Director of Scholarly communications at Elsevier) to discuss ways in which you can object to published research","date_published":"2017-04-07T18:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/ea285b89-7f83-49fc-99bb-3fdd5d36e648.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48327004,"duration_in_seconds":4027}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/314212506","title":"40: Meta-research (with Michèle Nuijten)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/40","content_text":"Dan and James are joined by Michèle Nuijten (Tilburg University) to discuss 'statcheck', an algorithm that automatically scans papers for statistical tests, recomputes p-values, and flags inconsistencies.\n\nThey also cover:\n\n\nHow Michèle dealt with statcheck criticisms\nPsychological Science’s pilot of statcheck for journal submissions\nDetecting data fraud\nWhen should a journal issue a correction?\nFuture plans for statcheck\nThe one thing Michèle thinks that everyone else thinks is crazy\nMichèle's most worthwhile career investment \nThe one paper that Michèle thinks everyone should read\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nMichèle's website: https://mbnuijten.com\nMichèle's twitter account: https://twitter.com/michelenuijten\nStatcheck: https://statcheck.io\nTilberg University meta-research center: http://metaresearch.nl\nGuardian story on detecting science fraud: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/feb/01/high-tech-war-on-science\nThe paper Michèle thinks everyone should read: http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/DPlab/papers/publishedPapers/Simmons_2011_False-Positive%20Psychology.pdf\nEverything Hertz on Twitter: https://twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast\nThe startup scientist, Dan's other podcast on boosting your scientific career: https://soundcloud.com/startup-scientist-podcast\nSpecial Guest: Michèle Nuijten.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James are joined by Michèle Nuijten (Tilburg University) to discuss \u0026#39;statcheck\u0026#39;, an algorithm that automatically scans papers for statistical tests, recomputes p-values, and flags inconsistencies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThey also cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow Michèle dealt with statcheck criticisms\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePsychological Science’s pilot of statcheck for journal submissions\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDetecting data fraud\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhen should a journal issue a correction?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFuture plans for statcheck\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe one thing Michèle thinks that everyone else thinks is crazy\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMichèle\u0026#39;s most worthwhile career investment \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe one paper that Michèle thinks everyone should read\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMichèle\u0026#39;s website: \u003ca href=\"https://mbnuijten.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://mbnuijten.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMichèle\u0026#39;s twitter account: \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/michelenuijten\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/michelenuijten\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStatcheck: \u003ca href=\"https://statcheck.io\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://statcheck.io\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTilberg University meta-research center: \u003ca href=\"http://metaresearch.nl\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://metaresearch.nl\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGuardian story on detecting science fraud: \u003ca href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/feb/01/high-tech-war-on-science\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/feb/01/high-tech-war-on-science\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe paper Michèle thinks everyone should read: \u003ca href=\"http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/DPlab/papers/publishedPapers/Simmons_2011_False-Positive%20Psychology.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/DPlab/papers/publishedPapers/Simmons_2011_False-Positive%20Psychology.pdf\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverything Hertz on Twitter: \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEverything Hertz on Facebook: \u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe startup scientist, Dan\u0026#39;s other podcast on boosting your scientific career: \u003ca href=\"https://soundcloud.com/startup-scientist-podcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://soundcloud.com/startup-scientist-podcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Michèle Nuijten.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James are joined by Michèle Nuijten (Tilburg University) to discuss 'statcheck', an algorithm that automatically scans papers for statistical tests, recomputes p-values, and flags inconsistencies","date_published":"2017-03-24T06:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/8d61acf5-0da5-4ffd-afa8-31730880d4a6.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":35502760,"duration_in_seconds":2958}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/311663363","title":"39: Academic hipsters","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/39","content_text":"We all know hipsters. You know, like the guy that rides his Penny-farthing to the local cafe to write his memoirs on a typewriter - just because its more ‘authentic’. In this episode, James and Dan discuss academic hipsters. These are people who insist you need to use specific tools in your science like R, python, and LaTeX. So should you start using these trendy tools despite the steep learning curve?\n\nOther stuff they cover:\n\n\nWhy James finally jumped onto Twitter\nA new segment: 2-minutes hate \nThe senior academic that blamed an uncredited co-author for data anomalies \nAn infographic ranking science journalism quality that’s mostly wrong\nWhen to learn new tools, and when to stick with what you know\nAuthorea as a good example of a compromise between \"easy\" and \"reproducible\"\n\n\nLinks\n\nThe science journalism infographic \n\nhttp://www.nature.com/news/science-journalism-can-be-evidence-based-compelling-and-wrong-1.21591\n\nFacebook page\n\nwww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nwww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWe all know hipsters. You know, like the guy that rides his Penny-farthing to the local cafe to write his memoirs on a typewriter - just because its more ‘authentic’. In this episode, James and Dan discuss academic hipsters. These are people who \u003cem\u003einsist\u003c/em\u003e you need to use specific tools in your science like R, python, and LaTeX. So should you start using these trendy tools despite the steep learning curve?\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOther stuff they cover:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy James finally jumped onto Twitter\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA new segment: 2-minutes hate \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe senior academic that blamed an uncredited co-author for data anomalies \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAn infographic ranking science journalism quality that’s mostly wrong\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhen to learn new tools, and when to stick with what you know\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAuthorea as a good example of a compromise between \u0026quot;easy\u0026quot; and \u0026quot;reproducible\u0026quot;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe science journalism infographic \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.nature.com/news/science-journalism-can-be-evidence-based-compelling-and-wrong-1.21591\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.nature.com/news/science-journalism-can-be-evidence-based-compelling-and-wrong-1.21591\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMusic credits: Lee Rosevere \u003ca href=\"http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"In this episode, James and Dan discuss academic hipsters. These are people who *insist* you need to use specific tools in your science like R, python, and LaTeX. So should you start using these trendy tools despite the steep learning curve?","date_published":"2017-03-10T09:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/084a6fd2-da17-4773-bfc8-dc5765928f06.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":39478289,"duration_in_seconds":3289}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/309312464","title":"38: Work/life balance - Part 2","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/38","content_text":"Dan and James continue their discussion on work/life balance in academia. They also suggest ways to get your work done within a sane amount of hours as well as how to pick the right lab.  \n\nSome of the topics covered:\n\n\nFeedback from our last episode\nWhy the podcast started in the first place\nThe \"Red Queen\" problem\nDoes the \"70 hour lab\" produce better work?\nSome experiments aren't suited to a 9-5 schedule\nMore tips for anonomusly skiving off at work\nWhat are cognitive limits off focused work? \nDo early career researchers even earn the minimum  wage when you factor in the hours worked? \nHow James gets things done: Work on one thing at a time until it's done and protect your time\nHow Dan gets things done: Pomodoros (40 mins work, 10 minute break), blocking social/news websites\nHow do pick a lab to work in?\n\n\nLinks\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James continue their discussion on work/life balance in academia. They also suggest ways to get your work done within a sane amount of hours as well as how to pick the right lab.  \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics covered:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFeedback from our last episode\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy the podcast started in the first place\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u0026quot;Red Queen\u0026quot; problem\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDoes the \u0026quot;70 hour lab\u0026quot; produce better work?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSome experiments aren\u0026#39;t suited to a 9-5 schedule\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMore tips for anonomusly skiving off at work\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat are cognitive limits off focused work? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDo early career researchers even earn the minimum  wage when you factor in the hours worked? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow James gets things done: Work on one thing at a time until it\u0026#39;s done and protect your time\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow Dan gets things done: Pomodoros (40 mins work, 10 minute break), blocking social/news websites\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow do pick a lab to work in?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James continue their discussion on work/life balance in academia. They also suggest ways to get your work done within a sane amount of hours as well as how to pick the right lab","date_published":"2017-02-24T10:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/718e2fc0-d995-46b5-9bee-8b6738e46d72.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":44649704,"duration_in_seconds":3720}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/308182842","title":"37: Work/life balance in academia","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/37","content_text":"In this episode, we talk work/life balance for early career researchers. Do you need to work a 70-hour week to be a successful scientist or can you actually have a life outside the lab?\n\nSome of the topics covered:\n\n\nAn update on \"the postdoc that didn't say no\" story\nBrian Wansink's response\nDe-identifying data in research\nThe perils of public criticism\nCriticising the research vs. criticising the person\nSome sage advice from a senior academic on \"Making science the centre of your life\" \nLook for a boss that won't make insane demands of your time\nHow much good work is really coming out of a 70-hour week?\nAn old hack Dan used to do to pretend he was working on data when he was really just on twitter\n\n\nLinks\n\nGRIM test calculator\n\nhttp://www.prepubmed.org/grim_test/\n\nJordan's follow-up post\n\nhttps://medium.com/@OmnesRes/the-donald-trump-of-food-research-49e2bc7daa41#.me8e97z51\n\nBrian Wansink's response\n\nhttp://www.brianwansink.com/phd-advice/statistical-heartburn-and-long-term-lessons\n\nThe \"Making science the centre of your life\" slide\n\nhttps://twitter.com/hertzpodcast/status/832501121893724160\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode, we talk work/life balance for early career researchers. Do you need to work a 70-hour week to be a successful scientist or can you actually have a life outside the lab?\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics covered:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAn update on \u0026quot;the postdoc that didn\u0026#39;t say no\u0026quot; story\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBrian Wansink\u0026#39;s response\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDe-identifying data in research\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe perils of public criticism\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCriticising the research vs. criticising the person\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSome sage advice from a senior academic on \u0026quot;Making science the centre of your life\u0026quot; \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLook for a boss that won\u0026#39;t make insane demands of your time\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow much good work is \u003cem\u003ereally\u003c/em\u003e coming out of a 70-hour week?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAn old hack Dan used to do to pretend he was working on data when he was really just on twitter\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eGRIM test calculator\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.prepubmed.org/grim_test/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.prepubmed.org/grim_test/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eJordan\u0026#39;s follow-up post\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://medium.com/@OmnesRes/the-donald-trump-of-food-research-49e2bc7daa41#.me8e97z51\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://medium.com/@OmnesRes/the-donald-trump-of-food-research-49e2bc7daa41#.me8e97z51\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eBrian Wansink\u0026#39;s response\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.brianwansink.com/phd-advice/statistical-heartburn-and-long-term-lessons\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.brianwansink.com/phd-advice/statistical-heartburn-and-long-term-lessons\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe \u0026quot;Making science the centre of your life\u0026quot; slide\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/hertzpodcast/status/832501121893724160\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/hertzpodcast/status/832501121893724160\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"In this episode, we talk work/life balance for early career researchers. Do you need to work a 70-hour week to be a successful scientist or can you actually have a life outside the lab?","date_published":"2017-02-17T10:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/488c3f72-8d7e-454f-aa4b-ad9ea9a95f7f.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":40689967,"duration_in_seconds":3390}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/304826743","title":"36: Statistical inconsistencies in published research","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/36","content_text":"In episode 34 we covered a blog post that highlighted questionable analytical approaches in psychology. That post mentioned four studies that resulted from this approach, which a team of researchers took a closer look into. Dan and James discuss the statistical inconsistencies that the authors reported in a recent preprint.\n\nSome of the topics covered:\n\n\nTrump (of course)\nA summary of the preprint\nThe GRIM test to detect inconsistencies\nThe researchers that accidently administered the equivalent of 300 cups of coffee to study participants\nHow do we prevent inconsistent reporting?\n21 word solution for research transparency \nJournals mandating statistical inconsistency checks, such as 'statcheck'\n\n\nLinks\n\nThe pre-print\nhttps://peerj.com/preprints/2748/\n\n'The grad student that didn't say no' blog post\nhttp://www.brianwansink.com/phd-advice/the-grad-student-who-never-said-no\n\nThe caffeine study\nhttp://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-tyne-38744307\n\nTobacco and Alcohol Research Group lab handbook (see page 6 for open science practices)\nhttp://www.bris.ac.uk/media-library/sites/expsych/documents/targ/TARG%20Handbook%20161128.pdf\n\n21 word solution\nhttp://spsp.org/sites/default/files/dialogue_26(2).pdf\n\nFacebook page\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn episode 34 we covered a blog post that highlighted questionable analytical approaches in psychology. That post mentioned four studies that resulted from this approach, which a team of researchers took a closer look into. Dan and James discuss the statistical inconsistencies that the authors reported in a recent preprint.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics covered:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTrump (of course)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA summary of the preprint\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe GRIM test to detect inconsistencies\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe researchers that accidently administered the equivalent of 300 cups of coffee to study participants\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow do we prevent inconsistent reporting?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e21 word solution for research transparency \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJournals mandating statistical inconsistency checks, such as \u0026#39;statcheck\u0026#39;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe pre-print\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003ca href=\"https://peerj.com/preprints/2748/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://peerj.com/preprints/2748/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026#39;The grad student that didn\u0026#39;t say no\u0026#39; blog post\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003ca href=\"http://www.brianwansink.com/phd-advice/the-grad-student-who-never-said-no\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.brianwansink.com/phd-advice/the-grad-student-who-never-said-no\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe caffeine study\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003ca href=\"http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-tyne-38744307\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-tyne-38744307\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTobacco and Alcohol Research Group lab handbook (see page 6 for open science practices)\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003ca href=\"http://www.bris.ac.uk/media-library/sites/expsych/documents/targ/TARG%20Handbook%20161128.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.bris.ac.uk/media-library/sites/expsych/documents/targ/TARG%20Handbook%20161128.pdf\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e21 word solution\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003ca href=\"http://spsp.org/sites/default/files/dialogue_26(2).pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://spsp.org/sites/default/files/dialogue_26(2).pdf\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"In episode 34 we covered a blog post that highlighted questionable analytical approaches in psychology. That post mentioned four studies that resulted from this approach, which a team of researchers took a closer look into. Dan and James discuss the statistical inconsistencies that the authors reported in a recent preprint.","date_published":"2017-01-27T19:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5c851dce-e8ae-4e50-98ad-30d0afca0c16.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":36483181,"duration_in_seconds":3040}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/303651321","title":"35: A manifesto for reproducible science","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/35","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a new paper in the inaugural issue of Nature Human Behaviour, \"A manifesto for reproducible science\".    \n\nSome of the topics covered:\n\n\nWhat's a manfesto for reproducibility doing in a Nature group journal?\nRegistered reports\nThe importance of incentives to actually make change happen\nWhat people should report vs. what they actually report\nA common pitfall of published meta-analyses\nThe reliance of metrics in hiring decisions and the impact of open science practices\nTone police\nHow do we transition to open science practices?\nSSRN preprints being bought by Elsevier\nAuthors getting gouged by copyediting costs (and solutions) \nDoes being 'double-blind' extend to doing your analysis blind \nTrial monitoring is expensive\n\n\nLinks\n\nThe paper\nhttp://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-016-0021\n\nOur paper on reporting standards in heart rate variability \nhttp://www.nature.com/tp/journal/v6/n5/full/tp201673a.html\n\nEquator guidelines\nhttp://www.equator-network.org\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss a new paper in the inaugural issue of Nature Human Behaviour, \u0026quot;A manifesto for reproducible science\u0026quot;.    \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics covered:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat\u0026#39;s a manfesto for reproducibility doing in a Nature group journal?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRegistered reports\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe importance of incentives to actually make change happen\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat people \u003cem\u003eshould\u003c/em\u003e report vs. what they actually report\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA common pitfall of published meta-analyses\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe reliance of metrics in hiring decisions and the impact of open science practices\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTone police\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow do we transition to open science practices?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSSRN preprints being bought by Elsevier\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAuthors getting gouged by copyediting costs (and solutions) \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDoes being \u0026#39;double-blind\u0026#39; extend to doing your analysis blind \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTrial monitoring is expensive\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe paper\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003ca href=\"http://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-016-0021\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-016-0021\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOur paper on reporting standards in heart rate variability \u003cbr\u003e\n\u003ca href=\"http://www.nature.com/tp/journal/v6/n5/full/tp201673a.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.nature.com/tp/journal/v6/n5/full/tp201673a.html\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eEquator guidelines\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003ca href=\"http://www.equator-network.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.equator-network.org\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss a new paper in the inaugural issue of Nature Human Behaviour, \"A manifesto for reproducible science\"","date_published":"2017-01-20T14:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/996e1418-8de7-46e4-9b41-4c26ac61820a.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":36494253,"duration_in_seconds":3041}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/299142048","title":"34: E-health (with Robin Kok)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/34","content_text":"Dan and James have their very first guest! For this episode they're joined by Robin Kok (University of Southern Denmark) to talk e-health. They also cover a recent blog post that inadvertently highlighted questionable research practices in psychology.\n\nSome of the topics covered:\n\n\nThe grad student who never said no\nPostdoc work/life balance\nQuestionable research practices\nTorturing data (with rattan sticks)\nUsing the GRIM test to assess data accuracy\nUnpaid internships\nSaying 'yes' to opportunities that come your way\nThe Myers-Briggs test is rubbish\nWhat is e-health?\nAre e-health interventions efficacious?\ne-health intervention implementation issues\nThe poor quality of psych intervention smartphone apps\nUsing \"Facebook Live\" to broadcast conference presentations\nThe future of e-health\n\n\n\n\nLinks\n\nRobin's twitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/robinnkok\n\n\n\"The grad student who never said no\" blog post\n\n\nhttp://www.brianwansink.com/phd-types-only/the-grad-student-who-never-said-no\n\n\nThe Buzzfeed quiz on 'Which Disney princess are you?' (James is Belle)\n\n\nhttps://www.buzzfeed.com/mccarricksean/which-disney-princes-are-you?utm_term=.riNJn5DbW#.ci9gL3Xq8\n\n\nXKXD TornadoGuard comic\n\n\nhttps://xkcd.com/937/ \n\n\nThe efficacy of e-health interventions\n\n\nhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wps.20151/abstract\n\n\nWild West eHealth: Time to Hold our Horses? \n\n\nwww.ehps.net/ehp/index.php/contents/article/download/765/pdf_44\n\n\nSmartphone app interventions\n\n\nhttp://www.jmir.org/2013/11/e247/\n\n\nFacebook page\n\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\n\nTwitter account\n\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcastSpecial Guest: Robin Kok.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James have their very first guest! For this episode they\u0026#39;re joined by Robin Kok (University of Southern Denmark) to talk e-health. They also cover a recent blog post that inadvertently highlighted questionable research practices in psychology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics covered:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe grad student who never said no\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePostdoc work/life balance\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eQuestionable research practices\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTorturing data (with rattan sticks)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing the GRIM test to assess data accuracy\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnpaid internships\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSaying \u0026#39;yes\u0026#39; to opportunities that come your way\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Myers-Briggs test is rubbish\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat is e-health?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAre e-health interventions efficacious?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ee-health intervention implementation issues\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe poor quality of psych intervention smartphone apps\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing \u0026quot;Facebook Live\u0026quot; to broadcast conference presentations\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe future of e-health\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003chr\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eRobin\u0026#39;s twitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/robinnkok\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/robinnkok\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026quot;The grad student who never said no\u0026quot; blog post\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.brianwansink.com/phd-types-only/the-grad-student-who-never-said-no\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.brianwansink.com/phd-types-only/the-grad-student-who-never-said-no\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Buzzfeed quiz on \u0026#39;Which Disney princess are you?\u0026#39; (James is Belle)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.buzzfeed.com/mccarricksean/which-disney-princes-are-you?utm_term=.riNJn5DbW#.ci9gL3Xq8\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.buzzfeed.com/mccarricksean/which-disney-princes-are-you?utm_term=.riNJn5DbW#.ci9gL3Xq8\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eXKXD TornadoGuard comic\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://xkcd.com/937/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://xkcd.com/937/\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe efficacy of e-health interventions\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wps.20151/abstract\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wps.20151/abstract\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWild West eHealth: Time to Hold our Horses? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.ehps.net/ehp/index.php/contents/article/download/765/pdf_44\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ewww.ehps.net/ehp/index.php/contents/article/download/765/pdf_44\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSmartphone app interventions\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.jmir.org/2013/11/e247/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.jmir.org/2013/11/e247/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFacebook page\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTwitter account\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpecial Guest: Robin Kok.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James have their very first guest! For this episode they're joined by Robin Kok (University of Southern Denmark) to talk e-health. They also cover a recent blog post that inadvertently highlighted questionable research practices in psychology.","date_published":"2016-12-22T14:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/55859e8a-c3c3-4825-b7cf-90b387fc2dc1.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":43335904,"duration_in_seconds":3611}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/298180600","title":"33: Zombie theories","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/33","content_text":"Dan and James discuss Zombie theories, which are scientific ideas that continue to live on in the absence of evidence. Why do these ideas persist and how do we kill them for good?\n\nSome of the topics covered:\n\n\nWhy do some ideas live on?\nZombie theories in heart rate variability research\nReasons why zombie theories proliferate more in the social sciences\nAttractiveness and simplicity\nTheories become brands\nOxytocin zombie theories \nThe power of shaming\nIdeas are corrected more quickly in smaller fields \nJames' new interest in Cow ECG\nPeople using science as a weapon to open up hip pockets\nHow do we kill these zombies for good?\nManual vs. automated PubMed comments\nWhat's the impact of paper retraction on future citations?\nHow do you correct the scientific record?\n\n\nLinks\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss Zombie theories, which are scientific ideas that continue to live on in the absence of evidence. Why do these ideas persist and how do we kill them for good?\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics covered:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy do some ideas live on?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZombie theories in heart rate variability research\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eReasons why zombie theories proliferate more in the social sciences\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAttractiveness and simplicity\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTheories become brands\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOxytocin zombie theories \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe power of shaming\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdeas are corrected more quickly in smaller fields \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; new interest in Cow ECG\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeople using science as a weapon to open up hip pockets\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow do we kill these zombies for good?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eManual vs. automated PubMed comments\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat\u0026#39;s the impact of paper retraction on future citations?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow do you correct the scientific record?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss Zombie theories, which are scientific ideas that continue to live on in the absence of evidence. Why do these ideas persist and how do we kill them for good?","date_published":"2016-12-16T09:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/19178509-1447-43de-9f13-3d38b2c1c0b7.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":31598361,"duration_in_seconds":2633}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/295682869","title":"32:  Can worrying about getting sick make you sicker?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/32","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a new population study that linked health anxiety data with future heart disease. \n\nSome of the topics covered:\n\n\nWeb MD and health anxiety\nHow would healthy anxiety contribute to heart disease?\nA summary of the study\nIschemic heart disease = coronary artery disease\nDo people with healthy anxiety take better care of thier health?\nDon't be fooled by percentage increase of risk for something that's rare\nThere are some things you can't just randomize\nThe pros and cons of big data collection \n\n\nLinks\n\nThe paper\n\nhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/11/e012914.full\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss a new population study that linked health anxiety data with future heart disease. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics covered:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWeb MD and health anxiety\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow would healthy anxiety contribute to heart disease?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA summary of the study\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIschemic heart disease = coronary artery disease\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDo people with healthy anxiety take \u003cem\u003ebetter\u003c/em\u003e care of thier health?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDon\u0026#39;t be fooled by percentage increase of risk for something that\u0026#39;s rare\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThere are some things you can\u0026#39;t just randomize\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe pros and cons of big data collection \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe paper\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/11/e012914.full\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/11/e012914.full\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss a new population study that linked health anxiety data with future heart disease","date_published":"2016-12-01T10:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/aec9be55-7b1c-4f85-a749-c9a64e3a42fd.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":31058326,"duration_in_seconds":2588}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/293360515","title":"31: Discover your psychiatric risk with this one weird trick","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/31","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a recent study of over one million Swedish men that found that higher resting heart rate late adolescence was associated with an increased risk for subsequent psychiatric illness. \n\nSome of the topics covered:\n\n\nHow did these authors get such an enormous dataset?\nThe benefits of testing so many people\nWhat we liked about the study (hint: lots of things)\nMeasuring cardiovascular efficiency using a cycle ergometer\nThe pitfalls of self-reported physical activity \nHow the media covered this study\nContextual factors - does the testing environment induce anxiety?\nCo-morbidity in psychiatry\nWhat would James do with 200,000 ECGs strips?\n\n\nLinks\n\nThe paper\n\nhttp://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/2569454 \n\nThe Daily Mail story\n\nhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3875062/Why-heartbeat-teenager-affect-later-life-Boys-high-blood-pressure-risk-mental-health-problems-adults.html?linkId=30382089\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss a recent study of over one million Swedish men that found that higher resting heart rate late adolescence was associated with an increased risk for subsequent psychiatric illness. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics covered:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow did these authors get such an enormous dataset?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe benefits of testing so many people\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat we liked about the study (hint: lots of things)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMeasuring cardiovascular efficiency using a cycle ergometer\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe pitfalls of self-reported physical activity \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow the media covered this study\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eContextual factors - does the testing environment induce anxiety?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-morbidity in psychiatry\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat would James do with 200,000 ECGs strips?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe paper\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/2569454\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/2569454\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe Daily Mail story\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3875062/Why-heartbeat-teenager-affect-later-life-Boys-high-blood-pressure-risk-mental-health-problems-adults.html?linkId=30382089\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3875062/Why-heartbeat-teenager-affect-later-life-Boys-high-blood-pressure-risk-mental-health-problems-adults.html?linkId=30382089\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss a recent study of over one million Swedish men that found that higher resting heart rate late adolescence was associated with an increased risk for subsequent psychiatric illness","date_published":"2016-11-16T21:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/c1d8bd1d-d19c-45b1-9316-16d3b41d6293.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":39556888,"duration_in_seconds":3296}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/291133430","title":"30: Authorship","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/30","content_text":"Dan and James discuss authorship in the biomedical sciences","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss authorship in the biomedical sciences\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss authorship in the biomedical sciences","date_published":"2016-11-02T16:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b8ea65f5-83f4-46be-84fb-22fc413d88e8.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":35345712,"duration_in_seconds":2945}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/288298289","title":"29: Learning new skills","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/29","content_text":"Dan and James talk about how they learn new things.\n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nInternet memes\nConsolidating old ideas rather than learning new ones\nWhy learn a new skill when you just get someone else to do it?\nA lesson of not having a good understanding statistical software...\nJames and Dan butt heads about meta-analysis (again)\nLearning new things is interesting\nHow did people learn things before the internet?\nHow to follow things on Twitter without being on Twitter\n\n\nLinks\n\nBayes factor paper with 'primer' paper matrix\n\n\nhttps://alexanderetz.com/2016/02/07/understanding-bayes-how-to-become-a-bayesian-in-eight-easy-steps/\n\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James talk about how they learn new things.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics discussed:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eInternet memes\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eConsolidating old ideas rather than learning new ones\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy learn a new skill when you just get someone else to do it?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA lesson of not having a good understanding statistical software...\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames and Dan butt heads about meta-analysis (again)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLearning new things is interesting\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow did people learn things before the internet?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow to follow things on Twitter without \u003cem\u003ebeing\u003c/em\u003e on Twitter\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eBayes factor paper with \u0026#39;primer\u0026#39; paper matrix\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://alexanderetz.com/2016/02/07/understanding-bayes-how-to-become-a-bayesian-in-eight-easy-steps/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://alexanderetz.com/2016/02/07/understanding-bayes-how-to-become-a-bayesian-in-eight-easy-steps/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James talk about how they learn new things","date_published":"2016-10-16T14:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5e289d31-04df-4993-9117-6f59c26b8945.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":35228142,"duration_in_seconds":2935}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/285440467","title":"28: Positive developments in biomedical science","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/28","content_text":"Pre-registration, p-hacking, power, protocols. All these concepts are pretty mainstream in 2016 but hardly discussed 5 years ago. In this episode, James and Dan talk about these ideas and other developments in biomedical science.  \n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nJames loves blinded reviews, scihub\nDan loves protocols, learning stats through social media, reproducible science \n\n\nLinks\n\nThe COMPARE initiative \n\n\nhttp://compare-trials.org\n\n\n\"Give me the F-ing PDF\"  Chrome extension\n\n\nhttps://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/give-me-the-f-ing-pdf/iekjpaipocoglamgpjoehfdemffdmami/related\n\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003ePre-registration, p-hacking, power, protocols. All these concepts are pretty mainstream in 2016 but hardly discussed 5 years ago. In this episode, James and Dan talk about these ideas and other developments in biomedical science.  \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics discussed:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames loves blinded reviews, scihub\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan loves protocols, learning stats through social media, reproducible science \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe COMPARE initiative \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://compare-trials.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://compare-trials.org\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026quot;Give me the F-ing PDF\u0026quot;  Chrome extension\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/give-me-the-f-ing-pdf/iekjpaipocoglamgpjoehfdemffdmami/related\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/give-me-the-f-ing-pdf/iekjpaipocoglamgpjoehfdemffdmami/related\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Pre-registration, p-hacking, power, protocols. All these concepts are pretty mainstream in 2016 but hardly discussed 5 years ago. In this episode, James and Dan talk about these ideas and other developments in biomedical science.","date_published":"2016-09-30T18:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/9b217cea-c2d1-429b-9d95-bc84f256f498.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":35337994,"duration_in_seconds":2944}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/284250939","title":"27: Complaints and grievances","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/27","content_text":"Dan and James discuss complaints and grievances. Stay tuned for part 2 where things get positive. \n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nConflicts of interest \nCriticism in psychology\nWhy does there seem to be so much bad blood in psychology?\nRetracted papers: fraud or sloppiness? \nAuthors not acknowledging your peer-review remarks\nThe short-term nature of research \nThe benefits of 'centers of excellence' \n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe 'vibe of the thing' scene from 'The Castle' (Great Aussie film)\n\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJuXIq7OazQ\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss complaints and grievances. Stay tuned for part 2 where things get positive. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics discussed:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eConflicts of interest \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCriticism in psychology\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy does there seem to be so much bad blood in psychology?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRetracted papers: fraud or sloppiness? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAuthors not acknowledging your peer-review remarks\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe short-term nature of research \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe benefits of \u0026#39;centers of excellence\u0026#39; \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe \u0026#39;vibe of the thing\u0026#39; scene from \u0026#39;The Castle\u0026#39; (Great Aussie film)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJuXIq7OazQ\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJuXIq7OazQ\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss complaints and grievances. Stay tuned for part 2 (next episode) where things get positive.","date_published":"2016-09-23T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/004563e9-4a9e-4969-89db-473e0acb8e5d.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":37985992,"duration_in_seconds":3165}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/282165920","title":"26: Interpreting effect sizes","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/26","content_text":"When interpreting the magnitude of group differences using effect sizes, researchers often rely on Cohen's guidelines for small, medium, and large effects. However, Cohen originally proposed these guidelines as a fall back when the distribution of effect sizes was unknown. Despite the hundreds of available studies comparing heart rate variability (HRV), Cohen's guidelines are still used for interpretation. In this episode, Dan discusses his recent preprint describing an effect size distribution analysis on HRV studies. \n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nA summary of Dan's preprint\nWhat is an effect size?\nWhat can an effect size distribution tell us?\nHow effect sizes can inform study planning\nHow close are Cohen's guidelines to the distribution of HRV effect sizes? \nWhat samples sizes are appropriate?\nPre-publication review vs. post-publication review\nStatcheck \n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe preprint article \n\n\nhttp://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/08/31/072660\n\n\nStatcheck\n\n\nhttps://mbnuijten.com/statcheck/\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWhen interpreting the magnitude of group differences using effect sizes, researchers often rely on Cohen\u0026#39;s guidelines for small, medium, and large effects. However, Cohen originally proposed these guidelines as a fall back when the distribution of effect sizes was unknown. Despite the hundreds of available studies comparing heart rate variability (HRV), Cohen\u0026#39;s guidelines are still used for interpretation. In this episode, Dan discusses his recent preprint describing an effect size distribution analysis on HRV studies. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics discussed:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA summary of Dan\u0026#39;s preprint\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat is an effect size?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat can an effect size distribution tell us?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow effect sizes can inform study planning\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow close are Cohen\u0026#39;s guidelines to the distribution of HRV effect sizes? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat samples sizes are appropriate?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePre-publication review vs. post-publication review\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStatcheck \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe preprint article \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/08/31/072660\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/08/31/072660\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStatcheck\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://mbnuijten.com/statcheck/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://mbnuijten.com/statcheck/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss Dan's recent preprint describing an effect size distribution analysis on HRV studies.","date_published":"2016-09-09T21:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/0c2a415f-3ab3-4923-9dba-503c8f9ca076.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":32782694,"duration_in_seconds":2731}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/280151434","title":"25: Misunderstanding p-values","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/25","content_text":"P-values are universal, but do we really know what they mean? In this episode, Dan and James discuss a recent paper describing the failure to correctly interpret p-values in a sample of academic psychologists. \n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nCommon p-value misconceptions\nJames tests Dan on his p-value knowledge\np-values vs. effect size\nThe problem of sample size with p-value interpretation\nThe Facebook mood manipulation study\nData peeking\nEquivalent p-values do not represent equivalent results\nMeta-analytical thinking \nUsing significance as a categorical factor\nStatistical vs. clinical significance \nClinical trial registration and 'secondary outcome creep'\nDan and James answer listener questions\nScience communicator vs. scientist\nGrant titles and the 'Pub test'\nNASA and social media \n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe article \n\n\nhttp://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01247/full\n\n\nGeoff Cumming's book (we got the name completely wrong - sorry Geoff!)\n\n\nhttp://www.amazon.com/Understanding-The-New-Statistics-Meta-Analysis-ebook/dp/B007M9D76G/ref=pd_sim_kstore_1?ie=UTF8\u0026amp;refRID=1QWKES82EP85DBAEKNT1\n\nThe story on research passing the 'pub' test\n\nhttps://theconversation.com/if-youre-going-to-ridicule-research-do-your-homework-64238\n\nReal scientists\n\nhttp://realscientists.org\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eP-values are universal, but do we really know what they mean? In this episode, Dan and James discuss a recent paper describing the failure to correctly interpret p-values in a sample of academic psychologists. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics discussed:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCommon p-value misconceptions\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames tests Dan on his p-value knowledge\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ep-values vs. effect size\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe problem of sample size with p-value interpretation\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Facebook mood manipulation study\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eData peeking\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEquivalent p-values do not represent equivalent results\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMeta-analytical thinking \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing significance as a categorical factor\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStatistical vs. clinical significance \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eClinical trial registration and \u0026#39;secondary outcome creep\u0026#39;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan and James answer listener questions\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScience communicator vs. scientist\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGrant titles and the \u0026#39;Pub test\u0026#39;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNASA and social media \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe article \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01247/full\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01247/full\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGeoff Cumming\u0026#39;s book (we got the name completely wrong - sorry Geoff!)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-The-New-Statistics-Meta-Analysis-ebook/dp/B007M9D76G/ref=pd_sim_kstore_1?ie=UTF8\u0026refRID=1QWKES82EP85DBAEKNT1\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.amazon.com/Understanding-The-New-Statistics-Meta-Analysis-ebook/dp/B007M9D76G/ref=pd_sim_kstore_1?ie=UTF8\u0026amp;refRID=1QWKES82EP85DBAEKNT1\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe story on research passing the \u0026#39;pub\u0026#39; test\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://theconversation.com/if-youre-going-to-ridicule-research-do-your-homework-64238\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://theconversation.com/if-youre-going-to-ridicule-research-do-your-homework-64238\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eReal scientists\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://realscientists.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://realscientists.org\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"P-values are universal, but do we really know what they mean? In this episode, Dan and James discuss a recent paper describing the failure to correctly interpret p-values in a sample of academic psychologists. ","date_published":"2016-08-27T14:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/e959cb74-f7f5-411f-9464-56439cb09fba.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":39626449,"duration_in_seconds":3302}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/278681709","title":"24: Incentive structures in science","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/24","content_text":"Science funding has a series of built in incentive structures, but what sort of science does this produce?\n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nFeedback from our 'Public health and Pokemon' episode (#22)\nIncentive structures in science\nWhat we should be doing in science compared to what we are doing\nQuantity vs. Quality\nThe analysis of Trump's tweets for negativity vs. positivity\nPre-registration\nHow much detail do you need to go into when it comes to pre-registering an analysis\nAPS journal badges - they're working!\nData sharing makes you more careful with your data\nSolutions to the incentive problem have to come from the policy level\nThe grant funding lottery system proposal\nThe PhD oversupply\nGaming the system\nJames wants to mandate science communication\nDan wants to include replication studies in PhD programs\nScientist names that suit their research area\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe article on incentive structures\n\n\nhttps://medium.com/the-spike/how-a-happy-moment-for-neuroscience-is-a-sad-moment-for-science-c4ba00336e9c#.x3sea13i1\n\n\nThe Allen brain atlas\n\n\nhttp://observatory.brain-map.org\n\n\nAnalysis of Trump's tweets\n\n\nhttp://varianceexplained.org/r/trump-tweets/\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eScience funding has a series of built in incentive structures, but what sort of science does this produce?\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics discussed:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFeedback from our \u0026#39;Public health and Pokemon\u0026#39; episode (#22)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIncentive structures in science\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat we \u003cem\u003eshould\u003c/em\u003e be doing in science compared to what we \u003cem\u003eare\u003c/em\u003e doing\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eQuantity vs. Quality\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe analysis of Trump\u0026#39;s tweets for negativity vs. positivity\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePre-registration\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow much detail do you need to go into when it comes to pre-registering an analysis\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAPS journal badges - they\u0026#39;re working!\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eData sharing makes you more careful with your data\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSolutions to the incentive problem have to come from the policy level\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe grant funding lottery system proposal\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe PhD oversupply\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGaming the system\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames wants to mandate science communication\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan wants to include replication studies in PhD programs\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScientist names that suit their research area\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe article on incentive structures\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://medium.com/the-spike/how-a-happy-moment-for-neuroscience-is-a-sad-moment-for-science-c4ba00336e9c#.x3sea13i1\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://medium.com/the-spike/how-a-happy-moment-for-neuroscience-is-a-sad-moment-for-science-c4ba00336e9c#.x3sea13i1\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Allen brain atlas\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://observatory.brain-map.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://observatory.brain-map.org\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnalysis of Trump\u0026#39;s tweets\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://varianceexplained.org/r/trump-tweets/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://varianceexplained.org/r/trump-tweets/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Science funding has a series of built in incentive structures, but what sort of science does this produce?","date_published":"2016-08-17T20:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/adfd4145-2aa2-4578-a7d9-9b678e89d28b.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":43449438,"duration_in_seconds":3620}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/277845576","title":"23: Serious academics","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/23","content_text":"Can you be a \"serious academic\" while still posting photos on Instagram? In this episode, James and Dan discuss a recent article bemoaning the infiltration of the \"selfie epidemic\" into academia.\n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nJames and Dan share their thoughts on the article\nThe REAL 'c' word....\nSocial media and conferences\nSnapchat + academics = snapademics\nUsing Instagram stories to share you research\nWhy \"PHD comics\" is so successful\nCriticism in academia\nListener question 1: What's your favourite part of research?\nListener question 2: What's your favourite technique or experiment to perform?\nListener question 3: What's a funny story from being an academic?\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe article\n\n\nhttps://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2016/aug/05/im-a-serious-academic-not-a-professional-instagrammer\n\n\nA response to the article\n\n\nhttps://www.theguardian.com/science/brain-flapping/2016/aug/05/im-a-non-serious-academic-i-make-no-apologies-for-this\n\n\nSnapademics\n\n\nhttps://twitter.com/snapademia\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eCan you be a \u0026quot;serious academic\u0026quot; while still posting photos on Instagram? In this episode, James and Dan discuss a recent article bemoaning the infiltration of the \u0026quot;selfie epidemic\u0026quot; into academia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics discussed:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames and Dan share their thoughts on the article\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe REAL \u0026#39;c\u0026#39; word....\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSocial media and conferences\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSnapchat + academics = snapademics\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsing Instagram stories to share you research\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy \u0026quot;PHD comics\u0026quot; is so successful\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCriticism in academia\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eListener question 1: What\u0026#39;s your favourite part of research?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eListener question 2: What\u0026#39;s your favourite technique or experiment to perform?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eListener question 3: What\u0026#39;s a funny story from being an academic?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe article\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2016/aug/05/im-a-serious-academic-not-a-professional-instagrammer\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2016/aug/05/im-a-serious-academic-not-a-professional-instagrammer\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA response to the article\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/science/brain-flapping/2016/aug/05/im-a-non-serious-academic-i-make-no-apologies-for-this\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.theguardian.com/science/brain-flapping/2016/aug/05/im-a-non-serious-academic-i-make-no-apologies-for-this\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSnapademics\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/snapademia\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/snapademia\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Can you be a \"serious academic\" while still posting photos on Instagram? In this episode, James and Dan discuss a recent article bemoaning the infiltration of the \"selfie epidemic\" into academia.","date_published":"2016-08-11T20:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/578699ad-eed4-499e-af63-ef864785bb34.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":37931452,"duration_in_seconds":3160}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/276689374","title":"22: Pokemon and public health","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/22","content_text":"Pokemon Go is sweeping the world and getting people walking again! But is the Pokemon Go 'model' a golden opportunity to tackle obesity or just another fad?\n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nJames plays \"Pokemon or Cholesterol medication?\" \nDan tries to explain Pokemon Go to James\nJames' first contact with Pokemon Go \"trainers\"\nShould health interventions be modeled on Pokemon Go?\nOther exercise augmented reality health apps\nWhat's the app's endgame? \nCan health authorities copy this model?\nWe make a correction from episode 17: PLoS is in fact a non-profit journal, not a for-profit journal\nDan and James answer two listener questions: i) The dumbest things they've ever done in the lab (both related to email faux pas) ii) How often should lab meetings be run\nThe importance of PROPERLY piloting your experiment\nIf you don't know the person in the meeting that takes up too much time, it's probably you.\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe quiz\n\n\nhttp://www.slate.com/articles/technology/gaming/2016/07/pokemon_or_cholesterol_medication_a_quiz.html\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003ePokemon Go is sweeping the world and getting people walking again! But is the Pokemon Go \u0026#39;model\u0026#39; a golden opportunity to tackle obesity or just another fad?\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics discussed:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames plays \u0026quot;Pokemon or Cholesterol medication?\u0026quot; \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan tries to explain Pokemon Go to James\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; first contact with Pokemon Go \u0026quot;trainers\u0026quot;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShould health interventions be modeled on Pokemon Go?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOther exercise augmented reality health apps\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat\u0026#39;s the app\u0026#39;s endgame? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCan health authorities copy this model?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe make a correction from episode 17: PLoS is in fact a non-profit journal, not a for-profit journal\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan and James answer two listener questions: i) The dumbest things they\u0026#39;ve ever done in the lab (both related to email faux pas) ii) How often should lab meetings be run\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe importance of PROPERLY piloting your experiment\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIf you don\u0026#39;t know the person in the meeting that takes up too much time, it\u0026#39;s probably you.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe quiz\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/gaming/2016/07/pokemon_or_cholesterol_medication_a_quiz.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.slate.com/articles/technology/gaming/2016/07/pokemon_or_cholesterol_medication_a_quiz.html\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Pokemon Go is sweeping the world and getting people walking again! But is the Pokemon Go 'model' a golden opportunity to tackle obesity or just another fad?","date_published":"2016-08-03T21:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/1c80edd1-91d6-4655-b9cd-0636885c1028.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":42662191,"duration_in_seconds":3555}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/274854907","title":"21: This is your brain on steroids","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/21","content_text":"It's well established that steroid use is associated with many adverse healthy outcomes, but what does it actually do to your brain? \n\nDan and James discuss an interesting new paper that compared brain structure in long-term steroid users and non-using weightlifters.\n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nA summary of the study\nHow are steroids typically used?\nWhat are the differences in use between sports?\nThe recruitment of 'real' users\nJames gives Dan a surprise Norwegian test (he doesn't do too well)\nThe things Dan and James liked about the study (hint: many things)\nSteroid use in women\nDose-dependent effects of steroids\nFolk beliefs surrounding steroid use\nJames' goal of making his cat as jacked as possible\nIf you have a great study, there's no need to oversell\nJames' experience of participating in a growth hormone trial \n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper \n\n\nhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000632231632529X\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIt\u0026#39;s well established that steroid use is associated with many adverse healthy outcomes, but what does it actually do to your brain? \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss an interesting new paper that compared brain structure in long-term steroid users and non-using weightlifters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics discussed:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA summary of the study\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow are steroids typically used?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat are the differences in use between sports?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe recruitment of \u0026#39;real\u0026#39; users\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames gives Dan a surprise Norwegian test (he doesn\u0026#39;t do too well)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe things Dan and James liked about the study (hint: many things)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSteroid use in women\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDose-dependent effects of steroids\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFolk beliefs surrounding steroid use\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; goal of making his cat as jacked as possible\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIf you have a great study, there\u0026#39;s no need to oversell\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; experience of participating in a growth hormone trial \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe paper \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000632231632529X\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000632231632529X\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss a new paper that compared brain structure in long-term steroid users and non-using weightlifters","date_published":"2016-07-22T15:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/42a08963-3a58-4315-b7b1-96813207d9e3.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":41966147,"duration_in_seconds":3497}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/273462747","title":"20: Sample sizes in psychology studies","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/20","content_text":"Can psychologists learn more by studying fewer people?\n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nBrexit and science \nCan the UK take the 'Norway' option?\nHorizon 2020\nThe impact on personnel and research training\nItalian coffee\nListener feedback \nWe're sorry for the chewing sound from episode 17!\nIntraindividual replication vs. larger sample sizes\nWhat sort of experiments are better suited to detailed within-subject studies?\nIs 'quantified self' data more valid than experimental data?\nWhat if you happen to recruit a 'weird' person?\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper \n\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911349/\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eCan psychologists learn more by studying fewer people?\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics discussed:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBrexit and science \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCan the UK take the \u0026#39;Norway\u0026#39; option?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHorizon 2020\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe impact on personnel and research training\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eItalian coffee\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eListener feedback \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWe\u0026#39;re sorry for the chewing sound from episode 17!\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIntraindividual replication vs. larger sample sizes\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat sort of experiments are better suited to detailed within-subject studies?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIs \u0026#39;quantified self\u0026#39; data more valid than experimental data?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat if you happen to recruit a \u0026#39;weird\u0026#39; person?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe paper \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911349/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911349/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Can psychologists learn more by studying fewer people?","date_published":"2016-07-13T13:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/03b36687-fcc0-4611-a85a-892591598144.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":44636971,"duration_in_seconds":3719}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/272424565","title":"19: Let us spray: oxytocin and spirituality","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/19","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper on intranasal oxytocin and spirituality \n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nA summary of a recent paper on oxytocin and spirituality \nWhy within-subject designs are a better choice for oxytocin research\nThe physiology of nasal administration \nHow do you control for differences in nasal environment\nHypothesis-driven vs. exploratory research\nOxytocin pathway gene\nANCOVA and Lord's paradox (yep, it's called that)\nDan applauding the authors for posting ALL their data online \nJames disagrees with Dan on approaches to pre-registering studies\nJames promises never to chew during a recording (sorry!)\nProducing research vs. actually reading other people's research\nOur first citation (sort of)\nHow the replication crisis is the fact that we're not doing any\nHeart rate variability in oysters (and other animals)\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper \n\n\nhttp://scan.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/06/22/scan.nsw078\n\n\nDan's blog post on intranasal oxytocin administration  considerations\n\n\nhttps://medium.com/@dsquintana/intranasal-drug-administration-in-psychiatry-80d076f1abdd#.dsdrrohdu\n\n\nDan's paper on the promise and pitfalls of intranasal administration \n\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26552590\n\n\nThe data from the paper\n\n\nhttps://osf.io/mjhzw/\n\n\nOur first (blog post) citation\n\n\nhttps://rhythmicpsychology.wordpress.com/2016/06/22/shock-shock-horror-horror/\n\n\nCan we replicate the replication crisis?\n\n\nhttps://theconversation.com/is-psychology-really-in-crisis-60869\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss a recent paper on intranasal oxytocin and spirituality \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics discussed:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA summary of a recent paper on oxytocin and spirituality \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy within-subject designs are a better choice for oxytocin research\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe physiology of nasal administration \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow do you control for differences in nasal environment\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHypothesis-driven vs. exploratory research\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOxytocin pathway gene\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eANCOVA and Lord\u0026#39;s paradox (yep, it\u0026#39;s called that)\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan applauding the authors for posting ALL their data online \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames disagrees with Dan on approaches to pre-registering studies\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames promises never to chew during a recording (sorry!)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eProducing research vs. actually reading other people\u0026#39;s research\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur first citation (sort of)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow the replication crisis is the fact that we\u0026#39;re not doing any\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHeart rate variability in oysters (and other animals)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe paper \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/06/22/scan.nsw078\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://scan.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/06/22/scan.nsw078\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan\u0026#39;s blog post on intranasal oxytocin administration  considerations\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://medium.com/@dsquintana/intranasal-drug-administration-in-psychiatry-80d076f1abdd#.dsdrrohdu\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://medium.com/@dsquintana/intranasal-drug-administration-in-psychiatry-80d076f1abdd#.dsdrrohdu\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan\u0026#39;s paper on the promise and pitfalls of intranasal administration \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26552590\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26552590\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe data from the paper\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://osf.io/mjhzw/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://osf.io/mjhzw/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur first (blog post) citation\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://rhythmicpsychology.wordpress.com/2016/06/22/shock-shock-horror-horror/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://rhythmicpsychology.wordpress.com/2016/06/22/shock-shock-horror-horror/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCan we replicate the replication crisis?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://theconversation.com/is-psychology-really-in-crisis-60869\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://theconversation.com/is-psychology-really-in-crisis-60869\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper on intranasal oxytocin and spirituality \r\n  ","date_published":"2016-07-06T13:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/a8bceb31-f81b-43f4-ba1f-9224b4a283c1.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":34138980,"duration_in_seconds":2844}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/271385846","title":"18: Data sharing","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/18","content_text":"Withholding data: bad science or scientific misconduct? \n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nDan raises privacy issues surrounding sharing data\nWhat are the limits of AI to identify people from 'un-identifiable' data?\nThe new age of sharing data\nWhat grinds Dan's gears\nRequesting data from people who said that they'd actually share their data\nJames' experiences with requesting data\nDan offers a solution for accessing data via an independent 3rd party\nWhen is a data request 'vexatious'? \nHiding data vs. just being lazy with data management\nThe importance of sharing your analysis code along with the data\nVersion controlling manuscripts\nHow much will open data actually improve science?\n'Fake' journals masquerading as real ones \nAustralia's windfarm commissioner (a real thing, unfortunalty)\nAustralian coffee vs. the rest of the world\nOur Twitter followers numbers have surpassed our Facebook fans!\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper on requesting data\n\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22686633\n\n\nThe blog post on whether withholding your data is scientific misconduct\n\n\nhttp://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2015/07/03/data-secrecy-bad-science-or-scientific-misconduct/\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWithholding data: bad science or scientific misconduct? \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics discussed:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan raises privacy issues surrounding sharing data\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat are the limits of AI to identify people from \u0026#39;un-identifiable\u0026#39; data?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe new age of sharing data\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat grinds Dan\u0026#39;s gears\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRequesting data from people who said that they\u0026#39;d actually share their data\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; experiences with requesting data\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan offers a solution for accessing data via an independent 3rd party\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhen is a data request \u0026#39;vexatious\u0026#39;? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHiding data vs. just being lazy with data management\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe importance of sharing your analysis code along with the data\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVersion controlling manuscripts\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow much will open data actually improve science?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026#39;Fake\u0026#39; journals masquerading as real ones \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAustralia\u0026#39;s windfarm commissioner (a real thing, unfortunalty)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAustralian coffee vs. the rest of the world\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOur Twitter followers numbers have surpassed our Facebook fans!\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe paper on requesting data\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22686633\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22686633\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe blog post on whether withholding your data is scientific misconduct\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2015/07/03/data-secrecy-bad-science-or-scientific-misconduct/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2015/07/03/data-secrecy-bad-science-or-scientific-misconduct/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Withholding data: bad science or scientific misconduct? ","date_published":"2016-06-29T14:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/192d920e-29c4-436e-ae05-2fb3b8af5d14.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":37065706,"duration_in_seconds":3088}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/270365037","title":"17: Journals: Do we need them?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/17","content_text":"Do we really need scientific journals? \n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nJames trolling predatory journals with jibberish papers on the 'DONG' effect\nHow do these spammy journal invitation emails actually work?\nFormal journals vs. preprint servers \nThe shift to preprints in psychology\nWhy do some journals forbid preprints?\nAn article defending the big publishers\nHow much does it really  cost to have an online journal?\nWhat if the public funders were to set up thier own journals?\nWhat's the role of post-pubication review?\nDo journals provide added value?\nJames' brush with the 'established'  media\n\n\nLinks \n\nPublisher policies on preprints\n\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_journals_by_preprint_policy\n\nHow much do universities pay for journal subscriptions?\n\nhttps://gowers.wordpress.com/2014/04/24/elsevier-journals-some-facts/ \n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDo we really need scientific journals? \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics discussed:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames trolling predatory journals with jibberish papers on the \u0026#39;DONG\u0026#39; effect\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow do these spammy journal invitation emails actually work?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFormal journals vs. preprint servers \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe shift to preprints in psychology\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhy do some journals forbid preprints?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAn article defending the big publishers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow much does it \u003cem\u003ereally\u003c/em\u003e  cost to have an online journal?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat if the public funders were to set up thier own journals?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat\u0026#39;s the role of post-pubication review?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDo journals provide added value?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames\u0026#39; brush with the \u0026#39;established\u0026#39;  media\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003ePublisher policies on preprints\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_journals_by_preprint_policy\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_journals_by_preprint_policy\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eHow much do universities pay for journal subscriptions?\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://gowers.wordpress.com/2014/04/24/elsevier-journals-some-facts/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://gowers.wordpress.com/2014/04/24/elsevier-journals-some-facts/\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Do we really need scientific journals? ","date_published":"2016-06-22T20:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b53714b6-68bf-47cd-8e8e-5938fae2e45d.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":36745299,"duration_in_seconds":3062}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/269241416","title":"16: What makes a good psych study?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/16","content_text":"What are the defining characteristics of a good psychology study? We received this excellent question from a listener and decided to do a whole episode on this idea. \n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nWhen’s the last time you saw a psych study that only reported a t-test? \nDan and James’ new paper on worry and heart rate variability\nSkepticism towards studies with many variables and ‘novel’ statistical approaches (that tend to always provide marvellous results)\nRepeated measures ANOVAs vs. linear mixed models\nPublishing convenient ideas, even if they’re wrong\nFishing expeditions \nThe ‘nocebo’ effect in action\nWhat are markers of study quality?\nPre-registering studies - can it be gamed?\nThe gradual improvement of psychology studies\n\n\nLinks \n\nDan and James' new paper on worry and heart rate variability  \n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255891 \n\nThe paper that said \"Encouraging experimental psychologists to use LMMs was like giving shotguns to toddlers.” \n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657634\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eWhat are the defining characteristics of a good psychology study? We received this excellent question from a listener and decided to do a whole episode on this idea. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome of the topics discussed:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhen’s the last time you saw a psych study that only reported a t-test? \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan and James’ new paper on worry and heart rate variability\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSkepticism towards studies with many variables and ‘novel’ statistical approaches (that tend to always provide marvellous results)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRepeated measures ANOVAs vs. linear mixed models\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePublishing convenient ideas, even if they’re wrong\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFishing expeditions \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe ‘nocebo’ effect in action\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat are markers of study quality?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePre-registering studies - can it be gamed?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe gradual improvement of psychology studies\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDan and James\u0026#39; new paper on worry and heart rate variability  \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255891\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255891\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe paper that said \u0026quot;Encouraging experimental psychologists to use LMMs was like giving shotguns to toddlers.” \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657634\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657634\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"What are the defining characteristics of a good psychology study?","date_published":"2016-06-15T19:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/db690aae-af6b-4ac9-993c-94e324029749.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":35403850,"duration_in_seconds":2950}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/268127035","title":"15: Software and coding","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/15","content_text":"Dan and James discuss software and coding, including the tools they use   \n\nLinks (lots this week)\n\nIntroduction to Python course - http://python.swaroopch.com //// R markdown - http://rmarkdown.rstudio.com //// GraphPad - http://www.graphpad.com //// JASP - https://jasp-stats.org ////\nIgor - https://www.wavemetrics.com/products/igorpro/igorpro.htm //// Canva - https://www.canva.com ////Omnifocus - https://www.omnigroup.com/omnifocus ////Slack - https://slack.com //// PsychoPy - http://www.psychopy.org //// 1Password - https://1password.com //// Papers - http://papersapp.com //// http://www.manuscriptsapp.com\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss software and coding, including the tools they use   \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks (lots this week)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eIntroduction to Python course - \u003ca href=\"http://python.swaroopch.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://python.swaroopch.com\u003c/a\u003e //// R markdown - \u003ca href=\"http://rmarkdown.rstudio.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://rmarkdown.rstudio.com\u003c/a\u003e //// GraphPad - \u003ca href=\"http://www.graphpad.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.graphpad.com\u003c/a\u003e //// JASP - \u003ca href=\"https://jasp-stats.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://jasp-stats.org\u003c/a\u003e ////\u003cbr\u003e\nIgor - \u003ca href=\"https://www.wavemetrics.com/products/igorpro/igorpro.htm\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.wavemetrics.com/products/igorpro/igorpro.htm\u003c/a\u003e //// Canva - \u003ca href=\"https://www.canva.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.canva.com\u003c/a\u003e ////Omnifocus - \u003ca href=\"https://www.omnigroup.com/omnifocus\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.omnigroup.com/omnifocus\u003c/a\u003e ////Slack - \u003ca href=\"https://slack.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://slack.com\u003c/a\u003e //// PsychoPy - \u003ca href=\"http://www.psychopy.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.psychopy.org\u003c/a\u003e //// 1Password - \u003ca href=\"https://1password.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://1password.com\u003c/a\u003e //// Papers - \u003ca href=\"http://papersapp.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://papersapp.com\u003c/a\u003e //// \u003ca href=\"http://www.manuscriptsapp.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.manuscriptsapp.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss software and coding, including the tools they use   ","date_published":"2016-06-08T14:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/d5c18fc3-8a68-4f56-bfdd-1554554e012c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":32725800,"duration_in_seconds":2727}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/267066277","title":"14: Science communication","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/14","content_text":"Dan and James discuss public engagement, science communication, and the internet outrage machine.   \n\nLinks:\n\nJames' GRIM pre-print\n\nhttps://peerj.com/preprints/2064v1/\n\nDan's meta-analysis paper\n\nhttp://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01549/full\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss public engagement, science communication, and the internet outrage machine.   \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eJames\u0026#39; GRIM pre-print\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://peerj.com/preprints/2064v1/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://peerj.com/preprints/2064v1/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDan\u0026#39;s meta-analysis paper\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01549/full\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01549/full\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss public engagement, science communication, and the internet outrage machine.   \r\n","date_published":"2016-06-02T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/e1fc0943-767d-4943-b72d-e6716cfd4a4c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":23629963,"duration_in_seconds":1969}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/266081160","title":"13: Academic horror stories","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/13","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a few academic horror stories sent in by their listeners. \n\nLinks:\n\nThe Gawker story on leaving academia\n\nhttp://gawker.com/i-left-my-ph-d-program-in-chemistry-a-few-years-back-wh-1774236393\n\nEquator network\n\nhttp://www.equator-network.org \n\nJack Johnson (the singer, not the boxer from the turn of the century)\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seZMOTGCDag \n\nAbominable Putridity (the band James mentioned)\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JYFgoaEeaQ\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss a few academic horror stories sent in by their listeners. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe Gawker story on leaving academia\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://gawker.com/i-left-my-ph-d-program-in-chemistry-a-few-years-back-wh-1774236393\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://gawker.com/i-left-my-ph-d-program-in-chemistry-a-few-years-back-wh-1774236393\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eEquator network\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.equator-network.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.equator-network.org\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eJack Johnson (the singer, not the boxer from the turn of the century)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seZMOTGCDag\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seZMOTGCDag\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eAbominable Putridity (the band James mentioned)\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JYFgoaEeaQ\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JYFgoaEeaQ\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss a few academic horror stories sent in by their listeners.","date_published":"2016-05-26T22:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/4c6a39de-ca5d-4e3f-9fce-3fed616b0c60.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":37586492,"duration_in_seconds":3132}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/265269936","title":"12: Reporting heart rate variability studies","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/12","content_text":"Heart rate variability is becoming incredibly popular in the biobehavioral sciences yet there's no standard for how this research is reported. In this episode, Dan and James discuss their latest paper where they propose heart rate variability reporting guidelines. They also talk about saunas (why not?) and why 'sympathovagal balance' should be abandoned.\n\nLinks:\n\nDan and James' guidelines paper\n\nhttp://www.nature.com/tp/journal/v6/n5/abs/tp201673a.html\n\nDan and Gail's heart rate variability meta-analysis\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26447819\n\nQuora\n\nhttps://www.quora.com \n\nWhole body hyperthermia study\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27172277\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eHeart rate variability is becoming incredibly popular in the biobehavioral sciences yet there\u0026#39;s no standard for how this research is reported. In this episode, Dan and James discuss their latest paper where they propose heart rate variability reporting guidelines. They also talk about saunas (why not?) and why \u0026#39;sympathovagal balance\u0026#39; should be abandoned.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDan and James\u0026#39; guidelines paper\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.nature.com/tp/journal/v6/n5/abs/tp201673a.html\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.nature.com/tp/journal/v6/n5/abs/tp201673a.html\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDan and Gail\u0026#39;s heart rate variability meta-analysis\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26447819\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26447819\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eQuora\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.quora.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.quora.com\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eWhole body hyperthermia study\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27172277\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27172277\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss their latest paper, in which they propose heart rate variability reporting guidelines. They also talk about saunas (why not?) and why the concept of 'sympathovagal balance' should be abandoned.","date_published":"2016-05-22T00:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b809d82c-2fe4-4bdd-a42b-03ddf82022c8.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":43104426,"duration_in_seconds":3591}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/263382832","title":"11: The placebo effect","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/11","content_text":"In this episode, James and Dan discuss issues surrounding the placebo effect.\n\nLinks:\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\n\nDan's other podcast\n\nhttps://soundcloud.com/startup-scientist-podcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode, James and Dan discuss issues surrounding the placebo effect.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDan\u0026#39;s other podcast\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://soundcloud.com/startup-scientist-podcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://soundcloud.com/startup-scientist-podcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"James and Dan discuss issues surrounding the placebo effect","date_published":"2016-05-10T12:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/26bb0859-d0a5-4921-bec4-bce3ad7018b4.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":31421721,"duration_in_seconds":2618}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/262520501","title":"10: Failure","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/10","content_text":"In this episode, James and Dan talk about failure.  What's the benefit of openly sharing your failures - is this an antidote to the imposter syndrome or something only the privileged few can afford to do?  ","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode, James and Dan talk about failure.  What\u0026#39;s the benefit of openly sharing your failures - is this an antidote to the imposter syndrome or something only the privileged few can afford to do?  \u003c/p\u003e","summary":"James and Dan talk about failure.  What's the benefit of openly sharing your failures - is this an antidote to the imposter syndrome or something only the privileged few can afford to do?  ","date_published":"2016-05-04T23:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/7a036fd1-7e3d-46c2-84e0-5bfc770a64e4.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":36349943,"duration_in_seconds":3029}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/261287236","title":"9: What happens if your research is wrong?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/9","content_text":"In this episode, James and Dan discuss what happens if your research is wrong.  They talk about the recent controversy surrounding tDCS, why many people don't hold negative results to the same scrutiny as positive results, and the hype cycle of research.\n\nLinks:\n\nDan's new Startup Scientist podcast\n\nhttps://soundcloud.com/startup-scientist-podcast\n\nVestibular stimulation\n\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanic_vestibular_stimulation \n\nThe one slide on the tDCS presentation that Dan found\n\nhttps://twitter.com/nomorewires/status/717384486888022016\n\nThe hype cycle\n\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode, James and Dan discuss what happens if your research is wrong.  They talk about the recent controversy surrounding tDCS, why many people don\u0026#39;t hold negative results to the same scrutiny as positive results, and the hype cycle of research.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDan\u0026#39;s new Startup Scientist podcast\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://soundcloud.com/startup-scientist-podcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://soundcloud.com/startup-scientist-podcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eVestibular stimulation\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanic_vestibular_stimulation\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanic_vestibular_stimulation\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe one slide on the tDCS presentation that Dan found\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/nomorewires/status/717384486888022016\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://twitter.com/nomorewires/status/717384486888022016\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe hype cycle\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"James and Dan discuss what happens if your research is wrong. They talk about the recent controversy surrounding tDCS, why many people don't hold negative results to the same scrutiny as positive results, and the \"hype cycle\" of research.","date_published":"2016-04-28T08:30:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5866bd02-be36-4d76-9233-cb2dce16958a.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":37274633,"duration_in_seconds":3106}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/260058864","title":"8: The PhD to Postdoc transition","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/8","content_text":"In this episode, James and Dan discuss how to navigate the PhD to Postdoc transition. They provide advice to a hypothetical first-year graduate student and discuss the realities of the postdoc job market. \n\nLinks:\n\nPropel Careers - https://www.propelcareers.com\n\nJames' blog post - https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/12-thing-you-should-know-before-you-start-a-phd-9c064a979e8#.iqqwzf55s  \n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode, James and Dan discuss how to navigate the PhD to Postdoc transition. They provide advice to a hypothetical first-year graduate student and discuss the realities of the postdoc job market. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003ePropel Careers - \u003ca href=\"https://www.propelcareers.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.propelcareers.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eJames\u0026#39; blog post - \u003ca href=\"https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/12-thing-you-should-know-before-you-start-a-phd-9c064a979e8#.iqqwzf55s\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://medium.com/@jamesheathers/12-thing-you-should-know-before-you-start-a-phd-9c064a979e8#.iqqwzf55s\u003c/a\u003e  \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"James and Dan discuss how to navigate the PhD to Postdoc transition. They provide advice to a hypothetical first-year graduate student and also discuss the realities of the postdoc job market.","date_published":"2016-04-20T20:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5c002d62-0ef4-4435-abb7-2711596dba4e.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":36578523,"duration_in_seconds":3048}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/259275723","title":"Episode 7: 7: The writing process","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/7","content_text":"How do you write a lot and do it well?  In this episode, James and Dan discuss the writing process and the tools they use to get things done.\n\nLinks:\n\nThe Conversation\n\nhttps://theconversation.com\n\nBreakTime app\n\nhttp://breaktimeapp.com\n\nTomato timer\n\nhttp://tomato-timer.com \n\nJelte Wichert's  paper  \n\nhttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0026828\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eHow do you write a lot and do it well?  In this episode, James and Dan discuss the writing process and the tools they use to get things done.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe Conversation\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://theconversation.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://theconversation.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eBreakTime app\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://breaktimeapp.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://breaktimeapp.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTomato timer\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://tomato-timer.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://tomato-timer.com\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eJelte Wichert\u0026#39;s  paper  \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0026828\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0026828\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"How do you write a lot and do it well?  In this e…","date_published":"2016-04-15T21:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/cfa8b749-e88a-4ec1-ae73-110c13f63b63.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":35914058,"duration_in_seconds":2992}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/257805218","title":"6: The research pipeline - getting from idea to publication","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/6","content_text":"In this episode, James and Dan talk about getting from research idea to publication. They discuss the ethical approval process, getting research published, and share tips for running experiments. They also cover some of the software that they use in their own research: JASP and Papers.  \n\nLinks:\n\nJASP - https://jasp-stats.org\n\nPapers - http://www.papersapp.com\n\nAuthorea - https://www.authorea.com \n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode, James and Dan talk about getting from research idea to publication. They discuss the ethical approval process, getting research published, and share tips for running experiments. They also cover some of the software that they use in their own research: JASP and Papers.  \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eJASP - \u003ca href=\"https://jasp-stats.org\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://jasp-stats.org\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003ePapers - \u003ca href=\"http://www.papersapp.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.papersapp.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eAuthorea - \u003ca href=\"https://www.authorea.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.authorea.com\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"In this episode, James and Dan talk about getting from research idea to publication. They also discuss the ethical approval process, getting research published, and share tips for running experiments","date_published":"2016-04-07T17:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/501ae5f2-8b27-446d-a2eb-df01bd968cb5.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":38807658,"duration_in_seconds":3233}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/256320874","title":"5: Do you even replicate?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/5","content_text":"In this episode, James and Dan talk about replication in science, self-control, and the file-drawer problem in oxytocin research.\n\nLinks:\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eIn this episode, James and Dan talk about replication in science, self-control, and the file-drawer problem in oxytocin research.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook page\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter account\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"In this episode, James and Dan talk about replication in science, self-control, and the file-drawer problem in oxytocin research.","date_published":"2016-03-30T21:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/f3da4eed-6d87-496c-a6cf-2cd9d09fdf4e.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":32405599,"duration_in_seconds":2700}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/254274717","title":"4: Meta-analysis or mega-silliness?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/4","content_text":"Meta-analysis has become an increasingly popular tool used by many scientists to synthesise data. However, it's not without its detractors — from H. J. Eysenck, Ph.D., calling it \"an exercise in mega-silliness\" in 1978,  to J. A. J. Heathers Ph.D., describing its use as a \"profound moral failing\" (he's half-serious) in 2016.\n\nIn this episode, Dan defends meta-analysis against more recent criticisms put forward by James and offers suggestions on how meta-analysis can be improved. \n\nLinks:\n\nPRISMA statement - http://www.prisma-statement.org/\n\nFacebook - https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter - https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eMeta-analysis has become an increasingly popular tool used by many scientists to synthesise data. However, it\u0026#39;s not without its detractors — from H. J. Eysenck, Ph.D., calling it \u0026quot;an exercise in mega-silliness\u0026quot; in 1978,  to J. A. J. Heathers Ph.D., describing its use as a \u0026quot;profound moral failing\u0026quot; (he\u0026#39;s half-serious) in 2016.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eIn this episode, Dan defends meta-analysis against more recent criticisms put forward by James and offers suggestions on how meta-analysis can be improved. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinks:\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003ePRISMA statement - \u003ca href=\"http://www.prisma-statement.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttp://www.prisma-statement.org/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFacebook - \u003ca href=\"https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTwitter - \u003ca href=\"https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"In this episode, Dan defends meta-analysis against more recent criticisms put forward by James and offers suggestions on how meta-analysis can be improved. ","date_published":"2016-03-22T18:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/8a197422-44a1-4d71-885b-9a5e5626381c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":28642281,"duration_in_seconds":2386}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/252212072","title":"3: Scientific publishing","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/3","content_text":"Dan and James talk about Scihub and open access publishing.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James talk about Scihub and open access publishing.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James talk about Scihub and open access publishing.","date_published":"2016-03-16T20:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/1b5e0b0a-5192-410a-926f-c29f4584435f.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":35482405,"duration_in_seconds":2956}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/251054402","title":"2: Nutrition and Psychiatry","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/2","content_text":"Dan and James talk about nutrition and psychiatry. They also introduce themselves (you know, because that's what you do for your second episode) and explain the origin of their podcast name.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James talk about nutrition and psychiatry. They also introduce themselves (you know, because that\u0026#39;s what you do for your \u003cem\u003esecond\u003c/em\u003e episode) and explain the origin of their podcast name.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James talk about nutrition and psychiatry. They also introduce themselves (you know, because that's what you do for your *second* episode) and explain the origin of their podcast name.","date_published":"2016-03-09T20:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/46128b10-d0e4-4131-afd1-ab8709bea510.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":34082047,"duration_in_seconds":2840}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/249885400","title":"1: So you want to measure heart rate variability...","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/1","content_text":"Dan and James discuss what to do if you want to collect heart rate variability (HRV) data, oxytocin parties (yes, they're a thing), and the peer review process.","content_html":"\u003cp\u003eDan and James discuss what to do if you want to collect heart rate variability (HRV) data, oxytocin parties (yes, they\u0026#39;re a thing), and the peer review process.\u003c/p\u003e","summary":"Dan and James discuss what to do if you want to collect heart rate variability (HRV) data, oxytocin parties (yes, they're a thing), and the peer review process.","date_published":"2016-03-02T21:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/10171fcb-a2ce-4068-84a9-9a93066abe5b.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":31465752,"duration_in_seconds":2622}]}]}