\n
![\"\"](\"https://vangogh.teespring.com/v3/image/MMTLZXJvOr6yzbqO5k5mdkmfFhY/480/560.jpg\")
In this episode we chat about a Nordic approach for evaluating the journal quality and how we should be teaching undergraduates to evaluate journal and article quality
\n\nLinks
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D. S., & Heathers, J. (2024, Nov 13). 186: Evaluating journal quality, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KB37U
","summary":"In this episode we chat about a Nordic approach for evaluating the journal quality and how we should be teaching undergraduates to evaluate journal and article quality","date_published":"2024-11-13T19:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/74dca206-c4a6-4e4d-8ac5-6603d1a2734f.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":31092715,"duration_in_seconds":2591}]},{"id":"ddb1f15e-3360-4442-bcf3-80709666592f","title":"185: The Retraction","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/185","content_text":"We discuss the recent retraction of a paper that reported the effects of rigour-enhancing practices on replicability. We also cover James' new estimate that 1 out of 7 scientific papers are fake.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe story about data integrity concerns in 130 women’s health papers \nJames' new preprint with the estimate that 1 out of 7 scientific papers are fake\nThe retracted paper in Nature Human Behavior by Protzko and coworkers\nThe Matters Arising article from Bak-Coleman and Devezer, who initially raised concerns about the paper from Protzko and coworkers.\nThe Everything Hertz merch store \nThe paper about puns/jokes in paper titles\nThe \"Everything Hertz\" paper from James\nDan's only paper with a pun in the title\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D. S., & Heathers, J. (2024, Oct 4). 185: The Retraction, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/528SF","content_html":"We discuss the recent retraction of a paper that reported the effects of rigour-enhancing practices on replicability. We also cover James' new estimate that 1 out of 7 scientific papers are fake.
\n\nLinks
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D. S., & Heathers, J. (2024, Oct 4). 185: The Retraction, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/528SF
","summary":"We discuss the recent retraction of a paper that reported the effects of rigour-enhancing practices on replicability. We also cover James' new estimate that 1 out of 7 scientific papers are fake","date_published":"2024-10-04T07:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/ddb1f15e-3360-4442-bcf3-80709666592f.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49448855,"duration_in_seconds":4120}]},{"id":"52abf447-73bd-45db-bc69-b00c5f726d03","title":"184: A race to the bottom","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/184","content_text":"Open access articles have democratized the availability of scientific research, but are author-paid publication fees undermining the quality of science? \n\nThe preprint by Morgan and Smaldino - https://osf.io/preprints/osf/3ez9v\nPaul Smaldino's text book - Modeling social behavior\n\nMain edisode takeaways (AI-assisted summary)\n\n\nThere is a wide variability in the quality of papers published in gold open access journals and a wide variate of open access journals, some of which prioritise quality research\nDiamond open access and green open access are alternative models to consider.\nThe publishing industry needs more transparency and mandatory reporting of data. The pressure to publish more can lead to a crowding out problem and a focus on quantity over quality.\nDetermining the quality of journals and papers is challenging, and there are varying levels of quality within different tiers of journals.\nFraudulent publishing practices, such as paper mills and fake papers, can be facilitated by the market for publishing.\nThe Publons service (R.I.P) and similar platforms can improve the transparency of peer review and provide a record of reviewers' contributions.\nSociety journals may offer a better publishing model as they have a reputation to maintain and are less likely to prioritize quantity over quality.\n\n\nOther links\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D. S., & Heathers, J. (2024, Sept 5). 184: A race to the bottom, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3MUJV","content_html":"Open access articles have democratized the availability of scientific research, but are author-paid publication fees undermining the quality of science?
\n\nThe preprint by Morgan and Smaldino - https://osf.io/preprints/osf/3ez9v
\nPaul Smaldino's text book - Modeling social behavior
Main edisode takeaways (AI-assisted summary)
\n\nOther links
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D. S., & Heathers, J. (2024, Sept 5). 184: A race to the bottom, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3MUJV
","summary":"Open access articles have democratized the availability of scientific research, but are author-paid publication fees undermining the quality of science? ","date_published":"2024-09-05T19:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/52abf447-73bd-45db-bc69-b00c5f726d03.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":34765949,"duration_in_seconds":2897}]},{"id":"806742dc-2ca8-4df3-9e73-a2208614ca10","title":"183: Too beautiful to be true","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/183","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a paper describing a journal editor's efforts to receive data from authors who submitted papers with results that seemed a little too beautiful to be true\n\nMain edisode takeaways (AI generated summary)\n\n\nThis editorial on the reproducibility crisis emphasizes the importance of providing raw data in scientific publications and highlights the need for transparency and accountability in the research process\nThe lack of oversight and the discrepancy between the amount of data required for scientific statements and what is often provided in academic publishing is a cause for concern.\nEnsuring the integrity of scientific research requires the active involvement of editors, reviewers, and researchers in promoting transparency and upholding ethical standards. The scientific publishing process lacks oversight and accountability, leading to potential issues with the accuracy and trustworthiness of published papers.\nJournals should prioritize maintaining high standards and ensuring that papers are thoroughly reviewed and validated before publication.\nChanging behaviors within the scientific community, such as pledging to publish in open access journals, can promote positive change and improve research integrity.\nThere is a need for active maintenance and improvement of the systems and parameters of scientific research to prevent potential negative consequences.\n\n\nLinks for papers we mentioned\n\n\nThe Molecular Brain editorial by Miyakawa: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-020-0552-2\nThe STALT preprint: https://osf.io/6hste\n\n\nOther links\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D. S., & Heathers, J. (2024, Aug 3). 183: Too beautiful to be true Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JF5MS","content_html":"Dan and James discuss a paper describing a journal editor's efforts to receive data from authors who submitted papers with results that seemed a little too beautiful to be true
\n\nMain edisode takeaways (AI generated summary)
\n\nLinks for papers we mentioned
\n\nOther links
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D. S., & Heathers, J. (2024, Aug 3). 183: Too beautiful to be true Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JF5MS
","summary":"Dan and James discuss a paper describing a journal editor's efforts to receive data from authors who submitted papers with results that seemed a little too beautiful to be true","date_published":"2024-08-03T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/806742dc-2ca8-4df3-9e73-a2208614ca10.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":43288449,"duration_in_seconds":2705}]},{"id":"bfc27816-6f79-4c76-ab94-13bd8c18b509","title":"182: What practices should the behavioural sciences borrow (and ignore) from other research fields?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/182","content_text":"Dan and James answer a listener question on what practices should the behavioural sciences borrow (and ignore) from other research fields.\n\nHere are the main takeaways:\n\n\nKeeping laboratory records and using electronic lab management software is beneficial practices biology that would benefit the behavioral sciences\nThe rate of pre-registration of meta-analysis in psychology is low, unlike other fields, which have a higher pre-registration rate. Here is the preprint on pre-registration of psychology meta-analyses that was mentioned: https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/627a4\nCase studies (somewhat common in medicine) can provide valuable insights, especially when there is aggressive sampling and oversampling of single points\nDouble-blinded should not be adopted. as these can be challenging to implement effectively and may not always work as intended\nPhilosophers often (but not always) have a clear writing style and structure their arguments well, which can be enjoyable to read and should be more widely adopted\nThe publishing industry needs more innovation, particularly in the areas of peer review and editorial processes\n\n\nOther links\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D. S., & Heathers, J. (2024, July 2). 182: What practices should the behavioural sciences borrow (and ignore) from other research fields? Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XN8DT","content_html":"Dan and James answer a listener question on what practices should the behavioural sciences borrow (and ignore) from other research fields.
\n\nHere are the main takeaways:
\n\nOther links
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D. S., & Heathers, J. (2024, July 2). 182: What practices should the behavioural sciences borrow (and ignore) from other research fields? Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XN8DT
","summary":"Dan and James answer a listener question on what practices should the behavioural sciences borrow (and ignore) from other research fields","date_published":"2024-07-02T19:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/bfc27816-6f79-4c76-ab94-13bd8c18b509.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49119816,"duration_in_seconds":3069}]},{"id":"2a84c764-bedf-4354-a6d7-99f88472cfb9","title":"181: Down the rabbit hole","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/181","content_text":"We discuss how following citation chains in psychology can often lead to unexpected places, and how this can contribute to unreplicable findings. We also discuss why team science has taken longer to catch on in psychology compared to other research fields.\n\n\nHere is the preprint that we mentioned authored by Andrew Gelman and Nick Brown - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/ekmdf\nOur episode with Nick Brown - https://everythinghertz.com/44\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, June 3) \"181: Down the rabbit hole\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/C7F9N","content_html":"We discuss how following citation chains in psychology can often lead to unexpected places, and how this can contribute to unreplicable findings. We also discuss why team science has taken longer to catch on in psychology compared to other research fields.
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, June 3) "181: Down the rabbit hole", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/C7F9N
","summary":"We discuss how following citation chains in psychology can often lead to unexpected places, and how this can contribute to unreplicable findings. We also discuss why team science has taken longer to catch on in psychology compared to other research fields.","date_published":"2024-06-03T13:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2a84c764-bedf-4354-a6d7-99f88472cfb9.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":41129272,"duration_in_seconds":2570}]},{"id":"8491786a-86eb-4c56-bfc5-997cec4df130","title":"180: Consortium peer reviews","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/180","content_text":"Dan and James discuss why innovation in scientific publishing is so hard, an emerging consortium peer review model, and a recent replication of the 'refilling soup bowl' study.\n\nOther things they cover and links:\n\n\nWhich studies should we spend time replicating?\nThe business models of for-profit scientific publishers \nHow many tacos can you buy with the money it costs to publish open access in Nature?\nThe original soup bowl study: https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2005.12\nThe replication study: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001503\nThe Peer Community In initiative: https://peercommunityin.org/\nStuart Buck's newsletter: https://goodscience.substack.com\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, May 2) \"180: Consortium peer reviews\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/24FMP","content_html":"Dan and James discuss why innovation in scientific publishing is so hard, an emerging consortium peer review model, and a recent replication of the 'refilling soup bowl' study.
\n\nOther things they cover and links:
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, May 2) "180: Consortium peer reviews", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/24FMP
","summary":"Dan and James discuss why innovation in scientific publishing is so hard, an emerging consortium peer review model, and a recent replication of the 'refilling soup bowl' study.","date_published":"2024-05-02T10:15:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/8491786a-86eb-4c56-bfc5-997cec4df130.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48231652,"duration_in_seconds":3014}]},{"id":"02087976-ed03-4cd1-b847-b56c54abf0d2","title":"179: Discovery vs. maintenance ","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/179","content_text":"Dan and James discuss how scientific research often neglects the importance of maintenance and long-term access for scientific tools and resources.\n\nOther things they cover:\n\n\nShould there be an annual limit on publications (even if this were somehow possible)?\nThe downsides of PhD by publication\nThe Gates Foundation's new Open Access policy\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, April 3) \"179: Discovery vs. maintenance\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KS8PV","content_html":"Dan and James discuss how scientific research often neglects the importance of maintenance and long-term access for scientific tools and resources.
\n\nOther things they cover:
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, April 3) "179: Discovery vs. maintenance", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KS8PV
","summary":"Dan and James discuss how scientific research often neglects the importance of maintenance and long-term access for scientific tools and resources","date_published":"2024-04-03T06:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/02087976-ed03-4cd1-b847-b56c54abf0d2.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":46696070,"duration_in_seconds":2918}]},{"id":"12ce8dbf-be90-4fef-adad-3f8c67db0126","title":"178: Alerting researchers about retractions","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/178","content_text":"Dan and James discuss the Retractobot service, which emails authors about papers they've cited that have been retracted. What should authors do if they discover a paper they've cited has been retracted after they published their paper?\n\nOther things they chat about\n\n\nA listener question about including examiner's comments in thesis\nThe different types of retractions and thier impact\nWhy aren't versioning systems more common in scientific publishing?\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, February 29) \"178: Alerting researchers about retractions\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/T8HRD","content_html":"Dan and James discuss the Retractobot service, which emails authors about papers they've cited that have been retracted. What should authors do if they discover a paper they've cited has been retracted after they published their paper?
\n\nOther things they chat about
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, February 29) "178: Alerting researchers about retractions", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/T8HRD
","summary":"Dan and James discuss the Retractobot service, which emails authors about papers they've cited that have been retracted. What should authors do if they discover a paper they've cited has been retracted after they published their paper?","date_published":"2024-02-29T21:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/12ce8dbf-be90-4fef-adad-3f8c67db0126.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":47760612,"duration_in_seconds":2985}]},{"id":"29ad5802-d32d-4d00-8675-2c443397e8e7","title":"177: Plagiarism ","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/177","content_text":"We discuss two recent plagiarism cases, one you've probably heard about and another that you probably haven't heard about if you're outside Norway. We also chat about the parallels between plagiarism and sports doping—would people reconsider academic dishonesty if they were reminded that future technology may catch them out?\n\nHere are some of the takeaways from the episode (generated with the help of AI):\n\n\nPlagiarism cases can range from minor academic practice issues to more serious instances of copying verbatim\nThe detection and punishment of plagiarism can vary depending on the context, such as academic journals or internal university issues.\nThe mindset and motivations behind plagiarism can differ between athletes and students, with athletes often driven by intense competition.\nLong-term detectability and the potential consequences of cheating are factors that may discourage individuals from engaging in plagiarism.\nAddressing plagiarism requires a balance between identifying genuine cases and avoiding ideological biases. \n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, January 31) \"177: Plagiarism\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4M3F2","content_html":"We discuss two recent plagiarism cases, one you've probably heard about and another that you probably haven't heard about if you're outside Norway. We also chat about the parallels between plagiarism and sports doping—would people reconsider academic dishonesty if they were reminded that future technology may catch them out?
\n\nHere are some of the takeaways from the episode (generated with the help of AI):
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, January 31) "177: Plagiarism", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4M3F2
","summary":"We discuss two recent plagiarism cases, one you've probably heard about and another that you probably haven't heard about if you're outside Norway. We also chat about the parallels between plagiarism and sports doping—would people reconsider academic dishonesty if they were reminded that future technology may catch them out?","date_published":"2024-01-31T20:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/29ad5802-d32d-4d00-8675-2c443397e8e7.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":41155603,"duration_in_seconds":2572}]},{"id":"2edf1492-7433-471a-82c8-8091505c580d","title":"176: Tracking academic workloads","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/176","content_text":"We chat about a paper on the invisible workload of open science and why academics are so bad at tracking their workloads.\n\nThis episode was originally recorded in May 2023 in a hotel room just before our live recording of Episode 169, which is why we refer to the paper as a 'new' paper near the start of the episode.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper on the invisible workload of open research\nOur live and in-person episode with Sandra Matz on using big data to understand behavior\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, December 29) \"176: Tracking academic workloads\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U84JC","content_html":"We chat about a paper on the invisible workload of open science and why academics are so bad at tracking their workloads.
\n\nThis episode was originally recorded in May 2023 in a hotel room just before our live recording of Episode 169, which is why we refer to the paper as a 'new' paper near the start of the episode.
\n\nLinks
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, December 29) "176: Tracking academic workloads", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U84JC
","summary":"We chat about a paper on the invisible workload of open science and why academics are so bad at tracking their workloads","date_published":"2023-12-29T20:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2edf1492-7433-471a-82c8-8091505c580d.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":34763336,"duration_in_seconds":2172}]},{"id":"f2c6507b-4408-4415-95bf-f7db65f773b6","title":"175: Defending against the scientific dark arts","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/175","content_text":"We chat about a recent blogpost from Dorothy Bishop, in which she proposes a Master course that will provide training in fraud detection—what should such a course specifically teach and where would these people work to apply their training? We also discuss whether open science is a cult that has trouble seeing outward.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe blog post on the Master in dark arts defence from Dorothy Bishop\nThe blog post on whether open science is a cult from Andrew Gelman\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, December 7) \"175: Defending against the scientific dark arts\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/K2J7N","content_html":"We chat about a recent blogpost from Dorothy Bishop, in which she proposes a Master course that will provide training in fraud detection—what should such a course specifically teach and where would these people work to apply their training? We also discuss whether open science is a cult that has trouble seeing outward.
\n\nLinks
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, December 7) "175: Defending against the scientific dark arts", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/K2J7N
","summary":"We chat about a recent blogpost from Dorothy Bishop, in which she proposes a Master course that will provide training in fraud detection—what should such a course specifically teach and where would these people work to apply their training? We also discuss whether open science is a cult that has trouble seeing outward.","date_published":"2023-12-07T14:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/f2c6507b-4408-4415-95bf-f7db65f773b6.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":36647496,"duration_in_seconds":2290}]},{"id":"f8afc507-6b31-4fb3-8574-3a1d2e756c47","title":"174: Smug missionaries with test tubes","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/174","content_text":"James proposes proposes a new type of consortium paper that could provide collaborative opportunities for researchers from countries that are underrepresented in published research papers. We also talk about computational reproducibility and paper publication bonuses. \n\nLinks\nThe paper from Steve Lindsay on computational reproducbility: A Plea to Psychology Professional Societies that Publish Journals: Assess Computational Reproducibility\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, October 31) \"174: Smug missionaries with test tubes\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FBHRZ","content_html":"James proposes proposes a new type of consortium paper that could provide collaborative opportunities for researchers from countries that are underrepresented in published research papers. We also talk about computational reproducibility and paper publication bonuses.
\n\nLinks
\nThe paper from Steve Lindsay on computational reproducbility: A Plea to Psychology Professional Societies that Publish Journals: Assess Computational Reproducibility
Other links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, October 31) "174: Smug missionaries with test tubes", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FBHRZ
","summary":"James proposes a new type of consortium paper that could provide collaborative opportunities for researchers from countries that are underrepresented in published research papers ","date_published":"2023-11-01T21:15:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/f8afc507-6b31-4fb3-8574-3a1d2e756c47.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":51225076,"duration_in_seconds":3201}]},{"id":"bbfc3ecf-6c6e-465c-b72c-cb82921900d4","title":"173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/173","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper that investigated how science journalists evaluate psychology papers. To answer this question, the researchers presented science journalists with fictitious psychology studies and manipulated sample size, sample representativeness, p-values, and institutional prestige\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper on how science journalists evaluate psychology papers\nThe preprint paper on small samples\nLaboratory Life by Bruno Latour\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, September 30) \"173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/SG4BM","content_html":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper that investigated how science journalists evaluate psychology papers. To answer this question, the researchers presented science journalists with fictitious psychology studies and manipulated sample size, sample representativeness, p-values, and institutional prestige
\n\nLinks
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, September 30) "173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/SG4BM
","summary":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper that investigated how science journalists evaluate psychology papers. To answer this question, the researchers presented science journalists with fictitious psychology studies and manipulated sample size, sample representativeness, p-values, and institutional prestige","date_published":"2023-10-01T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/bbfc3ecf-6c6e-465c-b72c-cb82921900d4.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":33713422,"duration_in_seconds":2107}]},{"id":"d92a8a7f-a9f2-4ac9-bce9-9c96f7e5c108","title":"172: In defence of the discussion section","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/172","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a recent proposal to do away with discussion sections and suggest other stuff they'd like to get rid of from academic publishing.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper on the proposed elimiation of the discussion section\nThe paper on machine readable hypothesis tests\nOur episodes with Daniel Lakens\nOur episode with Lisa DeBruine\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, August 31) \"172: In defence of the discussion section\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/N3SFT","content_html":"Dan and James discuss a recent proposal to do away with discussion sections and suggest other stuff they'd like to get rid of from academic publishing.
\n\nLinks
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, August 31) "172: In defence of the discussion section", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/N3SFT
","summary":"Dan and James discuss a recent proposal to do away with discussion sections and suggest other stuff they'd like to get rid of from academic publishing","date_published":"2023-08-31T21:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/d92a8a7f-a9f2-4ac9-bce9-9c96f7e5c108.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":34185298,"duration_in_seconds":2136}]},{"id":"c31876c8-f38d-487e-98b5-3b789b09e4b1","title":"171: The easiest person to fool is yourself (with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/171","content_text":"We chat with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris about the science of cons and how we can we can avoid being taken in. We also cover the fate of the gorilla suit from the 'invisible gorilla' study, why scientists are especially prone to being fooled, plus more!\n\nBuy Daniel and Christopher's new book, Nobody's fool, from your favourite bookseller here.\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, July 20) \"171: The easiest person to fool is yourself (with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/F8SMRSpecial Guests: Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons.","content_html":"We chat with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris about the science of cons and how we can we can avoid being taken in. We also cover the fate of the gorilla suit from the 'invisible gorilla' study, why scientists are especially prone to being fooled, plus more!
\n\nBuy Daniel and Christopher's new book, Nobody's fool, from your favourite bookseller here.
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, July 20) "171: The easiest person to fool is yourself (with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/F8SMR
Special Guests: Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons.
","summary":"We chat with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris about the science of cons and how we can we can avoid being taken in. We also cover the fate of the gorilla suit from the 'invisible gorilla' study, why scientists are especially prone to being fooled, plus more!","date_published":"2023-07-20T19:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/c31876c8-f38d-487e-98b5-3b789b09e4b1.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":53480384,"duration_in_seconds":3342}]},{"id":"f712ba6d-2570-4079-a61b-9c3566606a5f","title":"170: Holy sheet","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/170","content_text":"We discuss evidence of data tampering in a series of experiments investigating dishonesty revealed via excel spreadsheet metadata and how traditional peer review is not suited for the detection of data tampering.\n\nLinks\n\n\nData colada post 1\nThe conceptual replication attempt in Guatemalan taxpayers \nThe paper on using caution when applying behavioural science to policy \nData colada post 2\nThe carthorse child\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, June 23) \"170: Holy Sheet\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DW2C7","content_html":"We discuss evidence of data tampering in a series of experiments investigating dishonesty revealed via excel spreadsheet metadata and how traditional peer review is not suited for the detection of data tampering.
\n\nLinks
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, June 23) "170: Holy Sheet", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DW2C7
","summary":"We discuss evidence of data tampering in a series of experiments investigating dishonesty revealed via excel spreadsheet metadata and how traditional peer review is not suited for the detection of data tampering.","date_published":"2023-06-23T15:45:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/f712ba6d-2570-4079-a61b-9c3566606a5f.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48519626,"duration_in_seconds":3032}]},{"id":"b3dc2531-fb57-4d41-b063-23c1f5a09a14","title":"169: Using big data to understand behavior (Live episode with Sandra Matz)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/169","content_text":"In our first ever live and in-person episode, we chat with Sandra Matz about the opportunities and challenges for using big data to understand human behavior\n\nLinks\n\n\nEverybody lies book, by Seth Stephens-Davidowitz\nA paper on \"Born open\" data \n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, May 31) \"169: Using big data to understand behavior (Live episode with Sandra Matz)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JDXHFSpecial Guest: Sandra Matz.","content_html":"In our first ever live and in-person episode, we chat with Sandra Matz about the opportunities and challenges for using big data to understand human behavior
\n\nLinks
\n\n\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, May 31) "169: Using big data to understand behavior (Live episode with Sandra Matz)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JDXHF
Special Guest: Sandra Matz.
","summary":"In our first ever live and in-person episode, we chat with Sandra Matz about the opportunities and challenges for using big data to understand human behavior","date_published":"2023-05-31T10:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b3dc2531-fb57-4d41-b063-23c1f5a09a14.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":41988178,"duration_in_seconds":2624}]},{"id":"5ae3b881-edc8-47ac-91f7-e368f1f45c54","title":"168: Meta-meta-science","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/168","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a new paper that reviews potential issues in metascience practices. They also talk about their upcoming live show in May in Frankfurt.\n\nLinks\n\n\nOur upcoming show on May 8th, which will be a part of the at the 4th symposium on big data and research syntheses in psychology symposium to be held in Frankfurt, Germany\nThe paper we discuss from Mark Rubin \nPeder Isager and team's paper on what to replicate \n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, April 26) \"168: Meta-meta-science\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/CSJ3X","content_html":"Dan and James discuss a new paper that reviews potential issues in metascience practices. They also talk about their upcoming live show in May in Frankfurt.
\n\nLinks
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, April 26) "168: Meta-meta-science", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/CSJ3X
","summary":"Dan and James discuss a new paper that reviews potential issues in metascience practices. They also talk about their upcoming live show in May in Frankfurt.","date_published":"2023-04-27T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5ae3b881-edc8-47ac-91f7-e368f1f45c54.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":46505481,"duration_in_seconds":2906}]},{"id":"50984b49-057c-4cdd-8855-01ce6eac0e84","title":"167: Diluted effect sizes","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/167","content_text":"Dan and James chat about a new study that uses homeopathy studies to evaluate bias in biomedical research, a new-ish type of authorship fraud, and the potential for Chat GPT peer-review.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe Chat GPT paper library tweet\nThe Homeopathy paper\nThe David Grimes paper\nBritish dental journal paper on fraud\nThe AHealthcareZ YouTube channel\nThe FittDesign Studio YouTube channel\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, March 16) \"167: Diluted effect sizes\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/H847F","content_html":"Dan and James chat about a new study that uses homeopathy studies to evaluate bias in biomedical research, a new-ish type of authorship fraud, and the potential for Chat GPT peer-review.
\n\nLinks
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, March 16) "167: Diluted effect sizes", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/H847F
","summary":"Dan and James chat about a new study that uses homeopathy studies to evaluate bias in biomedical research, a new-ish type of authorship fraud, and the potential for Chat GPT peer-review.","date_published":"2023-03-16T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/50984b49-057c-4cdd-8855-01ce6eac0e84.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":41917543,"duration_in_seconds":2619}]},{"id":"29fc59bf-4429-4191-949b-9140c488bc12","title":"166: Is science becoming less disruptive over time?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/166","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper that claims that science is becoming less disruptive over time and the suggested causes for this decline.\n\nLinks\n\n\nOur prior episode, which discussed PhD defences\nThe paper on disruption in science\nThe news piece on the paper\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, January 25) \"166: Is science becoming less disruptive over time?\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/X6YS5","content_html":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper that claims that science is becoming less disruptive over time and the suggested causes for this decline.
\n\nLinks
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, January 25) "166: Is science becoming less disruptive over time?", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/X6YS5
","summary":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper that claims that science is becoming less disruptive over time and the suggested causes for this decline.","date_published":"2023-01-25T09:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/29fc59bf-4429-4191-949b-9140c488bc12.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":50125843,"duration_in_seconds":3132}]},{"id":"7e6f6829-88bd-41a4-8b1e-e9e4666a9f4e","title":"165: Self-promotion","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/165","content_text":"Dan and James chat about self-promotion in academia, how they both wish they had doctoral defences (these aren't a thing in Australia), and replacing error bars with the letter \"t\".\n\nLinks and stuff\n\n\nThe now retracted paper with the error bars as \"t\"s \nA direct link to the figure \nThe blog post on self-promotion, titled \"The End of Decency: When Self-Promotion Goes Too Far\" https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2022/12/09/why-too-much-public-self-promotion-academics-damaging-opinion\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, December 30) \"165: Self-promotion\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U2N9Q","content_html":"Dan and James chat about self-promotion in academia, how they both wish they had doctoral defences (these aren't a thing in Australia), and replacing error bars with the letter "t".
\n\nLinks and stuff
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, December 30) "165: Self-promotion", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U2N9Q
","summary":"Dan and James chat about self-promotion in academia, how they both wish they had doctoral defences (these aren't a thing in Australia), and replacing error bars with the letter \"t\".","date_published":"2022-12-30T09:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/7e6f6829-88bd-41a4-8b1e-e9e4666a9f4e.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":39662820,"duration_in_seconds":2478}]},{"id":"e1ff9e27-137b-4b6b-870f-e7ec4da558d2","title":"164: The great migration","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/164","content_text":"James and Dan discuss the recent migration of scientists from Twitter to Mastodon and the pros and cons of sharing the prior submission history of manuscripts \n\n\nThe Mastodon thread discussion the submission history policy in American Chemical Society Journals\nThe \"Weekend at Bernies\" film \nOur new Mastodon account: @hertzpodcast@mas.to\nJames' leaf blower man haiku \n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, November 28) \"164: The great migration\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/ZBJQS","content_html":"James and Dan discuss the recent migration of scientists from Twitter to Mastodon and the pros and cons of sharing the prior submission history of manuscripts
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, November 28) "164: The great migration", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/ZBJQS
Dan and James discuss eLife's new peer review model, in which they no longer make accept/reject decisions at the end of the peer-review process. Instead, papers invited for peer review will receive an assessment from eLife and the peer reviews will be shared on eLife's website. It's up to author if they would like revise their manuscript or publish their paper as the version of record.
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, November 7) "163: eLife's new peer review model", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/XYBU5
","summary":"Dan and James discuss eLife's new peer review model, in which they no longer make accept/reject decisions at the end of the peer-review process. Instead, papers invited for peer review will receive an assessment from eLife and the peer reviews will be shared on eLife's website. It's up to author if they would like revise their manuscript or publish their paper as the version of record. ","date_published":"2022-11-07T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/a41f46dd-ea93-4b25-b773-25e57883f789.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":52544991,"duration_in_seconds":3284}]},{"id":"ef14f3df-11a0-41ea-99c7-6941d2451411","title":"162: Status bias in peer review","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/162","content_text":"We chat about a recent preprint describing an experiment on the role of author status in peer-review, dodgy conference proceedings journals, and authorships for sale.\n\nLinks\n\n\nJames' blogpost on conference proceedings journals\nThe preprint/working paper on status bias \n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, October 17) \"162: Status bias in peer review\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 110.17605/OSF.IO/WX2A7","content_html":"We chat about a recent preprint describing an experiment on the role of author status in peer-review, dodgy conference proceedings journals, and authorships for sale.
\n\nLinks
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, October 17) "162: Status bias in peer review", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 110.17605/OSF.IO/WX2A7
","summary":"We chat about a recent preprint describing an experiment on the role of author status in peer-review, dodgy conference proceedings journals, and authorships for sale ","date_published":"2022-10-17T09:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/ef14f3df-11a0-41ea-99c7-6941d2451411.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48693079,"duration_in_seconds":3043}]},{"id":"2e3bbe4f-dc59-4f4b-b658-11415af92fa0","title":"161: The memo (with Brian Nosek)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/161","content_text":"Dan and James are joined by Brian Nosek (Co-founder and Executive Director of the Center for Open Science) to discuss the recent White House Office of Science Technology & Policy memo ensuring free, immediate, and equitable access to federally funded research. They also cover the implications of this memo for scientific publishing, as well as the mechanics of culture change in science.\n\n\nOpen Science Framework hits half a million users\nThe White house memo\nBrian on Twitter\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, August 31) \"161: The memo (with Brian Nosek)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/A7D86Special Guest: Brian Nosek.","content_html":"Dan and James are joined by Brian Nosek (Co-founder and Executive Director of the Center for Open Science) to discuss the recent White House Office of Science Technology & Policy memo ensuring free, immediate, and equitable access to federally funded research. They also cover the implications of this memo for scientific publishing, as well as the mechanics of culture change in science.
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, August 31) "161: The memo (with Brian Nosek)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/A7D86
Special Guest: Brian Nosek.
","summary":"Dan and James are joined by Brian Nosek (Co-founder and Executive Director of the Center for Open Science) to discuss the recent White House Office of Science Technology & Policy memo ensuring free, immediate, and equitable access to federally funded research. They also cover the implications of this memo for scientific publishing, as well as the mechanics of culture change in science.","date_published":"2022-09-12T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2e3bbe4f-dc59-4f4b-b658-11415af92fa0.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":46054085,"duration_in_seconds":2878}]},{"id":"bf23b318-e59d-4cef-9621-7f90c80723a3","title":"160: Whistleblowing","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/160","content_text":"Dan and James share ten rules for whistleblowing academic misconduct. \n\n\nThe Safe Faculty Project website\nSLAPP statues https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_public_participation\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, August 31) \"160: Whistleblowing\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/NFUJQ","content_html":"Dan and James share ten rules for whistleblowing academic misconduct.
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, August 31) "160: Whistleblowing", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/NFUJQ
","summary":"Dan and James share ten rules for whistleblowing academic misconduct. ","date_published":"2022-08-31T14:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/bf23b318-e59d-4cef-9621-7f90c80723a3.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48645432,"duration_in_seconds":3040}]},{"id":"1720dda1-c492-4584-84ae-11ca81e65e19","title":"159: Peer review isn't working (with Saloni Dattani)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/159","content_text":"Dan and James are joined by Saloni Dattani for a chat about the history of peer review, a reimagination of what peer review could look like, what happens when you actually pay peer reviewers, peer reviewer specialisation, post publication peer review, annual paper limits for authors, automation in peer review, and Big Cheese.\n\nLinks\n\n\nWorks in Progress magazine\nOne of the many news stories about the Jarsberg cheese study\nThe actual study\nSaloni's peer review piece\nThe F1000 format\nOur episode with Elisabeth Bik\nPCI registered reports\nSaloni on Twitter\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, August 15) \"159: Peer review isn't working (with Saloni Dattani)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/PZS97Special Guest: Saloni Dattani.","content_html":"Dan and James are joined by Saloni Dattani for a chat about the history of peer review, a reimagination of what peer review could look like, what happens when you actually pay peer reviewers, peer reviewer specialisation, post publication peer review, annual paper limits for authors, automation in peer review, and Big Cheese.
\n\nLinks
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, August 15) "159: Peer review isn't working (with Saloni Dattani)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/PZS97
Special Guest: Saloni Dattani.
","summary":"Dan and James are joined by Saloni Dattani for a chat about the history of peer review, a reimagination of what peer review could look like, what happens when you actually pay peer reviewers, peer reviewer specialisation, post publication peer review, annual paper limits for authors, automation in peer review, and Big Cheese.","date_published":"2022-08-15T10:15:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/1720dda1-c492-4584-84ae-11ca81e65e19.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49525236,"duration_in_seconds":3095}]},{"id":"574197fb-e771-49df-aa90-14a6dae545a9","title":"158: Word limits","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/158","content_text":"By popular demand, Dan and James chat about journal word and page limits.They also the debate around a recent meta-analysis on nudge interventions.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe PNAS nudge meta-analysis\nThe response letter \nThe paper on adjectives and adverbs in life sciences\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, August 1) \"158: Word limits\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3DY9J","content_html":"By popular demand, Dan and James chat about journal word and page limits.They also the debate around a recent meta-analysis on nudge interventions.
\n\nLinks
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, August 1) "158: Word limits", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3DY9J
","summary":"By popular demand, Dan and James chat about journal word and page limits. They also the debate around a recent meta-analysis on nudge interventions","date_published":"2022-08-01T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/574197fb-e771-49df-aa90-14a6dae545a9.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":43390013,"duration_in_seconds":2711}]},{"id":"f9031ba8-ad42-4d53-ba8c-79486c1e1af8","title":"157: Limitations","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/157","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a new preprint that examined the types of limitations authors discuss in their published articles and whether these limitation types has changed over the past decade, especially in light of methodological reform efforts. \n\nLinks\n\n\nThe Genetic Lottery by Kathryn Paige Harden\nThe limitations preprint by Beth Clarke and collegues \nSimine Vazire’s episode (also known as the one where Dan's wife starts going into labor)\nThe heartbeat paper from Galvez-Pol and collegues\nRand Wilcox and robust statistical methods\nThe tweet thread explainer from Beth Clarke\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, July 11) \"157: Limitations\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/APCU3","content_html":"Dan and James discuss a new preprint that examined the types of limitations authors discuss in their published articles and whether these limitation types has changed over the past decade, especially in light of methodological reform efforts.
\n\nLinks
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, July 11) "157: Limitations", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/APCU3
","summary":"Dan and James discuss a new preprint that examined the types of limitations authors discuss in their published articles and whether these limitation types has changed over the past decade, especially in light of methodological reform efforts. ","date_published":"2022-07-11T19:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/f9031ba8-ad42-4d53-ba8c-79486c1e1af8.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":44909713,"duration_in_seconds":2806}]},{"id":"73e8bcd3-fc78-4ed3-9f96-a32733dbc0f9","title":"156: Looking for seeders","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/156","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper that concluded (again) that most researchers aren't compliant with their published data sharing statement and whether torrents (remember them?) are a viable alternative for sharing large datasets.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe data request paper\nThe paper Dan and James co-authored led by Julian Koenig\nOur episode with Henry Drysdale\nOur episode with Chris Chambers\nThe meta-psychology journal\n\n\nOther links\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, June 21) \"156: Looking for seeders\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4Q6JY","content_html":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper that concluded (again) that most researchers aren't compliant with their published data sharing statement and whether torrents (remember them?) are a viable alternative for sharing large datasets.
\n\nLinks
\n\nOther links
\nEverything Hertz on social media
Citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, June 21) "156: Looking for seeders", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4Q6JY
","summary":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper that concluded (again) that most researchers aren't compliant with their published data sharing statement and whether torrents (remember them?) are a viable alternative for sharing large datasets.","date_published":"2022-06-21T23:30:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/73e8bcd3-fc78-4ed3-9f96-a32733dbc0f9.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48922957,"duration_in_seconds":3057}]},{"id":"ba64c9cd-82bf-43ef-9a99-dcebba437e5e","title":"155: Don't you know who I am?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/155","content_text":"We chat about appeals to authority when responding to scientific critique, university ranking systems, Goodhart’s law (and its origin), and private institutional review boards.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe history of Goodhart's law \nThe original psychadelics paper in Nature Medicine\nThe critique\nThe response to the critique\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation \n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, May 30) \"155: Don't you know who I am?\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VXBKS","content_html":"We chat about appeals to authority when responding to scientific critique, university ranking systems, Goodhart’s law (and its origin), and private institutional review boards.
\n\nLinks
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, May 30) "155: Don't you know who I am?", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VXBKS
","summary":"We chat about appeals to authority when responding to scientific critique, university ranking systems, Goodhart’s law (and its origin), and private institutional review boards.","date_published":"2022-05-30T09:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/ba64c9cd-82bf-43ef-9a99-dcebba437e5e.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":44482141,"duration_in_seconds":2780}]},{"id":"aca5af64-9a88-429f-adfd-e89332af9034","title":"154: When the evidence is constructed around the narrative","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/154","content_text":"We chat about the Theranos story and the parallels with academic research, as well as Twitter's new owner and whether academics will actually leave the platform\n\nLinks\n\n\nMastodon (the band) \nElon Musk’s Onion article\nThe Dropout podcast\nThe Juicero \nBad Blood: The Final Chapter podcast by John Carreyrou \n \"Macho Man\" Randy Savage \n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, May 9) \"154: When the evidence is constructed around the narrative\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/45Z2J","content_html":"We chat about the Theranos story and the parallels with academic research, as well as Twitter's new owner and whether academics will actually leave the platform
\n\nLinks
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, May 9) "154: When the evidence is constructed around the narrative", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/45Z2J
We discuss a journal's new "wall of shame" page, which details unethical behaviours in an effort to discourage future misconduct. We also cover scientific ideas that won't die (but one idea that HAS died), and ECNP's "negative data" prize
\n\nThe audio quality of this recording isn't up to our usual standards as we were both travelling and without our normal recording gear. We'll be back with our normal gear next episode!
\n\nLinks
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, April 18) "153: Shame shame shame", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/YZ8VG
","summary":"We discuss a journal's new \"wall of shame\" page, which details unethical behaviours in an effort to discourage future misconduct. We also cover scientific ideas that won't die (but one idea that HAS died), and ECNP's \"negative data\" prize","date_published":"2022-04-18T09:45:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2f69f8a7-38db-42d8-879f-c6ae61c61ef6.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":45435088,"duration_in_seconds":2839}]},{"id":"75cab818-c0ee-458e-8602-a3abfa4011a5","title":"152: Sorry Not Sorry","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/152","content_text":"James and Dan chat about apologies vs. non-apologies, how to decide when to call it quits on a paper, and governments vetoing research proposals recommended by their own funding agencies\n\nLinks for stuff we mention\n\n\nThe tweet from Chris Jackson that started it all\nChris Jackson's Hertz episode on the cumulative advantage of academic capital \nThe Science Diagrams that Look Like Shitposts twitter account\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, April 4) \"152: Sorry Not Sorry\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WBVXZ","content_html":"James and Dan chat about apologies vs. non-apologies, how to decide when to call it quits on a paper, and governments vetoing research proposals recommended by their own funding agencies
\n\nLinks for stuff we mention
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, April 4) "152: Sorry Not Sorry", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WBVXZ
","summary":"James and Dan chat about apologies vs. non-apologies, how to decide when to call it quits on a paper, and governments vetoing research proposals recommended by their own funding agencies\r\n","date_published":"2022-04-04T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/75cab818-c0ee-458e-8602-a3abfa4011a5.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":53547675,"duration_in_seconds":3346}]},{"id":"ef8dcf79-7caf-47d0-aed4-63c04cdfc9be","title":"151: The dirty dozen","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/151","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a new preprint that details twelve p-hacking strategies and simulates their impact on false-positive rates. They also discuss the Great Resignation in academia and the academic job market.\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe twitter discussion on Associate editor pay kicked off by Eiko Fried\nThe p-hacking paper from Angelika Stefan and Felix Schönbrodt\nThe sample size preprint from Daniel Lakens\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, March 21) \"151: The dirty dozen\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KNM59","content_html":"Dan and James discuss a new preprint that details twelve p-hacking strategies and simulates their impact on false-positive rates. They also discuss the Great Resignation in academia and the academic job market.
\n\nLinks
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, March 21) "151: The dirty dozen", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KNM59
","summary":"Dan and James discuss a new preprint that details twelve p-hacking strategies and simulates their impact on false-positive rates. They also discuss the Great Resignation in academia and the academic job market.","date_published":"2022-03-21T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/ef8dcf79-7caf-47d0-aed4-63c04cdfc9be.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":38305877,"duration_in_seconds":2393}]},{"id":"02ca7cba-d7e8-49c9-9cf6-44c1ae5af19c","title":"150: Why can't you do nothing?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/150","content_text":"We discuss the latest paper to seriously use the Kardashian index, which is the discrepancy between a scientist's publication record and social media following, and a listener question on whether original authors should get the last word when a comment on an article is submitted \n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper on citation impact and social media visibility of Great Barrington and John Snow signatories for COVID-19 strategy\nThe Rapid Responses comments on the paper\nThe peer review reports for the paper\nSend us an audio question!\nAbout PubPeer\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nCitation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, February 28) \"150: Why can't you do nothing?\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7RPA4","content_html":"We discuss the latest paper to seriously use the Kardashian index, which is the discrepancy between a scientist's publication record and social media following, and a listener question on whether original authors should get the last word when a comment on an article is submitted
\n\nLinks
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, February 28) "150: Why can't you do nothing?", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7RPA4
Dan and James chat with cardiologist Rohin Francis about medical misinformation and how he uses YouTube for science communication via his 'Medlife Crisis' channel.
\n\nLinks to stuff that was mentioned:
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, February 14) "149: Medical misinformation (with Rohin Francis)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7RCMN
Special Guest: Rohin Francis.
","summary":"Dan and James chat with cardiologist Rohin Francis about medical misinformation and how he uses YouTube for science communication","date_published":"2022-02-14T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2b4bffca-1c25-4d19-be81-e2679100e40c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":54531133,"duration_in_seconds":3408}]},{"id":"582c81b5-400c-4cfd-bbe5-b7a5c5eabbd2","title":"148: Academic reference letters","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/148","content_text":"Dan and James chat about why academic reference letters are terrible, a recent position statement on preprints, and whether the \"great resignation\" is also happening in academia.\n\nLinks to stuff that was mentioned:\n\n\nThe tweet from Dr. Eliza Bliss-Moreau on acedemic reference letter\nThe tweet from Gilad Feldman about the 100 references he's submitted in 2020 alone\nThe AMWA-EMWA-ISMPP joint position statement paper on medical publications, preprints, and peer review,\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, January 31) \"148: Academic reference letters\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VZ67","content_html":"Dan and James chat about why academic reference letters are terrible, a recent position statement on preprints, and whether the "great resignation" is also happening in academia.
\n\nLinks to stuff that was mentioned:
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, January 31) "148: Academic reference letters", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VZ67
","summary":"Dan and James chat about why academic reference letters are terrible, a recent position statement on preprints, and whether the \"great resignation\" is also happening in academia.","date_published":"2022-01-31T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/582c81b5-400c-4cfd-bbe5-b7a5c5eabbd2.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49714990,"duration_in_seconds":3107}]},{"id":"5cfa7684-8137-4281-b777-3e539299ce6a","title":"147: The $7000 golden ticket","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/147","content_text":"We discuss the $7000 'accelerated publication' option for some Taylor & Francis journals that promises 3-5 week publication and a novel type of research fellowship.\n\n\nDetails for the accelerated publication\nThe New Science 2022 Summer Fellowship\n\n\nWe have new merch! Use the discount code 'METAL' to get 20% off (valid until January 31st, 2022).\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, January 17) \"147: The $7000 golden ticket\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VNPBJ","content_html":"We discuss the $7000 'accelerated publication' option for some Taylor & Francis journals that promises 3-5 week publication and a novel type of research fellowship.
\n\nWe have new merch! Use the discount code 'METAL' to get 20% off (valid until January 31st, 2022).
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2022, January 17) "147: The $7000 golden ticket", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VNPBJ
","summary":"We discuss the $7000 'accelerated publication' option for some Taylor & Francis journals that promises 3-5 week publication, and a novel type of research fellowship from New Science","date_published":"2022-01-17T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5cfa7684-8137-4281-b777-3e539299ce6a.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":52285857,"duration_in_seconds":3267}]},{"id":"edb3486b-2a2f-4638-81fb-e099c89368d6","title":"146: Skills pay bills","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/146","content_text":"We answer a series of questions from a listener on whether to start a PhD, what to ask potential supervisors, the financial perils of being a PhD student, the future of higher education, the importance of skills, what keeps us going, and more.\n\nHere are the specific questions that we answered in this episode (the background to these questions is shared in the episode):\n\n\n Would you have any advice on how I can even decide whether to commence a PhD? \n Are there any questions in particular that you think are important to ask prospective supervisors?\n How do people make PhDs work financially? You are supposed to treat the degree like a regular 40 hour/ week job (and students commonly fail to do so). However, what full-time job pays ~$540 per week and expects this?! You are not supposed to work > 8 hours/ week outside of this?! I thought I could at least work 2-3 full days a week if I needed to.\n Why do people generally leave academia, or not continue, after their PhD, despite obvious potential?\n In what form do you think universities will be around in 5 and 10 years?\n Are one-year progress reports from the PhD committee enough to stay on track?\n What utility do PhDs hold inside and outside of academia? Apparently, skills matter more than a topic, and you have a better chance of getting a postdoc etc... if you have worked on a hot topic with a well-known supervisor.\n How can one start the PhD prepared enough to finish it on time and earlier?\n I am wondering what keeps academics going. I may be jaded, but lab environments don’t seem collaborative, and academics seem to be ruled by the admin people and hedge fund managers (or whoever). They also seem to make their money off students (i.e., the customer). I see a reverence for science and people trying to game the system, but not people wanting to seek truth in science. I now wonder how much of academia is motivated by pride, comfort, and not knowing what else to do. In my mind (and I am exaggerating a little), the PhD journey is coming to resemble an abusive relationship between the student and the uni, facilitated by the supervisor who hopefully gets something out of it. I assume it only gets worse from here.\nI have been told that the PhD is the only program that offers solid research training and the ability to do your original research (something an industry job does not offer). Even if I accept those premises, I now wonder what it is all for.\nWhere do you both see yourselves in 5 and 10 years?\nWhat keeps you both going?\n\n\n\nWe have new merch! Use the discount code 'METAL' to get 20% off (valid until January 31st, 2022).\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, December 27) \"146: Skills pay bills\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/PUW6N","content_html":"We answer a series of questions from a listener on whether to start a PhD, what to ask potential supervisors, the financial perils of being a PhD student, the future of higher education, the importance of skills, what keeps us going, and more.
\n\nHere are the specific questions that we answered in this episode (the background to these questions is shared in the episode):
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, December 27) "146: Skills pay bills", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/PUW6N
","summary":"We answer a series of questions from a listener on whether to start a PhD, what to ask potential supervisors, the financial perils of being a PhD student, the future of higher education, the importance of skills, what keeps us going, and more","date_published":"2021-12-27T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/edb3486b-2a2f-4638-81fb-e099c89368d6.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":66953298,"duration_in_seconds":4184}]},{"id":"41dc8d16-3fb3-41a0-abc2-603b9a81d919","title":"145: Our boat is sinking slightly slower","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/145","content_text":"We discuss the results from the cancer biology reproducibility project, the inevitable comparisons with reproducibility in psychology, and authorship expectations for posting public datasets. \n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology \nThe paper on the impact of alphabetical order on career outcomes in economics (whose authorship order are determinedby alphabetical order\n That human sports science paper that inlcluded a cranionotomy\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, December 13) \"145: Our boat is sinking slightly slower\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/634QJ","content_html":"We discuss the results from the cancer biology reproducibility project, the inevitable comparisons with reproducibility in psychology, and authorship expectations for posting public datasets.
\n\nLinks
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, December 13) "145: Our boat is sinking slightly slower", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/634QJ
","summary":"We discuss the results from the cancer biology reproducibility project, the inevitable comparisons with reproducibility in psychology, and authorship expectations for posting open datasets. ","date_published":"2021-12-13T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/41dc8d16-3fb3-41a0-abc2-603b9a81d919.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":46157321,"duration_in_seconds":2884}]},{"id":"6bea82bc-27b6-464f-b8f3-3c65bf36dba5","title":"144: The role of luck in academia","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/144","content_text":"If your child asked you whether they should pursue a career in academia, what would you say? We discuss this question plus three more quick-fire topics: the death of expertise, memorable presentations, and including internships in more graduate programs \n\nLinks\n\n\nGet a 30% discount on a Scite subscription for a year, just use the coupon code EVERYTHINGHERTZ via this link\nThe “Remind me of this later” twitter bot\nThe Chase, Chance, and Creativity book\n\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, November 15) \"144: The role of luck in academia\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BKAH6Sponsored By:Scite: Everything Hertz listeners can get 30% off for a year of access to scite, just use the promo code EVERYTHINGHERTZ at checkout Promo Code: EVERYTHINGHERTZ","content_html":"If your child asked you whether they should pursue a career in academia, what would you say? We discuss this question plus three more quick-fire topics: the death of expertise, memorable presentations, and including internships in more graduate programs
\n\nLinks
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, November 15) "144: The role of luck in academia", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BKAH6
Sponsored By:
Dan and James discuss the differences between 'talk' and 'action' in scientific reform and why reforms are taking such a long time to be realised. They also chat about whether messy (but correct) code is worse than no code at all, and revisit the grad student who never said "no".
\n\nOther links
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, November 1) "143: A little less conversation, a little more action", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/X75SZ
Sponsored By:
In this live episode, Dan and James discuss red flags in academia, in terms of research fields, papers, and individuals. Thanks to everyone that participated in this live event!
\n\nLinks to stuff that was mentioned
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, October 18) "142: Red flags in academia [Live episode]", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3YB47
Sponsored By:
We chat with Sakshi Ghai (University of Cambridge) about why we should diversify sample diversity and retire the Western, educated, rich, industrialized and democratic (WEIRD) dichotomy in the behavioral sciences
\n\nLinks to stuff we discuss:
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nMusic credits
\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, September 20) "141: Why we should diversify study samples (with Sakshi Ghai)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/J9E6W
Special Guest: Sakshi Ghai.
","summary":"We chat with Sakshi Ghai (University of Cambridge) about why we should diversify sample diversity and retire the Western, educated, rich, industrialized and democratic (WEIRD) dichotomy in the behavioral sciences ","date_published":"2021-10-04T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/fdc5283c-63ce-4839-84b4-a8a975d4fa99.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":54875114,"duration_in_seconds":3429}]},{"id":"b818709b-8b91-4602-94e6-167fd62434c3","title":"140: You can’t buy cat biscuits with ‘thank you’ emails","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/140","content_text":"James proposes that peer review reports should be published as their own citable objects, provided that the manuscript author thinks that the peer review report is of sufficient quality and the peer reviewers agree\n\nOther links and things we discuss\n\n\nAn update on James’ start up job\nThe American service industry \nDan’s first outing since the pandemic started\nThe villlage of Hell, in Norway\nThe villiage of Fucking (now changed to Fugging) in Austria \nThe Hertz long term archive on Open Science Framework\nWe’re up for doing a syllabus episodes that you can assign to your classes\nDan’s recent piece in Nature Human Behavior on replication projects for undergraduate research theses\nWhat about a replication study as part of a PhD thesis?\nThe trope of, “future replications are needed’\nCollaborative Replications and Education Project (CREP)\nDaniel Lakens mentioning that his paper might be the most cited Frontiers article ever\nHow thorough should peer review be?\nJames' new articles isn't online yet, but he will pin it to his Twitter profile as soon as it is\nThe Julian Koenig-led paper James mentioned (that Dan and James are co-authors on)\nThe Psychophysiology liviing meta-analysis article\n\n\nOther links\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nMusic credits\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere\n\nEpisode citation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, September 20) \"140: You can’t buy cat biscuits with ‘thank you’ emails\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BW65N","content_html":"James proposes that peer review reports should be published as their own citable objects, provided that the manuscript author thinks that the peer review report is of sufficient quality and the peer reviewers agree
\n\nOther links and things we discuss
\n\nOther links
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nMusic credits
\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, September 20) "140: You can’t buy cat biscuits with ‘thank you’ emails", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BW65N
We chat with Ashley Farley about her background as an academic librarian, the underrecognised importance of copyright in academic publishing, and her work as a Program Officer at the Gates Foundation
\n\nOther links
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nMusic credits
\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, September 6) "139: Open science from a funder's perspective (with Ashley Farley)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FQXSZ
Special Guest: Ashley Farley.
","summary":"We chat with Ashley Farley about her background as an academic librarian, the underrecognised importance of copyright in academic publishing, and her work as a Program Officer at the Gates Foundation","date_published":"2021-09-06T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/ee1fbae1-840b-471b-a265-db2d73a0fda9.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":54181301,"duration_in_seconds":3386}]},{"id":"09d86ffd-4240-46c9-8238-39cbd4eeba32","title":"138: Preprints in the time of coronavirus (with Michele Avissar-Whiting)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/138","content_text":"We chat with Michele Avissar-Whiting about her role as the Editor-in-chief of the Research Square preprint platform and how she weighs up the benefits and costs of potentially problematic preprints during a pandemic.\n\nNotes, links, and stuff we cover:\n\n\nThe Journal Ghoul reference in the intro\nMichele’s role as a the editor for a preprint server\nHow Research Square works\nWeighing up the urgency of preprints vs. potential danger\nThe preprint-to- hype pipeline\nThe Scholarly Kitchen piece on knowledge democratization\nBadges for preprints\nThe recent withdrawal of a preprint\n\n\nOther links\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nMusic credits\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, August 16) \"138: Preprints in the time of coronavirus (with Michele Avissar-Whiting)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/AU8PWSpecial Guest: Michele Avissar-Whiting.","content_html":"We chat with Michele Avissar-Whiting about her role as the Editor-in-chief of the Research Square preprint platform and how she weighs up the benefits and costs of potentially problematic preprints during a pandemic.
\n\nNotes, links, and stuff we cover:
\n\nOther links
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nMusic credits
\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, August 16) "138: Preprints in the time of coronavirus (with Michele Avissar-Whiting)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/AU8PW
Special Guest: Michele Avissar-Whiting.
","summary":"We chat with Michele Avissar-Whiting about her role as the Editor-in-chief of the Research Square preprint platform and how she weighs up the benefits and costs of potentially problematic preprints during a pandemic","date_published":"2021-08-16T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/09d86ffd-4240-46c9-8238-39cbd4eeba32.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":64205217,"duration_in_seconds":4012}]},{"id":"c15bafbd-130e-43ed-a854-394385d221b5","title":"137: Ten rules for improving academic work-life balance","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/137","content_text":"Dan and James share their thoughts on a recent paper that proposes ten rules for improving academic work-life balance for early career researchers and the figure from this paper that became a meme.\n\nHere are the rules:\n\n\nLong hours do not equal productive hours\nExamine your options for flexible work practices\nSet boundaries to establish your workplace and time\nCommit to strategies that increase your efficiency and productivity\nHave a long-term strategy to help with prioritization, and review it regularly\nMake your health a priority\nRegularly interact with family and friends\nMake time for volunteer work or similar commitments that are important and meaningful to you\nSeek out or help create peer and institutional support systems\nOpen a dialogue about the importance of work–life balance and advocate for systemic change\n\n\nDan mentioned an app he sometimes uses to track his time, called Timery.\n\nOther links\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nMusic credits\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, August 2) \"137: Ten rules for improving academic work-life balance\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7F3KN","content_html":"Dan and James share their thoughts on a recent paper that proposes ten rules for improving academic work-life balance for early career researchers and the figure from this paper that became a meme.
\n\nHere are the rules:
\n\nDan mentioned an app he sometimes uses to track his time, called Timery.
\n\nOther links
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nMusic credits
\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, August 2) "137: Ten rules for improving academic work-life balance", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7F3KN
","summary":"Dan and James share their thoughts on a recent paper that proposes ten rules for improving academic work-life balance for early career researchers and the figure from this paper that became a meme.","date_published":"2021-08-02T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/c15bafbd-130e-43ed-a854-394385d221b5.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":51221314,"duration_in_seconds":3201}]},{"id":"0f414481-fc19-4bfa-b45b-b7c4b84b6ce6","title":"136: Who peer-reviews the peer-reviewed journals?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/136","content_text":"We discuss Journal Reviewer (journalreviewer.org), which is a website that provides a forum for researchers to share and rate their experiences with journal's peer review processes. We also cover how some journals negotiate the way in which their impact factors are calculated. \n\nLinks\n\n\nThe reference to James' mention of Dick Whittington\nJames’ RIOT science talk \nNichola's Raihani's tweet\nhttps://journalreviewer.org/\nThe South Park Yelp episode\n\n\nOther links\n\nEverything Hertz on social media\n\n\nDan on twitter \nJames on twitter\nEverything Hertz on twitter \nEverything Hertz on Facebook\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\n\nMusic credits\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere\n\nEpisode citation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, July 19) \"136: Who peer-reviews the peer-reviewed journals?\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/5SH2Z","content_html":"We discuss Journal Reviewer (journalreviewer.org), which is a website that provides a forum for researchers to share and rate their experiences with journal's peer review processes. We also cover how some journals negotiate the way in which their impact factors are calculated.
\n\nLinks
\n\nOther links
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nMusic credits
\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, July 19) "136: Who peer-reviews the peer-reviewed journals?", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/5SH2Z
Dan Quintana and James Heathers chat about well-known psychology studies that we've now lost confidence in due to replication failures and the role of auxiliary assumptions in hypothesis-driven research.
\n\nOther links
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nMusic credits
\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, July 5) "135: A loss of confidence", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/GHKRC
Sponsored By:
We discuss a recent retraction triggered by the authors not paying a copyright fee to use a questionnaire (that also happened to be critical of the original questionnaire).
\n\nLinks for stuff that we mention:
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nMusic credits
\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, June 21) "134: Paywalled questionnaires", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/76KTY
Sponsored By:
Some journals use nominal manuscript submission fees to discourage frivolous submissions. However, it has been suggested that increasing submission fees could reduce article processing charges. Dan and James discuss this proposal, along with the recently released code of conduct for scientific integrity from the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences.
\n\nEverything Hertz on social media
\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nMusic credits
\nOur outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, June 7) "133: Manuscript submission fees", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/5MAQN
Sponsored By:
Dan and James discuss how academia should operate in a post-pandemic world. What pandemic practices should we keep and what should we abandon?
\n\nLinks and details:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, May 17) "132: Post-pandemic academia", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FAU7Z
","summary":"Dan and James discuss how academia should operate in a post-pandemic world. What pandemic practices should we keep and what should we abandon? ","date_published":"2021-05-17T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/881459f9-5807-43d4-9ccd-543f86fa9940.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48712306,"duration_in_seconds":3044}]},{"id":"7bc5024b-98b6-45e1-8c31-6fc483991690","title":"131: Long live the overhead projector!","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/131","content_text":"Dan and James answer listener audio questions on indirect costs for research grants, the mind/body problem, and why many academics aren't trained to teach. They also profess their love for the overhead projector\n\nSome more details:\n\n\nShould we require universities to justify overhead costs, like heating and electricity?\nOverheads can inflate the costs of grants, some grants provide an additional percentage for overheads but others don’t allow this, which can eat into grants\nGet to know the people in your local grant office!\nIndirect costs at MIT \nA primer on indirect costs and why they are important to MIT\nDoes it matter that we address the mind body problem in psychology? \nOn the teaching of the history and philosophy of science (or lack thereof) in psychology courses\nWhy aren’t academics better equipped to teach? \nThe 3Blue1Brown YouTube channel \n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, May 3) \"131: Long live the overhead projector!\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8TFKC","content_html":"Dan and James answer listener audio questions on indirect costs for research grants, the mind/body problem, and why many academics aren't trained to teach. They also profess their love for the overhead projector
\n\nSome more details:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, May 3) "131: Long live the overhead projector!", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8TFKC
","summary":"Dan and James answer listener audio questions on indirect costs for research grants, the mind/body problem, and why many academics aren't trained to teach. They also profess their love for the overhead projector\r\n","date_published":"2021-05-03T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/7bc5024b-98b6-45e1-8c31-6fc483991690.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":60682657,"duration_in_seconds":3792}]},{"id":"5651405c-e19a-4e26-94cc-ba7b662979f8","title":"130: Normalizing retractions (with Dorothy Bishop)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/130","content_text":"Dan and James chat with Dorothy Bishop (University of Oxford) about the importance of normalizing the retraction of scientific papers, publication ethics, and whether paper mills (companies that make fake papers at scale) are an issue in the psychological sciences\n\nHere are some links and stuff we covered:\n\n\nDorothy's thoughts on how the adoption of open science practices has been progressing since we last had her on the show in June 2018\nThe European Research Council's new open access journal, which is free to publish in if you're ERC funded\nDan's proposal of something similar in a 2019 The Chronicle piece (free to read with email signup) \nDorothy's recent blogpost on publication ethics\nThe Society for Microbiology piece behind the blogpost\nOur episode with Elisabeth Bik\nImage manipulation in scientific papers\nWhy don't publishers have agreements with authors that if they discover something dodgy in papers the author can't sue them?\nRetraction notices don't easily discriminate between fraud and mistakes, and this is one reason why that authors are so reluctant to have their work retracted\nJames' fictional paper mill story (based on real fraud), that he wrote with Otto Kalliokoski\nAre paper mills a problem in psychology?\nDorothy's Oxford photo challenge\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, April 19) \"130: Normalizing retractions (with Dorothy Bishop)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HRXU2Special Guest: Dorothy Bishop.","content_html":"Dan and James chat with Dorothy Bishop (University of Oxford) about the importance of normalizing the retraction of scientific papers, publication ethics, and whether paper mills (companies that make fake papers at scale) are an issue in the psychological sciences
\n\nHere are some links and stuff we covered:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, April 19) "130: Normalizing retractions (with Dorothy Bishop)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HRXU2
Special Guest: Dorothy Bishop.
","summary":"Dan and James chat with Dorothy Bishop (University of Oxford) about the importance of normalizing the retraction of scientific papers, publication ethics, and whether paper mills (companies that make fake papers at scale) are an issue in the psychological sciences ","date_published":"2021-04-19T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5651405c-e19a-4e26-94cc-ba7b662979f8.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":43376013,"duration_in_seconds":3614}]},{"id":"1f4c2b61-a2cf-449a-bc13-c1db011dca9d","title":"129: Transparency audits ","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/129","content_text":"Dan and James discuss the recently proposed \"transparency audit\", why it received so much blowback, and the characteristics of successful reform schemes\n\nThe specifics...\n\n\nThe computational research integrity conference\nThe transparancy leaderboard proposed by Curate Science\nOur episode with Chris Jackson, that James mentioned\nWhat about a transparency leaderboard for instiutions?\nWhat are the characteristics of grassroots reform schemes that worked?\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, April 5) \"129: Transparency audits\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JRNP8","content_html":"Dan and James discuss the recently proposed "transparency audit", why it received so much blowback, and the characteristics of successful reform schemes
\n\nThe specifics...
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, April 5) "129: Transparency audits", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JRNP8
","summary":"Dan and James discuss the recently proposed \"transparency audit\", why it received so much blowback, and the characteristics of successful reform schemes","date_published":"2021-04-05T07:45:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/1f4c2b61-a2cf-449a-bc13-c1db011dca9d.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":40941609,"duration_in_seconds":3411}]},{"id":"c5ca06b0-1fee-4c56-8081-ee2fec2f980f","title":"128: How do you generate new research ideas?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/128","content_text":"Dan and James chat about how they come up with new ideas, why everyone seems to be trying to monetise their hobbies, and why it's so hard for most labs to have a singular focus of research.\n\nWe had some problems with James' mic so the quality of his audio wasn't up our usual standard. To make up for this we've added one of our older bonus episodes at the end of this conventional episode (this begins at 54:18). These bonus episodes are typically only made available for our Professor Fancypants Patreon patrons, but now you'll get to hear one!\n\nOther notes and links:\n\n\nThe half-serious \"Highlander\" bounty program from Noah Haber\nThe metapsy journal \nHow do we come up with new ideas?\nWhat James watches and listens to in his spare time\nThe urge to monetise your hobby\nThe \"Let's do nothing\" kids book\n\"How to Do Nothing\" by Jenny Odell\nRobert Provine's Laughter as a scientific problem: An adventure in sidewalk neuroscience\nThe value of including many experiments in a single paper\nIs there too much reform happening in psychology?\nClubhouse and the new twitter clone, 'Spaces' (still in beta)\nBonus episode 15: The true truth of pre-registration\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, March 15) \"128: How do you generate new research ideas?\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U79NW","content_html":"Dan and James chat about how they come up with new ideas, why everyone seems to be trying to monetise their hobbies, and why it's so hard for most labs to have a singular focus of research.
\n\nWe had some problems with James' mic so the quality of his audio wasn't up our usual standard. To make up for this we've added one of our older bonus episodes at the end of this conventional episode (this begins at 54:18). These bonus episodes are typically only made available for our Professor Fancypants Patreon patrons, but now you'll get to hear one!
\n\nOther notes and links:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, March 15) "128: How do you generate new research ideas?", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U79NW
","summary":"Dan and James chat about how they come up with new ideas, why everyone seems to be trying to monetise their hobbies, and why it's so hard for most labs to have a singular focus of research.","date_published":"2021-03-15T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/c5ca06b0-1fee-4c56-8081-ee2fec2f980f.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":51454746,"duration_in_seconds":4287}]},{"id":"7e2e5c87-09b1-4b4b-9240-eeb821150a82","title":"127: Speak up or shut up?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/127","content_text":"We discuss when is the right time in your academic career to begin speaking up to critique your research field or whether the risk of retaliation means you should shut up and keep your head down. This was a recorded Clubhouse chat, which includes some audience interaction at the end.\n\nLinks and details:\n\n\nMoin Syed's blogpost, which was the inspiration for this topic\nThe 'proper' letter to the editor critique vs. a social media critique \nWhat about retaliation for speaking out?\nDifferences between industry and academia\nThank you to Yan, Louis, Evan for their contribitions to our chat!\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation","content_html":"We discuss when is the right time in your academic career to begin speaking up to critique your research field or whether the risk of retaliation means you should shut up and keep your head down. This was a recorded Clubhouse chat, which includes some audience interaction at the end.
\n\nLinks and details:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
","summary":"We discuss when is the right time in your academic career to begin speaking up to critique your research field or whether the risk of retaliation means you should shut up and keep your head down","date_published":"2021-03-01T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/7e2e5c87-09b1-4b4b-9240-eeb821150a82.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":36863059,"duration_in_seconds":3071}]},{"id":"86121b0a-2f20-4722-872a-9c802aad8005","title":"126: The division of scientific labor (with Saloni Dattani) ","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/126","content_text":"We have a wide-ranging chat with Saloni Dattani (Kings College London and University of Hong Kong) about the benefits of dividing scientific labor, the magazine she co-founded (Works in Progress) that shares novel ideas and stories of progress, and fighting online misinformation \n\nHere are some links and other stuff we cover\n\n\nFollow Saloni on Twitter: https://twitter.com/salonium\nWhy Saloni started the Works in Progress magazine\n[Overleaf](overleaf.com), for writing papers in LaTeX \nHow science will benefit from the division of labour \nPublic writing vs. scientific writing\nWhy has behavioral science not been very useful in curbing the pandemic?\nA paper suggested a link between digit ratio (2D:4D) and sex differences in COVID fatalities, and another paper debunking this claim \nA paper suggesting baldness is a coronavirus risk factor, without controlling for age \nShould peer-review be abolished altogether? Paper link\nThe Japanese mathematician who solved an \"impossible\" conjecture and posted the papers on his website \nReforms are more likely by work by chipping away at smaller problems, rather trying to fix everyting \nGoogle dataset search https://datasetsearch.research.google.com/\nThe COVIDfaq.co website\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nBuy our Merch here: https://everything-hertz-podcast.creator-spring.com/\n\n\n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, February 15) \"126: The division of scientific labor (with Saloni Dattani)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VJA4SSpecial Guest: Saloni Dattani.","content_html":"We have a wide-ranging chat with Saloni Dattani (Kings College London and University of Hong Kong) about the benefits of dividing scientific labor, the magazine she co-founded (Works in Progress) that shares novel ideas and stories of progress, and fighting online misinformation
\n\nHere are some links and other stuff we cover
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nBuy our Merch here: https://everything-hertz-podcast.creator-spring.com/
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, February 15) "126: The division of scientific labor (with Saloni Dattani)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VJA4S
Special Guest: Saloni Dattani.
","summary":"We have a wide-ranging chat with Saloni Dattani (Kings College London and University of Hong Kong) about the benefits of dividing scientific labor, the magazine she co-founded (Works in Progress) that shares novel ideas and stories of progress, and fighting online misinformation ","date_published":"2021-02-15T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/86121b0a-2f20-4722-872a-9c802aad8005.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":37600966,"duration_in_seconds":3133}]},{"id":"200fb190-dd3b-4208-a8d8-aa46c7d591fe","title":"125: Upon reasonable request","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/125","content_text":"Dan has a blue-sky proposal to increase data sharing—that funders mandate scholars to store and analyse data on their servers for which the funder decides what constitutes a reasonable data request (among other benefits)\n\nOther stuff covered:\n\n\nWe return with part 2 of \"overrated/underrated/appropately rated\", in which James throws nouns at Dan and he responds with whether these things are overrated, underrated, or appropately rated.\nJoe Hilgard's blog post\nDan' proposal that funders should require all funded researchers to store and perform their analysis on a central server, which would make it easier to share data, and then the funder could decide what \"upon reasonable request\" means, not the reseacher or the instution\nLong term vs. short term reform efforts\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, February 1) \"125: Upon reasonable request \", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HR5JA","content_html":"Dan has a blue-sky proposal to increase data sharing—that funders mandate scholars to store and analyse data on their servers for which the funder decides what constitutes a reasonable data request (among other benefits)
\n\nOther stuff covered:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, February 1) "125: Upon reasonable request ", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HR5JA
","summary":"Dan has a blue-sky proposal to increase data sharing—that funders mandate scholars to store and analyse data on their servers for which the funder decides what constitutes a reasonable data request (among other benefits)","date_published":"2021-02-01T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/200fb190-dd3b-4208-a8d8-aa46c7d591fe.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":33824600,"duration_in_seconds":2818}]},{"id":"c3ed69f9-39d6-41c7-951e-6c243313c7c3","title":"124: From Ptolemy to Takeshi's Castle","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/124","content_text":"We discuss under which circumstances retracting decades-old articles is worth the time. We also chat about why LinkenIn is underrated (yes, really) and special journal issues are overrated.\n\nA more specific list of topics and links:\n\n\nWe play a game of \"overated/underated\", in which Dan has a list of stuff that he asks James whether these things are overrated or underated (or appropiated rated)\nWhy LinkedIn is underated\nGraphical abstracts are underrated\nOnline conferences are underrated\nAuthors should have the chance to wildly speculate (as long as it's marked as wild speculation)\nSourdough bread is so gorgeous that even hipsters can't ruin it\nSpecial journal themes are overrated\nShould we bother putting the energy into retracting old studies?\nThe retracted article that Eysenck co-authored, entitled “Coffee-Drinking and Personality as Factors in the Genesis of Cancer and Coronary Heart Disease”\nTHIS is Takeshi's Castle\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, January 18) \"124: From Ptolemy to Takeshi's Castle\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DG3PY","content_html":"We discuss under which circumstances retracting decades-old articles is worth the time. We also chat about why LinkenIn is underrated (yes, really) and special journal issues are overrated.
\n\nA more specific list of topics and links:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, January 18) "124: From Ptolemy to Takeshi's Castle", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DG3PY
","summary":"We discuss under which circumstances retracting decades-old articles is worth the time. We also chat about why LinkenIn is underrated (yes, really) and special journal issues are overrated.","date_published":"2021-01-18T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/c3ed69f9-39d6-41c7-951e-6c243313c7c3.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":36924186,"duration_in_seconds":3077}]},{"id":"efe932b9-154a-4465-a3c9-1f55d26d4958","title":"123: Authenticated anonymity (with Michael Eisen)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/123","content_text":"Part two of our chat with Michael Eisen (eLife Editor-in-Cheif), in which we discuss the pros and cons of collaborative peer review, journal submission interfaces, Michael's take on James' proposal that peer reviewers should be paid $450 dollars, why negative comments on peer reviews need to be normalised, plus much more. \n\nSome more details:\n\n\nThe pros and cons of collaborative peer review (in which all peer reviewers discuss the paper after all individual peer reviews have been submitted \nHow technology can constrain journal operations\nThe strange engineered delay in paper reviews (I doesn't take 2-3 weeks to review a paper)\nMichael's proposal for a system in which people can nominate they have time in the near future to review a paper and then papers can be sent to them so they're rapidly reviewed\nJournal submission interfaces\nMichael's take on paying peer reviewers \nWho owns peer reviews?\nWould negative (anonomous or not) comments on an open peer review report penalise authors in the future?\nEvery paper gets negative peer-review comments, this doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad paper \nMichael proposes an explicit \"speculation\" section for papers, where authors get free reign to basically say whatever they want\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citationSpecial Guest: Michael Eisen.Sponsored By:Scite: Scite is a new tool that helps researchers quickly see how a research paper has been cited and if it has been supported or disputed by subsequent research. Instead of just a list of titles, Scite shows you an excerpt of text from each citing article so you can easily see what each citing paper says.\r\n\r\nAs an Everything Hertz listener, you can get 30% off their premium package for 12 months, which gives you access to unlimited reports and reference checks. Use the coupon code \"HERTZ\" to claim this offer. This offer expires on Jan 1, 2021. Promo Code: HERTZ","content_html":"Part two of our chat with Michael Eisen (eLife Editor-in-Cheif), in which we discuss the pros and cons of collaborative peer review, journal submission interfaces, Michael's take on James' proposal that peer reviewers should be paid $450 dollars, why negative comments on peer reviews need to be normalised, plus much more.
\n\nSome more details:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
Special Guest: Michael Eisen.
Sponsored By:
The internet should have transformed science publishing, but it didn't. We chat with Michael Eisen (Editor-in-Chief of eLife) about reoptimizing scientific publishing and peer review for the internet age.
\n\nHere what we cover and some links:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, December 21) "122: Reoptimizing scientific publishing for the internet age (with Michael Eisen)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/USYFC
Special Guest: Michael Eisen.
Sponsored By:
Dan and James discuss the pros and cons of transparent peer-review, in which peer review reports are published alongside manuscripts, as a keynote feature at the recent Munin Conference on scholarly publishing.
\n\nHere's what they cover and some links:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, December 7) "121: Transparent peer review", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/S2948
Sponsored By:
Dan and James chat with Cailin O'Connor (University of California, Irvine) about the how false beliefs spread in science and remedies for this issue
\n\nHere's what they cover:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, November 16) "120: How false beliefs spread in science (with Cailin O'Connor", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/6S8TB
Special Guest: Cailin O'Connor.
Sponsored By:
Dan and James discuss how rules of thumbs in science, such as those often applied to sample sizes and effect sizes, lead to mindless research evaluation.
\n\nMore info and links:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, November 2) "119: Rules of thumb", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UMXR7
Sponsored By:
Dan and James answer audio listener questions on the worst review comments they've received (and how the responded), their thoughts on the current state of preprints, and how institutional prestige influences researcher evaluations.
\n\nOther points and links:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, October 19) "118: Evidence-free gatekeeping", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/RAVXK
","summary":"Dan and James answer audio listener questions on the worst review comments they've received (and how the responded), their thoughts on the current state of preprints, and how institutional prestige influences researcher evaluations.","date_published":"2020-10-19T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/cbcff247-7f77-4ab6-9cd1-25ee63572458.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":46475598,"duration_in_seconds":3872}]},{"id":"35c7fecb-e304-46f9-96ce-9336bea3af7c","title":"117: How we peer-review papers","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/117","content_text":"Dan and James choose a preprint and walk through how they would peer-review it. James also provides an update on his recent proposal that scientists should be paid for performing peer reviews for journals published by for-profit companies\n\nSpecific links and topics:\n\n\nAn update on the 450 movement, which proposes that scientists should be paid for performing peer reviews for journals published by for-profit companies\nYou should follow Overly Honest Editor on Twitter\nThe Volkswagen fellowships \nEmma Mills, from Lancaster University, asks us how we review papers\nWe review this paper: \"Direct perception of other people’s heart rate\"\nThe tweet from Maarten van Smeeden on data simulation\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n\n\n- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month \n\nEpisode citation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, October 5) \"117: How we peer-review papers\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7JHFP","content_html":"Dan and James choose a preprint and walk through how they would peer-review it. James also provides an update on his recent proposal that scientists should be paid for performing peer reviews for journals published by for-profit companies
\n\nSpecific links and topics:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, October 5) "117: How we peer-review papers", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7JHFP
Dan and James chat about a recent twitter discussion on open science funding and the benefits of Editors sharing their opinions online. James also shares three project proposals that he thinks deserves funding, which Dan ranks.
\n\nOther stuff...
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, September 21) "116: In my opinion", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WT46Z
We discuss James' recent proposal that scientists should be paid for performing peer review for journals published by for-profit companies—$450, to be precise. Dan also puts forward three meta-science projects that he thinks are worth funding.
\n\nMore details
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, September 7) "115: A modest proposal", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4ZQ2E
We chat with Jess Wade (Imperial College London) about diversity issues in science, including her work increasing the profile of underrepresented scientists on Wikipedia and on getting more young women into science.
\n\nHere's what we cover:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, August 16) "114: Diversity in Science (with Jess Wade)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/A6VMU
Special Guest: Jess Wade.
","summary":"We chat with Jess Wade (Imperial College London) about diversity issues in science, including her work increasing the profile of underrepresented scientists on Wikipedia and on getting more young women into science.","date_published":"2020-08-17T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/698e1774-9221-4f7a-80b8-54546b3ba1e4.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":38683062,"duration_in_seconds":3223}]},{"id":"32c58e2d-f02e-461d-8f37-68dd70acda22","title":"113: Citation needed","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/113","content_text":"Dan and James discuss whether scientists should spend more time creating and editing Wikipedia articles. They also chat about how they read scientific articles and the heuristics they use to help decide whether a paper's worth their time.\n\nHere are some more details and links:\n\n\nSend in your audio questions here\nHow does James read so much and what tips do Dan and James have for reading papers?\nThe Stork paper recommendation service\nHow James and Dan rapidly judge whether a paper is worth the time to read\nThe benefit of a memorable paper title\nPeer review forces you to read papers carefully\nJames screens a few papers for further reading on the spot based on their titles\nWhat is the role of Wikipedia in science communication and education?\nJess Wade's project advocating for better representation of female scientists on Wikipedia\nWikipedia articles vs. textbooks\nDo we even need textbooks in psychology?\nThe Biological Psychology wiki textbook is a ghost town \nUsing the R bookdown package for online books\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, August 3) \"113: Citation needed\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3D6YJ","content_html":"Dan and James discuss whether scientists should spend more time creating and editing Wikipedia articles. They also chat about how they read scientific articles and the heuristics they use to help decide whether a paper's worth their time.
\n\nHere are some more details and links:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, August 3) "113: Citation needed", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3D6YJ
Dan and James chat about James' new industry job, why he quit academia, the biggest differences between academia and industry, and why it's crucial for early career researchers to have a plan B.
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCite this episode
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, July 27) "112: Leaving academia", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DAZ7S
We chat with Chris Jackson (Imperial College, London) about the "Matthew Effect" in academia, how we can improve work/balance, and whether we should stop citing shitty people.
\n\nHere's more stuff we cover:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCite this episode
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, July 6) "111: The cumulative advantage of academic capital (with Chris Jackson)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KJ76G
Special Guest: Chris Jackson.
Sponsored By:
We answer a listener question on identifying red flags for errors in papers. Is there a way to better equip peer-reviewers for spotting errors and suspicious data?
\n\nMore details and links...
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nBuy our merch from our online store! We've got hats, mugs, hoodies, shirts + more
\n
Cite this episode
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, June 15) "110: Red flags for errors in papers", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VTYNG
Sponsored By:
Dan and James recorded a live episode on open publishing as part of the Open Publishing Fest. They also ran a survey (from start to finish) during the course of the episode on the public's perception of open scientific publishing and discuss the results.
\n\nHere are more stuff they covered, plus links!
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nWe have a Merch store too, where you can pick up some Hertz gear.
\n\nCite this episode
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, June 1) "109: Open scientific publishing [live episode]", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/AT2XH
Sponsored By:
We discuss the recent claim that screen time is more harmful than heroin and whether psychological science is a crisis-ready discipline
\n\nOther stuff we cover:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, May 18) "108: Requiem for a screen", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BCKMS
Sponsored By:
We chat with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti (Chapman University, USA) about the role of memes and emerging social media in communicating science and statistics.
\n\nStuff we cover + links:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, May 4) "107: Memes, TikTok, and science communication (with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], Retrieved from https://osf.io/8dywb/
Special Guest: Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti.
Sponsored By:
Dan and James discuss whether getting rapid outcomes to address the pandemic is worth the increased risk of mistakes—how can researchers perform research that is both urgent and accurate?
\n\nHere's other stuff they discuss...
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, April 20) "106: Science on the Run)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], Retrieved from https://osf.io/7ydvz/
Sponsored By:
We chat with Marike Schiffer, who is a Senior Editor at Nature Human Behavior, about her journal's push to increase reproducibility in the behavioral sciences. She also shares how her team evaluates manuscripts and some common misunderstandings about scientific publishing.
\n\nHere's what else we cover:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\n\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, April 6) "105: Tell it like it is (with Marike Schiffer)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U9QRN, Retrieved from https://osf.io/u9qrn/
Special Guest: Marike Schiffer.
Sponsored By:
Dan and James discuss the COVID-19 pandemic and how it's impacting academia
\n\nOther things they discuss:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, March 2) "Now we'll discover which meetings could've been emails", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DHGR6, Retrieved from https://osf.io/dhgr6/
Sponsored By:
Dan and James discuss rejection in academia and emerging science communication mediums. Here are a few links and other things they cover:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, March 2) "Swiping right", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/5XR2F, Retrieved from https://osf.io/5xr2f/
Sponsored By:
Should research scientists build their knowledge and skillset broadly at the risk of being a master of none? Dan and James discuss this, along with a recent editorial on the use of Twitter in academia.
\n\nHere's other stuff they cover:
\n\n![\"\"](\"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7e/Napoleon_Fish_by_Gustavo_Gerdel.jpg\")
Other links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, February 17) "Master of none", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3A9TN, Retrieved from https://osf.io/3a9tn/
Sponsored By:
Dan and James cover a new paper which discusses whether research misconduct should be criminalised. If so, where do we draw the line and who should investigate these cases?
\n\nHere's an episode overview and links to stuff we mentioned:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nGet 10% off Everything Hertz merch, like mugs, stickers, shirts, and hoodies, by using the discount code "HERTZ101" at our online store. Discount code valid until February 17, 2020.
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, February 3) "Punishing research misconduct", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/Q86AK, Retrieved from https://osf.io/q86ak/
Sponsored By:
To celebrate our 100th episode, which we video-streamed live, Dan and James were joined by three special guests: Daniel Lakens, Amy Orben, and Chris Chambers.
\n\nHere's what they covered in this episode:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nThis episode was brought you by Prolific, who is giving away $50 to podcast listeners who want to give online sampling a go! Redeem the free credit here: https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
Special Guests: Amy Orben, Chris Chambers, and Daniel Lakens.
Sponsored By:
Dan and James answer a listener question on science advocacy. Is this an activity that all scientists should do, and if so, how much advocacy work should we be doing?
\n\nHere's other stuff they cover and links to stuff they mention:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, January 6) "Science advocacy", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8R5ZD, Retrieved from https://osf.io/8r5zd/
We chat with Sophia Crüwell (Meta-Research Innovation Center Berlin) about pre-registration and her recent work introducing pre-registration templates for cognitive modelling research.
\n\nHere's what we cover and some links:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, December 16) "Episode titles are redundant, at best (with Sophia Crüwell)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/R942W, Retrieved from https://osf.io/r942w/
Special Guest: Sophia Crüwell.
","summary":"We chat with Sophia Crüwell (Meta-Research Innovation Center Berlin) about pre-registration and her recent work introducing pre-registration templates for cognitive modelling research.","date_published":"2019-12-16T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/bd98ec30-1db3-4fdf-a2ca-823587fd0538.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mp3","size_in_bytes":42816783,"duration_in_seconds":3568}]},{"id":"9a290b44-7a88-43a4-bd76-8b962e6f9e92","title":"97: Slow science","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/97","content_text":"Dan and James discuss the concept of \"slow science\", which has been proposed in order to improve the quality of scientific research and create a more sustainable work environment.\n\nHere's what they cover in this episode\n\n\n Thank you patrons day!\n Social media algorithms reward outrage, not quality of substance\n A paper on slow science from Uta Frith, which includes a proposal of publication limits\n Is information overload really a problem?\n The META platform for a weekly research digest \n Would reducing the volume of publications really improve quality? \n The working paper that simulated the quality vs. quantity question \n The slow professor book https://utorontopress.com/ca/the-slow-professor-3\n Michael Frank’s paper on N-best evaluation\n Some institutions are now screening papers before submission to check for errors\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, December 2) \"Slow Science\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/XEU42, Retrieved from https://osf.io/xeu42/","content_html":"Dan and James discuss the concept of "slow science", which has been proposed in order to improve the quality of scientific research and create a more sustainable work environment.
\n\nHere's what they cover in this episode
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, December 2) "Slow Science", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/XEU42, Retrieved from https://osf.io/xeu42/
Dan and James discuss the results of this year's Nature survey of PhD students. Despite a majority of students reporting general satisfaction with their decision to undertake a PhD, many described a sense of uncertainty, harassment in the lab, and gruelling work hours.
\n\nThings they discuss...
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, November 18) "The chaotic state of doctoral research", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/CDZRA, Retrieved from https://osf.io/cdzra/
Dan and James discuss why academia tolerates bad presentations and the strange distrust of polished presentations.
\n\nHere's what else they discuss...
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
","summary":"Dan and James discuss why academia tolerates bad presentations and the strange distrust of polished presentations. ","date_published":"2019-11-04T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/9e483938-2670-45e2-9c49-cc60baaa88a1.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mp3","size_in_bytes":61241050,"duration_in_seconds":3827}]},{"id":"00e6acc7-daf5-442f-835e-d2c0189d0d3c","title":"94: Predicting the replicability of research ","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/94","content_text":"Dan and James chat with Fiona Fidler (University of Melbourne), who is leading the repliCATS project, which aims to develop accurate techniques to elicit estimates of the replicability of research. This is also the first time they interview a guest live!\n\nHere's what they discuss...\n\n\nThe story behind repliCATS\nAustralia's best export, Tim Tams\nThe SCORE project organised by DARPA\nCan anyone use the repliCATS methodology?\nDan, Fiona, and James talk about did their honours theses (this is roughly the Australian equivalent of a Masters)\nWhat would a successful repliCATS project look like?\nWhat sort of heuristics do people use to assess replicability?\nThe AIMOS conference \nThe role of replicability in public policy\nThis is Bob Katter\nShould we be keeping the replication crisis behind closed doors?\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, October 21) \"Predicting the replicability of research \", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KZPYG, Retrieved from https://osf.io/kzpyg/Special Guest: Fiona Fidler.","content_html":"Dan and James chat with Fiona Fidler (University of Melbourne), who is leading the repliCATS project, which aims to develop accurate techniques to elicit estimates of the replicability of research. This is also the first time they interview a guest live!
\n\nHere's what they discuss...
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, October 21) "Predicting the replicability of research ", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KZPYG, Retrieved from https://osf.io/kzpyg/
Special Guest: Fiona Fidler.
","summary":"Dan and James chat with Fiona Fidler (University of Melbourne), who is leading the repliCATS project, which aims to develop accurate techniques to elicit estimates of the replicability of research. ","date_published":"2019-10-21T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/00e6acc7-daf5-442f-835e-d2c0189d0d3c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mp3","size_in_bytes":55840599,"duration_in_seconds":3490}]},{"id":"9414f388-c0cc-4672-af4f-9b0a7dc05fc6","title":"93: Double-blind peer review vs. open science","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/93","content_text":"Dan and James answer a listener question on how to navigate open science practices, such as preprints and open code repositories, in light of double-blind reviews. \n\nStuff they cover:\n\n\nHow common is double-blind review?\nHow many journals don’t accept preprints?\nBias in the review process\nHow practical is blinded review?\nDo the benefits of preprints outweighs not having blinded review?\nJames' approach to getting comments on his preprints\nConvincing your supervisor to adopt open science practices\nThe preprint that James won’t submit for publication, for some reason\nWe get reviews...\nOur first live guest!\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nCitation\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, October 7) \"Double-blind peer review vs. Open Science\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7ZPME","content_html":"Dan and James answer a listener question on how to navigate open science practices, such as preprints and open code repositories, in light of double-blind reviews.
\n\nStuff they cover:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nCitation
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, October 7) "Double-blind peer review vs. Open Science", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7ZPME
Dan and James discuss the role of Google Scholar in citation patterns and whether we should limit academics to only publishing two papers a year.
\n\nLinks and details:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, September 16) "Chaos in the brickyard", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast] https://osf.io/xfd2p/
We chat with Kristin Sainani (Stanford University) about a popular statistical method in sports medicine research (magnitude based inference), which has been banned by some journals, but continues to thrive in some pockets of scholarship. We also discuss the role of statistical inference in the current replication crisis.
\n\nLinks and info
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, September 2) "Shifting the goalposts in statistics (with Kristin Sainani)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], Retrieved from https://osf.io/3q25f/
Special Guest: Kristin Sainani.
","summary":"We chat with Kristin Sainani (Stanford University) about a popular statistical method in sports medicine research (magnitude based inference), which has been banned by some journals, but continues to thrive in some pockets of scholarship. We also discuss the role of statistical inference in the current replication crisis.","date_published":"2019-09-02T09:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/0b565e74-8574-4b8b-89cb-07dc4343d5f2.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":61216808,"duration_in_seconds":3826}]},{"id":"7796c00e-defc-4573-8b59-f856599e9f15","title":"90: Mo data mo problems","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/90","content_text":"Dan and James discuss two listener questions on performing secondary data analysis and the potential for prestige to creep into open science reforms.\n\nMore info and links:\n\n\nWhy generate your own dataset when you can get a high impact paper using public data?\nThanks to Stu Murray for the question\nWill people steal your ideas?\nThe journal Scientific Data\nAre we now incentivising data mining rather than data collecting?\nSynthetic data \nDan’s recent synthetic data preprint primer\nEgo and prestige got us into the mess we’re trying to fix with open science, but how can we stop this from happening again?\nThanks to Robin Kok for the question, listen to our episode with him on e-health!\nDid all the people who co-authored the paper to change statistical significance the default p-value threshold to .005 actually do this in subsequent papers?\nVagus nerve brain washing paper\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, August 19) \"Mo data mo problems\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/TQ75J","content_html":"Dan and James discuss two listener questions on performing secondary data analysis and the potential for prestige to creep into open science reforms.
\n\nMore info and links:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, August 19) "Mo data mo problems", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/TQ75J
We chat with Tom about whether psychology has a conflict-of-interest problem and how to best define such conflicts.
\n\nLinks and other stuff we cover...
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, August 5) "Conflicts of interest in psychology (with Tom Chivers)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/F9WBM
Special Guest: Tom Chivers.
","summary":"We chat with Tom about whether psychology has a conflict-of-interest problem and how to best define conflicts.","date_published":"2019-08-05T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b87b0438-366c-4f5e-97d8-0673cdf125ac.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":57476910,"duration_in_seconds":3592}]},{"id":"31e6f18b-ad36-4394-a7c3-6a3a6184271f","title":"88: The pomodoro episode","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/88","content_text":"Dan and James apply the pomodoro principle by tackling four topics within a strict ten-minute time limit each: James' new error detection tool, academic dress codes, the \"back in my day...\" defence for QRPs, and p-slacking. \n\nHere are links and details...\n\n\nJames won an award\nJames’ new error detection tool, DEBIT\nAcademic dress codes\nP-slacking \nThe p-slacking paper\nMarcus Crede’s paper: A Negative Effect of a Contractive Pose Is Not Evidence for the Positive Effect of an Expansive Pose\nA preview of our next episode on conflicts of interest in psychology\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, July 15) \"The pomodoro episode\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VTDQ8","content_html":"Dan and James apply the pomodoro principle by tackling four topics within a strict ten-minute time limit each: James' new error detection tool, academic dress codes, the "back in my day..." defence for QRPs, and p-slacking.
\n\nHere are links and details...
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, July 15) "The pomodoro episode", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VTDQ8
We chat with Mike Morrison, a former User Experience (UX) designer who quit his tech career to research how we can bring UX design principles to science. We discuss Mike's recently introduced 'better poster' format and why scientists should think carefully about UX.
\n\nHere's what we cover:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, July 1) "Improving the scientific poster (with Mike Morrison)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BNP7E
Special Guest: Mike Morrison.
","summary":"We chat with Mike Morrison, a former User Experience (UX) designer who quit his tech career to research how we can bring UX design principles to science. We discuss Mike's recently introduced 'better poster' format and why scientists should think carefully about UX.","date_published":"2019-07-01T09:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/0b18a77f-d3e4-48be-812b-eb2a76916abe.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49220962,"duration_in_seconds":3076}]},{"id":"796930b0-e6ef-40e4-8730-b4ade1846629","title":"86: Should I stay or should I go?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/86","content_text":"Dan and James answer a listener question on whether they should stick it out for a few months in a toxic lab to get one more paper or if they should leave.\n\nOther stuff they cover:\n\n\nWe don’t like cricket, oh no, we love it\nJames is bad at tribalism\nWe answer a listener question about a bad lab environment \nThe “Dutch Bounce”\nThe Golden Lab Child\nDemonstrating independence by writing a sole author paper\nWhat should you do if there’s a late authorship switch on your paper?\nHaving an upfront conversation about authorship\nJames on NPR\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, June 17) \"Should I stay or should I go?\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/RX7FB","content_html":"Dan and James answer a listener question on whether they should stick it out for a few months in a toxic lab to get one more paper or if they should leave.
\n\nOther stuff they cover:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, June 17) "Should I stay or should I go?", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/RX7FB
We chat with Kevin Mitchell (Trinity College Dublin) about what the field of psychology can learn from genetics research, how our research theories tend to be constrained by our research tools, and his new book, "Innate".
\n\nOther stuff we cover:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, June 3) "GWAS big teeth you have, grandmother (with Kevin Mitchell)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/RS4HX
Special Guest: Kevin Mitchell.
","summary":"We chat with Kevin Mitchell (Trinity College Dublin) about what the field of psychology can learn from genetics research, how our research theories tend to be constrained by our research tools, and his new book, \"Innate\". ","date_published":"2019-06-03T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/1d1baca8-a4ac-429e-81b7-f85d6bf4d699.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":79703561,"duration_in_seconds":4981}]},{"id":"a5463aa9-a8e2-425c-824a-b7230f894662","title":"84: A GPS in the Garden of Forking Paths (with Amy Orben)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/84","content_text":"We chat with Amy Orben, who applies \"multiverse\" methodology to combat and expose analytical flexibility in her research area of the impact of digital technologies on psychological wellbeing. We also discuss ReproducibiliTea, an early career researcher-led journal club initiative she co-founded, which helps young researchers create local open science groups. \n\nHere are some more details and links:\n\n\nThe tweet pointing our Dan's gramatical error in his usual introduction. THANKS DENIS\nIs Twitter melting our brains?\nThe history of \"new technology\" panic \nWhat's the next panic?\nMoral entrepreneurs: profiting from moral panic\nSpecification curve analysis: a way to run all theoretically defensible analysis options on a given dataset \nAmy's Nature Human Behavior paper\nAmy's PNAS paper \nThe longitudincal effect of social media use on life satisfaction\nHow should scientists speak out against dodgy science?\nThe story behind Reproducabilitea \nThe ReproducibiliTea podcast\nReproducibiliTea stickers!\nThe UK Reproducibility network\nDaniel Lakens' Coursera course\nA multiverse of multiverses\nPress releasing every paper might not be the best idea\nAmy's book recommendation: The long way to a small angry planet\n\n\nOther links\n\n\nAmy on Twitter\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, May 21) \"A GPS in the Garden of Forking Paths (with Amy Orben)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/38KPESpecial Guest: Amy Orben.","content_html":"We chat with Amy Orben, who applies "multiverse" methodology to combat and expose analytical flexibility in her research area of the impact of digital technologies on psychological wellbeing. We also discuss ReproducibiliTea, an early career researcher-led journal club initiative she co-founded, which helps young researchers create local open science groups.
\n\nHere are some more details and links:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, May 21) "A GPS in the Garden of Forking Paths (with Amy Orben)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/38KPE
Special Guest: Amy Orben.
","summary":"We chat with Amy Orben, who applies \"multiverse\" methodology to combat and expose analytical flexibility in her research area of the impact of digital technologies on psychological wellbeing. We also discuss ReproducibiliTea, an early career researcher-led journal club initiative she co-founded, which helps young researchers create local open science groups. ","date_published":"2019-05-21T18:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/a5463aa9-a8e2-425c-824a-b7230f894662.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":50282996,"duration_in_seconds":3142}]},{"id":"ef3e1d0d-ca2b-41c4-ac54-9924d75cb0bd","title":"83: Back to our dirty unwashed roots","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/83","content_text":"By popular demand, Dan and James are kicking it old school and just shooting the breeze. They cover whether scientists should be on Twitter, if Fortnite is ruining our youth, book recommendations, and null oxytocin studies.\n\nStuff they cover and links to obsure references\n\n\nShould scientists be on twitter?\nJames runs a Twitter experiment\nScite has now gone live, listen to our episode on this platform\nOur dreams of a live Hertz episode\nIs Fortnite killing our youth and the parallels with the “heavy metal” scare\nAmy Orben’s screen time study \nMultiverse analysis \nBook recommendations: Kevin Mitchell’s \"Innate\", Gareth Leng's \"Heart of the brain\" \nDaryl dug a hole reference, from the Aussie classic, \"The Castle\"\nA new null oxytocin paper and the twitter response, and Dan's response \nThe SANS meeting venue\nQR codes on posters\nThe slides to Dan’s oxytocin talk at SANS\nThe Hertz Hype Cycle\nDan recollects one of the first conversations he had with James\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, May 8) \"Back to our dirty unwashed roots\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/N9BGX","content_html":"By popular demand, Dan and James are kicking it old school and just shooting the breeze. They cover whether scientists should be on Twitter, if Fortnite is ruining our youth, book recommendations, and null oxytocin studies.
\n\nStuff they cover and links to obsure references
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, May 8) "Back to our dirty unwashed roots", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/N9BGX
We answer a listener question on the possible negative consequences of the open science movement—are things moving too quickly?
\n\nLinks and things we discuss in the episode:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, April 15) "More janitors and fewer architects" Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7ZR9J
We answer our first audio question, on whether academia is too broken to fix, and a second question on whether we’ve ever worried about the possible repercussions of our public critiques and commentary on academia.
\n\nShow details:
\n\nLinks
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, April 1) "Too Young To Know, Too Old To Care" Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/W6MER
We chat with Sean Rife, who the co-founder of scite.ai, a start-up that combines natural language processing with a network of experts to evaluate the veracity of scientific work.
\n\nHere's what we cover and links for a few things we mention
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, March 18) "Cites are not endorsements", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/Q9EYG
Special Guest: Sean Rife.
","summary":"We chat with Sean Rife, who the co-founder of scite.ai, a start-up that combines natural language processing with a network of experts to evaluate the veracity of scientific work","date_published":"2019-03-17T23:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/07dbec38-7a70-44fd-9ef4-f590a1a7a2a8.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49490546,"duration_in_seconds":3093}]},{"id":"7f36586f-f5fa-4815-900e-52672625bf33","title":"79: Clinical trial reporting (with Henry Drysdale)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/79","content_text":"We chat with Henry Drysdale (University of Oxford), co-founder of the COMPare trials project, which compared clinical trial registrations with reported outcomes in five top medical journals and qualitatively analysed the responses to critical correspondence. \n\nDiscussion points and links galore:\n\n\nThe history behind the COMPare project\nThe two papers that were published: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials and a qualitative analysis of researchers’ responses to critical correspondence \nBen Goldacre's books\nWhat is outcome switching?\nWhat were some of the responses to query letters from the authors and journals?\nMisreporting trials (usually) doesn't lead to patient harm, but it harms the evidence base\nWhere should the buck stop with outcome switching?\nWould Registered Reports solve this problem?\nThe CONSORT guidelines\nHave the journals changed their practices?\nCOMPare on twitter\nThe COMPare website\nHere is Henry on Twitter - @HenryMDrysdale\nHere is Ben Goldacre on Twitter - @bengoldacre\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, March 4) \"Clinical trial reporting (with Henry Drysdale)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HBX8RSpecial Guest: Henry Drysdale.","content_html":"We chat with Henry Drysdale (University of Oxford), co-founder of the COMPare trials project, which compared clinical trial registrations with reported outcomes in five top medical journals and qualitatively analysed the responses to critical correspondence.
\n\nDiscussion points and links galore:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, March 4) "Clinical trial reporting (with Henry Drysdale)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HBX8R
Special Guest: Henry Drysdale.
","summary":"We chat with Henry Drysdale (University of Oxford), co-founder of the COMPare trials project, which compared clinical trial registrations with reported outcomes in five top medical journals and qualitatively analysed the responses to critical correspondence.","date_published":"2019-03-03T21:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/7f36586f-f5fa-4815-900e-52672625bf33.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":53558542,"duration_in_seconds":3347}]},{"id":"2fbb6ba6-d090-43af-a51c-68181ec46d5b","title":"78: Large-scale collaborative science (with Lisa DeBruine)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/78","content_text":"In this episde, we chat with Lisa DeBruine (University of Glasgow) about her experience with large-scale collaborative science and how her psychology department made the switch from SPSS to R.\n\nDiscussion points and links galore:\n\n\nDeborah Apthorp's tweet on having to teach SPSS, \"because that's what students know\"\nPeople who are involved with teaching R for psychology at the University of Glasgow: @Eavanmac @dalejbarr @McAleerP @clelandwoods @PatersonHelena @emilynordmann\nWhy the #psyTeachR started teaching R for reproducible science\nData wrangling vs. statistical analysis\nThe psyTeachR website\nDanielle Navarro, and her R text book that you should read\nLisa's \"faux\" package for data simulation\nSometimes you can't share data, simulations are a good way around this problem\n\"synthpop\" is the name of the package that Dan mentioned that can simulate census data\nPower analysis can be hard once you go beyond the more conventional statistical tests (e.g., t-tests, ANOVAs etc...)\nLisa's OSF page \nDirty code is always better than no code (but the cleaner the better)\nLive coding is terrifying but a useful teaching tool. Here's Dan live coding how to build a website in R, typos and all\nUsing a Slack group for help\nThe psychological science accelerator \nChris Chartier (Psych Science Accelerator Director) on Twitter\nA few of the other (hundreds) of folks involved with the Psych Science Accelerator Director: @PsySciAcc: @CRChartier @Ben_C_J @JkayFlake @hmoshontz\nLisa's Registered Report project on face rating\nThe challenges associated with collaborating with 100+ labs\nAuthorship order\nAuthor contributions: CRediT taxonomy\nThe DARPA-funding project on using AI to determine reproducibility \nInteracting Minds workshop in Denmark in March on open science and reproducibility\nLisa shares what Glasgow is like\nLisa has changed her mind about the importance of research metrics (h-index, impact factors etc...)\nLisa thinks you should read this paper on equivalence testing, which includes two former guests, Daniel Lakens, Anne Scheel, and friend of the show Peder Isager.\nHere's the latest episode from Psych Soc O'Clock\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the first tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, February 18) \"Large-scale collaborative science (with Lisa DeBruine)\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JDT6FSpecial Guest: Lisa DeBruine.","content_html":"In this episde, we chat with Lisa DeBruine (University of Glasgow) about her experience with large-scale collaborative science and how her psychology department made the switch from SPSS to R.
\n\nDiscussion points and links galore:
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, February 18) "Large-scale collaborative science (with Lisa DeBruine)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JDT6F
Special Guest: Lisa DeBruine.
","summary":"We chat with Lisa DeBruine (University of Glasgow) about large-scale collaborative science and how her psychology department made the switch from SPSS to R ","date_published":"2019-02-17T21:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2fbb6ba6-d090-43af-a51c-68181ec46d5b.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":56302444,"duration_in_seconds":3518}]},{"id":"b907f238-ff9d-46be-a2b9-f683a0b4ad6d","title":"77: Promiscuous expertise","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/77","content_text":"Dan and James discuss how to deal with the problem of scientists who start talking about topics outside their area of expertise. They also discuss what they would do differently if they would do their PhDs again\n\nHere's what they cover...\n\n\nThe podcast will now be permanently archived on Open Science Framework\nJames did a talk at the Sound Education conference on podcasting for early career researchers. Here's the video if you want to see him squirm uncomfortably in his chair for 20 minutes and/or hear his thoughts our approach to podcasting\n The temptation for academics to believe their own press and to have their thoughts reinforced by the praise they get\n Keeping a handle on what you know and don't know\n Nassim Nicholas Taleb has FANS\n The \"Pete Evans\" effect, James' solution, that we should eat Pete Evans, pesca-pescaterianism, and the spectacularly bad advice that we should stare into the sun \n You should follow gynecologist Jennifer Gunter on Twitter\n How much money would you pay for 100,000 engaged twitter followers? Here's the tweet James was referring to \n Should researchers have something like a Hippocratic Oath? How would we police this?\n Researchers are not good at admitting they're wrong, do we need to approach retractions differently?\n Would a bounty system, in which journals offer rewards, for finding errors in their papers, work well?\n The \"Loss of confidence\" project, and Rebecca Willen's CV \n The \"Nobel disease\"\n\n\nOther links\n\n\n[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)\n[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)\n[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) \n[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)\n\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n\n\n\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, February 4) \"Promiscuous expertise\", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VYCAH","content_html":"Dan and James discuss how to deal with the problem of scientists who start talking about topics outside their area of expertise. They also discuss what they would do differently if they would do their PhDs again
\n\nHere's what they cover...
\n\nOther links
\n\nMusic credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nEpisode citation and permanent link
\nQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, February 4) "Promiscuous expertise", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VYCAH
Peer review is typically conducted behind closed doors. There's been a recent push to make open peer review standard, but what's often left out of these conversations are the potential downsides. To illustrate this, Dan and James discuss a recent instance of open peer review that led to considerable online debate.
\n\nHere's what they cover...
\n\nLinks
\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nWe’re joined by Daniele Marinazzo (University of Ghent) to chat about the recently launched overlay journal Neurons, Behavior, Data analysis and Theory (NBDT), for which he on the Editorial Board.
\n\nAn overlay journal is organised a set of manuscripts that is published and hosted by a seperate entity (in this case, the Arxiv server), a feature that dramatically reduces publication costs. We discuss the unique overlay model, how this can drive article fees to essentially zero, and what it takes to build a good community journal.
\n\nHere’s what we cover:
\n\nLinks...
\n\nNBDT journal: https://nbdt.scholasticahq.com
\nDanielle on twitter: https://twitter.com/dan_marinazzo
\nDan on twitter https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana
\nJames on twitter https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers
\nEverything Hertz on twitter https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nSpecial Guest: Daniele Marinazzo.
","summary":"We’re joined by Daniele Marinazzo (University of Ghent) to chat about the recently launched overlay journal Neurons, Behavior, Data analysis and Theory (NBDT), for which he on the Editorial Board","date_published":"2019-01-07T16:45:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2a0eac45-615e-4729-90d6-683e999ab398.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":55982288,"duration_in_seconds":3498}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/547152000","title":"74: Seeing double (with Elisabeth Bik)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/74","content_text":"In this episode, Dan and James chat with microbiologist Elisabeth Bik about about the detection of problematic images in scientific papers, the state of microbiome research, and making the jump from academia to industry.\n\nMore info on what they cover:\n\n\nHow Elisabeth get into error detection of scientific images\nThe process of detecting errors in images \nHow groups of authors tend to publish multiple papers with problematic images\nThe association between journal prestige and problematic images\nProviding monetary incentives for publications\nMaking the jump from academia to industry \nThe current state of microbiome research\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nPatreon: www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\nElisabeth on Twitter: www.twitter.com/microbiomdigest\nElisabeth online: https://microbiomedigest.com \nThe problematic image paper: https://mbio.asm.org/content/7/3/e00809-16.short\nPubpeer: https://pubpeer.com\nDan on twitter: www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter: www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter: www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook: www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\nSpecial Guest: Elisabeth Bik.","content_html":"In this episode, Dan and James chat with microbiologist Elisabeth Bik about about the detection of problematic images in scientific papers, the state of microbiome research, and making the jump from academia to industry.
\n\nMore info on what they cover:
\n\nLinks
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nSpecial Guest: Elisabeth Bik.
","summary":"In this episode, Dan and James chat with microbiologist Elisabeth Bik about about the detection of problematic images in scientific papers, the state of microbiome research, and making the jump from academia to industry","date_published":"2018-12-19T08:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/1e242f99-6351-4e4c-a168-7d4cfd300960.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49653550,"duration_in_seconds":3103}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/539084586","title":"73: Update your damn syllabus","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/73","content_text":"Dan and James discuss what's missing from biobehavioral science course syllabi.\n\nHere's the episode lowdown:\n\n\nA thank you to our new Patron supporters\nThe (supposed)CRISPR baby\nSPSS vs. R: What should be used for instruction?\nWhat would Dan and James include in a new syllabus?\nShould students be taught scientific communication?\nIf we’re going to add new stuff to a syllabus, what gets removed?\nAre courses too big these days?\nShould students be taught how to set up a side hustle to apply their research skills outside of academia?\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast\nCRISPR baby story: https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/11/30/18119589/crispr-technology-he-jiankui\nDan on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/\n\n\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!\n\n\n$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show\n$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)\n","content_html":"Dan and James discuss what's missing from biobehavioral science course syllabi.
\n\nHere's the episode lowdown:
\n\nLinks
\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nDan and James discuss a new journal of "controversial ideas" that will allow authors to publish articles anonymously. They also launch their Patreon page, in which listeners can support the show and get bonus features.
\n\nHere's the episode lowdown
\n\nLinks
\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
\n\nSupport us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
\n\nIn this episode, we chat about whether it’s necessary to move for an academic job to demonstrate “independence”.
\n\nHere's a rundown of the other stuff we cover:
\n\nLinks
\n\nSFN social media policy https://twitter.com/fedeadolfi/status/1058760331747581953
\nDan on twitter https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana
\nJames on twitter https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers
\nEverything Hertz on twitter https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
","summary":"In this episode, we chat about whether it’s necessary to move for an academic job to demonstrate “independence”","date_published":"2018-11-05T13:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/efe6bd65-d871-41b8-83a0-7e1e793d2eb5.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":52093177,"duration_in_seconds":3255}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/514457976","title":"70: Doubling-blinding dog balls","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/70","content_text":"Dan and James discuss the recent \"grievance studies\" hoax, whereby three people spent a year writing twenty-one fake manuscripts for submission to various cultural studies journals. They also discuss a new proposal to shift publication culture in which researchers pledge to publish exclusively in community-run journals but only when a pre-specified threshold of support for this commitment by the research community has been met.\n\nHere's an overview of the episode:\n\n\nIt’s fat bear week!\nThe new proposal to fix the stranglehold of commercial publishers in academia \nFlipping journals to open access\nThe ‘grievance studies’ hoax\nWhen James first came across the “dog rape” paper\nWhat if you were to design the dog study properly? \nShould we systematically try and hoax journals?\nAstronomy already injects fake data, can we learn from this?\nShould these new hoaxes all be associated with Sokal?\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nBrian Resnick’s fat bear week story: https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/10/9/17955432/fat-bear-week-katmai-national-park-409-747-salmon\nhttps://freeourknowledge.org\nPaywall the movie: https://paywallthemovie.com\nThe ‘grievance studies’ hoax: https://areomagazine.com/2018/10/02/academic-grievance-studies-and-the-corruption-of-scholarship/\nJames’ thread on the “dog-rape” study: https://twitter.com/jamesheathers/status/1048313273563668486\nThe proposal for systematic hoaxing: https://twitter.com/Meaningness/status/1047507838493499392\nA tweet from one of the reviewers of the dog paper: https://twitter.com/dwschieber/status/1047497301021798400 \nFake (a.k.a. blind) injection in astronomy: https://www.ligo.org/news/blind-injection\nThe original Sokal paper: http://www.physics.nyu.edu/sokal/transgress_v2/transgress_v2_singlefile.html\nDan on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter: https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/","content_html":"Dan and James discuss the recent "grievance studies" hoax, whereby three people spent a year writing twenty-one fake manuscripts for submission to various cultural studies journals. They also discuss a new proposal to shift publication culture in which researchers pledge to publish exclusively in community-run journals but only when a pre-specified threshold of support for this commitment by the research community has been met.
\n\nHere's an overview of the episode:
\n\nLinks
\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
","summary":"Dan and James discuss the recent \"grievance studies\" hoax, whereby three people spent a year writing twenty-one fake manuscripts for submission to various cultural studies journals. They also discuss a new proposal to shift publication culture in which researchers pledge to publish exclusively in community-run journals but only when a pre-specified threshold of support for this commitment by the research community has been met","date_published":"2018-10-15T06:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5579f405-f4f1-499d-89c2-f2ef66013f35.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":63900106,"duration_in_seconds":3993}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/511707519","title":"69: Open science tools (with Brian Nosek)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/69","content_text":"We’re joined by Brian Nosek (Centre for Open Science and University of Virginia) to chat about building technology to make open science easier to implement, and shifting the norms of science to make it more open. We also discuss his recent social sciences replication project in which researchers accurately predicted which studies would replicate. \n\nHere’s what we cover:\n\n\nWhat is the Centre for Open Science?\nHow did Brian go from Psychology professor to the director of tech organisation?\nHow can researchers use the Open Science Framework (OSF)?\nHow does OSF remove friction for conducting open science?\nRegistered reports (now available at 131 journals!)\nWhat factors converged to cause the emerging acceptance of open science? \nThe social sciences replication project\nCan researchers anticipate which findings can replicate?\nWhat happened when Brian and his team tried to submit their replication attempts of Science papers to Science?\nThe experience of reviewing registered reports\n\n\nLinks:\nCentre for open science https://cos.io\nOpen Science Framework https://osf.io\nProject Implicit https://www.projectimplicit.net/index.html\nThe social sciences replication project paper https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0399-z\nBrian on Twitter https://www.twitter.com/briannosek\nDan on twitter https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Brian Nosek.","content_html":"We’re joined by Brian Nosek (Centre for Open Science and University of Virginia) to chat about building technology to make open science easier to implement, and shifting the norms of science to make it more open. We also discuss his recent social sciences replication project in which researchers accurately predicted which studies would replicate.
\n\nHere’s what we cover:
\n\nLinks:
\nCentre for open science https://cos.io
\nOpen Science Framework https://osf.io
\nProject Implicit https://www.projectimplicit.net/index.html
\nThe social sciences replication project paper https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0399-z
\nBrian on Twitter https://www.twitter.com/briannosek
\nDan on twitter https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana
\nJames on twitter https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers
\nEverything Hertz on twitter https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
Special Guest: Brian Nosek.
","summary":"We’re joined by Brian Nosek (Centre for Open Science and University of Virginia) to chat about building technology to make open science easier to implement, and shifting the norms of science to make it more open. We also discuss his recent social sciences replication project in which researchers accurately predicted which studies would replicate","date_published":"2018-10-09T11:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/796d65be-d183-42b3-90e1-44b928b387a0.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":47076831,"duration_in_seconds":2942}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/494537697","title":"68: Friends don’t let friends believe in impact factors (with Nathan Hall)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/68","content_text":"This episode includes part two of a chat with Nathan Hall (McGill University), who is the person behind the ’Shit academics say’ account (@AcademicsSay), which pokes fun of all the weird stuff that academics say. Before getting to the discussion, James and Dan answer two listener questions on grants and data cleaning.\n\nHere’s what is covered in the episode:\n\n\nPeople talk about papers all the time, but the grant process is not discussed openly—why? \nSpeaking to your funding body’s relevant program officer\nAssembling a team that complements your weaknesses\nData carpentry and the tidyverse\nOutlier analysis\nNathan Hall on big publishing \nUpending the publication system by getting journals to bid for papers\nUsing peer review quality to judge the quality of journals \nDebunking learning styes\nAcademics chasing after celebrity and hype\nThe cost of chasing academic prestige \nUsing twitter hashtags like #PhDChat and #ECRchat to learn more about the experiences of other people\n\n\nLinks\nData carpentry https://datacarpentry.org/\nThe paper with detailed code https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03811-x\nThe podcast conference https://www.soundeducation.fm/\nCern and comic sans https://www.theverge.com/2012/7/4/3136652/cern-scientists-comic-sans-higgs-boson\nShit Academics Say on twitter https://www.twitter.com/AcademicsSay\nNathan on Twitter https://www.twitter.com/prof_nch\nDan on twitter https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Nathan Hall.","content_html":"This episode includes part two of a chat with Nathan Hall (McGill University), who is the person behind the ’Shit academics say’ account (@AcademicsSay), which pokes fun of all the weird stuff that academics say. Before getting to the discussion, James and Dan answer two listener questions on grants and data cleaning.
\n\nHere’s what is covered in the episode:
\n\nLinks
\nData carpentry https://datacarpentry.org/
\nThe paper with detailed code https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03811-x
\nThe podcast conference https://www.soundeducation.fm/
\nCern and comic sans https://www.theverge.com/2012/7/4/3136652/cern-scientists-comic-sans-higgs-boson
\nShit Academics Say on twitter https://www.twitter.com/AcademicsSay
\nNathan on Twitter https://www.twitter.com/prof_nch
\nDan on twitter https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana
\nJames on twitter https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers
\nEverything Hertz on twitter https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
Special Guest: Nathan Hall.
","summary":"This episode includes part two of a chat with Nathan Hall (McGill University), who is the person behind the ’Shit academics say’ account (@AcademicsSay), which pokes fun of all the weird stuff that academics say. Before getting to the discussion, James and Dan answer two listener questions on grants and data cleaning.","date_published":"2018-09-03T13:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/ca0bf96b-9732-4963-96be-a238d4bee23b.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":71207287,"duration_in_seconds":4450}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/487974981","title":"67: Shit Academics Say (with Nathan Hall)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/67","content_text":"We’re joined by Nathan Hall (McGill University) to chat about the role of humour in academia. Nathan is the person behind the ’Shit academics say’ Twitter account (@AcademicsSay), which pokes fun of all the weird stuff that academics say. \n\nHere’s what we cover:\n\n\nHow Nathan got started with the account\nThe story behind Nathan's 'Research Wahlberg' Twitter account (@ResearchMark) \nThe risk of social media usage being perceived as “unprofessional”\nThe amount of free labor that academics are pressured to do\nHow alcohol is becoming an unspoken coping strategy in academia\nAcademic guilt and glamorising overwork\nWhy Nathan changed his mind about making Imposter Syndrome jokes\nLeaving tweets in your draft folder\n\n\nLinks\nNein Quarterly https://twitter.com/NeinQuarterly\nShit my Dad says https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays\nCern and comic sans https://www.theverge.com/2012/7/4/3136652/cern-scientists-comic-sans-higgs-boson\nAte the onion https://www.reddit.com/r/AteTheOnion/\nShit Academics Say on twitter https://www.twitter.com/AcademicsSay\nNathan on Twitter https://www.twitter.com/prof_nch\nDan on twitter https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Nathan Hall.","content_html":"We’re joined by Nathan Hall (McGill University) to chat about the role of humour in academia. Nathan is the person behind the ’Shit academics say’ Twitter account (@AcademicsSay), which pokes fun of all the weird stuff that academics say.
\n\nHere’s what we cover:
\n\nLinks
\nNein Quarterly https://twitter.com/NeinQuarterly
\nShit my Dad says https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays
\nCern and comic sans https://www.theverge.com/2012/7/4/3136652/cern-scientists-comic-sans-higgs-boson
\nAte the onion https://www.reddit.com/r/AteTheOnion/
\nShit Academics Say on twitter https://www.twitter.com/AcademicsSay
\nNathan on Twitter https://www.twitter.com/prof_nch
\nDan on twitter https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana
\nJames on twitter https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers
\nEverything Hertz on twitter https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
Special Guest: Nathan Hall.
","summary":"We’re joined by Nathan Hall (McGill University) to chat about the role of humour in academia. Nathan is the person behind the ’Shit academics say’ Twitter account (@AcademicsSay), which pokes fun of all the weird stuff that academics say. ","date_published":"2018-08-20T09:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/0bd3c084-233f-4a2a-b4a2-3dd53d4e8256.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":60517145,"duration_in_seconds":3782}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/481678263","title":"66: Ideal worlds vs grim truths","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/66","content_text":"Dan and James answer listener questions on tips for starting your PhD and the role of statistics in exploratory research. \n\nOther stuff they cover:\n\n\nJames new paper on people that voluntarily give themselves goosebumps\nDan’s new podcast: Physiology and Behavior \nA preview of next weeks guest, Nathan Hall\nWhen things are taken out of context on Twitter\nWhat do you do when people are angry with you on the internet?\nTips for people starting a PhD\nCan inferential statistics play a role in exploratory research?\nWhy don’t journals publish peer review reports?\nWhy is PsycNet so bad?\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nJames’ paper https://peerj.com/articles/5292/\nPhysiology and Behavior podcast from Dan https://shows.pippa.io/dsquintana\nThe tweet we discuss https://twitter.com/andpru/status/1024005699737509888?s=21\n\n\nDan on twitter https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on twitter https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on twitter https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/","content_html":"Dan and James answer listener questions on tips for starting your PhD and the role of statistics in exploratory research.
\n\nOther stuff they cover:
\n\nLinks
\n\nDan on twitter https://www.twitter.com/dsquintana
\nJames on twitter https://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers
\nEverything Hertz on twitter https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
","summary":"Dan and James answer listener questions on tips for starting your PhD and the role of statistics in exploratory research","date_published":"2018-08-06T05:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/4e9780a2-2e26-484a-8a3f-bc0c85c430e4.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":52208952,"duration_in_seconds":3263}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/472240959","title":"65: Blockchain and open science (with Jon Brock)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/65","content_text":"Dan and James chat with Jon Brock (Cognitive scientist at Frankl) about the use of blockchain technology for open science.\n\nHere's what they cover:\n\nWhat is the blockchain?\nWhy Jon made the jump from academia to Frankl\nA cryptocurrency for open science\nWhat do institutional review boards think about using blockchain for data collection and storage?\nAutism heterogeneity \nHow will this approach scale to biological signals and genetics data?\nWhat’s something that Jon’s changed him mind about in regards to academia?\n\nLinks\n\nFrankl https://frankl.io\nFive reasons Frankl has a token https://medium.com/franklopenscience/why-does-frankl-need-a-frankl-token-4129d718ab74\nBjoern Brembs blog post http://bjoern.brembs.net/2018/05/after-24-years-when-will-academic-culture-finally-shift/\nAn explainer on cryptographic hashes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_hash_function#Illustration\nFrankl in a nutshell https://medium.com/franklopenscience/frankl-in-a-nutshell-9b488c554dea\nFrankl for autism https://medium.com/franklopenscience/frankl-for-autism-e74f0108bf5a\nRethinking Innateness https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/rethinking-innateness\n\nJon on Twitter twitter.com/DrBrocktagon\nDan on Twitter twitter.com/dsquintana\nJames on Twitter twitter.com/jamesheathers\nEverything Hertz on Twitter twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Jon Brock.","content_html":"Dan and James chat with Jon Brock (Cognitive scientist at Frankl) about the use of blockchain technology for open science.
\n\nHere's what they cover:
\n\nWhat is the blockchain?
\nWhy Jon made the jump from academia to Frankl
\nA cryptocurrency for open science
\nWhat do institutional review boards think about using blockchain for data collection and storage?
\nAutism heterogeneity
\nHow will this approach scale to biological signals and genetics data?
\nWhat’s something that Jon’s changed him mind about in regards to academia?
Links
\n\nFrankl https://frankl.io
\nFive reasons Frankl has a token https://medium.com/franklopenscience/why-does-frankl-need-a-frankl-token-4129d718ab74
\nBjoern Brembs blog post http://bjoern.brembs.net/2018/05/after-24-years-when-will-academic-culture-finally-shift/
\nAn explainer on cryptographic hashes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_hash_function#Illustration
\nFrankl in a nutshell https://medium.com/franklopenscience/frankl-in-a-nutshell-9b488c554dea
\nFrankl for autism https://medium.com/franklopenscience/frankl-for-autism-e74f0108bf5a
\nRethinking Innateness https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/rethinking-innateness
Jon on Twitter twitter.com/DrBrocktagon
\nDan on Twitter twitter.com/dsquintana
\nJames on Twitter twitter.com/jamesheathers
\nEverything Hertz on Twitter twitter.com/hertzpodcast
\nEverything Hertz on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
Special Guest: Jon Brock.
","summary":"Dan and James chat with Jon Brock (Cognitive scientist at Frankl) about the use of blockchain technology for open science","date_published":"2018-07-16T06:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/75c2531f-801d-477d-a398-ec9ab7e5d79d.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":52328070,"duration_in_seconds":3270}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/466151316","title":"64: Salami slicing","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/64","content_text":"Dan and James talk about the recent SIPS conference answer a listener question on \"salami slicing\" the outcomes from one study into multiple papers.\n\nHere's what they cover:\n\n\nWhat is the SIPS conference? [0:24]\nA SIPS proposal for Google scholar to highlight commentaries and replication attempts on specific articles [15:42]\nJames and Dan’s favourite Hertz episodes [20:43]\nWe answer a listener question on Salami slicing [28:45]\nCan you publish too much? [48:10]\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nSIPS conference: https://www.improvingpsych.org/SIPS2018/\nReproducibilitea podcast: https://soundcloud.com/reproducibilitea\nSalami slicing tweet: https://twitter.com/academicswrite/status/1008719899940786176\nCumulative impact factors: http://khakhalin.blogspot.com/2012/11/cumulative-impact-factor-benchmarking.html\nA working document from SIPS on making replications discoverable (including Google scholar) https://osf.io/57zxa/\n\n\nFind us on Twitter:\nwww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nwww.twitter.com/dsquintana\nwww.twitter.com/jamesheathers\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/","content_html":"Dan and James talk about the recent SIPS conference answer a listener question on "salami slicing" the outcomes from one study into multiple papers.
\n\nHere's what they cover:
\n\nLinks
\n\nFind us on Twitter:
\nwww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
\nwww.twitter.com/dsquintana
\nwww.twitter.com/jamesheathers
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
","summary":"Dan and James talk about the recent SIPS conference and answer a listener question on \"salami slicing\" the outcomes from one study into multiple papers","date_published":"2018-07-02T05:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/23b978a6-baa3-4c8b-835d-86b7a1c959cc.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":59478098,"duration_in_seconds":3717}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/459832776","title":"63: Science journalism (with Brian Resnick)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/63","content_text":"Dan and James chat about science journalism with Brian Resnick (@b_resnick), who is a science reporter at Vox.com.\n\nHere’s what they cover:\n\nShould scientists be worried that their work will be misrepresented when talking to the media? [0:58]\nHow Brian approaches science journalism [8:53]\nIt’s ok to challenge the assumptions of science journalists [16:57]\nHow do you write a great headline? [19:13]\nHow does Brian appraise the quality of research? [29:50]\nShould psychiatrists (or journalists) diagnose the US President? [32:50] \nStories in science that no one knows the answer to [36:58] \nHow to promote your research without going via your institution’s media department [40:24]\nThe best way to pitch your research to a science journalist [44:25]\nHow pre-preprints are great for research addressing current events [48:45]\nHow scientists can improve their science communication writing [53:15]\nDick jokes in science writing — yes or no? [54:30]\nWhat has Brian changed his mind about? [56:37]\nBrian’s book recommendation [58:05]\n\nLinks:\nBrian’s pieces at Vox - https://www.vox.com/authors/brian-resnick\nThe twitter poll that Dan was referring to - https://twitter.com/kylejasmin/status/960065733551181824?lang=en\nThe Weeds podcast episode on the Goldwater rule - https://art19.com/shows/the-weeds/episodes/72d4c65f-2d2a-4925-8bb6-7d6ca93cb561 \nBrian’s email - Brian@vox.com\nBrian on Twitter - https://www.twitter.com/b_resnick\n\nBooks mentioned:\nWe have no idea - https://www.amazon.com/We-Have-No-Idea-Universe/dp/0735211515\nDoes it fart? - https://www.amazon.com/Does-Fart-Definitive-Animal-Flatulence/dp/0316484156/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8\n\nFind us on Twitter:\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nhttps://www.twitter.com/dsquintana\nhttps://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Brian Resnick.","content_html":"Dan and James chat about science journalism with Brian Resnick (@b_resnick), who is a science reporter at Vox.com.
\n\nHere’s what they cover:
\n\nShould scientists be worried that their work will be misrepresented when talking to the media? [0:58]
\nHow Brian approaches science journalism [8:53]
\nIt’s ok to challenge the assumptions of science journalists [16:57]
\nHow do you write a great headline? [19:13]
\nHow does Brian appraise the quality of research? [29:50]
\nShould psychiatrists (or journalists) diagnose the US President? [32:50]
\nStories in science that no one knows the answer to [36:58]
\nHow to promote your research without going via your institution’s media department [40:24]
\nThe best way to pitch your research to a science journalist [44:25]
\nHow pre-preprints are great for research addressing current events [48:45]
\nHow scientists can improve their science communication writing [53:15]
\nDick jokes in science writing — yes or no? [54:30]
\nWhat has Brian changed his mind about? [56:37]
\nBrian’s book recommendation [58:05]
Links:
\nBrian’s pieces at Vox - https://www.vox.com/authors/brian-resnick
\nThe twitter poll that Dan was referring to - https://twitter.com/kylejasmin/status/960065733551181824?lang=en
\nThe Weeds podcast episode on the Goldwater rule - https://art19.com/shows/the-weeds/episodes/72d4c65f-2d2a-4925-8bb6-7d6ca93cb561
\nBrian’s email - Brian@vox.com
\nBrian on Twitter - https://www.twitter.com/b_resnick
Books mentioned:
\nWe have no idea - https://www.amazon.com/We-Have-No-Idea-Universe/dp/0735211515
\nDoes it fart? - https://www.amazon.com/Does-Fart-Definitive-Animal-Flatulence/dp/0316484156/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8
Find us on Twitter:
\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
\nhttps://www.twitter.com/dsquintana
\nhttps://www.twitter.com/jamesheathers
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
Special Guest: Brian Resnick.
","summary":"Dan and James chat about science journalism with Brian Resnick, who is a science reporter at Vox.com.","date_published":"2018-06-18T07:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/7723e5ff-0e78-4e72-8f3a-b091d3b0c14a.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":58160140,"duration_in_seconds":3634}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/453429525","title":"62: Adopting open science practices (with Dorothy Bishop)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/62","content_text":"Dan and James chat about the adoption of open science practices with Dorothy Bishop, Professor of Developmental Neuropsychology at the University of Oxford.\n\nHere are some highlights from the show:\n\n\nWhy Dorothy starting adopting open science practices\nForking paths of analysis\nDorothy’s experience with her first registered report\nIssues around data deposition\nWhen someone finds an error in your data\nWhat happens when a senior researcher is using questionable research practices?\nWhat to do when you’re caught doing something wrong\nDetecting errors in other papers\nThe potential for open data to be weaponised\nHow error detection is interpersonally difficult \nCarving out time for non-work pursuits\nThe benefits of writing fiction when you're a scientist\nUsing video for science communication \nJames Heathers: Cat dealer\nPromoting your research vs. promoting yourself\nDorothy’s book recommendation\n\n\nLinks\nDan Gilbert’s paper: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/351/6277/1037.2\nMerchants of doubt [book]: https://www.amazon.com/Merchants-Doubt-Handful-Scientists-Obscured/dp/1608193942\nDorothy's blog: deevybee.blogspot.com\nDorothy's crime novels: https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_ebooks_1?ie=UTF8&field-author=Deevy+Bishop&search-alias=digital-text&text=Deevy+Bishop&sort=relevancerank\nDorothy on Twitter: twitter.com/deevybee\n\nFind us on Twitter\ntwitter.com/hertzpodcast\ntwitter.com/dsquintana\ntwitter.com/jamesheathers\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Dorothy Bishop.","content_html":"Dan and James chat about the adoption of open science practices with Dorothy Bishop, Professor of Developmental Neuropsychology at the University of Oxford.
\n\nHere are some highlights from the show:
\n\nLinks
\nDan Gilbert’s paper: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/351/6277/1037.2
\nMerchants of doubt [book]: https://www.amazon.com/Merchants-Doubt-Handful-Scientists-Obscured/dp/1608193942
\nDorothy's blog: deevybee.blogspot.com
\nDorothy's crime novels: https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_ebooks_1?ie=UTF8&field-author=Deevy+Bishop&search-alias=digital-text&text=Deevy+Bishop&sort=relevancerank
\nDorothy on Twitter: twitter.com/deevybee
Find us on Twitter
\ntwitter.com/hertzpodcast
\ntwitter.com/dsquintana
\ntwitter.com/jamesheathers
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
Special Guest: Dorothy Bishop.
","summary":"Dan and James chat about the adoption of open science practices with Dorothy Bishop, Professor of Developmental Neuropsychology at the University of Oxford.","date_published":"2018-06-04T06:15:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2cc5a0ae-b9b2-40b9-8000-290e5a5732d5.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48300280,"duration_in_seconds":3449}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/446945370","title":"61: Performance enhancing thugs (with Greg Nuckols)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/61","content_text":"Dan and James chat with Greg Nuckols, who is grad student in exercise physiology, strength coach, and writer at strongerbyscience.com\n\nWhat they cover in this episode:\n\n\nWhy Greg blogs his papers before preprints \nHow Greg combines his business with his grad study\nGetting your research to your audience without publishing in scientific journals \nThe limitations of traditional publishing\nAddressing popular misconceptions in research \nAre questionable research practices as bad in sports science as they are in psychology?\nBeing an “academic outsider” can be tough, but it has some advantages\nThe work that goes into exercise physiology studies\nHow practical are multilab research projects in sports science?\nExercise “experts” on Instagram \nUsing Instagram to disseminate research \nGreg’s go-to resources for learning about open science\nWhat Greg’s changed his mind about\nHow Greg’s planning on funding his future research without grants\n\n\nLinks\n\nScihub - whereisscihub.now.sh\nGreg on Twitter - twitter.com/GregNuckols\nGreg's website and newsletter - https://www.strongerbyscience.com\nStronger by Science on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/strongerbyscience/\nChris Beardsly on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chrisabeardsley/\nData colada - http://datacolada.org\nSlatestar codex - http://slatestarcodex.com\nJordan Anaya's blog - https://medium.com/@OmnesRes\nSportRXiv - http://sportrxiv.org\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Greg Nuckols.","content_html":"Dan and James chat with Greg Nuckols, who is grad student in exercise physiology, strength coach, and writer at strongerbyscience.com
\n\nWhat they cover in this episode:
\n\nLinks
\n\nScihub - whereisscihub.now.sh
\nGreg on Twitter - twitter.com/GregNuckols
\nGreg's website and newsletter - https://www.strongerbyscience.com
\nStronger by Science on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/strongerbyscience/
\nChris Beardsly on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chrisabeardsley/
\nData colada - http://datacolada.org
\nSlatestar codex - http://slatestarcodex.com
\nJordan Anaya's blog - https://medium.com/@OmnesRes
\nSportRXiv - http://sportrxiv.org
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
Special Guest: Greg Nuckols.
","summary":"Dan and James chat with Greg Nuckols, who is grad student in exercise physiology, strength coach, and writer at strongerbyscience.com","date_published":"2018-05-21T06:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/8eed66d1-78a2-480e-b0c4-cfa54ee77904.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":47139495,"duration_in_seconds":3367}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/440998464","title":"60: This is more of a comment than a question","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/60","content_text":"Dan and James answer listener questions on academic conferences, getting abreast of the literature, and conflicts of interest.\n\nHere are more details of what's on this episode:\n\n\nHow question times during conference seminars are useless \nChoosing which conferences to attend as a PhD student\nFeedback from our Registered Reports episode with Chris Chambers (Episode 56)\nPeople that have binged our entire back catalogue\nThe amount of reading do you need to do to keep track of the field you work in \nPhD students need time to make time to read the literature \nPeople sending out half-arsed work hoping that peer-review will “fix it”\nGuest authorship\nWhen you’re a native English speaker and get asked to have your manuscript proofed by a native English speaker \nIs it a conflict of interest to a review a paper with that includes someone you’ve co-authored with in the past on a different topic?\nThe Frontiers journal model\nReviewing papers so that authors are actually grateful for your criticism \n\n\nLinks\n\nNuzzle: http://nuzzel.com\nPocket: https://getpocket.com\nMendeley: http://mendeley.com\n\nFind us on Twitter:\n\ntwitter.com/hertzpodcast\ntwitter.com/dsquintana\ntwitter.com/jamesheathers\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/","content_html":"Dan and James answer listener questions on academic conferences, getting abreast of the literature, and conflicts of interest.
\n\nHere are more details of what's on this episode:
\n\nLinks
\n\nNuzzle: http://nuzzel.com
\nPocket: https://getpocket.com
\nMendeley: http://mendeley.com
Find us on Twitter:
\n\ntwitter.com/hertzpodcast
\ntwitter.com/dsquintana
\ntwitter.com/jamesheathers
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
","summary":"Dan and James answer listener questions on academic conferences, getting abreast of the literature, and conflicts of interest","date_published":"2018-05-08T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5055237e-6754-4dd7-8e8d-3660bdc99433.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":64851665,"duration_in_seconds":4053}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/430358043","title":"59: Rethinking the scientific journal (with Rickard Carlsson)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/59","content_text":"Despite cosmetic changes, scientific journals haven't changed that much over the past few decades. So what if we were to completely rethink how a scientific journal should operate in today's environment? \n\nDan and James are joined by Rickard Carlsson (Linnaeus University, Sweden), who is the Co-Editor of the new \"Meta-Psychology\" journal.\n\nHere's what they cover:\n\n\nWhy start a new psychology journal?\nWhat’s new about this journal?\nHow does the journal have no subscription fees and no article processing fees?\nHow does a new journal increase its profile?\nThe difficulties in publishing negative results\nThe limits of study pre-registration\nAre data archiving requirements unrealistic?\nOpen polices and the Swedish constitution \nHow can we make data anonymous?\nWhat’s the hardest thing about starting a journal?\nWhat would success look like for this new journal? \nWhat has Rickard changed his mind about recently?\nWhat’s one book or paper that Rickard thinks everyone should read\n\n\nLinks\n\nThe Daniel Lakens blog post on JPSP (The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology) http://daniellakens.blogspot.no/2018/03/the-journal-of-personality-and-social.html\nStatistical rethinking book http://xcelab.net/rm/statistical-rethinking/\nPsych methods Facebook group https://www.facebook.com/groups/853552931365745/\n\nTwitter handles\nEverything Hertz - @hertzpodcast\nRickard - @RickCarlsson\nDan - @dsquintana\nJames - @JamesHeathers\n\nMusic credits - Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Rickard Carlsson.","content_html":"Despite cosmetic changes, scientific journals haven't changed that much over the past few decades. So what if we were to completely rethink how a scientific journal should operate in today's environment?
\n\nDan and James are joined by Rickard Carlsson (Linnaeus University, Sweden), who is the Co-Editor of the new "Meta-Psychology" journal.
\n\nHere's what they cover:
\n\nLinks
\n\nThe Daniel Lakens blog post on JPSP (The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology) http://daniellakens.blogspot.no/2018/03/the-journal-of-personality-and-social.html
\nStatistical rethinking book http://xcelab.net/rm/statistical-rethinking/
\nPsych methods Facebook group https://www.facebook.com/groups/853552931365745/
Twitter handles
\nEverything Hertz - @hertzpodcast
\nRickard - @RickCarlsson
\nDan - @dsquintana
\nJames - @JamesHeathers
Music credits - Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
Special Guest: Rickard Carlsson.
","summary":"Despite cosmetic changes, scientific journals hav…","date_published":"2018-04-16T07:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/eae37317-90df-46b7-907c-3b0c1d39caf6.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":60223319,"duration_in_seconds":3763}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/423522429","title":"58: Lessons from podcasting (with Simine Vazire)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/58","content_text":"Dan and James are joined by Simine Vazire (University of California, Davis and co-host of the Black Goat podcast) to chat about the role of podcasting in scientific communication. Dan's wife also starts going into labor during the episode, so this is an extra special one - make sure you listen through the ENTIRE episode.\n\nHere's what the cover:\n\n\nWhy Simine started podcasting\nThe perils of being a \"methodologist terrorist\" researcher \nWhy podcast when you could blog or tweet?\nDan and James’ favourite things about podcasting\nThe current role of blogs\nNavigating the public/private crossover of science communication\nHow much do we censor our podcasts?\nShould Journal editors tweet and podcast in a personal capacity?\nShould early career researchers podcast?\nThe costs of not speaking above your station\nWhat equipment does we use to record podcasts?\nTwo vs. three podcast hosts?\nHow do you know when you have a good podcast?\nWhat type of person is suited to podcasting?\nWhat book does Simine think everyone should read?\nWhat’s something Simine’s changed her mind about recently?\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nEd Vul Social neuroscience paper https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/wiki/whynhow/images/e/ef/Vul_et_al_orig_paper.pdf\nSnowball ice microphone https://www.bluedesigns.com/products/snowball/\nBlack Goat podcast http://www.theblackgoatpodcast.com\nJames’ advice for PhDs https://medium.com/age-of-awareness/12-thing-you-should-know-before-you-start-a-phd-9c064a979e8\nUnderstanding Psychology as a Science https://www.macmillanihe.com/page/detail/Understanding-Psychology-as-a-Science/?K=9780230542303\nWhat is this thing called science? https://www.amazon.com/What-This-Thing-Called-Science/dp/162466038X/ref=dp_ob_title_bk\n\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Simine Vazire.","content_html":"Dan and James are joined by Simine Vazire (University of California, Davis and co-host of the Black Goat podcast) to chat about the role of podcasting in scientific communication. Dan's wife also starts going into labor during the episode, so this is an extra special one - make sure you listen through the ENTIRE episode.
\n\nHere's what the cover:
\n\nLinks
\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
Special Guest: Simine Vazire.
","summary":"Dan and James are joined by Simine Vazire (University of California, Davis and co-host of the Black Goat podcast) to chat about the role of podcasting in scientific communication. Dan's wife also starts going into labor during the episode, so this is an extra special one","date_published":"2018-04-02T07:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/81b3ab81-a22b-4f6d-b668-005b856e6bf1.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":51375943,"duration_in_seconds":3669}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/414317748","title":"57: Radical Transparency (with Rebecca Willén)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/57","content_text":"Dan and James are joined by Rebecca Willén (Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education) to discuss transparency in scientific research and how she started her own independent research institute in Bali.\n\nHere's what they cover:\n\n\nRebecca explains the story behind her practice of sharing disclosure statements for her published work\nMany people are changing their research practices for the better for current research - but what about their past research?\nThe 21 word solution\nUsing disclosure statements in your pHD\nThe state of research openness in forensic psychology\nThe flexibility in determining a primary outcome\nHow and why Rebecca founded the IGDORE research institute \nThe drawbacks to starting your own research institute \nRebecca’s recommendation for getting started with open science\nThe story behind the RONIN institute \n\n\nLinks - \nIGDORE https://igdore.org\nRebecca’s website https://rmwillen.info\n21 word solution https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2160588\nPNAS article questioning whether there’s a reporducability crisis http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/03/08/1708272114\nIGDORE Open Science meetup https://igdore.org/open-science-meetup-bali-2018/\nIGDORE affiliation https://igdore.org/affiliation/\nRONIN institute http://ronininstitute.org\nXKCD theme for R http://xkcd.r-forge.r-project.org\nGNU manifesto https://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.html\nTwitter: @hertzpodcast, @dsquintana, @jamesheathers, and @rmwillen\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Rebecca Willén.","content_html":"Dan and James are joined by Rebecca Willén (Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education) to discuss transparency in scientific research and how she started her own independent research institute in Bali.
\n\nHere's what they cover:
\n\nLinks -
\nIGDORE https://igdore.org
\nRebecca’s website https://rmwillen.info
\n21 word solution https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2160588
\nPNAS article questioning whether there’s a reporducability crisis http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/03/08/1708272114
\nIGDORE Open Science meetup https://igdore.org/open-science-meetup-bali-2018/
\nIGDORE affiliation https://igdore.org/affiliation/
\nRONIN institute http://ronininstitute.org
\nXKCD theme for R http://xkcd.r-forge.r-project.org
\nGNU manifesto https://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.html
\nTwitter: @hertzpodcast, @dsquintana, @jamesheathers, and @rmwillen
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
Special Guest: Rebecca Willén.
","summary":"Dan and James are joined by Rebecca Willén (Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education) to discuss transparency in scientific research and how she started her own independent research institute in Bali","date_published":"2018-03-15T23:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2d89e6e9-e736-4902-8457-ac602914b835.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":47292435,"duration_in_seconds":2955}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/393307968","title":"56: Registered reports (with Chris Chambers)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/56","content_text":"Dan and James are joined by Chris Chambers (Cardiff University) to discuss the Registered Reports format.\n\nHere’s an overview of what they covered:\n\nWhat is a registered report and why should we implement them? [1:47]\nThe impact of conscious and unconscious bias on scientific publication [6:17]\nCommon objections to registered reports [8:21]\nThe slippery slope fallacy [14:33] \nThe advantages of registered reports for early career researchers [15:47] \nThe generational divide for embracing methodological reforms [19:13] \nThe launch of registered reports in 2013 [23:30] \nThe “tone debate” in psychology [24:50] \nDealing with publishing decisions as an early career researcher [27:30]\nUsing registered reports to disarm your research rivals [30:52]\nA peek behind the curtain of peer-review [34:40]\nHow do we convince journals to take up the registered report format? [36:28]\nUsing registered reports for meta-analysis [38:40]\nWhat’s something that Chris has changed his mind about recently? [43:14]\nWhat’s Chris’ favourite failure? [48:23]\nChris’ opinion of Wales [51:49]\n\nLinks\n\nThe Seven Deadly Sins of Psychology https://www.amazon.com/Seven-Deadly-Sins-Psychology-Scientific/dp/0691158908\nChris Chambers on Twitter @chrisdc77\nDorothy Bishop’s blog on how registered reports provides better control of the publication timeline http://deevybee.blogspot.no/2016/03/better-control-of-publication-time-line.html\nThe Startup Scientist podcast https://shows.pippa.io/startupscientist\nStartup scientist on Twitter @Startup_sci\nThe open science pyramid (slide 8) https://osf.io/yq59d/\nThe Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology “power posing” issue http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rrsp20/2/1?nav=tocList\nDan on Twitter @dsquintana\nJames on Twitter @JamesHeathers\n\nMusic credits Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Chris Chambers.","content_html":"Dan and James are joined by Chris Chambers (Cardiff University) to discuss the Registered Reports format.
\n\nHere’s an overview of what they covered:
\n\nWhat is a registered report and why should we implement them? [1:47]
\nThe impact of conscious and unconscious bias on scientific publication [6:17]
\nCommon objections to registered reports [8:21]
\nThe slippery slope fallacy [14:33]
\nThe advantages of registered reports for early career researchers [15:47]
\nThe generational divide for embracing methodological reforms [19:13]
\nThe launch of registered reports in 2013 [23:30]
\nThe “tone debate” in psychology [24:50]
\nDealing with publishing decisions as an early career researcher [27:30]
\nUsing registered reports to disarm your research rivals [30:52]
\nA peek behind the curtain of peer-review [34:40]
\nHow do we convince journals to take up the registered report format? [36:28]
\nUsing registered reports for meta-analysis [38:40]
\nWhat’s something that Chris has changed his mind about recently? [43:14]
\nWhat’s Chris’ favourite failure? [48:23]
\nChris’ opinion of Wales [51:49]
Links
\n\nThe Seven Deadly Sins of Psychology https://www.amazon.com/Seven-Deadly-Sins-Psychology-Scientific/dp/0691158908
\nChris Chambers on Twitter @chrisdc77
\nDorothy Bishop’s blog on how registered reports provides better control of the publication timeline http://deevybee.blogspot.no/2016/03/better-control-of-publication-time-line.html
\nThe Startup Scientist podcast https://shows.pippa.io/startupscientist
\nStartup scientist on Twitter @Startup_sci
\nThe open science pyramid (slide 8) https://osf.io/yq59d/
\nThe Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology “power posing” issue http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rrsp20/2/1?nav=tocList
\nDan on Twitter @dsquintana
\nJames on Twitter @JamesHeathers
Music credits Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
Special Guest: Chris Chambers.
","summary":"Dan and James are joined by Chris Chambers (Cardiff University) to discuss the Registered Reports format","date_published":"2018-02-02T07:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/788e6063-8915-4727-94b5-26c7b7ebf000.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":51894274,"duration_in_seconds":3239}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/385439813","title":"55: The proposal to redefine clinical trials","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/55","content_text":"In this episode, Dan and James discuss the US National Institutes of Health's new definition of a “clinical trial”, which comes into effect on the 25th of January. \n\nHere’s the new definition: “A research study in which one or more human subjects are prospectively assigned to one or more interventions (which may include placebo or other control) to evaluate the effects of those interventions on health-related biomedical or behavioural outcomes”. \n\nOver the course of this episode, they cover the pros and cons of this decision along with the implications for researchers and science in general.\n\nHere are a few things they cover:\n\n\nThe traditional definition of a clinical trial\nWe go through James’ old work to determine if he’s been a clinical trialist all along\nThe lack of clarity surrounding the new definition\nWhy are adopting a clinical trial approach when this approach has obvious weaknesses?\nWhat do you actually have to do when running a clinical trial?\nWill institutions also adopt this new definition, thus putting basic research through clinical trial IRBs?\nWhat if this extra red tape actually improves science?\nOne argument against the proposal is that registering more studies on clinicaltrials.gov will confuse the public. We don’t buy that.\nClinical trial registrations generally miss the many nuances of study design\nThe new clinical trial definition will eliminate some of the ‘forking paths’ when analysing and reporting data\nHow this new definition will affect grant applications for early career researchers? \nWhat happens to exploratory research?\nNIH case studies of what may constitute a clinical trial \n\n\nLinks\n\nNIH clinical trial definition https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/definition.htm\nThe NIH “clinical trial decision tree” https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/CT-decision-tree.pdf\nNIH case studies of what may constitute a clinical trial https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/case-studies.htm#case1","content_html":"In this episode, Dan and James discuss the US National Institutes of Health's new definition of a “clinical trial”, which comes into effect on the 25th of January.
\n\nHere’s the new definition: “A research study in which one or more human subjects are prospectively assigned to one or more interventions (which may include placebo or other control) to evaluate the effects of those interventions on health-related biomedical or behavioural outcomes”.
\n\nOver the course of this episode, they cover the pros and cons of this decision along with the implications for researchers and science in general.
\n\nHere are a few things they cover:
\n\nLinks
\n\nNIH clinical trial definition https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/definition.htm
\nThe NIH “clinical trial decision tree” https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/CT-decision-tree.pdf
\nNIH case studies of what may constitute a clinical trial https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/case-studies.htm#case1
In this episode, James sits in the guest chair as Dan interviews him on his recent work find and exposing inconsistent results in the scientific literature.
\n\nStuff they cover:
\n\nLinks
\n\nThe Sokal hoax: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair
\nJames’ Psychological Science paper: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0956797615572908
\nThe @IamSciComm Tweetstorm on podcasting: https://twitter.com/iamscicomm/status/935851867661357057
Dan and James discuss whether you need to have “skin in the game” to critique research.
\n\nHere's what else they cover in the episode:
\n\nLinks:
\nThe science communication Twitter thread https://twitter.com/ocaptmycapt/status/927193779693645825
\nERC comics https://www.erccomics.com
\nThe “skin in the game” tweet https://twitter.com/paperbag1/status/914923706648055813
\nThat study in neuopsychopharmacology on a IL-6 receptor antibody to treat residual symptoms in schizophrenia https://www.nature.com/articles/npp2017258
In this episode, Dan and James welcome back Daniel Lakens (Eindhoven University of Technology) to discuss his new paper on justifying your alpha level.
\n\nHighlights:
\n\nLinks
\n\nDaniel on Twitter - https://www.twitter.com/lakens
\nDaniel’s courser course - https://www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences
\nJustify your alpha paper - https://psyarxiv.com/9s3y6
\nAbandon statistical significance - https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.07588
\nUsing the costs of error rates to set your alpha - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00625.x
Special Guest: Daniel Lakens.
","summary":"In this episode, Dan and James welcome back Daniel Lakens (Eindhoven University of Technology) to discuss his new paper on justifying your alpha level","date_published":"2017-10-20T06:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b484d21b-7507-4a56-9cb0-8210eedb690c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":45040799,"duration_in_seconds":3753}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/345597190","title":"51: Preprints (with Jessica Polka)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/51","content_text":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Jessica Polka, Director of ASAPbio, to chat about preprints.\n\nHighlights:\n\n\nWhat is ASAPbio?\nDifferences between the publication processes in the biological sciences vs. the biomedical sciences\nCommon concerns with preprints\nMedia embargoes \nHow peer review isn’t necessarily a mark of quality\nDo preprints make it harder to curate information?\nSpecialty preprint servers vs. broad servers?\nHow well do you need to format your preprint?\nHow do you bring up preprints to lab heads and PIs?\nAn example of a good preprint experience from Dan\nUsing preprints for your grant applications\nWhat Jessica has changed her mind about\nThe one article that Jessica thinks everyone should read\n\n\nLinks\n\nJessica's Twitter account - @jessicapolka\nASAPbio - http://asapbio.org & @asapbio_\nRescuing Biomedical science conference 2014 resources - http://rescuingbiomedicalresearch.org/events/\nSherpa/Romeo - http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/index.php\nPaleoArxiv - https://osf.io/preprints/paleorxiv\nPrinciples for Open Scholarly Infrastructures paper - https://figshare.com/articles/Principles_for_Open_Scholarly_Infrastructures_v1/1314859Special Guest: Jessica Polka.","content_html":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Jessica Polka, Director of ASAPbio, to chat about preprints.
\n\nHighlights:
\n\nLinks
\n\nJessica's Twitter account - @jessicapolka
\nASAPbio - http://asapbio.org & @asapbio_
\nRescuing Biomedical science conference 2014 resources - http://rescuingbiomedicalresearch.org/events/
\nSherpa/Romeo - http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/index.php
\nPaleoArxiv - https://osf.io/preprints/paleorxiv
\nPrinciples for Open Scholarly Infrastructures paper - https://figshare.com/articles/Principles_for_Open_Scholarly_Infrastructures_v1/1314859
Special Guest: Jessica Polka.
","summary":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Jessica Polka, Director of ASAPbio, to chat about preprints","date_published":"2017-10-06T09:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/472fc280-7e8a-40fd-8fcf-b28afe4c4c0c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":40495920,"duration_in_seconds":3374}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/342333229","title":"50: Special 50th episode (LIVE)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/50","content_text":"Dan and James celebrate their 50th episode with a live recording! They cover a blog post that argues grad students shouldn’t be publishing, what’s expected of today’s postdocs, and the ‘tone’ debate in psychology.\n\nBONUS: You can also watch the video of this episode on the Everything Hertz podcast channel (link below)\n\nOther stuff they cover:\n\n\nJames offends a sociologist, as is his wont\nThe argument for why grad students shouldn’t publish\nGatekeepers controlling what’s being published \nEditors that Google authors before sending papers out for review\nJudging researchers on their institution’s location\nJames on networking \nHow do you challenge reviewers when they say you are \"too junior\"\nThe standards of Frontiers papers\nWriting review papers for the wrong reasons\nWhy are there so many meta-analyses?\nPre-registering your meta-analysis\nRegistered reports vs. pre-registration\nWhat’s expected of today’s postdocs\nHow many papers should you peer review?\nHow James tried to ward off review requests \nThings that millennials are ruining \nThe role of humour in the tone debate\n\n\nLinks\nEpisode video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj3WsTiUuLo&t=3s\n\nThe “should grad students publish\" article: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/08/23/renewed-debate-over-whether-graduate-students-should-publish#.WaGAeN_v8jI.link\n\nProspero meta-analysis registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/\n\nEiko Fried’s tweet on postdoc expectations: https://twitter.com/eikofried/status/902470702892290048\n\nJames’ publons profile: https://publons.com/author/1171358/james-aj-heathers#profile\n\nJANE: http://jane.biosemantics.org\n\nAnonymous PubPeer comments: https://pubpeer.com/publications/0E0DAEBEC6183646F18F4FAED03B1A#7","content_html":"Dan and James celebrate their 50th episode with a live recording! They cover a blog post that argues grad students shouldn’t be publishing, what’s expected of today’s postdocs, and the ‘tone’ debate in psychology.
\n\nBONUS: You can also watch the video of this episode on the Everything Hertz podcast channel (link below)
\n\nOther stuff they cover:
\n\nLinks
\nEpisode video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj3WsTiUuLo&t=3s
The “should grad students publish" article: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/08/23/renewed-debate-over-whether-graduate-students-should-publish#.WaGAeN_v8jI.link
\n\nProspero meta-analysis registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/
\n\nEiko Fried’s tweet on postdoc expectations: https://twitter.com/eikofried/status/902470702892290048
\n\nJames’ publons profile: https://publons.com/author/1171358/james-aj-heathers#profile
\n\nJANE: http://jane.biosemantics.org
\n\nAnonymous PubPeer comments: https://pubpeer.com/publications/0E0DAEBEC6183646F18F4FAED03B1A#7
","summary":"Dan and James celebrate their 50th episode with a live recording! They cover a blog post that argues grad students shouldn’t be publishing, what’s expected of today’s postdocs, and the ‘tone’ debate in psychology. You can also watch the video of this episode on the Everything Hertz YouTube channel (link in show notes)","date_published":"2017-09-14T16:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/116794c5-bf4a-4450-b9bc-d1e19ed8e913.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":71815500,"duration_in_seconds":5984}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/335690637","title":"49: War and p's","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/49","content_text":"In this episode Dan and James discuss a forthcoming paper that's causing a bit of a stir by proposing that biobehavioral scientists should use a 0.005 p-value statistical significance threshold instead of 0.05.\n\nStuff they cover:\n\n\nA summary of the paper and how they decided on 0.005.\nWhether raising the threshold the best way to improve reproducibility?\nIs 0.005 too stringent?\nWould this new threshold unfairly favour “super” labs? \nIf we keep shifting the number does any threshold really matter?\nDan and James’ first impressions of the paper\nA crash course on Mediterranean taxation systems\nWhat would a 0.005 threshold practically mean for researchers? \n\n\nLinks\nThe paper https://osf.io/mky9j/\nENIGMA consortium http://enigma.ini.usc.edu\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/","content_html":"In this episode Dan and James discuss a forthcoming paper that's causing a bit of a stir by proposing that biobehavioral scientists should use a 0.005 p-value statistical significance threshold instead of 0.05.
\n\nStuff they cover:
\n\nLinks
\nThe paper https://osf.io/mky9j/
\nENIGMA consortium http://enigma.ini.usc.edu
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
","summary":"Dan and James discuss a forthcoming paper that's causing a bit of a stir by proposing that biobehavioral scientists should use a 0.005 p-value statistical significance threshold instead of 0.05.","date_published":"2017-07-31T22:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b975600d-2fd4-4a85-b29f-c22e5fe0c9bb.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":40312548,"duration_in_seconds":3359}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/334138423","title":"48: Breaking up with the impact factor (with Jason Hoyt)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/48","content_text":"Dan and James are joined by Jason Hoyt, who is the CEO and co-founder of PeerJ, an open access journal for the biological and medical sciences.\n\nHere's some of what they cover:\n\n\nPeerJ’s model and how it got started\nWhat goes into running a journal\nImpact factors vs. low-cost publishing\nWhen the journal user experience is too good\nGetting a quick reviewer turnaround \nThe need scientists to change their practices (not publishers)\nPeerJ’s membership model\nGlamour journals \nFuture plans for PeerJ\nPredatory journals\nResearchers don’t want cheap journals, only impact factors\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nPeerJ: https://peerj.com\nThe Phoenix project: https://www.amazon.com/Phoenix-Project-DevOps-Helping-Business-ebook/dp/B00AZRBLHO\nThe Goal: https://www.amazon.com/Goal-Process-Ongoing-Improvement-ebook/dp/B002LHRM2O/ref=pd_sim_351_2?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=EMTE1M9W2XW5Q24X4GE8\n\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Jason Hoyt.","content_html":"Dan and James are joined by Jason Hoyt, who is the CEO and co-founder of PeerJ, an open access journal for the biological and medical sciences.
\n\nHere's some of what they cover:
\n\nLinks
\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
Special Guest: Jason Hoyt.
","summary":"Dan and James are joined by Jason Hoyt, who is the CEO and co-founder of PeerJ, an open access journal for the biological and medical sciences","date_published":"2017-07-21T07:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/581dcd2b-2081-4f04-be5a-3c75975799a9.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":38849775,"duration_in_seconds":3237}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/332056747","title":"47: Truth bombs from a methodological freedom fighter (with Anne Scheel)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/47","content_text":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Anne Scheel (LMU Munich) to discuss open science advocacy. \n\nHighlights:\n\n\nHow Anne became an open science advocate\nOpen science is better science\nMethodological terrorists/freedom fighters \nThe time Anne stood up after a conference keynote and asked a question\nAsking poor PhD students to pay for conference costs upfront and then reimbursing them 6 months later \nIs it worth if for early career researchers to push open science practices?\nHow to begin with implementing open science practices\nPower analysis should be normal practice, it shouldn’t be controversial \nAnne’s going to start a podcast\nThe 100%CI: A long copy blog with 4 writers \nThe benefits of preprints and blogging \nScience communication in English for non-native English speakers\nDoing stuff that interests you vs. stuff that’s meant to advance your career\n\n\nTwitter accounts of people/things we mentioned: \n@dalejbarr - 2:10\n@siminevazire - 2:45\n@lakens - 2:45\n@nicebread303 (Felix Schönbrodt)- 3:50\n@annaveer - 21:40\n@methodpodcast - 29:20\n@the100ci - 30:40\n@realscientists - 31:40\n@upulie - 31:55\n@fMRI_guy (Jens Foell) - 32:20\n@realsci_DE (Real scientists Germany) - 32:30\n@maltoesermalte, @_r_c_a, @dingding_peng (100% CI team) - 33:55\n@stuartJRitchie - 65:05\n\nLinks\n\n\nEarly Career Researchers and publishing practices: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1102/full (paywalled)\nPre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template” Paywalled link: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103116301925, Preprint link: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/4frms/\nThe CI 100%: http://www.the100.ci\n\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Anne Scheel.","content_html":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Anne Scheel (LMU Munich) to discuss open science advocacy.
\n\nHighlights:
\n\nTwitter accounts of people/things we mentioned:
\n@dalejbarr - 2:10
\n@siminevazire - 2:45
\n@lakens - 2:45
\n@nicebread303 (Felix Schönbrodt)- 3:50
\n@annaveer - 21:40
\n@methodpodcast - 29:20
\n@the100ci - 30:40
\n@realscientists - 31:40
\n@upulie - 31:55
\n@fMRI_guy (Jens Foell) - 32:20
\n@realsci_DE (Real scientists Germany) - 32:30
\n@maltoesermalte, @_r_c_a, @dingding_peng (100% CI team) - 33:55
\n@stuartJRitchie - 65:05
Links
\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
Special Guest: Anne Scheel.
","summary":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Anne Scheel (LMU Munich) to discuss open science advocacy","date_published":"2017-07-07T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/ea9e5210-b583-4e73-95aa-57cd496206b2.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49982512,"duration_in_seconds":4165}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/329621084","title":"46: Statistical literacy (with Andy Field)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/46","content_text":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Andy Field (University of Sussex), author of the “Discovering Statistics” textbook series, to chat about statistical literacy. \n\nHighlights:\n\n\nThe story behind Andy’s new book\nSPSS and Bayesian statistics\nAndy explains why he thinks the biggest problem in science is statistical illiteracy \nResearcher degrees of freedom and p-hacking\nThe story behind the the first version of ‘Discovering statistics’\nHow to improve your statistical literacy\nDoes peer review improve the statistics of papers\nResearchers will draw different conclusions on the same dataset\nThe American Statistical Association’s statement on p-values\nHow has the teaching of statistics for psychology degrees changed over the years\nAndy fact checks his own Wikipedia page\nAndy’s thoughts on Bayesian statistics and how he applied it in a recent paper\nThe peer review of new statistical methods\nAndy’s future textbook plans\nThe rudeness of mailing lists/discussion forums\nWhat is something academia or stats-related that Andy believes that others think is crazy? \nThe one book that Andy recommends that everyone should read\nWe learn the crossover in James and Andy’s taste in metal bands\n\n\nLinks\n\nAndy’s books: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/author/andy-field-0\nThe ‘PENIS of statistics’ lecture from Andy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oe3_DeLC2JE\nDaniel Lakens’ Coursera course: https://www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences\nThe American Statistical Association’s statement on p-values: http://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108\nThe refereeing decision paper: https://osf.io/gvm2z/\nR stan: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rstan/index.html\nStatistical rethinking book: https://www.crcpress.com/Statistical-Rethinking-A-Bayesian-Course-with-Examples-in-R-and-Stan/McElreath/p/book/9781482253443\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Andy Field.","content_html":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Andy Field (University of Sussex), author of the “Discovering Statistics” textbook series, to chat about statistical literacy.
\n\nHighlights:
\n\nLinks
\n\nAndy’s books: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/author/andy-field-0
\nThe ‘PENIS of statistics’ lecture from Andy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oe3_DeLC2JE
\nDaniel Lakens’ Coursera course: https://www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences
\nThe American Statistical Association’s statement on p-values: http://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
\nThe refereeing decision paper: https://osf.io/gvm2z/
\nR stan: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rstan/index.html
\nStatistical rethinking book: https://www.crcpress.com/Statistical-Rethinking-A-Bayesian-Course-with-Examples-in-R-and-Stan/McElreath/p/book/9781482253443
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
Special Guest: Andy Field.
","summary":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Andy Field (University of Sussex), author of the “Discovering Statistics” textbook series, to chat about statistical literacy","date_published":"2017-06-23T10:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/bbcec718-9708-49e6-8ef7-22c15da2bad9.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":57522916,"duration_in_seconds":4793}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/325695962","title":"45: Conferences and conspiracy theories","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/45","content_text":"It’s conference season so in this episode Dan and James discuss the ins and outs of scientific conferences. \n\nHere’s what they cover: \n\n\nResearch parasite award\nHow much do you save when you don’t run an fMRI study\nThey come up with an even better name than “Research parasite”\nCould the GOP weaponise the open science movement? \nConspiracy theories \nAttempts to slow down science by taking science out of context\nThe Black Goat Podcast \nThe conference backchannel\nContacting people at conferences\nSitting though seminars (and not falling asleep)\nTwitter conferences\nGood presentations vs. bad presentations\nStarting collaborations at conferences \nDo conference locations matter?\nPeriscoping conference presentations\n\n\nLinks\n\nThe research parasite award: http://researchparasite.com\nThe GOP and science reform https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/04/reproducibility-science-open-judoflip/521952/\nThe Crackpot index http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html\nThe Brain Twitter conference https://brain.tc\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/","content_html":"It’s conference season so in this episode Dan and James discuss the ins and outs of scientific conferences.
\n\nHere’s what they cover:
\n\nLinks
\n\nThe research parasite award: http://researchparasite.com
\nThe GOP and science reform https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/04/reproducibility-science-open-judoflip/521952/
\nThe Crackpot index http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html
\nThe Brain Twitter conference https://brain.tc
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
","summary":"It’s conference season so in this episode Dan and James discuss the ins and outs of scientific conferences","date_published":"2017-06-02T15:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b060c465-539f-499c-8606-03e36bee9656.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":44362896,"duration_in_seconds":3696}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/323415633","title":"44: Who’s afraid of the New Bad People? (with Nick Brown)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/44","content_text":"James and Dan are joined by Nick Brown (University of Groningen) to discuss how the New Bad People — also known as shameless little bullies, vigilantes, the self-appointed data police, angry nothings, scientific McCarthyites, second-stringers, whiners, the Stasi, destructo-critics, and wackaloons* — are trying to improve science\n\nHere’s what they cover \n\n\nPower imbalances in academia\nPublication bias\nEuphemisms for people who are publicly critical of science\nHow to go about questioning the scientific record\nPeer reviewed criticism vs. blog posts\nMaking meta-analysis easier\nData-recycling\nWell-being and genomics\nPopular science books and conflicts of interest\nThe ‘typical’ response to a Letter to an Editor\nWhat Dan and James do during the breaks\nWhy don’t people report descriptive statistics anymore?\nPriming studies \nScience in the media\nWhat Nick has changed his mind about\n\n\nLinks\nNick on Twitter - @sTeamTraen\nNick’s blog - http://steamtraen.blogspot.no\n\n\nThis list is from one of James’ blog posts https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/meet-the-new-bad-people-4922137949a1\n\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Nick Brown.","content_html":"James and Dan are joined by Nick Brown (University of Groningen) to discuss how the New Bad People — also known as shameless little bullies, vigilantes, the self-appointed data police, angry nothings, scientific McCarthyites, second-stringers, whiners, the Stasi, destructo-critics, and wackaloons* — are trying to improve science
\n\nHere’s what they cover
\n\nLinks
\nNick on Twitter - @sTeamTraen
\nNick’s blog - http://steamtraen.blogspot.no
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
Special Guest: Nick Brown.
","summary":"James and Dan are joined by Nick Brown (University of Groningen) to discuss how the New Bad People—also known as shameless little bullies, vigilantes, the self-appointed data police, angry nothings, scientific McCarthyites, second-stringers, whiners, the Stasi, destructo-critics, and wackaloons—are trying to improve science","date_published":"2017-05-19T18:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/391df644-cd0b-48b4-9245-7da858b494ca.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":49596553,"duration_in_seconds":4132}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/321067772","title":"43: Death, taxes, and publication bias in meta-analysis (with Daniel Lakens)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/43","content_text":"Daniel Lakens (Eindhoven University of Technology) joins James and Dan to talk meta-analysis. \n\nHere’s what they cover: \n\n\nDaniel’s opinion on the current state of meta-analysis\nThe benefit of reporting guidelines (even though hardly anyone actually follows them)\nHow fixing publication bias can fix science\nMeta-analysis before and after that Bem paper \nHow to correct for publication bias\nWhether meta-analyses are just published for the citations\nThe benefits of pre-registering meta-analysis\nHow we get people to share their data\nHow sharing data doesn’t just benefit others - it also helps you replicate your own analyses later\nSuccess is tied to funding, no matter how “cheap” your research is\nHow people can say “yes” to cumulative science, but “no” to sharing data\nResponding to mistakes\nHow to find errors in your own papers before submission\nWe ask Daniel: i) If he could should one slide to every introductory psychology lecture in the world, what would say?, ii) What has he changed his mind about in the last few years?, iii) The one book/paper he thinks everyone should read\nDaniel also gives James and Dan ideas for their 50th episode \n\n\nLinks\nDaniel on Twitter - @lakens\nDaniel’s course - www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences\nDaniel’s blog - daniellakens.blogspot.no\nDaniel’s recommended book - Understanding Psychology as a science https://he.palgrave.com/page/detail/?sf1=barcode&st1=9780230542303\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Daniel Lakens.","content_html":"Daniel Lakens (Eindhoven University of Technology) joins James and Dan to talk meta-analysis.
\n\nHere’s what they cover:
\n\nLinks
\nDaniel on Twitter - @lakens
\nDaniel’s course - www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences
\nDaniel’s blog - daniellakens.blogspot.no
\nDaniel’s recommended book - Understanding Psychology as a science https://he.palgrave.com/page/detail/?sf1=barcode&st1=9780230542303
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
Special Guest: Daniel Lakens.
","summary":"Daniel Lakens (Eindhoven University of Technology) joins James and Dan to talk meta-analysis","date_published":"2017-05-05T09:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/e5bf1750-891c-4f77-adfe-b48424cfa3f8.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":45129974,"duration_in_seconds":3760}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/318762756","title":"42: Some of my best friends are Bayesians (with Daniel Lakens)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/42","content_text":"Daniel Lakens (Eindhoven University of Technology) drops in to talk statistical inference with James and Dan. \n\nHere’s what they cover: \n\n\nHow did Daniel get into statistical inference?\nAre we overdoing the Frequentist vs. Bayes debate?\nWhat situations better suit Bayesian inference?\nThe over advertising of Bayesian inference \nStudy design is underrated \nThe limits of p-values\nWhy not report both p-values and Bayes factors?\nThe “perfect t-test” script and the difference between Student’s and Welch’s t-tests\nThe two-one sided test\nFrequentist and Bayesian approaches for stopping procedures \nWhy James and Dan started the podcast\nThe worst bits of advice that Daniel has heard about statistical inference\nDan discuss a new preprint on Bayes factors in psychiatry \nStatistical power \nExcel isn’t all bad…\nThe importance of accessible software\nWe ask Daniel about his research workflow - how does he get stuff done?\nUsing blog posts as a way of gauging interest in a topic\nChris Chambers’ new book: The seven deadly sins of psychology\nEven more names for methodological terrorists\n\n\nLinks\n\nDaniel on Twitter - @lakens\nDaniel’s course - https://www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences\nDaniel’s blog - http://daniellakens.blogspot.no\nTOSTER - http://daniellakens.blogspot.no/2016/12/tost-equivalence-testing-r-package.html\nDan’s preprint on Bayesian alternatives for psychiatry research - https://osf.io/sgpe9/\nUnderstanding the new statistics - https://www.amazon.com/Understanding-New-Statistics-Meta-Analysis-Multivariate/dp/041587968X\nDaniel’s effect size paper - http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863/full\nThe seven deadly sins of Psychology - http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10970.htmlSpecial Guest: Daniel Lakens.","content_html":"Daniel Lakens (Eindhoven University of Technology) drops in to talk statistical inference with James and Dan.
\n\nHere’s what they cover:
\n\nLinks
\n\nDaniel on Twitter - @lakens
\nDaniel’s course - https://www.coursera.org/learn/statistical-inferences
\nDaniel’s blog - http://daniellakens.blogspot.no
\nTOSTER - http://daniellakens.blogspot.no/2016/12/tost-equivalence-testing-r-package.html
\nDan’s preprint on Bayesian alternatives for psychiatry research - https://osf.io/sgpe9/
\nUnderstanding the new statistics - https://www.amazon.com/Understanding-New-Statistics-Meta-Analysis-Multivariate/dp/041587968X
\nDaniel’s effect size paper - http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863/full
\nThe seven deadly sins of Psychology - http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10970.html
Special Guest: Daniel Lakens.
","summary":"Daniel Lakens (Eindhoven University of Technology) drops in to talk statistical inference with James and Dan","date_published":"2017-04-21T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/2ca44b55-dfa1-4455-b3dc-12e6c32f29e2.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48277247,"duration_in_seconds":4023}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/316584965","title":"41: Objecting to published research (with William Gunn)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/41","content_text":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by William Gunn (Director of Scholarly communications at Elsevier) to discuss ways in which you can object to published research.\n\nThey also cover:\n\n\nWhat differentiates an analytics company from a publishing company?\nHow scientific journals are one of the last areas to fully adopt the dynamic nature of the internet\nData repositories \nHow to make a correction in a journal\nThe benefits of Registered Reports\nWhen everyone asked Elsevier for a journal of negative results but no one submitted to them\nHow unit of publication isn’t really indicative of science as a process\nAltmetrics and gaming the system\nHow to appeal to a journal about a paper\nCitation cartels: the dumbest crime\nWilliam’s switch from research to publishing and his shift in perspective \nThe crackpot index\nJames’ flowchart on how to contact an editor\nThe copyediting process\nElsevier’s approach to open peer review: should junior researchers be worried?\nThe one thing William thinks that everyone else thinks is crazy\nWilliam’s most worthwhile career investment \nThe one paper that William thinks everyone should read\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nWilliams’s twitter account: @mrgunn \nWilliams’s blog: http://synthesis.williamgunn.org\nThe Crackpot index: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html\nThe paper William thinks everyone should read: http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/8/341/341ps12.full\nSpecial Guest: William Gunn.","content_html":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by William Gunn (Director of Scholarly communications at Elsevier) to discuss ways in which you can object to published research.
\n\nThey also cover:
\n\nLinks
\n\nSpecial Guest: William Gunn.
","summary":"In this episode, Dan and James are joined by William Gunn (Director of Scholarly communications at Elsevier) to discuss ways in which you can object to published research","date_published":"2017-04-07T18:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/ea285b89-7f83-49fc-99bb-3fdd5d36e648.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":48327004,"duration_in_seconds":4027}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/314212506","title":"40: Meta-research (with Michèle Nuijten)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/40","content_text":"Dan and James are joined by Michèle Nuijten (Tilburg University) to discuss 'statcheck', an algorithm that automatically scans papers for statistical tests, recomputes p-values, and flags inconsistencies.\n\nThey also cover:\n\n\nHow Michèle dealt with statcheck criticisms\nPsychological Science’s pilot of statcheck for journal submissions\nDetecting data fraud\nWhen should a journal issue a correction?\nFuture plans for statcheck\nThe one thing Michèle thinks that everyone else thinks is crazy\nMichèle's most worthwhile career investment \nThe one paper that Michèle thinks everyone should read\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nMichèle's website: https://mbnuijten.com\nMichèle's twitter account: https://twitter.com/michelenuijten\nStatcheck: https://statcheck.io\nTilberg University meta-research center: http://metaresearch.nl\nGuardian story on detecting science fraud: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/feb/01/high-tech-war-on-science\nThe paper Michèle thinks everyone should read: http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/DPlab/papers/publishedPapers/Simmons_2011_False-Positive%20Psychology.pdf\nEverything Hertz on Twitter: https://twitter.com/hertzpodcast\nEverything Hertz on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast\nThe startup scientist, Dan's other podcast on boosting your scientific career: https://soundcloud.com/startup-scientist-podcast\nSpecial Guest: Michèle Nuijten.","content_html":"Dan and James are joined by Michèle Nuijten (Tilburg University) to discuss 'statcheck', an algorithm that automatically scans papers for statistical tests, recomputes p-values, and flags inconsistencies.
\n\nThey also cover:
\n\nLinks
\n\nSpecial Guest: Michèle Nuijten.
","summary":"Dan and James are joined by Michèle Nuijten (Tilburg University) to discuss 'statcheck', an algorithm that automatically scans papers for statistical tests, recomputes p-values, and flags inconsistencies","date_published":"2017-03-24T06:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/8d61acf5-0da5-4ffd-afa8-31730880d4a6.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":35502760,"duration_in_seconds":2958}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/311663363","title":"39: Academic hipsters","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/39","content_text":"We all know hipsters. You know, like the guy that rides his Penny-farthing to the local cafe to write his memoirs on a typewriter - just because its more ‘authentic’. In this episode, James and Dan discuss academic hipsters. These are people who insist you need to use specific tools in your science like R, python, and LaTeX. So should you start using these trendy tools despite the steep learning curve?\n\nOther stuff they cover:\n\n\nWhy James finally jumped onto Twitter\nA new segment: 2-minutes hate \nThe senior academic that blamed an uncredited co-author for data anomalies \nAn infographic ranking science journalism quality that’s mostly wrong\nWhen to learn new tools, and when to stick with what you know\nAuthorea as a good example of a compromise between \"easy\" and \"reproducible\"\n\n\nLinks\n\nThe science journalism infographic \n\nhttp://www.nature.com/news/science-journalism-can-be-evidence-based-compelling-and-wrong-1.21591\n\nFacebook page\n\nwww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nwww.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/","content_html":"We all know hipsters. You know, like the guy that rides his Penny-farthing to the local cafe to write his memoirs on a typewriter - just because its more ‘authentic’. In this episode, James and Dan discuss academic hipsters. These are people who insist you need to use specific tools in your science like R, python, and LaTeX. So should you start using these trendy tools despite the steep learning curve?
\n\nOther stuff they cover:
\n\nLinks
\n\nThe science journalism infographic
\n\nhttp://www.nature.com/news/science-journalism-can-be-evidence-based-compelling-and-wrong-1.21591
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nwww.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\n\n\nMusic credits: Lee Rosevere http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/
","summary":"In this episode, James and Dan discuss academic hipsters. These are people who *insist* you need to use specific tools in your science like R, python, and LaTeX. So should you start using these trendy tools despite the steep learning curve?","date_published":"2017-03-10T09:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/084a6fd2-da17-4773-bfc8-dc5765928f06.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":39478289,"duration_in_seconds":3289}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/309312464","title":"38: Work/life balance - Part 2","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/38","content_text":"Dan and James continue their discussion on work/life balance in academia. They also suggest ways to get your work done within a sane amount of hours as well as how to pick the right lab. \n\nSome of the topics covered:\n\n\nFeedback from our last episode\nWhy the podcast started in the first place\nThe \"Red Queen\" problem\nDoes the \"70 hour lab\" produce better work?\nSome experiments aren't suited to a 9-5 schedule\nMore tips for anonomusly skiving off at work\nWhat are cognitive limits off focused work? \nDo early career researchers even earn the minimum wage when you factor in the hours worked? \nHow James gets things done: Work on one thing at a time until it's done and protect your time\nHow Dan gets things done: Pomodoros (40 mins work, 10 minute break), blocking social/news websites\nHow do pick a lab to work in?\n\n\nLinks\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"Dan and James continue their discussion on work/life balance in academia. They also suggest ways to get your work done within a sane amount of hours as well as how to pick the right lab.
\n\nSome of the topics covered:
\n\nLinks
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Dan and James continue their discussion on work/life balance in academia. They also suggest ways to get your work done within a sane amount of hours as well as how to pick the right lab","date_published":"2017-02-24T10:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/718e2fc0-d995-46b5-9bee-8b6738e46d72.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":44649704,"duration_in_seconds":3720}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/308182842","title":"37: Work/life balance in academia","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/37","content_text":"In this episode, we talk work/life balance for early career researchers. Do you need to work a 70-hour week to be a successful scientist or can you actually have a life outside the lab?\n\nSome of the topics covered:\n\n\nAn update on \"the postdoc that didn't say no\" story\nBrian Wansink's response\nDe-identifying data in research\nThe perils of public criticism\nCriticising the research vs. criticising the person\nSome sage advice from a senior academic on \"Making science the centre of your life\" \nLook for a boss that won't make insane demands of your time\nHow much good work is really coming out of a 70-hour week?\nAn old hack Dan used to do to pretend he was working on data when he was really just on twitter\n\n\nLinks\n\nGRIM test calculator\n\nhttp://www.prepubmed.org/grim_test/\n\nJordan's follow-up post\n\nhttps://medium.com/@OmnesRes/the-donald-trump-of-food-research-49e2bc7daa41#.me8e97z51\n\nBrian Wansink's response\n\nhttp://www.brianwansink.com/phd-advice/statistical-heartburn-and-long-term-lessons\n\nThe \"Making science the centre of your life\" slide\n\nhttps://twitter.com/hertzpodcast/status/832501121893724160\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"In this episode, we talk work/life balance for early career researchers. Do you need to work a 70-hour week to be a successful scientist or can you actually have a life outside the lab?
\n\nSome of the topics covered:
\n\nLinks
\n\nGRIM test calculator
\n\nhttp://www.prepubmed.org/grim_test/
\n\nJordan's follow-up post
\n\nhttps://medium.com/@OmnesRes/the-donald-trump-of-food-research-49e2bc7daa41#.me8e97z51
\n\nBrian Wansink's response
\n\nhttp://www.brianwansink.com/phd-advice/statistical-heartburn-and-long-term-lessons
\n\nThe "Making science the centre of your life" slide
\n\nhttps://twitter.com/hertzpodcast/status/832501121893724160
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"In this episode, we talk work/life balance for early career researchers. Do you need to work a 70-hour week to be a successful scientist or can you actually have a life outside the lab?","date_published":"2017-02-17T10:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/488c3f72-8d7e-454f-aa4b-ad9ea9a95f7f.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":40689967,"duration_in_seconds":3390}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/304826743","title":"36: Statistical inconsistencies in published research","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/36","content_text":"In episode 34 we covered a blog post that highlighted questionable analytical approaches in psychology. That post mentioned four studies that resulted from this approach, which a team of researchers took a closer look into. Dan and James discuss the statistical inconsistencies that the authors reported in a recent preprint.\n\nSome of the topics covered:\n\n\nTrump (of course)\nA summary of the preprint\nThe GRIM test to detect inconsistencies\nThe researchers that accidently administered the equivalent of 300 cups of coffee to study participants\nHow do we prevent inconsistent reporting?\n21 word solution for research transparency \nJournals mandating statistical inconsistency checks, such as 'statcheck'\n\n\nLinks\n\nThe pre-print\nhttps://peerj.com/preprints/2748/\n\n'The grad student that didn't say no' blog post\nhttp://www.brianwansink.com/phd-advice/the-grad-student-who-never-said-no\n\nThe caffeine study\nhttp://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-tyne-38744307\n\nTobacco and Alcohol Research Group lab handbook (see page 6 for open science practices)\nhttp://www.bris.ac.uk/media-library/sites/expsych/documents/targ/TARG%20Handbook%20161128.pdf\n\n21 word solution\nhttp://spsp.org/sites/default/files/dialogue_26(2).pdf\n\nFacebook page\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"In episode 34 we covered a blog post that highlighted questionable analytical approaches in psychology. That post mentioned four studies that resulted from this approach, which a team of researchers took a closer look into. Dan and James discuss the statistical inconsistencies that the authors reported in a recent preprint.
\n\nSome of the topics covered:
\n\nLinks
\n\nThe pre-print
\nhttps://peerj.com/preprints/2748/
'The grad student that didn't say no' blog post
\nhttp://www.brianwansink.com/phd-advice/the-grad-student-who-never-said-no
The caffeine study
\nhttp://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-tyne-38744307
Tobacco and Alcohol Research Group lab handbook (see page 6 for open science practices)
\nhttp://www.bris.ac.uk/media-library/sites/expsych/documents/targ/TARG%20Handbook%20161128.pdf
21 word solution
\nhttp://spsp.org/sites/default/files/dialogue_26(2).pdf
Facebook page
\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
Twitter account
\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
Dan and James discuss a new paper in the inaugural issue of Nature Human Behaviour, "A manifesto for reproducible science".
\n\nSome of the topics covered:
\n\nLinks
\n\nThe paper
\nhttp://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-016-0021
Our paper on reporting standards in heart rate variability
\nhttp://www.nature.com/tp/journal/v6/n5/full/tp201673a.html
Equator guidelines
\nhttp://www.equator-network.org
Facebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Dan and James discuss a new paper in the inaugural issue of Nature Human Behaviour, \"A manifesto for reproducible science\"","date_published":"2017-01-20T14:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/996e1418-8de7-46e4-9b41-4c26ac61820a.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":36494253,"duration_in_seconds":3041}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/299142048","title":"34: E-health (with Robin Kok)","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/34","content_text":"Dan and James have their very first guest! For this episode they're joined by Robin Kok (University of Southern Denmark) to talk e-health. They also cover a recent blog post that inadvertently highlighted questionable research practices in psychology.\n\nSome of the topics covered:\n\n\nThe grad student who never said no\nPostdoc work/life balance\nQuestionable research practices\nTorturing data (with rattan sticks)\nUsing the GRIM test to assess data accuracy\nUnpaid internships\nSaying 'yes' to opportunities that come your way\nThe Myers-Briggs test is rubbish\nWhat is e-health?\nAre e-health interventions efficacious?\ne-health intervention implementation issues\nThe poor quality of psych intervention smartphone apps\nUsing \"Facebook Live\" to broadcast conference presentations\nThe future of e-health\n\n\n\n\nLinks\n\nRobin's twitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/robinnkok\n\n\n\"The grad student who never said no\" blog post\n\n\nhttp://www.brianwansink.com/phd-types-only/the-grad-student-who-never-said-no\n\n\nThe Buzzfeed quiz on 'Which Disney princess are you?' (James is Belle)\n\n\nhttps://www.buzzfeed.com/mccarricksean/which-disney-princes-are-you?utm_term=.riNJn5DbW#.ci9gL3Xq8\n\n\nXKXD TornadoGuard comic\n\n\nhttps://xkcd.com/937/ \n\n\nThe efficacy of e-health interventions\n\n\nhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wps.20151/abstract\n\n\nWild West eHealth: Time to Hold our Horses? \n\n\nwww.ehps.net/ehp/index.php/contents/article/download/765/pdf_44\n\n\nSmartphone app interventions\n\n\nhttp://www.jmir.org/2013/11/e247/\n\n\nFacebook page\n\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\n\nTwitter account\n\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcastSpecial Guest: Robin Kok.","content_html":"Dan and James have their very first guest! For this episode they're joined by Robin Kok (University of Southern Denmark) to talk e-health. They also cover a recent blog post that inadvertently highlighted questionable research practices in psychology.
\n\nSome of the topics covered:
\n\nLinks
\n\nRobin's twitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/robinnkok
\n\nhttp://www.brianwansink.com/phd-types-only/the-grad-student-who-never-said-no
\n\nhttps://www.buzzfeed.com/mccarricksean/which-disney-princes-are-you?utm_term=.riNJn5DbW#.ci9gL3Xq8
\n\nhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wps.20151/abstract
\n\nwww.ehps.net/ehp/index.php/contents/article/download/765/pdf_44
\n\nhttp://www.jmir.org/2013/11/e247/
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
Special Guest: Robin Kok.
","summary":"Dan and James have their very first guest! For this episode they're joined by Robin Kok (University of Southern Denmark) to talk e-health. They also cover a recent blog post that inadvertently highlighted questionable research practices in psychology.","date_published":"2016-12-22T14:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/55859e8a-c3c3-4825-b7cf-90b387fc2dc1.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":43335904,"duration_in_seconds":3611}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/298180600","title":"33: Zombie theories","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/33","content_text":"Dan and James discuss Zombie theories, which are scientific ideas that continue to live on in the absence of evidence. Why do these ideas persist and how do we kill them for good?\n\nSome of the topics covered:\n\n\nWhy do some ideas live on?\nZombie theories in heart rate variability research\nReasons why zombie theories proliferate more in the social sciences\nAttractiveness and simplicity\nTheories become brands\nOxytocin zombie theories \nThe power of shaming\nIdeas are corrected more quickly in smaller fields \nJames' new interest in Cow ECG\nPeople using science as a weapon to open up hip pockets\nHow do we kill these zombies for good?\nManual vs. automated PubMed comments\nWhat's the impact of paper retraction on future citations?\nHow do you correct the scientific record?\n\n\nLinks\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"Dan and James discuss Zombie theories, which are scientific ideas that continue to live on in the absence of evidence. Why do these ideas persist and how do we kill them for good?
\n\nSome of the topics covered:
\n\nLinks
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Dan and James discuss Zombie theories, which are scientific ideas that continue to live on in the absence of evidence. Why do these ideas persist and how do we kill them for good?","date_published":"2016-12-16T09:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/19178509-1447-43de-9f13-3d38b2c1c0b7.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":31598361,"duration_in_seconds":2633}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/295682869","title":"32: Can worrying about getting sick make you sicker?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/32","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a new population study that linked health anxiety data with future heart disease. \n\nSome of the topics covered:\n\n\nWeb MD and health anxiety\nHow would healthy anxiety contribute to heart disease?\nA summary of the study\nIschemic heart disease = coronary artery disease\nDo people with healthy anxiety take better care of thier health?\nDon't be fooled by percentage increase of risk for something that's rare\nThere are some things you can't just randomize\nThe pros and cons of big data collection \n\n\nLinks\n\nThe paper\n\nhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/11/e012914.full\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"Dan and James discuss a new population study that linked health anxiety data with future heart disease.
\n\nSome of the topics covered:
\n\nLinks
\n\nThe paper
\n\nhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/11/e012914.full
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Dan and James discuss a new population study that linked health anxiety data with future heart disease","date_published":"2016-12-01T10:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/aec9be55-7b1c-4f85-a749-c9a64e3a42fd.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":31058326,"duration_in_seconds":2588}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/293360515","title":"31: Discover your psychiatric risk with this one weird trick","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/31","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a recent study of over one million Swedish men that found that higher resting heart rate late adolescence was associated with an increased risk for subsequent psychiatric illness. \n\nSome of the topics covered:\n\n\nHow did these authors get such an enormous dataset?\nThe benefits of testing so many people\nWhat we liked about the study (hint: lots of things)\nMeasuring cardiovascular efficiency using a cycle ergometer\nThe pitfalls of self-reported physical activity \nHow the media covered this study\nContextual factors - does the testing environment induce anxiety?\nCo-morbidity in psychiatry\nWhat would James do with 200,000 ECGs strips?\n\n\nLinks\n\nThe paper\n\nhttp://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/2569454 \n\nThe Daily Mail story\n\nhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3875062/Why-heartbeat-teenager-affect-later-life-Boys-high-blood-pressure-risk-mental-health-problems-adults.html?linkId=30382089\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com","content_html":"Dan and James discuss a recent study of over one million Swedish men that found that higher resting heart rate late adolescence was associated with an increased risk for subsequent psychiatric illness.
\n\nSome of the topics covered:
\n\nLinks
\n\nThe paper
\n\nhttp://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/2569454
\n\nThe Daily Mail story
\n\n\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\n","summary":"Dan and James discuss a recent study of over one million Swedish men that found that higher resting heart rate late adolescence was associated with an increased risk for subsequent psychiatric illness","date_published":"2016-11-16T21:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/c1d8bd1d-d19c-45b1-9316-16d3b41d6293.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":39556888,"duration_in_seconds":3296}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/291133430","title":"30: Authorship","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/30","content_text":"Dan and James discuss authorship in the biomedical sciences","content_html":"Dan and James discuss authorship in the biomedical sciences
","summary":"Dan and James discuss authorship in the biomedical sciences","date_published":"2016-11-02T16:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b8ea65f5-83f4-46be-84fb-22fc413d88e8.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":35345712,"duration_in_seconds":2945}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/288298289","title":"29: Learning new skills","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/29","content_text":"Dan and James talk about how they learn new things.\n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nInternet memes\nConsolidating old ideas rather than learning new ones\nWhy learn a new skill when you just get someone else to do it?\nA lesson of not having a good understanding statistical software...\nJames and Dan butt heads about meta-analysis (again)\nLearning new things is interesting\nHow did people learn things before the internet?\nHow to follow things on Twitter without being on Twitter\n\n\nLinks\n\nBayes factor paper with 'primer' paper matrix\n\n\nhttps://alexanderetz.com/2016/02/07/understanding-bayes-how-to-become-a-bayesian-in-eight-easy-steps/\n\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"Dan and James talk about how they learn new things.
\n\nSome of the topics discussed:
\n\nLinks
\n\nBayes factor paper with 'primer' paper matrix
\n\n\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Dan and James talk about how they learn new things","date_published":"2016-10-16T14:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5e289d31-04df-4993-9117-6f59c26b8945.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":35228142,"duration_in_seconds":2935}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/285440467","title":"28: Positive developments in biomedical science","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/28","content_text":"Pre-registration, p-hacking, power, protocols. All these concepts are pretty mainstream in 2016 but hardly discussed 5 years ago. In this episode, James and Dan talk about these ideas and other developments in biomedical science. \n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nJames loves blinded reviews, scihub\nDan loves protocols, learning stats through social media, reproducible science \n\n\nLinks\n\nThe COMPARE initiative \n\n\nhttp://compare-trials.org\n\n\n\"Give me the F-ing PDF\" Chrome extension\n\n\nhttps://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/give-me-the-f-ing-pdf/iekjpaipocoglamgpjoehfdemffdmami/related\n\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"Pre-registration, p-hacking, power, protocols. All these concepts are pretty mainstream in 2016 but hardly discussed 5 years ago. In this episode, James and Dan talk about these ideas and other developments in biomedical science.
\n\nSome of the topics discussed:
\n\nLinks
\n\nThe COMPARE initiative
\n\n\n\n"Give me the F-ing PDF" Chrome extension
\n\n\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Pre-registration, p-hacking, power, protocols. All these concepts are pretty mainstream in 2016 but hardly discussed 5 years ago. In this episode, James and Dan talk about these ideas and other developments in biomedical science.","date_published":"2016-09-30T18:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/9b217cea-c2d1-429b-9d95-bc84f256f498.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":35337994,"duration_in_seconds":2944}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/284250939","title":"27: Complaints and grievances","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/27","content_text":"Dan and James discuss complaints and grievances. Stay tuned for part 2 where things get positive. \n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nConflicts of interest \nCriticism in psychology\nWhy does there seem to be so much bad blood in psychology?\nRetracted papers: fraud or sloppiness? \nAuthors not acknowledging your peer-review remarks\nThe short-term nature of research \nThe benefits of 'centers of excellence' \n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe 'vibe of the thing' scene from 'The Castle' (Great Aussie film)\n\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJuXIq7OazQ\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com","content_html":"Dan and James discuss complaints and grievances. Stay tuned for part 2 where things get positive.
\n\nSome of the topics discussed:
\n\nLinks
\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJuXIq7OazQ
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\n","summary":"Dan and James discuss complaints and grievances. Stay tuned for part 2 (next episode) where things get positive.","date_published":"2016-09-23T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/004563e9-4a9e-4969-89db-473e0acb8e5d.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":37985992,"duration_in_seconds":3165}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/282165920","title":"26: Interpreting effect sizes","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/26","content_text":"When interpreting the magnitude of group differences using effect sizes, researchers often rely on Cohen's guidelines for small, medium, and large effects. However, Cohen originally proposed these guidelines as a fall back when the distribution of effect sizes was unknown. Despite the hundreds of available studies comparing heart rate variability (HRV), Cohen's guidelines are still used for interpretation. In this episode, Dan discusses his recent preprint describing an effect size distribution analysis on HRV studies. \n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nA summary of Dan's preprint\nWhat is an effect size?\nWhat can an effect size distribution tell us?\nHow effect sizes can inform study planning\nHow close are Cohen's guidelines to the distribution of HRV effect sizes? \nWhat samples sizes are appropriate?\nPre-publication review vs. post-publication review\nStatcheck \n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe preprint article \n\n\nhttp://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/08/31/072660\n\n\nStatcheck\n\n\nhttps://mbnuijten.com/statcheck/\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com","content_html":"When interpreting the magnitude of group differences using effect sizes, researchers often rely on Cohen's guidelines for small, medium, and large effects. However, Cohen originally proposed these guidelines as a fall back when the distribution of effect sizes was unknown. Despite the hundreds of available studies comparing heart rate variability (HRV), Cohen's guidelines are still used for interpretation. In this episode, Dan discusses his recent preprint describing an effect size distribution analysis on HRV studies.
\n\nSome of the topics discussed:
\n\nLinks
\n\nhttp://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/08/31/072660
\n\nhttps://mbnuijten.com/statcheck/
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\n","summary":"Dan and James discuss Dan's recent preprint describing an effect size distribution analysis on HRV studies.","date_published":"2016-09-09T21:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/0c2a415f-3ab3-4923-9dba-503c8f9ca076.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":32782694,"duration_in_seconds":2731}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/280151434","title":"25: Misunderstanding p-values","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/25","content_text":"P-values are universal, but do we really know what they mean? In this episode, Dan and James discuss a recent paper describing the failure to correctly interpret p-values in a sample of academic psychologists. \n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nCommon p-value misconceptions\nJames tests Dan on his p-value knowledge\np-values vs. effect size\nThe problem of sample size with p-value interpretation\nThe Facebook mood manipulation study\nData peeking\nEquivalent p-values do not represent equivalent results\nMeta-analytical thinking \nUsing significance as a categorical factor\nStatistical vs. clinical significance \nClinical trial registration and 'secondary outcome creep'\nDan and James answer listener questions\nScience communicator vs. scientist\nGrant titles and the 'Pub test'\nNASA and social media \n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe article \n\n\nhttp://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01247/full\n\n\nGeoff Cumming's book (we got the name completely wrong - sorry Geoff!)\n\n\nhttp://www.amazon.com/Understanding-The-New-Statistics-Meta-Analysis-ebook/dp/B007M9D76G/ref=pd_sim_kstore_1?ie=UTF8&refRID=1QWKES82EP85DBAEKNT1\n\nThe story on research passing the 'pub' test\n\nhttps://theconversation.com/if-youre-going-to-ridicule-research-do-your-homework-64238\n\nReal scientists\n\nhttp://realscientists.org\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com","content_html":"P-values are universal, but do we really know what they mean? In this episode, Dan and James discuss a recent paper describing the failure to correctly interpret p-values in a sample of academic psychologists.
\n\nSome of the topics discussed:
\n\nLinks
\n\nhttp://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01247/full
\n\nThe story on research passing the 'pub' test
\n\nhttps://theconversation.com/if-youre-going-to-ridicule-research-do-your-homework-64238
\n\nReal scientists
\n\n\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\n","summary":"P-values are universal, but do we really know what they mean? In this episode, Dan and James discuss a recent paper describing the failure to correctly interpret p-values in a sample of academic psychologists. ","date_published":"2016-08-27T14:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/e959cb74-f7f5-411f-9464-56439cb09fba.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":39626449,"duration_in_seconds":3302}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/278681709","title":"24: Incentive structures in science","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/24","content_text":"Science funding has a series of built in incentive structures, but what sort of science does this produce?\n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nFeedback from our 'Public health and Pokemon' episode (#22)\nIncentive structures in science\nWhat we should be doing in science compared to what we are doing\nQuantity vs. Quality\nThe analysis of Trump's tweets for negativity vs. positivity\nPre-registration\nHow much detail do you need to go into when it comes to pre-registering an analysis\nAPS journal badges - they're working!\nData sharing makes you more careful with your data\nSolutions to the incentive problem have to come from the policy level\nThe grant funding lottery system proposal\nThe PhD oversupply\nGaming the system\nJames wants to mandate science communication\nDan wants to include replication studies in PhD programs\nScientist names that suit their research area\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe article on incentive structures\n\n\nhttps://medium.com/the-spike/how-a-happy-moment-for-neuroscience-is-a-sad-moment-for-science-c4ba00336e9c#.x3sea13i1\n\n\nThe Allen brain atlas\n\n\nhttp://observatory.brain-map.org\n\n\nAnalysis of Trump's tweets\n\n\nhttp://varianceexplained.org/r/trump-tweets/\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"Science funding has a series of built in incentive structures, but what sort of science does this produce?
\n\nSome of the topics discussed:
\n\nLinks
\n\nhttp://observatory.brain-map.org
\n\nhttp://varianceexplained.org/r/trump-tweets/
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Science funding has a series of built in incentive structures, but what sort of science does this produce?","date_published":"2016-08-17T20:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/adfd4145-2aa2-4578-a7d9-9b678e89d28b.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":43449438,"duration_in_seconds":3620}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/277845576","title":"23: Serious academics","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/23","content_text":"Can you be a \"serious academic\" while still posting photos on Instagram? In this episode, James and Dan discuss a recent article bemoaning the infiltration of the \"selfie epidemic\" into academia.\n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nJames and Dan share their thoughts on the article\nThe REAL 'c' word....\nSocial media and conferences\nSnapchat + academics = snapademics\nUsing Instagram stories to share you research\nWhy \"PHD comics\" is so successful\nCriticism in academia\nListener question 1: What's your favourite part of research?\nListener question 2: What's your favourite technique or experiment to perform?\nListener question 3: What's a funny story from being an academic?\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe article\n\n\nhttps://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2016/aug/05/im-a-serious-academic-not-a-professional-instagrammer\n\n\nA response to the article\n\n\nhttps://www.theguardian.com/science/brain-flapping/2016/aug/05/im-a-non-serious-academic-i-make-no-apologies-for-this\n\n\nSnapademics\n\n\nhttps://twitter.com/snapademia\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"Can you be a "serious academic" while still posting photos on Instagram? In this episode, James and Dan discuss a recent article bemoaning the infiltration of the "selfie epidemic" into academia.
\n\nSome of the topics discussed:
\n\nLinks
\n\nhttps://twitter.com/snapademia
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Can you be a \"serious academic\" while still posting photos on Instagram? In this episode, James and Dan discuss a recent article bemoaning the infiltration of the \"selfie epidemic\" into academia.","date_published":"2016-08-11T20:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/578699ad-eed4-499e-af63-ef864785bb34.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":37931452,"duration_in_seconds":3160}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/276689374","title":"22: Pokemon and public health","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/22","content_text":"Pokemon Go is sweeping the world and getting people walking again! But is the Pokemon Go 'model' a golden opportunity to tackle obesity or just another fad?\n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nJames plays \"Pokemon or Cholesterol medication?\" \nDan tries to explain Pokemon Go to James\nJames' first contact with Pokemon Go \"trainers\"\nShould health interventions be modeled on Pokemon Go?\nOther exercise augmented reality health apps\nWhat's the app's endgame? \nCan health authorities copy this model?\nWe make a correction from episode 17: PLoS is in fact a non-profit journal, not a for-profit journal\nDan and James answer two listener questions: i) The dumbest things they've ever done in the lab (both related to email faux pas) ii) How often should lab meetings be run\nThe importance of PROPERLY piloting your experiment\nIf you don't know the person in the meeting that takes up too much time, it's probably you.\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe quiz\n\n\nhttp://www.slate.com/articles/technology/gaming/2016/07/pokemon_or_cholesterol_medication_a_quiz.html\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"Pokemon Go is sweeping the world and getting people walking again! But is the Pokemon Go 'model' a golden opportunity to tackle obesity or just another fad?
\n\nSome of the topics discussed:
\n\nLinks
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Pokemon Go is sweeping the world and getting people walking again! But is the Pokemon Go 'model' a golden opportunity to tackle obesity or just another fad?","date_published":"2016-08-03T21:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/1c80edd1-91d6-4655-b9cd-0636885c1028.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":42662191,"duration_in_seconds":3555}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/274854907","title":"21: This is your brain on steroids","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/21","content_text":"It's well established that steroid use is associated with many adverse healthy outcomes, but what does it actually do to your brain? \n\nDan and James discuss an interesting new paper that compared brain structure in long-term steroid users and non-using weightlifters.\n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nA summary of the study\nHow are steroids typically used?\nWhat are the differences in use between sports?\nThe recruitment of 'real' users\nJames gives Dan a surprise Norwegian test (he doesn't do too well)\nThe things Dan and James liked about the study (hint: many things)\nSteroid use in women\nDose-dependent effects of steroids\nFolk beliefs surrounding steroid use\nJames' goal of making his cat as jacked as possible\nIf you have a great study, there's no need to oversell\nJames' experience of participating in a growth hormone trial \n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper \n\n\nhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000632231632529X\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"It's well established that steroid use is associated with many adverse healthy outcomes, but what does it actually do to your brain?
\n\nDan and James discuss an interesting new paper that compared brain structure in long-term steroid users and non-using weightlifters.
\n\nSome of the topics discussed:
\n\nLinks
\n\nhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000632231632529X
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Dan and James discuss a new paper that compared brain structure in long-term steroid users and non-using weightlifters","date_published":"2016-07-22T15:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/42a08963-3a58-4315-b7b1-96813207d9e3.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":41966147,"duration_in_seconds":3497}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/273462747","title":"20: Sample sizes in psychology studies","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/20","content_text":"Can psychologists learn more by studying fewer people?\n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nBrexit and science \nCan the UK take the 'Norway' option?\nHorizon 2020\nThe impact on personnel and research training\nItalian coffee\nListener feedback \nWe're sorry for the chewing sound from episode 17!\nIntraindividual replication vs. larger sample sizes\nWhat sort of experiments are better suited to detailed within-subject studies?\nIs 'quantified self' data more valid than experimental data?\nWhat if you happen to recruit a 'weird' person?\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper \n\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911349/\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"Can psychologists learn more by studying fewer people?
\n\nSome of the topics discussed:
\n\nLinks
\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911349/
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Can psychologists learn more by studying fewer people?","date_published":"2016-07-13T13:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/03b36687-fcc0-4611-a85a-892591598144.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":44636971,"duration_in_seconds":3719}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/272424565","title":"19: Let us spray: oxytocin and spirituality","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/19","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper on intranasal oxytocin and spirituality \n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nA summary of a recent paper on oxytocin and spirituality \nWhy within-subject designs are a better choice for oxytocin research\nThe physiology of nasal administration \nHow do you control for differences in nasal environment\nHypothesis-driven vs. exploratory research\nOxytocin pathway gene\nANCOVA and Lord's paradox (yep, it's called that)\nDan applauding the authors for posting ALL their data online \nJames disagrees with Dan on approaches to pre-registering studies\nJames promises never to chew during a recording (sorry!)\nProducing research vs. actually reading other people's research\nOur first citation (sort of)\nHow the replication crisis is the fact that we're not doing any\nHeart rate variability in oysters (and other animals)\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper \n\n\nhttp://scan.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/06/22/scan.nsw078\n\n\nDan's blog post on intranasal oxytocin administration considerations\n\n\nhttps://medium.com/@dsquintana/intranasal-drug-administration-in-psychiatry-80d076f1abdd#.dsdrrohdu\n\n\nDan's paper on the promise and pitfalls of intranasal administration \n\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26552590\n\n\nThe data from the paper\n\n\nhttps://osf.io/mjhzw/\n\n\nOur first (blog post) citation\n\n\nhttps://rhythmicpsychology.wordpress.com/2016/06/22/shock-shock-horror-horror/\n\n\nCan we replicate the replication crisis?\n\n\nhttps://theconversation.com/is-psychology-really-in-crisis-60869\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper on intranasal oxytocin and spirituality
\n\nSome of the topics discussed:
\n\nLinks
\n\nhttp://scan.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/06/22/scan.nsw078
\n\nhttps://medium.com/@dsquintana/intranasal-drug-administration-in-psychiatry-80d076f1abdd#.dsdrrohdu
\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26552590
\n\nhttps://rhythmicpsychology.wordpress.com/2016/06/22/shock-shock-horror-horror/
\n\nhttps://theconversation.com/is-psychology-really-in-crisis-60869
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Dan and James discuss a recent paper on intranasal oxytocin and spirituality \r\n ","date_published":"2016-07-06T13:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/a8bceb31-f81b-43f4-ba1f-9224b4a283c1.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":34138980,"duration_in_seconds":2844}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/271385846","title":"18: Data sharing","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/18","content_text":"Withholding data: bad science or scientific misconduct? \n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nDan raises privacy issues surrounding sharing data\nWhat are the limits of AI to identify people from 'un-identifiable' data?\nThe new age of sharing data\nWhat grinds Dan's gears\nRequesting data from people who said that they'd actually share their data\nJames' experiences with requesting data\nDan offers a solution for accessing data via an independent 3rd party\nWhen is a data request 'vexatious'? \nHiding data vs. just being lazy with data management\nThe importance of sharing your analysis code along with the data\nVersion controlling manuscripts\nHow much will open data actually improve science?\n'Fake' journals masquerading as real ones \nAustralia's windfarm commissioner (a real thing, unfortunalty)\nAustralian coffee vs. the rest of the world\nOur Twitter followers numbers have surpassed our Facebook fans!\n\n\nLinks\n\n\nThe paper on requesting data\n\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22686633\n\n\nThe blog post on whether withholding your data is scientific misconduct\n\n\nhttp://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2015/07/03/data-secrecy-bad-science-or-scientific-misconduct/\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"Withholding data: bad science or scientific misconduct?
\n\nSome of the topics discussed:
\n\nLinks
\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22686633
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Withholding data: bad science or scientific misconduct? ","date_published":"2016-06-29T14:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/192d920e-29c4-436e-ae05-2fb3b8af5d14.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":37065706,"duration_in_seconds":3088}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/270365037","title":"17: Journals: Do we need them?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/17","content_text":"Do we really need scientific journals? \n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nJames trolling predatory journals with jibberish papers on the 'DONG' effect\nHow do these spammy journal invitation emails actually work?\nFormal journals vs. preprint servers \nThe shift to preprints in psychology\nWhy do some journals forbid preprints?\nAn article defending the big publishers\nHow much does it really cost to have an online journal?\nWhat if the public funders were to set up thier own journals?\nWhat's the role of post-pubication review?\nDo journals provide added value?\nJames' brush with the 'established' media\n\n\nLinks \n\nPublisher policies on preprints\n\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_journals_by_preprint_policy\n\nHow much do universities pay for journal subscriptions?\n\nhttps://gowers.wordpress.com/2014/04/24/elsevier-journals-some-facts/ \n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"Do we really need scientific journals?
\n\nSome of the topics discussed:
\n\nLinks
\n\nPublisher policies on preprints
\n\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_journals_by_preprint_policy
\n\nHow much do universities pay for journal subscriptions?
\n\nhttps://gowers.wordpress.com/2014/04/24/elsevier-journals-some-facts/
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Do we really need scientific journals? ","date_published":"2016-06-22T20:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b53714b6-68bf-47cd-8e8e-5938fae2e45d.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":36745299,"duration_in_seconds":3062}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/269241416","title":"16: What makes a good psych study?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/16","content_text":"What are the defining characteristics of a good psychology study? We received this excellent question from a listener and decided to do a whole episode on this idea. \n\nSome of the topics discussed:\n\n\nWhen’s the last time you saw a psych study that only reported a t-test? \nDan and James’ new paper on worry and heart rate variability\nSkepticism towards studies with many variables and ‘novel’ statistical approaches (that tend to always provide marvellous results)\nRepeated measures ANOVAs vs. linear mixed models\nPublishing convenient ideas, even if they’re wrong\nFishing expeditions \nThe ‘nocebo’ effect in action\nWhat are markers of study quality?\nPre-registering studies - can it be gamed?\nThe gradual improvement of psychology studies\n\n\nLinks \n\nDan and James' new paper on worry and heart rate variability \n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255891 \n\nThe paper that said \"Encouraging experimental psychologists to use LMMs was like giving shotguns to toddlers.” \n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657634\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"What are the defining characteristics of a good psychology study? We received this excellent question from a listener and decided to do a whole episode on this idea.
\n\nSome of the topics discussed:
\n\nLinks
\n\nDan and James' new paper on worry and heart rate variability
\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255891
\n\nThe paper that said "Encouraging experimental psychologists to use LMMs was like giving shotguns to toddlers.”
\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657634
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"What are the defining characteristics of a good psychology study?","date_published":"2016-06-15T19:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/db690aae-af6b-4ac9-993c-94e324029749.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":35403850,"duration_in_seconds":2950}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/268127035","title":"15: Software and coding","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/15","content_text":"Dan and James discuss software and coding, including the tools they use \n\nLinks (lots this week)\n\nIntroduction to Python course - http://python.swaroopch.com //// R markdown - http://rmarkdown.rstudio.com //// GraphPad - http://www.graphpad.com //// JASP - https://jasp-stats.org ////\nIgor - https://www.wavemetrics.com/products/igorpro/igorpro.htm //// Canva - https://www.canva.com ////Omnifocus - https://www.omnigroup.com/omnifocus ////Slack - https://slack.com //// PsychoPy - http://www.psychopy.org //// 1Password - https://1password.com //// Papers - http://papersapp.com //// http://www.manuscriptsapp.com\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"Dan and James discuss software and coding, including the tools they use
\n\nLinks (lots this week)
\n\nIntroduction to Python course - http://python.swaroopch.com //// R markdown - http://rmarkdown.rstudio.com //// GraphPad - http://www.graphpad.com //// JASP - https://jasp-stats.org ////
\nIgor - https://www.wavemetrics.com/products/igorpro/igorpro.htm //// Canva - https://www.canva.com ////Omnifocus - https://www.omnigroup.com/omnifocus ////Slack - https://slack.com //// PsychoPy - http://www.psychopy.org //// 1Password - https://1password.com //// Papers - http://papersapp.com //// http://www.manuscriptsapp.com
Facebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Dan and James discuss software and coding, including the tools they use ","date_published":"2016-06-08T14:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/d5c18fc3-8a68-4f56-bfdd-1554554e012c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":32725800,"duration_in_seconds":2727}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/267066277","title":"14: Science communication","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/14","content_text":"Dan and James discuss public engagement, science communication, and the internet outrage machine. \n\nLinks:\n\nJames' GRIM pre-print\n\nhttps://peerj.com/preprints/2064v1/\n\nDan's meta-analysis paper\n\nhttp://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01549/full\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"Dan and James discuss public engagement, science communication, and the internet outrage machine.
\n\nLinks:
\n\nJames' GRIM pre-print
\n\nhttps://peerj.com/preprints/2064v1/
\n\nDan's meta-analysis paper
\n\nhttp://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01549/full
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Dan and James discuss public engagement, science communication, and the internet outrage machine. \r\n","date_published":"2016-06-02T08:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/e1fc0943-767d-4943-b72d-e6716cfd4a4c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":23629963,"duration_in_seconds":1969}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/266081160","title":"13: Academic horror stories","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/13","content_text":"Dan and James discuss a few academic horror stories sent in by their listeners. \n\nLinks:\n\nThe Gawker story on leaving academia\n\nhttp://gawker.com/i-left-my-ph-d-program-in-chemistry-a-few-years-back-wh-1774236393\n\nEquator network\n\nhttp://www.equator-network.org \n\nJack Johnson (the singer, not the boxer from the turn of the century)\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seZMOTGCDag \n\nAbominable Putridity (the band James mentioned)\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JYFgoaEeaQ\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"Dan and James discuss a few academic horror stories sent in by their listeners.
\n\nLinks:
\n\nThe Gawker story on leaving academia
\n\nhttp://gawker.com/i-left-my-ph-d-program-in-chemistry-a-few-years-back-wh-1774236393
\n\nEquator network
\n\nhttp://www.equator-network.org
\n\nJack Johnson (the singer, not the boxer from the turn of the century)
\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seZMOTGCDag
\n\nAbominable Putridity (the band James mentioned)
\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JYFgoaEeaQ
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Dan and James discuss a few academic horror stories sent in by their listeners.","date_published":"2016-05-26T22:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/4c6a39de-ca5d-4e3f-9fce-3fed616b0c60.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":37586492,"duration_in_seconds":3132}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/265269936","title":"12: Reporting heart rate variability studies","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/12","content_text":"Heart rate variability is becoming incredibly popular in the biobehavioral sciences yet there's no standard for how this research is reported. In this episode, Dan and James discuss their latest paper where they propose heart rate variability reporting guidelines. They also talk about saunas (why not?) and why 'sympathovagal balance' should be abandoned.\n\nLinks:\n\nDan and James' guidelines paper\n\nhttp://www.nature.com/tp/journal/v6/n5/abs/tp201673a.html\n\nDan and Gail's heart rate variability meta-analysis\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26447819\n\nQuora\n\nhttps://www.quora.com \n\nWhole body hyperthermia study\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27172277\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"Heart rate variability is becoming incredibly popular in the biobehavioral sciences yet there's no standard for how this research is reported. In this episode, Dan and James discuss their latest paper where they propose heart rate variability reporting guidelines. They also talk about saunas (why not?) and why 'sympathovagal balance' should be abandoned.
\n\nLinks:
\n\nDan and James' guidelines paper
\n\nhttp://www.nature.com/tp/journal/v6/n5/abs/tp201673a.html
\n\nDan and Gail's heart rate variability meta-analysis
\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26447819
\n\nQuora
\n\n\n\nWhole body hyperthermia study
\n\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27172277
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"Dan and James discuss their latest paper, in which they propose heart rate variability reporting guidelines. They also talk about saunas (why not?) and why the concept of 'sympathovagal balance' should be abandoned.","date_published":"2016-05-22T00:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/b809d82c-2fe4-4bdd-a42b-03ddf82022c8.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":43104426,"duration_in_seconds":3591}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/263382832","title":"11: The placebo effect","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/11","content_text":"In this episode, James and Dan discuss issues surrounding the placebo effect.\n\nLinks:\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast\n\nDan's other podcast\n\nhttps://soundcloud.com/startup-scientist-podcast","content_html":"In this episode, James and Dan discuss issues surrounding the placebo effect.
\n\nLinks:
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
\n\nDan's other podcast
\n\nhttps://soundcloud.com/startup-scientist-podcast
","summary":"James and Dan discuss issues surrounding the placebo effect","date_published":"2016-05-10T12:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/26bb0859-d0a5-4921-bec4-bce3ad7018b4.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":31421721,"duration_in_seconds":2618}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/262520501","title":"10: Failure","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/10","content_text":"In this episode, James and Dan talk about failure. What's the benefit of openly sharing your failures - is this an antidote to the imposter syndrome or something only the privileged few can afford to do? ","content_html":"In this episode, James and Dan talk about failure. What's the benefit of openly sharing your failures - is this an antidote to the imposter syndrome or something only the privileged few can afford to do?
","summary":"James and Dan talk about failure. What's the benefit of openly sharing your failures - is this an antidote to the imposter syndrome or something only the privileged few can afford to do? ","date_published":"2016-05-04T23:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/7a036fd1-7e3d-46c2-84e0-5bfc770a64e4.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":36349943,"duration_in_seconds":3029}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/261287236","title":"9: What happens if your research is wrong?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/9","content_text":"In this episode, James and Dan discuss what happens if your research is wrong. They talk about the recent controversy surrounding tDCS, why many people don't hold negative results to the same scrutiny as positive results, and the hype cycle of research.\n\nLinks:\n\nDan's new Startup Scientist podcast\n\nhttps://soundcloud.com/startup-scientist-podcast\n\nVestibular stimulation\n\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanic_vestibular_stimulation \n\nThe one slide on the tDCS presentation that Dan found\n\nhttps://twitter.com/nomorewires/status/717384486888022016\n\nThe hype cycle\n\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"In this episode, James and Dan discuss what happens if your research is wrong. They talk about the recent controversy surrounding tDCS, why many people don't hold negative results to the same scrutiny as positive results, and the hype cycle of research.
\n\nLinks:
\n\nDan's new Startup Scientist podcast
\n\nhttps://soundcloud.com/startup-scientist-podcast
\n\nVestibular stimulation
\n\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanic_vestibular_stimulation
\n\nThe one slide on the tDCS presentation that Dan found
\n\nhttps://twitter.com/nomorewires/status/717384486888022016
\n\nThe hype cycle
\n\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"James and Dan discuss what happens if your research is wrong. They talk about the recent controversy surrounding tDCS, why many people don't hold negative results to the same scrutiny as positive results, and the \"hype cycle\" of research.","date_published":"2016-04-28T08:30:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5866bd02-be36-4d76-9233-cb2dce16958a.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":37274633,"duration_in_seconds":3106}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/260058864","title":"8: The PhD to Postdoc transition","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/8","content_text":"In this episode, James and Dan discuss how to navigate the PhD to Postdoc transition. They provide advice to a hypothetical first-year graduate student and discuss the realities of the postdoc job market. \n\nLinks:\n\nPropel Careers - https://www.propelcareers.com\n\nJames' blog post - https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/12-thing-you-should-know-before-you-start-a-phd-9c064a979e8#.iqqwzf55s \n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"In this episode, James and Dan discuss how to navigate the PhD to Postdoc transition. They provide advice to a hypothetical first-year graduate student and discuss the realities of the postdoc job market.
\n\nLinks:
\n\nPropel Careers - https://www.propelcareers.com
\n\nJames' blog post - https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/12-thing-you-should-know-before-you-start-a-phd-9c064a979e8#.iqqwzf55s
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"James and Dan discuss how to navigate the PhD to Postdoc transition. They provide advice to a hypothetical first-year graduate student and also discuss the realities of the postdoc job market.","date_published":"2016-04-20T20:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/5c002d62-0ef4-4435-abb7-2711596dba4e.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":36578523,"duration_in_seconds":3048}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/259275723","title":"Episode 7: 7: The writing process","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/7","content_text":"How do you write a lot and do it well? In this episode, James and Dan discuss the writing process and the tools they use to get things done.\n\nLinks:\n\nThe Conversation\n\nhttps://theconversation.com\n\nBreakTime app\n\nhttp://breaktimeapp.com\n\nTomato timer\n\nhttp://tomato-timer.com \n\nJelte Wichert's paper \n\nhttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0026828\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"How do you write a lot and do it well? In this episode, James and Dan discuss the writing process and the tools they use to get things done.
\n\nLinks:
\n\nThe Conversation
\n\n\n\nBreakTime app
\n\n\n\nTomato timer
\n\n\n\nJelte Wichert's paper
\n\nhttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0026828
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"How do you write a lot and do it well? In this e…","date_published":"2016-04-15T21:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/cfa8b749-e88a-4ec1-ae73-110c13f63b63.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":35914058,"duration_in_seconds":2992}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/257805218","title":"6: The research pipeline - getting from idea to publication","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/6","content_text":"In this episode, James and Dan talk about getting from research idea to publication. They discuss the ethical approval process, getting research published, and share tips for running experiments. They also cover some of the software that they use in their own research: JASP and Papers. \n\nLinks:\n\nJASP - https://jasp-stats.org\n\nPapers - http://www.papersapp.com\n\nAuthorea - https://www.authorea.com \n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"In this episode, James and Dan talk about getting from research idea to publication. They discuss the ethical approval process, getting research published, and share tips for running experiments. They also cover some of the software that they use in their own research: JASP and Papers.
\n\nLinks:
\n\nJASP - https://jasp-stats.org
\n\nPapers - http://www.papersapp.com
\n\nAuthorea - https://www.authorea.com
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"In this episode, James and Dan talk about getting from research idea to publication. They also discuss the ethical approval process, getting research published, and share tips for running experiments","date_published":"2016-04-07T17:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/501ae5f2-8b27-446d-a2eb-df01bd968cb5.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":38807658,"duration_in_seconds":3233}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/256320874","title":"5: Do you even replicate?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/5","content_text":"In this episode, James and Dan talk about replication in science, self-control, and the file-drawer problem in oxytocin research.\n\nLinks:\n\nFacebook page\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter account\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"In this episode, James and Dan talk about replication in science, self-control, and the file-drawer problem in oxytocin research.
\n\nLinks:
\n\nFacebook page
\n\nhttps://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter account
\n\nhttps://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"In this episode, James and Dan talk about replication in science, self-control, and the file-drawer problem in oxytocin research.","date_published":"2016-03-30T21:00:00.000+02:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/f3da4eed-6d87-496c-a6cf-2cd9d09fdf4e.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":32405599,"duration_in_seconds":2700}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/254274717","title":"4: Meta-analysis or mega-silliness?","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/4","content_text":"Meta-analysis has become an increasingly popular tool used by many scientists to synthesise data. However, it's not without its detractors — from H. J. Eysenck, Ph.D., calling it \"an exercise in mega-silliness\" in 1978, to J. A. J. Heathers Ph.D., describing its use as a \"profound moral failing\" (he's half-serious) in 2016.\n\nIn this episode, Dan defends meta-analysis against more recent criticisms put forward by James and offers suggestions on how meta-analysis can be improved. \n\nLinks:\n\nPRISMA statement - http://www.prisma-statement.org/\n\nFacebook - https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/\n\nTwitter - https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast","content_html":"Meta-analysis has become an increasingly popular tool used by many scientists to synthesise data. However, it's not without its detractors — from H. J. Eysenck, Ph.D., calling it "an exercise in mega-silliness" in 1978, to J. A. J. Heathers Ph.D., describing its use as a "profound moral failing" (he's half-serious) in 2016.
\n\nIn this episode, Dan defends meta-analysis against more recent criticisms put forward by James and offers suggestions on how meta-analysis can be improved.
\n\nLinks:
\n\nPRISMA statement - http://www.prisma-statement.org/
\n\nFacebook - https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
\n\nTwitter - https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
","summary":"In this episode, Dan defends meta-analysis against more recent criticisms put forward by James and offers suggestions on how meta-analysis can be improved. ","date_published":"2016-03-22T18:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/8a197422-44a1-4d71-885b-9a5e5626381c.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":28642281,"duration_in_seconds":2386}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/252212072","title":"3: Scientific publishing","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/3","content_text":"Dan and James talk about Scihub and open access publishing.","content_html":"Dan and James talk about Scihub and open access publishing.
","summary":"Dan and James talk about Scihub and open access publishing.","date_published":"2016-03-16T20:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/1b5e0b0a-5192-410a-926f-c29f4584435f.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":35482405,"duration_in_seconds":2956}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/251054402","title":"2: Nutrition and Psychiatry","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/2","content_text":"Dan and James talk about nutrition and psychiatry. They also introduce themselves (you know, because that's what you do for your second episode) and explain the origin of their podcast name.","content_html":"Dan and James talk about nutrition and psychiatry. They also introduce themselves (you know, because that's what you do for your second episode) and explain the origin of their podcast name.
","summary":"Dan and James talk about nutrition and psychiatry. They also introduce themselves (you know, because that's what you do for your *second* episode) and explain the origin of their podcast name.","date_published":"2016-03-09T20:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/46128b10-d0e4-4131-afd1-ab8709bea510.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":34082047,"duration_in_seconds":2840}]},{"id":"tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/249885400","title":"1: So you want to measure heart rate variability...","url":"https://everythinghertz.com/1","content_text":"Dan and James discuss what to do if you want to collect heart rate variability (HRV) data, oxytocin parties (yes, they're a thing), and the peer review process.","content_html":"Dan and James discuss what to do if you want to collect heart rate variability (HRV) data, oxytocin parties (yes, they're a thing), and the peer review process.
","summary":"Dan and James discuss what to do if you want to collect heart rate variability (HRV) data, oxytocin parties (yes, they're a thing), and the peer review process.","date_published":"2016-03-02T21:00:00.000+01:00","attachments":[{"url":"https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/10171fcb-a2ce-4068-84a9-9a93066abe5b.mp3","mime_type":"audio/mpeg","size_in_bytes":31465752,"duration_in_seconds":2622}]}]}