Dan and James discuss a new paper in the inaugural issue of Nature Human Behaviour, "A manifesto for reproducible science".
Some of the topics covered:
- What's a manfesto for reproducibility doing in a Nature group journal?
- Registered reports
- The importance of incentives to actually make change happen
- What people should report vs. what they actually report
- A common pitfall of published meta-analyses
- The reliance of metrics in hiring decisions and the impact of open science practices
- Tone police
- How do we transition to open science practices?
- SSRN preprints being bought by Elsevier
- Authors getting gouged by copyediting costs (and solutions)
- Does being 'double-blind' extend to doing your analysis blind
- Trial monitoring is expensive
Our paper on reporting standards in heart rate variability
Twitter accountSupport Everything Hertz